The fact that every time Trayvon comes up we get 6 pages of the same argument leads me to believe that the AIDS won
Again
What argument? We get Kunts who make shit up and believe their opinions are facts who obviously didn't follow the trial. My point from the very beginning is that for CC to talk about other people not being able to be objective about the Trayvon case is a fucking joke. He chased him with a gun!!!!
He had a gun, and the dispatcher told him to not pursue him. He ignored the dispatcher and found himself face to face with an unarmed 155 lb. kid, who kicked his ass.
Facts. Boom!
Like I said. Glad he’s dead. FTG
For walking? I thought you were a libertarian / classical liberal. He didn't do anything to be in the situation in which he found himself.
Didn't do nuffin. Except break a guys nose, and beat his head into the concrete side walk. Other than that, he didn't do anything.
I make it a rule in life, personally speaking, to not confront suspicious looking strangers unless I'm 100% confident I can whoop their ass with my fists. If you think you're gonna need to rely upon the gun to protect you it's better to call the cops and let them deal with it. If some comes into my home and threatens my family then Old Besty is waiting for them.
Or, even if you think you can, you might not be able to anyway, and even then, you call the cops, and when they tell you to stand down, because, you know, they have experience with shit like this and know shit like that can happen, you stand down.
And, of course, it should go w/o saying, but then again we're in the Tug, that coming into your home and seeking out the conflict are rather different scenarios, agreed?
But, but trial verdict, facebook, weed, thuggin'.
Dispatchers answer phones and talk on radio's. They have zero actual police experience.
Neither do neighborhood watch guys.
How would you get your set of "facts" into the record at trial?
You are confusing the questioning of the outcome of a jury trial with my opinion about the circumstances of what happened. They are very different different things. I don't spend a lot of energy worrying or second guessing the former. On that point, I guess, I recall some ls classmates who were at the time KC prosecutors tell me that the prosecution made a mistake going after 2nd degree and should have just settled on manslaughter. Something about the odds of the charge that should stick (manslaughter) going down when you also charge a higher offense (2nd) that has lower odds. Don't know, don't really care. Different thread.
I know what I know the same way you and Bob know that Zimmerman was in fear for his life and didn't engage the altercation.
I didn't read your other posts because I assume they all drive to the same point you're trying to make in this last one and thus are inapposite to my concerns.
Let's recap what happened. Trump starts trade war. Gives farmers bailouts that total our actual snap program spending that you hate. Signs an agreement that basically did nothing. And you stroke his dick as if he accomplished something for the country.
Let's recap what happened. Trump starts trade war. Gives farmers bailouts that total our actual snap program spending that you hate. Signs an agreement that basically did nothing. And you stroke his dick as if he accomplished something for the country.
We predicted you’d be angry. And you are.
I predicted your only response was to say I'm angry. And I was right.
The fact that every time Trayvon comes up we get 6 pages of the same argument leads me to believe that the AIDS won
Again
What argument? We get Kunts who make shit up and believe their opinions are facts who obviously didn't follow the trial. My point from the very beginning is that for CC to talk about other people not being able to be objective about the Trayvon case is a fucking joke. He chased him with a gun!!!!
He had a gun, and the dispatcher told him to not pursue him. He ignored the dispatcher and found himself face to face with an unarmed 155 lb. kid, who kicked his ass.
Facts. Boom!
Like I said. Glad he’s dead. FTG
For walking? I thought you were a libertarian / classical liberal. He didn't do anything to be in the situation in which he found himself.
Didn't do nuffin. Except break a guys nose, and beat his head into the concrete side walk. Other than that, he didn't do anything.
I make it a rule in life, personally speaking, to not confront suspicious looking strangers unless I'm 100% confident I can whoop their ass with my fists. If you think you're gonna need to rely upon the gun to protect you it's better to call the cops and let them deal with it. If some comes into my home and threatens my family then Old Besty is waiting for them.
