Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
This Bolton shit
Comments
-
"Just knowing" Joe is corrupt is so much easier than having evidence. But even if true, Joe can't testify to Daddy's offenses. You'll need to start a prosecution of Joe.Bendintheriver said:
Oh rats like HH know that the bidens are corrupt. Anyone with any sense at all sees it for what it is. HH just has no scruples or integrity. The lack of the aforementioned is what allows him to look like such a lying hypocrite on here without FEELING any regrets. The corruption in the BO admin went on for 8 years and into the election. He actually illegally spied on Trumps campaign HQ during the election and rats like HH love it. He has zero problem with it because it is the rats shitting on the American people and he FEELS that is necessary for his party to gain power over the people.DoogieMcDoogerson said:Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that. What I mean by Smart People is they function well in the not political universe but are absolute dipshits when it comes to understanding politics.
-
Hey guys! The guy desperately trying to keep his country from being overrun says he wasn't extorted.
In other news, Otto Warmbier confessed.
-
There's a lot more evidence Joe's corrupt than there is that Trump engaged in a quid pro quo. It's funny that you have no problem with 2 + 2 when it's Trump but it's gotta be proven beyond any reasonable doubt if they have a D next to their name.HHusky said:
"Just knowing" Joe is corrupt is so much easier than having evidence. But even if true, Joe can't testify to Daddy's offenses. You'll need to start a prosecution of Joe.Bendintheriver said:
Oh rats like HH know that the bidens are corrupt. Anyone with any sense at all sees it for what it is. HH just has no scruples or integrity. The lack of the aforementioned is what allows him to look like such a lying hypocrite on here without FEELING any regrets. The corruption in the BO admin went on for 8 years and into the election. He actually illegally spied on Trumps campaign HQ during the election and rats like HH love it. He has zero problem with it because it is the rats shitting on the American people and he FEELS that is necessary for his party to gain power over the people.DoogieMcDoogerson said:Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that. What I mean by Smart People is they function well in the not political universe but are absolute dipshits when it comes to understanding politics.
-
You've got him bragging about demanding the firing of the prosecutor--something nobody gave a shit about until Daddy needed an excuse for his treason. What else?UW_Doog_Bot said:
There's a lot more evidence Joe's corrupt than there is that Trump engaged in a quid pro quo. It's funny that you have no problem with 2 + 2 when it's Trump but it's gotta be proven beyond any reasonable doubt if they have a D next to their name.HHusky said:
"Just knowing" Joe is corrupt is so much easier than having evidence. But even if true, Joe can't testify to Daddy's offenses. You'll need to start a prosecution of Joe.Bendintheriver said:
Oh rats like HH know that the bidens are corrupt. Anyone with any sense at all sees it for what it is. HH just has no scruples or integrity. The lack of the aforementioned is what allows him to look like such a lying hypocrite on here without FEELING any regrets. The corruption in the BO admin went on for 8 years and into the election. He actually illegally spied on Trumps campaign HQ during the election and rats like HH love it. He has zero problem with it because it is the rats shitting on the American people and he FEELS that is necessary for his party to gain power over the people.DoogieMcDoogerson said:Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that. What I mean by Smart People is they function well in the not political universe but are absolute dipshits when it comes to understanding politics.
-
So you think jet setting with Hunter as his sidekick and Hunter signing all that money is really hard to draw any conclusions from?HHusky said:
You've got him bragging about demanding the firing of the prosecutor--something nobody gave a shit about until Daddy needed an excuse for his treason. What else?UW_Doog_Bot said:
There's a lot more evidence Joe's corrupt than there is that Trump engaged in a quid pro quo. It's funny that you have no problem with 2 + 2 when it's Trump but it's gotta be proven beyond any reasonable doubt if they have a D next to their name.HHusky said:
"Just knowing" Joe is corrupt is so much easier than having evidence. But even if true, Joe can't testify to Daddy's offenses. You'll need to start a prosecution of Joe.Bendintheriver said:
Oh rats like HH know that the bidens are corrupt. Anyone with any sense at all sees it for what it is. HH just has no scruples or integrity. The lack of the aforementioned is what allows him to look like such a lying hypocrite on here without FEELING any regrets. The corruption in the BO admin went on for 8 years and into the election. He actually illegally spied on Trumps campaign HQ during the election and rats like HH love it. He has zero problem with it because it is the rats shitting on the American people and he FEELS that is necessary for his party to gain power over the people.DoogieMcDoogerson said:Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that. What I mean by Smart People is they function well in the not political universe but are absolute dipshits when it comes to understanding politics.
Or all this Burisma stuff is just "trading off his name" with no conflict of interest by daddy joe?
It's cute rhetoric but we all realize you've got double standards. You should be consistent and not argue against yourself in different threads.
