This Bolton shit

GDS said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

Why is Biden above the law?

You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.

Biden confessed

It relates directly to the Ukraine

And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government

No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime

There is no evidence aid was tied to anything

The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.

Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.

They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.

I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.

What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?

Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?

Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.

But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.

Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.

That’s where the FBI and US DOJ have traditionally drawn the line too. It’s based on the notion that you shouldn’t be slimed for having been investigated when no charges were brought. You are free to disagree.

In Daddy’s case, attaching the stigma of an investigation to Biden was far more important than whether anyone really did the investigation.

I seem to recall plenty of talk publicly about Trump being investigated by Mueller and yet no charges were ever brought against Trump. I missed your OUTRAGE

Hillary comes to mind too. The fact that the Mueller investigation played out in public wasn’t due to any attempt by the investigators to publicize it. The investigators were extremely close lipped about it throughout.

Biden’s actions regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor had been in the public record by August 2016 at the latest. Daddy could have had his DOJ look into it from day one. (Maybe they did and decided there was nothing to charge Joe with.). Daddy waited until Joe emerged has his chief rival to demand that a foreign country ANNOUNCE an investigation as a condition of receiving Congressionally approved aid. I’m sure he can explain it all in his testimony—his reputation as a deponent precedes him.

But you knew there was an investigation. Now you're complaining about your sore snatch because the Ukraine would announce there was an investigation.
Your OUTRAGE is as phony as you are O'Keefed.


And you're lying, looking into Burisma and the Bidens started before Joe even announced his candidacy.

Some of us are old enough to remember when Blob conceded that Trump should be impeached if he tied the aide to investigations. To be fair we all knew even then he would eventually “evolve”.

HHusky said:

salemcoog said:

TurdBomber said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

Bendintheriver said:

DoogieMcDoogerson said:

Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that. What I mean by Smart People is they function well in the not political universe but are absolute dipshits when it comes to understanding politics.

Oh rats like HH know that the bidens are corrupt. Anyone with any sense at all sees it for what it is. HH just has no scruples or integrity. The lack of the aforementioned is what allows him to look like such a lying hypocrite on here without FEELING any regrets. The corruption in the BO admin went on for 8 years and into the election. He actually illegally spied on Trumps campaign HQ during the election and rats like HH love it. He has zero problem with it because it is the rats shitting on the American people and he FEELS that is necessary for his party to gain power over the people.

"Just knowing" Joe is corrupt is so much easier than having evidence. But even if true, Joe can't testify to Daddy's offenses. You'll need to start a prosecution of Joe.

There's a lot more evidence Joe's corrupt than there is that Trump engaged in a quid pro quo. It's funny that you have no problem with 2 + 2 when it's Trump but it's gotta be proven beyond any reasonable doubt if they have a D next to their name.

You've got him bragging about demanding the firing of the prosecutor--something nobody gave a shit about until Daddy needed an excuse for his treason. What else?

So you think jet setting with Hunter as his sidekick and Hunter signing all that money is really hard to draw any conclusions from?

Or all this Burisma stuff is just "trading off his name" with no conflict of interest by daddy joe?

It's cute rhetoric but we all realize you've got double standards. You should be consistent and not argue against yourself in different threads.

2 + 2 = 4 councilor, right? And we aren't even talking impeaching old Joe, just that there's something tangible there to open an investigation over. It seems like your bar for that is even lower if I remember what it took to justify investigation of Trump.

Open an investigation. I don't care.

So far your smoking gun is Joe following the wishes of the US government and our allies.

That would be in stark contrast to what Daddy was doing.

Also, this is the basis for the qpq. If the investigation is justified, as you admit, then half the argument for qpq falls apart.

One has to wonder at the type of lawyer H is. Shameless or incompetent?

Most likely abundance.

Likely a Staff Attorney for a useless non-profit, or maybe the City or A.G. Skilled in warming chairs, wherever he is.

Being that He travels to Salem a lot for work, my money is on him being a public union lawyer.

I do?

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

blob's going to parse words down to meaninglessness--per usual.


If Trump simply asked the Ukraine to continue with their investigation of Biden I don't have any problem with that. If he offered them some form of inducement to re-start the investigation he has a problem.

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

blob's going to parse words down to meaninglessness--per usual.


If Trump simply asked the Ukraine to continue with their investigation of Biden I don't have any problem with that. If he offered them some form of inducement to re-start the investigation he has a problem.

Do you mean like when you were accusing Trump of engaging in a cover up?

I'm still accusing him of a cover-up, Madam.

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

blob's going to parse words down to meaninglessness--per usual.


