Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
GAO HIT PIECE on TRUMP GETS IT WRONG
Comments
-
Obstruction of Congress. Oh, wait.WestlinnDuck said:Still waiting for someone to tell me what crime Trump committed. The GAO claim is pure BS.
-
Someone had to ask this disingenuous question. Those of you who wagered it would be Gasbag, please come to the window and collect your money.WestlinnDuck said:Still waiting for someone to tell me what crime Trump committed. The GAO claim is pure BS.
-
The GAO comment is BS. Ball is still in your court, counselor. I pity your clients.
-
Federalist #65, Gasbag.WestlinnDuck said:The GAO comment is BS. Ball is still in your court, counselor. I pity your clients.
-
You want to know what part of the code was violated. When told, your news source says it's BS so you believe it. What a sheep you are.WestlinnDuck said:The GAO comment is BS. Ball is still in your court, counselor. I pity your clients.
-
In the GOP, perjury concerning the President's sexual encounters is a threat to the Republic. The President withholding funds intended to assist a US ally in its defense against a foreign enemy as part of an extortion scheme to retain power is no big deal.2001400ex said:
You want to know what part of the code was violated. When told, your news source says it's BS so you believe it. What a sheep you are.WestlinnDuck said:The GAO comment is BS. Ball is still in your court, counselor. I pity your clients.
-
Supposed Ambulance chaser HUDS, puts his spin that is worthy of his “Gentle Giant” bullshit tale .😂😂😂
-
WSJ
Opinion: The GAO's Legal Conclusion is Wrong
https://www.wsj.com/video/opinion-the-gao-legal-conclusion-is-wrong/70BCEB53-88B7-4BA6-9677-5EF7D6F67CC3.html -
“In any event, even if the GAO were correct in its legal conclusion — which it is not— the alleged violation would be neither a crime nor an impeachable offense. It would be a civil violation subject to a civil remedy, as were the numerous violations alleged by the GAO with regard to other presidents. Those alleged violations were barely noted by the media. But in the hyper-partisan impeachment atmosphere, this report received breathless "breaking news" coverage and a demand for inclusion among the articles of impeachment.
If Congress and its GAO truly believe that President Trump violated the law, let them go to court and seek the civil remedy provided by the law. But let us not continue to water down the constitutional criteria for impeachment by including highly questionable, and on my view wrongheaded, views about violations of an unconstitutional civil law.”Alan Dershowitz -
Opinion: yes I'm sure people who don't like it have the opinion the conclusion is wrong. For example, you have the opinion that Biden is a criminal.DJDuck said:WSJ
Opinion: The GAO's Legal Conclusion is Wrong
https://www.wsj.com/video/opinion-the-gao-legal-conclusion-is-wrong/70BCEB53-88B7-4BA6-9677-5EF7D6F67CC3.html