2 + 2 = 4 councilor, right? And we aren't even talking impeaching old Joe, just that there's something tangible there to open an investigation over. It seems like your bar for that is even lower if I remember what it took to justify investigation of Trump. -
Open an investigation. I don't care.UW_Doog_Bot said:
So you think jet setting with Hunter as his sidekick and Hunter signing all that money is really hard to draw any conclusions from?HHusky said:
You've got him bragging about demanding the firing of the prosecutor--something nobody gave a shit about until Daddy needed an excuse for his treason. What else?UW_Doog_Bot said:
There's a lot more evidence Joe's corrupt than there is that Trump engaged in a quid pro quo. It's funny that you have no problem with 2 + 2 when it's Trump but it's gotta be proven beyond any reasonable doubt if they have a D next to their name.HHusky said:
"Just knowing" Joe is corrupt is so much easier than having evidence. But even if true, Joe can't testify to Daddy's offenses. You'll need to start a prosecution of Joe.Bendintheriver said:
Oh rats like HH know that the bidens are corrupt. Anyone with any sense at all sees it for what it is. HH just has no scruples or integrity. The lack of the aforementioned is what allows him to look like such a lying hypocrite on here without FEELING any regrets. The corruption in the BO admin went on for 8 years and into the election. He actually illegally spied on Trumps campaign HQ during the election and rats like HH love it. He has zero problem with it because it is the rats shitting on the American people and he FEELS that is necessary for his party to gain power over the people.DoogieMcDoogerson said:Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that. What I mean by Smart People is they function well in the not political universe but are absolute dipshits when it comes to understanding politics.
Or all this Burisma stuff is just "trading off his name" with no conflict of interest by daddy joe?
It's cute rhetoric but we all realize you've got double standards. You should be consistent and not argue against yourself in different threads.
2 + 2 = 4 councilor, right? And we aren't even talking impeaching old Joe, just that there's something tangible there to open an investigation over. It seems like your bar for that is even lower if I remember what it took to justify investigation of Trump.
So far your smoking gun is Joe following the wishes of the US government and our allies.
That would be in stark contrast to what Daddy was doing.
-
It was the wish of the US government for the CCP to pile money into Hunters business? Big if true.HHusky said:
Open an investigation. I don't care.UW_Doog_Bot said:
So you think jet setting with Hunter as his sidekick and Hunter signing all that money is really hard to draw any conclusions from?HHusky said:
You've got him bragging about demanding the firing of the prosecutor--something nobody gave a shit about until Daddy needed an excuse for his treason. What else?UW_Doog_Bot said:
There's a lot more evidence Joe's corrupt than there is that Trump engaged in a quid pro quo. It's funny that you have no problem with 2 + 2 when it's Trump but it's gotta be proven beyond any reasonable doubt if they have a D next to their name.HHusky said:
"Just knowing" Joe is corrupt is so much easier than having evidence. But even if true, Joe can't testify to Daddy's offenses. You'll need to start a prosecution of Joe.Bendintheriver said:
Oh rats like HH know that the bidens are corrupt. Anyone with any sense at all sees it for what it is. HH just has no scruples or integrity. The lack of the aforementioned is what allows him to look like such a lying hypocrite on here without FEELING any regrets. The corruption in the BO admin went on for 8 years and into the election. He actually illegally spied on Trumps campaign HQ during the election and rats like HH love it. He has zero problem with it because it is the rats shitting on the American people and he FEELS that is necessary for his party to gain power over the people.DoogieMcDoogerson said:Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that. What I mean by Smart People is they function well in the not political universe but are absolute dipshits when it comes to understanding politics.
Or all this Burisma stuff is just "trading off his name" with no conflict of interest by daddy joe?
It's cute rhetoric but we all realize you've got double standards. You should be consistent and not argue against yourself in different threads.
2 + 2 = 4 councilor, right? And we aren't even talking impeaching old Joe, just that there's something tangible there to open an investigation over. It seems like your bar for that is even lower if I remember what it took to justify investigation of Trump.
So far your smoking gun is Joe following the wishes of the US government and our allies.
That would be in stark contrast to what Daddy was doing. -
And what is that? In your own words.HHusky said:
Open an investigation. I don't care.UW_Doog_Bot said:
So you think jet setting with Hunter as his sidekick and Hunter signing all that money is really hard to draw any conclusions from?HHusky said:
You've got him bragging about demanding the firing of the prosecutor--something nobody gave a shit about until Daddy needed an excuse for his treason. What else?UW_Doog_Bot said:
There's a lot more evidence Joe's corrupt than there is that Trump engaged in a quid pro quo. It's funny that you have no problem with 2 + 2 when it's Trump but it's gotta be proven beyond any reasonable doubt if they have a D next to their name.HHusky said:
"Just knowing" Joe is corrupt is so much easier than having evidence. But even if true, Joe can't testify to Daddy's offenses. You'll need to start a prosecution of Joe.Bendintheriver said:
Oh rats like HH know that the bidens are corrupt. Anyone with any sense at all sees it for what it is. HH just has no scruples or integrity. The lack of the aforementioned is what allows him to look like such a lying hypocrite on here without FEELING any regrets. The corruption in the BO admin went on for 8 years and into the election. He actually illegally spied on Trumps campaign HQ during the election and rats like HH love it. He has zero problem with it because it is the rats shitting on the American people and he FEELS that is necessary for his party to gain power over the people.DoogieMcDoogerson said:Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that. What I mean by Smart People is they function well in the not political universe but are absolute dipshits when it comes to understanding politics.
