Emeka Egbuka, 2021 5* WR, Steilacoom (Steilacoom HS), WA (Offered 10/20/18)

haie said:

RoadDawg55 said:

haie said:

Climp is definitely not falling off until FSU gets their shit together in a few years.

Someone in that conference needs to. The media hype is Mack Brown and UNC but they won’t get better than 9-3 ish at best.

The game had already passed him by at the end of his tenure at Texas. I’m not sure he was ever that great to begin with. A decent figurehead that relies entirely on his coordinators and talent. He had a loaded team every year and really only won or came close to winning the natty twice.

I get that the Pac 12 flak is money based, but holy shit is the ACC a pseudo power 5 at this point.

Miami doesn't care, and probably never will.
FSU's coach while overrated left because they wouldn't sell their soul for college football anymore.

I only brought them up because I love their new head coach. He's not a loser.

Boston College, Georgia tech, UNC came to play school.

Fucking Duke got some pub in that conference for a cuog like season.

Pitt? Jesus.

I was gonna make a point about Dabo leaving in a few years but who in their right mind would leave that situation? You coach 2-3 games a year.

Big 12 is also pretty bad. Same with the Big 10 most years. PAC 12 is obviously in the same conversation.

SEC is obviously best and that’s proven by the amount of highly ranked recruits and amount of player’s picked in the NFL, the number if championships.

Dabo probably isn’t leaving. Maybe Alabama when Saban leaves or if he gets a good NFL job.

Kingdome_Urinals said:

RoadDawg55 said:

Kingdome_Urinals said:

There has been a major shift in college offense and UW has completely failed to keep up with it. CP was the best and worst thing to happen to UW.

Not sure that’s it. Keeping up with the Jones’ doesn’t get you anywhere most of the time because you still aren’t as good at it as the ones that have been doing it for years.

CP changed his offenses a lot since his time at Boise. He just didn’t have a feel for anything or ever establish anything that consistently worked and was reliable.

In this case keeping up with the Joneses simply means putting some points on the board. The roster development and scheme at UW has been a disaster on offense, at a time when innovative coaching and schemes are squeezing 30+ points a game out of offenses around the country.

Failed to get a QB to challenge Browning, failed to get young talent on the field, failed to teach something that good players could learn.

Can’t argue that. Points are obviously what matters.

I do disagree on Browning. No highly rated QB is coming after Browning’s freshman or sophomore year. No highly ranked QB will come until at least Huard’s second year at well, probably his third. I wish we would have gotten a good one but I also realize that is tough to do when a guy plays that well his first two years.

Sure it would have been nice to have a guy to challenge him, but he regressed. Bad coaching for sure, but not much you can do at that point.

We brought in two four star QB’s before his senior year. One sucked and Sirmon will probably suck too. I doubt he ever starts a game.

RoadDawg55 said:

Tequilla said:

If you want to make the points scored argument ... then you have to also recognize what hurts us recruiting offensively should help us defensively

I also think the points scored argument is largely bullshit

Scoring points isn’t important? You can’t be good at offense and defense?

Scoring points is all about pace, plays, and possessions

Unless we start planning on running 100 plays a game (don’t think we are) then we’re never going to score the points that more up tempo teams will.

That was my point