If Trump simply asked the Ukraine to continue with their investigation of Biden I don't have any problem with that. If he offered them some form of inducement to re-start the investigation he has a problem.

Do you mean like when you were accusing Trump of engaging in a cover up?

I'm still accusing him of a cover-up, Madam.

Got it. Another charge for which you have no evidence. Just like your charge of colluding with the Russians to steal the election.

Hardly a new position for you, you've never been very big on gathering evidence and relying on facts before you run your mouth.

I guess Daddy must have fully cooperated with the Ukraine investigation, and only you are aware of it.

salemcoog said:

HHusky said:

salemcoog said:

HHusky said:

salemcoog said:

TurdBomber said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

Bendintheriver said:

DoogieMcDoogerson said:

Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that. What I mean by Smart People is they function well in the not political universe but are absolute dipshits when it comes to understanding politics.

Oh rats like HH know that the bidens are corrupt. Anyone with any sense at all sees it for what it is. HH just has no scruples or integrity. The lack of the aforementioned is what allows him to look like such a lying hypocrite on here without FEELING any regrets. The corruption in the BO admin went on for 8 years and into the election. He actually illegally spied on Trumps campaign HQ during the election and rats like HH love it. He has zero problem with it because it is the rats shitting on the American people and he FEELS that is necessary for his party to gain power over the people.

"Just knowing" Joe is corrupt is so much easier than having evidence. But even if true, Joe can't testify to Daddy's offenses. You'll need to start a prosecution of Joe.

There's a lot more evidence Joe's corrupt than there is that Trump engaged in a quid pro quo. It's funny that you have no problem with 2 + 2 when it's Trump but it's gotta be proven beyond any reasonable doubt if they have a D next to their name.

You've got him bragging about demanding the firing of the prosecutor--something nobody gave a shit about until Daddy needed an excuse for his treason. What else?

So you think jet setting with Hunter as his sidekick and Hunter signing all that money is really hard to draw any conclusions from?

Or all this Burisma stuff is just "trading off his name" with no conflict of interest by daddy joe?

It's cute rhetoric but we all realize you've got double standards. You should be consistent and not argue against yourself in different threads.

2 + 2 = 4 councilor, right? And we aren't even talking impeaching old Joe, just that there's something tangible there to open an investigation over. It seems like your bar for that is even lower if I remember what it took to justify investigation of Trump.

Open an investigation. I don't care.

So far your smoking gun is Joe following the wishes of the US government and our allies.

That would be in stark contrast to what Daddy was doing.

Also, this is the basis for the qpq. If the investigation is justified, as you admit, then half the argument for qpq falls apart.

One has to wonder at the type of lawyer H is. Shameless or incompetent?

Most likely abundance.

Likely a Staff Attorney for a useless non-profit, or maybe the City or A.G. Skilled in warming chairs, wherever he is.

Being that He travels to Salem a lot for work, my money is on him being a public union lawyer.

I do?

That’s what you said last year. Even highlighting certain areas, restaurants and what not. But I called you out as full of shit at the time.

So which is it, were you full of shit last year or are you full of shit now?


Obvious answer is obvious.



Abundance.

I travel to Salem a lot. I said that.

I don't know where you got the rest of your "information".

Simple process of elimination and playing the odds based on info given that relates to your acumen, or lack thereof, of basic criminal law.

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

blob's going to parse words down to meaninglessness--per usual.


If Trump simply asked the Ukraine to continue with their investigation of Biden I don't have any problem with that. If he offered them some form of inducement to re-start the investigation he has a problem.

Do you mean like when you were accusing Trump of engaging in a cover up?

HHusky said:

salemcoog said:

HHusky said:

salemcoog said:

HHusky said:

salemcoog said:

TurdBomber said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

Bendintheriver said:

DoogieMcDoogerson said:

Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that. What I mean by Smart People is they function well in the not political universe but are absolute dipshits when it comes to understanding politics.

Oh rats like HH know that the bidens are corrupt. Anyone with any sense at all sees it for what it is. HH just has no scruples or integrity. The lack of the aforementioned is what allows him to look like such a lying hypocrite on here without FEELING any regrets. The corruption in the BO admin went on for 8 years and into the election. He actually illegally spied on Trumps campaign HQ during the election and rats like HH love it. He has zero problem with it because it is the rats shitting on the American people and he FEELS that is necessary for his party to gain power over the people.

"Just knowing" Joe is corrupt is so much easier than having evidence. But even if true, Joe can't testify to Daddy's offenses. You'll need to start a prosecution of Joe.

There's a lot more evidence Joe's corrupt than there is that Trump engaged in a quid pro quo. It's funny that you have no problem with 2 + 2 when it's Trump but it's gotta be proven beyond any reasonable doubt if they have a D next to their name.