Or all this Burisma stuff is just "trading off his name" with no conflict of interest by daddy joe?
It's cute rhetoric but we all realize you've got double standards. You should be consistent and not argue against yourself in different threads.
2 + 2 = 4 councilor, right? And we aren't even talking impeaching old Joe, just that there's something tangible there to open an investigation over. It seems like your bar for that is even lower if I remember what it took to justify investigation of Trump.
So far your smoking gun is Joe following the wishes of the US government and our allies.
That would be in stark contrast to what Daddy was doing.
The specific crime, too.
-
Also, this is the basis for the qpq. If the investigation is justified, as you admit, then half the argument for qpq falls apart.HHusky said:
Open an investigation. I don't care.UW_Doog_Bot said:
So you think jet setting with Hunter as his sidekick and Hunter signing all that money is really hard to draw any conclusions from?HHusky said:
You've got him bragging about demanding the firing of the prosecutor--something nobody gave a shit about until Daddy needed an excuse for his treason. What else?UW_Doog_Bot said:
There's a lot more evidence Joe's corrupt than there is that Trump engaged in a quid pro quo. It's funny that you have no problem with 2 + 2 when it's Trump but it's gotta be proven beyond any reasonable doubt if they have a D next to their name.HHusky said:
"Just knowing" Joe is corrupt is so much easier than having evidence. But even if true, Joe can't testify to Daddy's offenses. You'll need to start a prosecution of Joe.Bendintheriver said:
Oh rats like HH know that the bidens are corrupt. Anyone with any sense at all sees it for what it is. HH just has no scruples or integrity. The lack of the aforementioned is what allows him to look like such a lying hypocrite on here without FEELING any regrets. The corruption in the BO admin went on for 8 years and into the election. He actually illegally spied on Trumps campaign HQ during the election and rats like HH love it. He has zero problem with it because it is the rats shitting on the American people and he FEELS that is necessary for his party to gain power over the people.DoogieMcDoogerson said:Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that. What I mean by Smart People is they function well in the not political universe but are absolute dipshits when it comes to understanding politics.
Or all this Burisma stuff is just "trading off his name" with no conflict of interest by daddy joe?
It's cute rhetoric but we all realize you've got double standards. You should be consistent and not argue against yourself in different threads.
2 + 2 = 4 councilor, right? And we aren't even talking impeaching old Joe, just that there's something tangible there to open an investigation over. It seems like your bar for that is even lower if I remember what it took to justify investigation of Trump.
So far your smoking gun is Joe following the wishes of the US government and our allies.
That would be in stark contrast to what Daddy was doing.
-
One has to wonder at the type of lawyer H is. Shameless or incompetent?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Also, this is the basis for the qpq. If the investigation is justified, as you admit, then half the argument for qpq falls apart.HHusky said:
Open an investigation. I don't care.UW_Doog_Bot said:
So you think jet setting with Hunter as his sidekick and Hunter signing all that money is really hard to draw any conclusions from?HHusky said:
You've got him bragging about demanding the firing of the prosecutor--something nobody gave a shit about until Daddy needed an excuse for his treason. What else?UW_Doog_Bot said:
There's a lot more evidence Joe's corrupt than there is that Trump engaged in a quid pro quo. It's funny that you have no problem with 2 + 2 when it's Trump but it's gotta be proven beyond any reasonable doubt if they have a D next to their name.HHusky said:
"Just knowing" Joe is corrupt is so much easier than having evidence. But even if true, Joe can't testify to Daddy's offenses. You'll need to start a prosecution of Joe.Bendintheriver said:
Oh rats like HH know that the bidens are corrupt. Anyone with any sense at all sees it for what it is. HH just has no scruples or integrity. The lack of the aforementioned is what allows him to look like such a lying hypocrite on here without FEELING any regrets. The corruption in the BO admin went on for 8 years and into the election. He actually illegally spied on Trumps campaign HQ during the election and rats like HH love it. He has zero problem with it because it is the rats shitting on the American people and he FEELS that is necessary for his party to gain power over the people.DoogieMcDoogerson said:Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that. What I mean by Smart People is they function well in the not political universe but are absolute dipshits when it comes to understanding politics.
Or all this Burisma stuff is just "trading off his name" with no conflict of interest by daddy joe?
It's cute rhetoric but we all realize you've got double standards. You should be consistent and not argue against yourself in different threads.
2 + 2 = 4 councilor, right? And we aren't even talking impeaching old Joe, just that there's something tangible there to open an investigation over. It seems like your bar for that is even lower if I remember what it took to justify investigation of Trump.
So far your smoking gun is Joe following the wishes of the US government and our allies.
That would be in stark contrast to what Daddy was doing.
