Pretty much baked in the cake...........no witnesses
Comments
-
Courts have to rely on the integrity of and their ability to discipline officers of the court who appear before them. They don't vet materials.RaceBannon said:
Well at least you now admit that the FISA warrants were bullshit made up by the Obama AdministrationHHusky said:
Madam, how was the problem at the FISA court--being misled by the government--due to any action of the Federal Judiciary?SFGbob said:
I liked how O'Keefed the super lawyer thought Roberts would have to "take up the case" in order to address the abuses against the FISA court.RaceBannon said:I'd like to see Roberts impeached
Like a dog
From the list of duties the Chief Justice has:
The chief justice is also the presiding officer of the Judicial Conference of the United States, an assembly of judges representing all the federal courts that reviews and investigates problems relating to the administration of justice in those courts.
But he'd have to take up the case!!!!
O'Keefed is so fucking stupid he believes that if the Chief Justice performs his job of overseeing and administrating the Federal Judiciary he is engaging in "Judicial Activism."
What fucking matchbook cover law school did you go to O'Keefed?
Nice effort though.
Baby steps
I seem to recall the FISA court itself coming under fire for not doing proper vetting which of course falls under Robert's jurisdiction as Bob correctly pointed out
The FISA warrants were incomplete and therefore potentially misleading. That's been established. -
Nation of laws? Nope.RaceBannon said:
Fuck off comradeHHusky said:
The triumph of Realpolitik. But you girls don't get to do that "shining city on a hill" shtick anymore. You've surrendered the right to invoke American ideals.DJDuck said:Collins just said she would vote for more witnesses but Lamar Alexander said he wouldn’t. Even if both Murkowski AND Romney voted for more witnesses the motion would fail. This should wind up pretty quickly.
Your team did exactly what Putin wanted. Your own witness confirmed that
Patriotism is the last refuge of a piece of shit -
Romney has turned into a sanctimonious piece of shit.DJDuck said:Collins just said she would vote for more witnesses but Lamar Alexander said he wouldn’t. Even if both Murkowski AND Romney voted for more witnesses the motion would fail. This should wind up pretty quickly.
Maybe he always was. But fuck
Bring the high crimes charges. In your own words.HHusky said:
The triumph of Realpolitik. But you girls don't get to do that "shining city on a hill" shtick anymore. You've surrendered the right to invoke American ideals.DJDuck said:Collins just said she would vote for more witnesses but Lamar Alexander said he wouldn’t. Even if both Murkowski AND Romney voted for more witnesses the motion would fail. This should wind up pretty quickly.
Crickets for another two weeks? Or always.
Pretend lawyer. -
"Potentially"? Lawyer speak for they lied.HHusky said:
Courts have to rely on the integrity of and their ability to discipline officers of the court who appear before them. They don't vet materials.RaceBannon said:
Well at least you now admit that the FISA warrants were bullshit made up by the Obama AdministrationHHusky said:
Madam, how was the problem at the FISA court--being misled by the government--due to any action of the Federal Judiciary?SFGbob said:
I liked how O'Keefed the super lawyer thought Roberts would have to "take up the case" in order to address the abuses against the FISA court.RaceBannon said:I'd like to see Roberts impeached
Like a dog
From the list of duties the Chief Justice has:
The chief justice is also the presiding officer of the Judicial Conference of the United States, an assembly of judges representing all the federal courts that reviews and investigates problems relating to the administration of justice in those courts.
But he'd have to take up the case!!!!
O'Keefed is so fucking stupid he believes that if the Chief Justice performs his job of overseeing and administrating the Federal Judiciary he is engaging in "Judicial Activism."
What fucking matchbook cover law school did you go to O'Keefed?
Nice effort though.
Baby steps
I seem to recall the FISA court itself coming under fire for not doing proper vetting which of course falls under Robert's jurisdiction as Bob correctly pointed out
The FISA warrants were incomplete and therefore potentially misleading. That's been established.
