This Bolton shit

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

Bendintheriver said:

DoogieMcDoogerson said:

Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that. What I mean by Smart People is they function well in the not political universe but are absolute dipshits when it comes to understanding politics.

Oh rats like HH know that the bidens are corrupt. Anyone with any sense at all sees it for what it is. HH just has no scruples or integrity. The lack of the aforementioned is what allows him to look like such a lying hypocrite on here without FEELING any regrets. The corruption in the BO admin went on for 8 years and into the election. He actually illegally spied on Trumps campaign HQ during the election and rats like HH love it. He has zero problem with it because it is the rats shitting on the American people and he FEELS that is necessary for his party to gain power over the people.

"Just knowing" Joe is corrupt is so much easier than having evidence. But even if true, Joe can't testify to Daddy's offenses. You'll need to start a prosecution of Joe.

There's a lot more evidence Joe's corrupt than there is that Trump engaged in a quid pro quo. It's funny that you have no problem with 2 + 2 when it's Trump but it's gotta be proven beyond any reasonable doubt if they have a D next to their name.

You've got him bragging about demanding the firing of the prosecutor--something nobody gave a shit about until Daddy needed an excuse for his treason. What else?

So you think jet setting with Hunter as his sidekick and Hunter signing all that money is really hard to draw any conclusions from?

Or all this Burisma stuff is just "trading off his name" with no conflict of interest by daddy joe?

It's cute rhetoric but we all realize you've got double standards. You should be consistent and not argue against yourself in different threads.

2 + 2 = 4 councilor, right? And we aren't even talking impeaching old Joe, just that there's something tangible there to open an investigation over. It seems like your bar for that is even lower if I remember what it took to justify investigation of Trump.

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

Bendintheriver said:

DoogieMcDoogerson said:

Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that. What I mean by Smart People is they function well in the not political universe but are absolute dipshits when it comes to understanding politics.

Oh rats like HH know that the bidens are corrupt. Anyone with any sense at all sees it for what it is. HH just has no scruples or integrity. The lack of the aforementioned is what allows him to look like such a lying hypocrite on here without FEELING any regrets. The corruption in the BO admin went on for 8 years and into the election. He actually illegally spied on Trumps campaign HQ during the election and rats like HH love it. He has zero problem with it because it is the rats shitting on the American people and he FEELS that is necessary for his party to gain power over the people.

"Just knowing" Joe is corrupt is so much easier than having evidence. But even if true, Joe can't testify to Daddy's offenses. You'll need to start a prosecution of Joe.

There's a lot more evidence Joe's corrupt than there is that Trump engaged in a quid pro quo. It's funny that you have no problem with 2 + 2 when it's Trump but it's gotta be proven beyond any reasonable doubt if they have a D next to their name.

You've got him bragging about demanding the firing of the prosecutor--something nobody gave a shit about until Daddy needed an excuse for his treason. What else?

So you think jet setting with Hunter as his sidekick and Hunter signing all that money is really hard to draw any conclusions from?

Or all this Burisma stuff is just "trading off his name" with no conflict of interest by daddy joe?

It's cute rhetoric but we all realize you've got double standards. You should be consistent and not argue against yourself in different threads.

2 + 2 = 4 councilor, right? And we aren't even talking impeaching old Joe, just that there's something tangible there to open an investigation over. It seems like your bar for that is even lower if I remember what it took to justify investigation of Trump.

Open an investigation. I don't care.

So far your smoking gun is Joe following the wishes of the US government and our allies.

That would be in stark contrast to what Daddy was doing.

It was the wish of the US government for the CCP to pile money into Hunters business? Big if true.

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

Bendintheriver said:

DoogieMcDoogerson said:

Seriously. How can you idiots not think there's anything wrong with Biden, Burisma, the Clinton Foundation, etc. How can you not see that? I know a lot of smart people. You guys might be what I'd call smart people. Smart people who don't take the time to actually dig into the details, look at both sides, and make your judgement. You all must just read twitter and HH and leave it at that. What I mean by Smart People is they function well in the not political universe but are absolute dipshits when it comes to understanding politics.

Oh rats like HH know that the bidens are corrupt. Anyone with any sense at all sees it for what it is. HH just has no scruples or integrity. The lack of the aforementioned is what allows him to look like such a lying hypocrite on here without FEELING any regrets. The corruption in the BO admin went on for 8 years and into the election. He actually illegally spied on Trumps campaign HQ during the election and rats like HH love it. He has zero problem with it because it is the rats shitting on the American people and he FEELS that is necessary for his party to gain power over the people.

"Just knowing" Joe is corrupt is so much easier than having evidence. But even if true, Joe can't testify to Daddy's offenses. You'll need to start a prosecution of Joe.

There's a lot more evidence Joe's corrupt than there is that Trump engaged in a quid pro quo. It's funny that you have no problem with 2 + 2 when it's Trump but it's gotta be proven beyond any reasonable doubt if they have a D next to their name.

You've got him bragging about demanding the firing of the prosecutor--something nobody gave a shit about until Daddy needed an excuse for his treason. What else?

So you think jet setting with Hunter as his sidekick and Hunter signing all that money is really hard to draw any conclusions from?

Or all this Burisma stuff is just "trading off his name" with no conflict of interest by daddy joe?

It's cute rhetoric but we all realize you've got double standards. You should be consistent and not argue against yourself in different threads.

2 + 2 = 4 councilor, right? And we aren't even talking impeaching old Joe, just that there's something tangible there to open an investigation over. It seems like your bar for that is even lower if I remember what it took to justify investigation of Trump.

Open an investigation. I don't care.

So far your smoking gun is Joe following the wishes of the US government and our allies.

That would be in stark contrast to what Daddy was doing.

Also, this is the basis for the qpq. If the investigation is justified, as you admit, then half the argument for qpq falls apart.