Most likely abundance. -
Disbarred.UW_Doog_Bot said:
One has to wonder at the type of lawyer H is. Shameless or incompetent?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Also, this is the basis for the qpq. If the investigation is justified, as you admit, then half the argument for qpq falls apart.HHusky said:
Open an investigation. I don't care.UW_Doog_Bot said:
So you think jet setting with Hunter as his sidekick and Hunter signing all that money is really hard to draw any conclusions from?HHusky said:
You've got him bragging about demanding the firing of the prosecutor--something nobody gave a shit about until Daddy needed an excuse for his treason. What else?UW_Doog_Bot said:
There's a lot more evidence Joe's corrupt than there is that Trump engaged in a quid pro quo. It's funny that you have no problem with 2 + 2 when it's Trump but it's gotta be proven beyond any reasonable doubt if they have a D next to their name.HHusky said:
"Just knowing" Joe is corrupt is so much easier than having evidence. But even if true, Joe can't testify to Daddy's offenses. You'll need to start a prosecution of Joe.Bendintheriver said:
Oh rats like HH know that the bidens are corrupt. Anyone with any sense at all sees it for what it is. HH just has no scruples or integrity. The lack of the aforementioned is what allows him to look like such a lying hypocrite on here without FEELING any regrets. The corruption in the BO admin went on for 8 years and into the election. He actually illegally spied on Trumps campaign HQ during the election and rats like HH love it. He has zero problem with it because it is the rats shitting on the American people and he FEELS that is necessary for his party to gain power over the people.DoogieMcDoogerson said:Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that. What I mean by Smart People is they function well in the not political universe but are absolute dipshits when it comes to understanding politics.
Or all this Burisma stuff is just "trading off his name" with no conflict of interest by daddy joe?
It's cute rhetoric but we all realize you've got double standards. You should be consistent and not argue against yourself in different threads.
2 + 2 = 4 councilor, right? And we aren't even talking impeaching old Joe, just that there's something tangible there to open an investigation over. It seems like your bar for that is even lower if I remember what it took to justify investigation of Trump.
So far your smoking gun is Joe following the wishes of the US government and our allies.
That would be in stark contrast to what Daddy was doing.
Most likely abundance.
-
DishonestUW_Doog_Bot said:
One has to wonder at the type of lawyer H is. Shameless or incompetent?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Also, this is the basis for the qpq. If the investigation is justified, as you admit, then half the argument for qpq falls apart.HHusky said:
Open an investigation. I don't care.UW_Doog_Bot said:
So you think jet setting with Hunter as his sidekick and Hunter signing all that money is really hard to draw any conclusions from?HHusky said:
You've got him bragging about demanding the firing of the prosecutor--something nobody gave a shit about until Daddy needed an excuse for his treason. What else?UW_Doog_Bot said:
There's a lot more evidence Joe's corrupt than there is that Trump engaged in a quid pro quo. It's funny that you have no problem with 2 + 2 when it's Trump but it's gotta be proven beyond any reasonable doubt if they have a D next to their name.HHusky said:
"Just knowing" Joe is corrupt is so much easier than having evidence. But even if true, Joe can't testify to Daddy's offenses. You'll need to start a prosecution of Joe.Bendintheriver said:
Oh rats like HH know that the bidens are corrupt. Anyone with any sense at all sees it for what it is. HH just has no scruples or integrity. The lack of the aforementioned is what allows him to look like such a lying hypocrite on here without FEELING any regrets. The corruption in the BO admin went on for 8 years and into the election. He actually illegally spied on Trumps campaign HQ during the election and rats like HH love it. He has zero problem with it because it is the rats shitting on the American people and he FEELS that is necessary for his party to gain power over the people.DoogieMcDoogerson said:Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that. What I mean by Smart People is they function well in the not political universe but are absolute dipshits when it comes to understanding politics.
Or all this Burisma stuff is just "trading off his name" with no conflict of interest by daddy joe?
It's cute rhetoric but we all realize you've got double standards. You should be consistent and not argue against yourself in different threads.
2 + 2 = 4 councilor, right? And we aren't even talking impeaching old Joe, just that there's something tangible there to open an investigation over. It seems like your bar for that is even lower if I remember what it took to justify investigation of Trump.
So far your smoking gun is Joe following the wishes of the US government and our allies.
That would be in stark contrast to what Daddy was doing.