Or, even if you think you can, you might not be able to anyway, and even then, you call the cops, and when they tell you to stand down, because, you know, they have experience with shit like this and know shit like that can happen, you stand down.
And, of course, it should go w/o saying, but then again we're in the Tug, that coming into your home and seeking out the conflict are rather different scenarios, agreed?
But, but trial verdict, facebook, weed, thuggin'.
Dispatchers answer phones and talk on radio's. They have zero actual police experience.
Neither do neighborhood watch guys.
How would you get your set of "facts" into the record at trial?
You are confusing the questioning of the outcome of a jury trial with my opinion about the circumstances of what happened. They are very different different things. I don't spend a lot of energy worrying or second guessing the former. On that point, I guess, I recall some ls classmates who were at the time KC prosecutors tell me that the prosecution made a mistake going after 2nd degree and should have just settled on manslaughter. Something about the odds of the charge that should stick (manslaughter) going down when you also charge a higher offense (2nd) that has lower odds. Don't know, don't really care. Different thread.
I know what I know the same way you and Bob know that Zimmerman was in fear for his life and didn't engage the altercation.
I didn't read your other posts because I assume they all drive to the same point you're trying to make in this last one and thus are inapposite to my concerns.
Copy it's all about your feelings and facts be damned. That's OK it's your life.
The fact that every time Trayvon comes up we get 6 pages of the same argument leads me to believe that the AIDS won
Again
What argument? We get Kunts who make shit up and believe their opinions are facts who obviously didn't follow the trial. My point from the very beginning is that for CC to talk about other people not being able to be objective about the Trayvon case is a fucking joke. He chased him with a gun!!!!
He had a gun, and the dispatcher told him to not pursue him. He ignored the dispatcher and found himself face to face with an unarmed 155 lb. kid, who kicked his ass.
Facts. Boom!
Like I said. Glad he’s dead. FTG
For walking? I thought you were a libertarian / classical liberal. He didn't do anything to be in the situation in which he found himself.
Didn't do nuffin. Except break a guys nose, and beat his head into the concrete side walk. Other than that, he didn't do anything.
I make it a rule in life, personally speaking, to not confront suspicious looking strangers unless I'm 100% confident I can whoop their ass with my fists. If you think you're gonna need to rely upon the gun to protect you it's better to call the cops and let them deal with it. If some comes into my home and threatens my family then Old Besty is waiting for them.
Or, even if you think you can, you might not be able to anyway, and even then, you call the cops, and when they tell you to stand down, because, you know, they have experience with shit like this and know shit like that can happen, you stand down.
And, of course, it should go w/o saying, but then again we're in the Tug, that coming into your home and seeking out the conflict are rather different scenarios, agreed?
But, but trial verdict, facebook, weed, thuggin'.
Dispatchers answer phones and talk on radio's. They have zero actual police experience.
Neither do neighborhood watch guys.
How would you get your set of "facts" into the record at trial?
You are confusing the questioning of the outcome of a jury trial with my opinion about the circumstances of what happened. They are very different different things. I don't spend a lot of energy worrying or second guessing the former. On that point, I guess, I recall some ls classmates who were at the time KC prosecutors tell me that the prosecution made a mistake going after 2nd degree and should have just settled on manslaughter. Something about the odds of the charge that should stick (manslaughter) going down when you also charge a higher offense (2nd) that has lower odds. Don't know, don't really care. Different thread.
I know what I know the same way you and Bob know that Zimmerman was in fear for his life and didn't engage the altercation.
I didn't read your other posts because I assume they all drive to the same point you're trying to make in this last one and thus are inapposite to my concerns.
Copy it's all about your feelings and facts be damned. That's OK it's your life.
10-4. But I think you are confused about what I wrote.
Comments
I know what I know the same way you and Bob know that Zimmerman was in fear for his life and didn't engage the altercation.
I didn't read your other posts because I assume they all drive to the same point you're trying to make in this last one and thus are inapposite to my concerns.