You've got him bragging about demanding the firing of the prosecutor--something nobody gave a shit about until Daddy needed an excuse for his treason. What else?

So you think jet setting with Hunter as his sidekick and Hunter signing all that money is really hard to draw any conclusions from?

Or all this Burisma stuff is just "trading off his name" with no conflict of interest by daddy joe?

It's cute rhetoric but we all realize you've got double standards. You should be consistent and not argue against yourself in different threads.

2 + 2 = 4 councilor, right? And we aren't even talking impeaching old Joe, just that there's something tangible there to open an investigation over. It seems like your bar for that is even lower if I remember what it took to justify investigation of Trump.

Open an investigation. I don't care.

So far your smoking gun is Joe following the wishes of the US government and our allies.

That would be in stark contrast to what Daddy was doing.

Also, this is the basis for the qpq. If the investigation is justified, as you admit, then half the argument for qpq falls apart.

One has to wonder at the type of lawyer H is. Shameless or incompetent?

Most likely abundance.

Likely a Staff Attorney for a useless non-profit, or maybe the City or A.G. Skilled in warming chairs, wherever he is.

Being that He travels to Salem a lot for work, my money is on him being a public union lawyer.

I do?

That’s what you said last year. Even highlighting certain areas, restaurants and what not. But I called you out as full of shit at the time.

So which is it, were you full of shit last year or are you full of shit now?


Obvious answer is obvious.



Abundance.

I travel to Salem a lot. I said that.

I don't know where you got the rest of your "information".

Simple process of elimination and playing the odds based on info given that relates to your acumen, or lack thereof, of basic criminal law.

I travel to Salem a lot.

HHusky said:

salemcoog said:

HHusky said:

salemcoog said:

HHusky said:

salemcoog said:

HHusky said:

salemcoog said:

TurdBomber said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

Bendintheriver said:

DoogieMcDoogerson said:

Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that. What I mean by Smart People is they function well in the not political universe but are absolute dipshits when it comes to understanding politics.

Oh rats like HH know that the bidens are corrupt. Anyone with any sense at all sees it for what it is. HH just has no scruples or integrity. The lack of the aforementioned is what allows him to look like such a lying hypocrite on here without FEELING any regrets. The corruption in the BO admin went on for 8 years and into the election. He actually illegally spied on Trumps campaign HQ during the election and rats like HH love it. He has zero problem with it because it is the rats shitting on the American people and he FEELS that is necessary for his party to gain power over the people.

"Just knowing" Joe is corrupt is so much easier than having evidence. But even if true, Joe can't testify to Daddy's offenses. You'll need to start a prosecution of Joe.

There's a lot more evidence Joe's corrupt than there is that Trump engaged in a quid pro quo. It's funny that you have no problem with 2 + 2 when it's Trump but it's gotta be proven beyond any reasonable doubt if they have a D next to their name.

You've got him bragging about demanding the firing of the prosecutor--something nobody gave a shit about until Daddy needed an excuse for his treason. What else?

So you think jet setting with Hunter as his sidekick and Hunter signing all that money is really hard to draw any conclusions from?

Or all this Burisma stuff is just "trading off his name" with no conflict of interest by daddy joe?

It's cute rhetoric but we all realize you've got double standards. You should be consistent and not argue against yourself in different threads.

2 + 2 = 4 councilor, right? And we aren't even talking impeaching old Joe, just that there's something tangible there to open an investigation over. It seems like your bar for that is even lower if I remember what it took to justify investigation of Trump.

Open an investigation. I don't care.

So far your smoking gun is Joe following the wishes of the US government and our allies.

That would be in stark contrast to what Daddy was doing.

Also, this is the basis for the qpq. If the investigation is justified, as you admit, then half the argument for qpq falls apart.

One has to wonder at the type of lawyer H is. Shameless or incompetent?

Most likely abundance.

Likely a Staff Attorney for a useless non-profit, or maybe the City or A.G. Skilled in warming chairs, wherever he is.

Being that He travels to Salem a lot for work, my money is on him being a public union lawyer.

I do?

That’s what you said last year. Even highlighting certain areas, restaurants and what not. But I called you out as full of shit at the time.

So which is it, were you full of shit last year or are you full of shit now?


Obvious answer is obvious.



Abundance.

I travel to Salem a lot. I said that.

I don't know where you got the rest of your "information".

Simple process of elimination and playing the odds based on info given that relates to your acumen, or lack thereof, of basic criminal law.

I travel to Salem a lot.

Yes. Corky. I got that the first time.

No. It’s quite evident you didn’t.