Most likely abundance. -
GayUW_Doog_Bot said:
One has to wonder at the type of lawyer H is. Shameless or incompetent?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Also, this is the basis for the qpq. If the investigation is justified, as you admit, then half the argument for qpq falls apart.HHusky said:
Open an investigation. I don't care.UW_Doog_Bot said:
So you think jet setting with Hunter as his sidekick and Hunter signing all that money is really hard to draw any conclusions from?HHusky said:
You've got him bragging about demanding the firing of the prosecutor--something nobody gave a shit about until Daddy needed an excuse for his treason. What else?UW_Doog_Bot said:
There's a lot more evidence Joe's corrupt than there is that Trump engaged in a quid pro quo. It's funny that you have no problem with 2 + 2 when it's Trump but it's gotta be proven beyond any reasonable doubt if they have a D next to their name.HHusky said:
"Just knowing" Joe is corrupt is so much easier than having evidence. But even if true, Joe can't testify to Daddy's offenses. You'll need to start a prosecution of Joe.Bendintheriver said:
Oh rats like HH know that the bidens are corrupt. Anyone with any sense at all sees it for what it is. HH just has no scruples or integrity. The lack of the aforementioned is what allows him to look like such a lying hypocrite on here without FEELING any regrets. The corruption in the BO admin went on for 8 years and into the election. He actually illegally spied on Trumps campaign HQ during the election and rats like HH love it. He has zero problem with it because it is the rats shitting on the American people and he FEELS that is necessary for his party to gain power over the people.DoogieMcDoogerson said:Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that. What I mean by Smart People is they function well in the not political universe but are absolute dipshits when it comes to understanding politics.
Or all this Burisma stuff is just "trading off his name" with no conflict of interest by daddy joe?
It's cute rhetoric but we all realize you've got double standards. You should be consistent and not argue against yourself in different threads.
2 + 2 = 4 councilor, right? And we aren't even talking impeaching old Joe, just that there's something tangible there to open an investigation over. It seems like your bar for that is even lower if I remember what it took to justify investigation of Trump.
So far your smoking gun is Joe following the wishes of the US government and our allies.
That would be in stark contrast to what Daddy was doing.
Most likely abundance. -
Like betting on the Globe Trotters against the Generals.GDS said:
Some of us are old enough to remember when Blob conceded that Trump should be impeached if he tied the aide to investigations. To be fair we all knew even then he would eventually “evolve”.SFGbob said:
But you knew there was an investigation. Now you're complaining about your sore snatch because the Ukraine would announce there was an investigation.HHusky said:
Hillary comes to mind too. The fact that the Mueller investigation played out in public wasn’t due to any attempt by the investigators to publicize it. The investigators were extremely close lipped about it throughout.SFGbob said:
I seem to recall plenty of talk publicly about Trump being investigated by Mueller and yet no charges were ever brought against Trump. I missed your OUTRAGEHHusky said:
That’s where the FBI and US DOJ have traditionally drawn the line too. It’s based on the notion that you shouldn’t be slimed for having been investigated when no charges were brought. You are free to disagree.SFGbob said:
Got it, investigate all you want just don't say you're doing it publicly. That's where you draw the line.HHusky said:
Daddy wanted a public announcement of an investigation. You know as well as I do that an investigation doesn’t require an announcement. I don’t care whether Biden is actually investigated or not—neither did Daddy btw.SFGbob said:
What value does he last name have to Burisma? Btw, when Joe's brother got billions from the Feds to build housing in Iraq, was he just trading off his last name? Why is Biden so blind to his family members trading off his last name?HHusky said:
I think Hunter was trading off his last name. I don’t know that any of us can prevent an adult from doing that. You’ve got nothing to tie Joe to any wrong-doing in the matter, but investigate it to your heart’s content. Daddy’s state of mind is relevant; neither Biden can testify to that.SFGbob said:
They should be investigated. Do you think Hunter got the job because of his skills as a lawyer? Hunter is corrupt. Joe either turned a blind eye or facilitated that corruption and we should know about it.HHusky said:
The impeachment trial isn’t where you “investigate Biden”. There is a boatload of evidence that the Ukraine aid was tied to Ukraine announcing an investigation of the Bidens. And the spineless toadies on your team don’t want any more of it to see the light of day.RaceBannon said:
Biden confessedHHusky said:
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.RaceBannon said:Why is Biden above the law?
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything
Daddy should just testify what he was thinking and clear up this whole misunderstanding.
Why do you always talk of both sides of your mouth O"Keefed? You're all but hurt right now because Trump wanted to investigate Biden and in your next breath you say investigate to my hearts content. Which is it Kunt?
But regardless, all that’s relevant now about Biden is what Daddy knew and intended. Neither Biden can provide relevant information about that. Bolton can. Mulvaney can. Daddy can.
In Daddy’s case, attaching the stigma of an investigation to Biden was far more important than whether anyone really did the investigation.
Biden’s actions regarding the Ukrainian prosecutor had been in the public record by August 2016 at the latest. Daddy could have had his DOJ look into it from day one. (Maybe they did and decided there was nothing to charge Joe with.). Daddy waited until Joe emerged has his chief rival to demand that a foreign country ANNOUNCE an investigation as a condition of receiving Congressionally approved aid. I’m sure he can explain it all in his testimony—his reputation as a deponent precedes him.
Your OUTRAGE is as phony as you are O'Keefed.
And you're lying, looking into Burisma and the Bidens started before Joe even announced his candidacy. -
Imagine thinking that there is a prosecutable crime when the alleged victim isn’t even aware of it occurring.RaceBannon said:
Biden confessedHHusky said:
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.RaceBannon said:Why is Biden above the law?
