A Football Thread
Comments
-
We don't like to comment on hypotheticals.He_Needs_More_Time said:
If you can be hypothetically in the Rose Bowl race come November what more can you ask for? It's like some of you Nega's had it out for Sark.HeretoBeatmyChest said:That Stanford loss was a real blow for the entire season. Played Oregon tough for 3 quarters but ran out of gas as I predicted on the podcast that week. After that the team wasn't playing for anything because they knew they were done. However....if they beat Stanford, then they are still playing for something against UCLA.
Going into UCLA, Stanford & UW would have 2 conference losses & Oregon 1. Oregon finished 7-2 and almost lost to OSU & would have been 6-3.
For UW to tie Oregon & Stanford all that needed to happen was UW beats Stanford & Oregon loses to OSU. For UW to win the division they needed to beat Stanford, UCLA and have Oregon lose to OSU.
Bottom line is if they come away with that game, the scope of the season changes quite a bit. Maybe you beat UCLA and sneak into a BCS bowl game. -
When did Stephanie Sarkisian hack your account?HeretoBeatmyChest said:That Stanford loss was a real blow for the entire season. Played Oregon tough for 3 quarters but ran out of gas as I predicted on the podcast that week. After that the team wasn't playing for anything because they knew they were done. However....if they beat Stanford, then they are still playing for something against UCLA.
Going into UCLA, Stanford & UW would have 2 conference losses & Oregon 1. Oregon finished 7-2 and almost lost to OSU & would have been 6-3.
For UW to tie Oregon & Stanford all that needed to happen was UW beats Stanford & Oregon loses to OSU. For UW to win the division they needed to beat Stanford, UCLA and have Oregon lose to OSU.
Bottom line is if they come away with that game, the scope of the season changes quite a bit. Maybe you beat UCLA and sneak into a BCS bowl game. -
She hacked it while Sark was at the new Joey in Torrance, CA.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
When did Stephanie Sarkisian hack your account?HeretoBeatmyChest said:That Stanford loss was a real blow for the entire season. Played Oregon tough for 3 quarters but ran out of gas as I predicted on the podcast that week. After that the team wasn't playing for anything because they knew they were done. However....if they beat Stanford, then they are still playing for something against UCLA.
Going into UCLA, Stanford & UW would have 2 conference losses & Oregon 1. Oregon finished 7-2 and almost lost to OSU & would have been 6-3.
For UW to tie Oregon & Stanford all that needed to happen was UW beats Stanford & Oregon loses to OSU. For UW to win the division they needed to beat Stanford, UCLA and have Oregon lose to OSU.
Bottom line is if they come away with that game, the scope of the season changes quite a bit. Maybe you beat UCLA and sneak into a BCS bowl game. -
You fuckos are a little slow, so I'll help.....
The point of the post is Sark's fucktardedness with ST cost UW a win over a top 5 team on the road.....not "Sark almost beat a top 5 team on the road." -
If you have to reiterate the point of your poast so that we better understand your poast, me thinks you should have done better the first time.
That being said - you're right. ST cost us minimum 1 game per season with Seven Win Steve. -
Otherwise I completely agree.RoadDawg55 said:Both Folk and Coons were
prettyvery good kickers. -
Will be interesting to see how big of a loss Coons is. He was 15/16 last season on FG's (only miss was blocked) and his punting work was enough to earn him All-Pac 12.
-
I think that is a big loss actually and I'm not confident we have a replacement to replace him in kicking and punting.HeretoBeatmyChest said:Will be interesting to see how big of a loss Coons is. He was 15/16 last season on FG's (only miss was blocked) and his punting work was enough to earn him All-Pac 12.
In some ways I fear his loss more than Keith Price or even Sankey's since we have ready replacements for those two. -
That's because we are a bunch of girls sitting around in kindergarden art class eating pasteHeretoBeatmyChest said:You fuckos are a little slow, so I'll help.....
The point of the post is Sark's fucktardedness with ST cost UW a win over a top 5 team on the road.....not "Sark almost beat a top 5 team on the road." -
He_Needs_More_Time said:
It matters because it shows how under coached these kids really were. Despite all that they still went 9-4 last year.sarktastic said:Who the fuck cares.
We got Peterman now.
Gives us even more hope going forward as we finally have a coach in place who stresses special teams, being focused, pass blocking for an RB, the basics, etc which should buy us an extra 1-2 wins.
Sark was a negative 1 win coach a year so if Petersen is just average that alone is on average going to be an one win improvement. If Petersen is a plus one coach which I think he will be then you are talking an extra two wins.
Had he been our coach last year I think Stanford and UCLA are wins while Oregon/ASU aren't plungers.
It really sounds like you're making excuses for Peterman sucking this year.
relax.
1. Peterman won't suck
2. If for some fluke he does suck he doesn't want you making fucking excuses.
c'mon man, recruits parents read this bored and they don't need to be getting a pussy vibe.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)