Schumer shouldn't have threatened the SCOTUS yesterday.Trump is striking while the Justice Roberts iron is hot.
Schumer shouldn't have threatened the SCOTUS yesterday.Trump is striking while the Justice Roberts iron is hot. Obamacare is under review again as well
As you know I'm not a huge Trump fan but this seems completely justifiable.As my Dad always says "What the federal government subsidizes, the federal government controls".Will be chinteresting to see who caves, and when.
As you know I'm not a huge Trump fan but this seems completely justifiable.As my Dad always says "What the federal government subsidizes, the federal government controls".Will be chinteresting to see who caves, and when. Cant be. I'm told that California subsidizes everything else
As you know I'm not a huge Trump fan but this seems completely justifiable.As my Dad always says "What the federal government subsidizes, the federal government controls".Will be chinteresting to see who caves, and when. Cant be. I'm told that California subsidizes everything else And they can do whatever they want
Hilarious that the dumb fucking Dems are making states rights arguments, after spending the last 40 years shitting all over any Red State that tried to assert them. Hypocrisy anyone?
Hilarious that the dumb fucking Dems are making states rights arguments, after spending the last 40 years shitting all over any Red State that tried to assert them. Hypocrisy anyone? Not hilarious that conservatives are suddenly against states rights after spending the last 160 years supporting them?We're living in the upside down.
Hilarious that the dumb fucking Dems are making states rights arguments, after spending the last 40 years shitting all over any Red State that tried to assert them. Hypocrisy anyone? Not hilarious that conservatives are suddenly against states rights after spending the last 160 years supporting them?We're living in the upside down. When Rat party members stood in the school house doorway I didn't support it. Now when they thumb their nose at Federal law, I don't support it. State's have no authority over immigration issues. That's a section of the law left solely to the Federal government. Are some people above the law? State's Right never involved areas of the law that are solely the purview of Federal Government.
Hilarious that the dumb fucking Dems are making states rights arguments, after spending the last 40 years shitting all over any Red State that tried to assert them. Hypocrisy anyone? Not hilarious that conservatives are suddenly against states rights after spending the last 160 years supporting them?We're living in the upside down. When Rat party members stood in the school house doorway I didn't support it. Now when they thumb their nose at Federal law, I don't support it. State's have no authority over immigration issues. That's a section of the law left solely to the Federal government. Are some people above the law? State's Right never involved areas of the law that are solely the purview of Federal Government. I don't disagree.I also think when the states won't support the rights of "life, liberty and pursuit of happiness" for certain individuals in their purvey then it's the federal governments right (and responsibility) to step in and enforce those rights.Which pretty much ends the vast majority of states rights issues historically.
I was never for State's RightsThat wasn't a conservative issue not that I am a conservative. It was a racist's issue.Not everything is everybody does it equallyThe people I supported back in the day who now support state's rights and illegals over citizens are hurting minorities and white workers the most. The very people the democrats claim to help.And the people that Trump is helping.