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything -
Likely a Staff Attorney for a useless non-profit, or maybe the City or A.G. Skilled in warming chairs, wherever he is.UW_Doog_Bot said:
One has to wonder at the type of lawyer H is. Shameless or incompetent?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Also, this is the basis for the qpq. If the investigation is justified, as you admit, then half the argument for qpq falls apart.HHusky said:
Open an investigation. I don't care.UW_Doog_Bot said:
So you think jet setting with Hunter as his sidekick and Hunter signing all that money is really hard to draw any conclusions from?HHusky said:
You've got him bragging about demanding the firing of the prosecutor--something nobody gave a shit about until Daddy needed an excuse for his treason. What else?UW_Doog_Bot said:
There's a lot more evidence Joe's corrupt than there is that Trump engaged in a quid pro quo. It's funny that you have no problem with 2 + 2 when it's Trump but it's gotta be proven beyond any reasonable doubt if they have a D next to their name.HHusky said:
"Just knowing" Joe is corrupt is so much easier than having evidence. But even if true, Joe can't testify to Daddy's offenses. You'll need to start a prosecution of Joe.Bendintheriver said:
Oh rats like HH know that the bidens are corrupt. Anyone with any sense at all sees it for what it is. HH just has no scruples or integrity. The lack of the aforementioned is what allows him to look like such a lying hypocrite on here without FEELING any regrets. The corruption in the BO admin went on for 8 years and into the election. He actually illegally spied on Trumps campaign HQ during the election and rats like HH love it. He has zero problem with it because it is the rats shitting on the American people and he FEELS that is necessary for his party to gain power over the people.DoogieMcDoogerson said:Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that. What I mean by Smart People is they function well in the not political universe but are absolute dipshits when it comes to understanding politics.
Or all this Burisma stuff is just "trading off his name" with no conflict of interest by daddy joe?
It's cute rhetoric but we all realize you've got double standards. You should be consistent and not argue against yourself in different threads.
2 + 2 = 4 councilor, right? And we aren't even talking impeaching old Joe, just that there's something tangible there to open an investigation over. It seems like your bar for that is even lower if I remember what it took to justify investigation of Trump.
So far your smoking gun is Joe following the wishes of the US government and our allies.
That would be in stark contrast to what Daddy was doing.
Most likely abundance. -
No victim no crime. Ask HH.salemcoog said:
Imagine thinking that there is a prosecutable crime when the alleged victim isn’t even aware of it occurring.RaceBannon said:
Biden confessedHHusky said:
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.RaceBannon said:Why is Biden above the law?
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything -
Being that He travels to Salem a lot for work, my money is on him being a public union lawyer.TurdBomber said:
Likely a Staff Attorney for a useless non-profit, or maybe the City or A.G. Skilled in warming chairs, wherever he is.UW_Doog_Bot said:
One has to wonder at the type of lawyer H is. Shameless or incompetent?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Also, this is the basis for the qpq. If the investigation is justified, as you admit, then half the argument for qpq falls apart.HHusky said:
Open an investigation. I don't care.UW_Doog_Bot said:
So you think jet setting with Hunter as his sidekick and Hunter signing all that money is really hard to draw any conclusions from?HHusky said:
You've got him bragging about demanding the firing of the prosecutor--something nobody gave a shit about until Daddy needed an excuse for his treason. What else?UW_Doog_Bot said:
There's a lot more evidence Joe's corrupt than there is that Trump engaged in a quid pro quo. It's funny that you have no problem with 2 + 2 when it's Trump but it's gotta be proven beyond any reasonable doubt if they have a D next to their name.HHusky said:
"Just knowing" Joe is corrupt is so much easier than having evidence. But even if true, Joe can't testify to Daddy's offenses. You'll need to start a prosecution of Joe.Bendintheriver said:
Oh rats like HH know that the bidens are corrupt. Anyone with any sense at all sees it for what it is. HH just has no scruples or integrity. The lack of the aforementioned is what allows him to look like such a lying hypocrite on here without FEELING any regrets. The corruption in the BO admin went on for 8 years and into the election. He actually illegally spied on Trumps campaign HQ during the election and rats like HH love it. He has zero problem with it because it is the rats shitting on the American people and he FEELS that is necessary for his party to gain power over the people.DoogieMcDoogerson said:Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that. What I mean by Smart People is they function well in the not political universe but are absolute dipshits when it comes to understanding politics.
Or all this Burisma stuff is just "trading off his name" with no conflict of interest by daddy joe?
It's cute rhetoric but we all realize you've got double standards. You should be consistent and not argue against yourself in different threads.
2 + 2 = 4 councilor, right? And we aren't even talking impeaching old Joe, just that there's something tangible there to open an investigation over. It seems like your bar for that is even lower if I remember what it took to justify investigation of Trump.
So far your smoking gun is Joe following the wishes of the US government and our allies.
That would be in stark contrast to what Daddy was doing.