-
We all know you have an irrelevant question pending. It makes you look stupid to anyone with even a rudimentary knowledge of history and the Constitution. Fortunately for you, it plays well to a segment of the audience that frequents this bored.PurpleThrobber said:
Romney has turned into a sanctimonious piece of shit.DJDuck said:Collins just said she would vote for more witnesses but Lamar Alexander said he wouldn’t. Even if both Murkowski AND Romney voted for more witnesses the motion would fail. This should wind up pretty quickly.
Maybe he always was. But fuck
Bring the high crimes charges. In your own words.HHusky said:
The triumph of Realpolitik. But you girls don't get to do that "shining city on a hill" shtick anymore. You've surrendered the right to invoke American ideals.DJDuck said:Collins just said she would vote for more witnesses but Lamar Alexander said he wouldn’t. Even if both Murkowski AND Romney voted for more witnesses the motion would fail. This should wind up pretty quickly.
Crickets for another two weeks? Or always.
Pretend lawyer. -
Incomplete! 😂😂😂😂😂😂
What a bunch of Bull Crap spin. It was a tad more nefarious than that moron. -
Only the judge can answer whether he/she was misled. I know how precision with words offends you hens.Sledog said:
"Potentially"? Lawyer speak for they lied.HHusky said:
Courts have to rely on the integrity of and their ability to discipline officers of the court who appear before them. They don't vet materials.RaceBannon said:
Well at least you now admit that the FISA warrants were bullshit made up by the Obama AdministrationHHusky said:
Madam, how was the problem at the FISA court--being misled by the government--due to any action of the Federal Judiciary?SFGbob said:
I liked how O'Keefed the super lawyer thought Roberts would have to "take up the case" in order to address the abuses against the FISA court.RaceBannon said:I'd like to see Roberts impeached
Like a dog
From the list of duties the Chief Justice has:
The chief justice is also the presiding officer of the Judicial Conference of the United States, an assembly of judges representing all the federal courts that reviews and investigates problems relating to the administration of justice in those courts.
But he'd have to take up the case!!!!
O'Keefed is so fucking stupid he believes that if the Chief Justice performs his job of overseeing and administrating the Federal Judiciary he is engaging in "Judicial Activism."
What fucking matchbook cover law school did you go to O'Keefed?
Nice effort though.
Baby steps
I seem to recall the FISA court itself coming under fire for not doing proper vetting which of course falls under Robert's jurisdiction as Bob correctly pointed out
The FISA warrants were incomplete and therefore potentially misleading. That's been established. -
HustlinOwl said:
Every one of you would have gladly swallowed Robert's pork sword when appointed. Now not so much.
Not so ADHD. It was a Bush doing the appointing. We Conservatives remember Souter all too well.HustlinOwl said:Every one of you would have gladly swallowed Robert's pork sword when appointed. Now not so much.
-
Time to walk the safety up again. Running the old Pettibone bone ‘too stupid’ angle.HHusky said:
We all know you have an irrelevant question pending. It makes you look stupid to anyone with even a rudimentary knowledge of history and the Constitution. Fortunately for you, it plays well to a segment of the audience that frequents this bored.PurpleThrobber said:
Romney has turned into a sanctimonious piece of shit.DJDuck said:Collins just said she would vote for more witnesses but Lamar Alexander said he wouldn’t. Even if both Murkowski AND Romney voted for more witnesses the motion would fail. This should wind up pretty quickly.
Maybe he always was. But fuck
Bring the high crimes charges. In your own words.HHusky said:
The triumph of Realpolitik. But you girls don't get to do that "shining city on a hill" shtick anymore. You've surrendered the right to invoke American ideals.DJDuck said:Collins just said she would vote for more witnesses but Lamar Alexander said he wouldn’t. Even if both Murkowski AND Romney voted for more witnesses the motion would fail. This should wind up pretty quickly.
Crickets for another two weeks? Or always.
Pretend lawyer.
Don’t die of the typhus on that sword like CD did.
Dazzle us with your legal brilliance. -
It omitted information. Another word for that is "incomplete". Did you know you can get a thesaurus online?DJDuck said:Incomplete! 😂😂😂😂😂😂
What a bunch of Bull Crap spin. It was a tad more nefarious than that moron.
Is your Down Syndrome Day tree up yet?