Most likely abundance. -
Talks about Civics = Old AFsalemcoog said:
Being that He travels to Salem a lot for work, my money is on him being a public union lawyer.TurdBomber said:
Likely a Staff Attorney for a useless non-profit, or maybe the City or A.G. Skilled in warming chairs, wherever he is.UW_Doog_Bot said:
One has to wonder at the type of lawyer H is. Shameless or incompetent?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Also, this is the basis for the qpq. If the investigation is justified, as you admit, then half the argument for qpq falls apart.HHusky said:
Open an investigation. I don't care.UW_Doog_Bot said:
So you think jet setting with Hunter as his sidekick and Hunter signing all that money is really hard to draw any conclusions from?HHusky said:
You've got him bragging about demanding the firing of the prosecutor--something nobody gave a shit about until Daddy needed an excuse for his treason. What else?UW_Doog_Bot said:
There's a lot more evidence Joe's corrupt than there is that Trump engaged in a quid pro quo. It's funny that you have no problem with 2 + 2 when it's Trump but it's gotta be proven beyond any reasonable doubt if they have a D next to their name.HHusky said:
"Just knowing" Joe is corrupt is so much easier than having evidence. But even if true, Joe can't testify to Daddy's offenses. You'll need to start a prosecution of Joe.Bendintheriver said:
Oh rats like HH know that the bidens are corrupt. Anyone with any sense at all sees it for what it is. HH just has no scruples or integrity. The lack of the aforementioned is what allows him to look like such a lying hypocrite on here without FEELING any regrets. The corruption in the BO admin went on for 8 years and into the election. He actually illegally spied on Trumps campaign HQ during the election and rats like HH love it. He has zero problem with it because it is the rats shitting on the American people and he FEELS that is necessary for his party to gain power over the people.DoogieMcDoogerson said:Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that. What I mean by Smart People is they function well in the not political universe but are absolute dipshits when it comes to understanding politics.
Or all this Burisma stuff is just "trading off his name" with no conflict of interest by daddy joe?
It's cute rhetoric but we all realize you've got double standards. You should be consistent and not argue against yourself in different threads.
2 + 2 = 4 councilor, right? And we aren't even talking impeaching old Joe, just that there's something tangible there to open an investigation over. It seems like your bar for that is even lower if I remember what it took to justify investigation of Trump.
So far your smoking gun is Joe following the wishes of the US government and our allies.
That would be in stark contrast to what Daddy was doing.
Most likely abundance. -
TurdBomber said:
Talks about Civics = Old AFsalemcoog said:
Being that He travels to Salem a lot for work, my money is on him being a public union lawyer.TurdBomber said:
Likely a Staff Attorney for a useless non-profit, or maybe the City or A.G. Skilled in warming chairs, wherever he is.UW_Doog_Bot said:
One has to wonder at the type of lawyer H is. Shameless or incompetent?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Also, this is the basis for the qpq. If the investigation is justified, as you admit, then half the argument for qpq falls apart.HHusky said:
Open an investigation. I don't care.UW_Doog_Bot said:
So you think jet setting with Hunter as his sidekick and Hunter signing all that money is really hard to draw any conclusions from?HHusky said:
You've got him bragging about demanding the firing of the prosecutor--something nobody gave a shit about until Daddy needed an excuse for his treason. What else?UW_Doog_Bot said:
There's a lot more evidence Joe's corrupt than there is that Trump engaged in a quid pro quo. It's funny that you have no problem with 2 + 2 when it's Trump but it's gotta be proven beyond any reasonable doubt if they have a D next to their name.HHusky said:
"Just knowing" Joe is corrupt is so much easier than having evidence. But even if true, Joe can't testify to Daddy's offenses. You'll need to start a prosecution of Joe.Bendintheriver said:
Oh rats like HH know that the bidens are corrupt. Anyone with any sense at all sees it for what it is. HH just has no scruples or integrity. The lack of the aforementioned is what allows him to look like such a lying hypocrite on here without FEELING any regrets. The corruption in the BO admin went on for 8 years and into the election. He actually illegally spied on Trumps campaign HQ during the election and rats like HH love it. He has zero problem with it because it is the rats shitting on the American people and he FEELS that is necessary for his party to gain power over the people.DoogieMcDoogerson said:Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that. What I mean by Smart People is they function well in the not political universe but are absolute dipshits when it comes to understanding politics.
Or all this Burisma stuff is just "trading off his name" with no conflict of interest by daddy joe?
It's cute rhetoric but we all realize you've got double standards. You should be consistent and not argue against yourself in different threads.
2 + 2 = 4 councilor, right? And we aren't even talking impeaching old Joe, just that there's something tangible there to open an investigation over. It seems like your bar for that is even lower if I remember what it took to justify investigation of Trump.
So far your smoking gun is Joe following the wishes of the US government and our allies.
That would be in stark contrast to what Daddy was doing.
Most likely abundance.
That fact that this is true is why socialist bartenders can become swampy congressman. -
They have a big jail in Salem.
-
"I'm being treated very well here by my North Korean hosts."salemcoog said:
Imagine thinking that there is a prosecutable crime when the alleged victim isn’t even aware of it occurring.RaceBannon said:
Biden confessedHHusky said:
You girls have let Blanche Dubois confuse you. Biden cannot testify to Daddy’s state of mind and his testimony is therefore irrelevant to the Senate trial. You’re still free to prosecute him if you can identify a crime he’s committed.RaceBannon said:Why is Biden above the law?
It relates directly to the Ukraine
And the state of mind in dealing with a corrupt government
No one is above the law. Investigating Biden isn't a crime
There is no evidence aid was tied to anything -
I do?salemcoog said:
Being that He travels to Salem a lot for work, my money is on him being a public union lawyer.TurdBomber said:
Likely a Staff Attorney for a useless non-profit, or maybe the City or A.G. Skilled in warming chairs, wherever he is.UW_Doog_Bot said:
One has to wonder at the type of lawyer H is. Shameless or incompetent?UW_Doog_Bot said:
Also, this is the basis for the qpq. If the investigation is justified, as you admit, then half the argument for qpq falls apart.HHusky said:
Open an investigation. I don't care.UW_Doog_Bot said:
So you think jet setting with Hunter as his sidekick and Hunter signing all that money is really hard to draw any conclusions from?HHusky said:
You've got him bragging about demanding the firing of the prosecutor--something nobody gave a shit about until Daddy needed an excuse for his treason. What else?UW_Doog_Bot said:
There's a lot more evidence Joe's corrupt than there is that Trump engaged in a quid pro quo. It's funny that you have no problem with 2 + 2 when it's Trump but it's gotta be proven beyond any reasonable doubt if they have a D next to their name.HHusky said:
"Just knowing" Joe is corrupt is so much easier than having evidence. But even if true, Joe can't testify to Daddy's offenses. You'll need to start a prosecution of Joe.Bendintheriver said:
Oh rats like HH know that the bidens are corrupt. Anyone with any sense at all sees it for what it is. HH just has no scruples or integrity. The lack of the aforementioned is what allows him to look like such a lying hypocrite on here without FEELING any regrets. The corruption in the BO admin went on for 8 years and into the election. He actually illegally spied on Trumps campaign HQ during the election and rats like HH love it. He has zero problem with it because it is the rats shitting on the American people and he FEELS that is necessary for his party to gain power over the people.DoogieMcDoogerson said:Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that. What I mean by Smart People is they function well in the not political universe but are absolute dipshits when it comes to understanding politics.
Or all this Burisma stuff is just "trading off his name" with no conflict of interest by daddy joe?
It's cute rhetoric but we all realize you've got double standards. You should be consistent and not argue against yourself in different threads.
2 + 2 = 4 councilor, right? And we aren't even talking impeaching old Joe, just that there's something tangible there to open an investigation over. It seems like your bar for that is even lower if I remember what it took to justify investigation of Trump.
So far your smoking gun is Joe following the wishes of the US government and our allies.
That would be in stark contrast to what Daddy was doing.
Most likely abundance. -
I'm old enough to remember when Bolton was a RW hero.
-
Very few here are ‘right wing’.HHusky said:I'm old enough to remember when Bolton was a RW hero.
I’m most certainly not.
Just abhor the progressive left. -
The right wing took over your party. Daddy isn't ideological at all, but he is intensely self-interested. He and the right wing have themselves a deal.PurpleThrobber said:
Very few here are ‘right wing’.HHusky said:I'm old enough to remember when Bolton was a RW hero.
I’m most certainly not.
Just abhor the progressive left. -
HHusky said:
The right wing took over your party. Daddy isn't ideological at all, but he is intensely self-interested. He and the right wing have themselves a deal.PurpleThrobber said:
Very few here are ‘right wing’.HHusky said:I'm old enough to remember when Bolton was a RW hero.
I’m most certainly not.
Just abhor the progressive left.
I don’t have a party. People who goosestep and argue by party line are fucking idiots.
Like you.
-
This is the kind of "analysis" you get from a fucking lightweight. The "right-wing" that took over the Republican party nominated McCain and Romney, both hardcore right wingers, and Trump who is far from a right-winger.HHusky said:
The right wing took over your party. Daddy isn't ideological at all, but he is intensely self-interested. He and the right wing have themselves a deal.PurpleThrobber said:
Very few here are ‘right wing’.HHusky said:I'm old enough to remember when Bolton was a RW hero.
I’m most certainly not.
Just abhor the progressive left.
As I recall, your "argument" when you voted for Obama over Romney was that Romney had been transformed into a "right-winger." -
Oh I know, this is where you Daddy cocksuckers all claim to be intensely "independent".PurpleThrobber said:HHusky said:
The right wing took over your party. Daddy isn't ideological at all, but he is intensely self-interested. He and the right wing have themselves a deal.PurpleThrobber said:
Very few here are ‘right wing’.HHusky said:I'm old enough to remember when Bolton was a RW hero.
I’m most certainly not.
Just abhor the progressive left.
I don’t have a party. People who goosestep and argue by party line are fucking idiots.
Like you.
-
