Sark on social media(Month old)
Comments
-
This. I've bee to frat bro parties at both UW and WSU. I would way rather go to UW and live in Seattle. Waking up on a Tuesday in Pullman has to be a terrible feeling, but it is easily better to go to and party. Way better girls as Orange noted, not as many academic squares.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
But it's way, wayyyy easier to bang drunk sluts at WSU than it is at the other in-state universities. Chicks that want to major in sex go to WSU. Was at a frat party there 4 years ago and could not believe how slutty the typical female there was. The frat bros there do well, if they can remember to wear condoms.CuntWaffle said:
There are a ton of places to visist for a weekend where you can get blacked out and bang sluts non stop. Almost every college in existance for starters.RoadDawg55 said:
Pullman is fucking awesome to visit for a weekend, but your post is pretty much spot on.CuntWaffle said:
Uhhh no they arent and no it isnt. Pullman is a fucking shithole and should be nuked and their football program has been an embarassment for a century.haie said:WSU is a good little team/school. The problem is that they sit and compare themselves to us instead of just liking their school and team for what it is.
Girls at WSU are also much hotter than your typical UW female. Fuck, the directional schools kill UW when it comes to dtf sloots.
-
Wulff won 4 games his last year. Leach won 3 the following year.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Uhhh...He_Needs_More_Time said:Remember Orange you have to win title game to be conference champion.
With this new format I don't know if WSU wins conference in 1997 or 2002. Remember they played ucla early in 1997. Ucla started 0-2 then won 20 games in a row.
In 2003 played USC early and USC lost one conference game the following 3 and a half years.
I think in a title game they lose the rematches.
I would take any bet that Leach never wins a conference title at wsu. End of the day he's 9-16 at wsu, Ty/Gilby were 7-16 after two years to illustrate how shitty he's doing.
Leach took over after fucking WULLF! dude. They had no good recruits when he got there, and recruiting to WSU is exponentially more difficult that recruiting to UW. Getting to a bowl game in his second season after inheriting that dumpster fire is impressive. He won't be a sub .500 coach there for long.
If WSU is good enough to get to the conference title game, they will have a chance to win that game, home or away. Would I put money down on WSU reaching the title game? No, but I wouldn't bet against them either.
-
I loved pointing that out to Coogs like CoogLJ. It would piss them off so much.sarktastic said:
Wulff won 4 games his last year. Leach won 3 the following year.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Uhhh...He_Needs_More_Time said:Remember Orange you have to win title game to be conference champion.
With this new format I don't know if WSU wins conference in 1997 or 2002. Remember they played ucla early in 1997. Ucla started 0-2 then won 20 games in a row.
In 2003 played USC early and USC lost one conference game the following 3 and a half years.
I think in a title game they lose the rematches.
I would take any bet that Leach never wins a conference title at wsu. End of the day he's 9-16 at wsu, Ty/Gilby were 7-16 after two years to illustrate how shitty he's doing.
Leach took over after fucking WULLF! dude. They had no good recruits when he got there, and recruiting to WSU is exponentially more difficult that recruiting to UW. Getting to a bowl game in his second season after inheriting that dumpster fire is impressive. He won't be a sub .500 coach there for long.
If WSU is good enough to get to the conference title game, they will have a chance to win that game, home or away. Would I put money down on WSU reaching the title game? No, but I wouldn't bet against them either. -
LEACHH!!1sarktastic said:
Wulff won 4 games his last year. Leach won 3 the following year.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Uhhh...He_Needs_More_Time said:Remember Orange you have to win title game to be conference champion.
With this new format I don't know if WSU wins conference in 1997 or 2002. Remember they played ucla early in 1997. Ucla started 0-2 then won 20 games in a row.
In 2003 played USC early and USC lost one conference game the following 3 and a half years.
I think in a title game they lose the rematches.
I would take any bet that Leach never wins a conference title at wsu. End of the day he's 9-16 at wsu, Ty/Gilby were 7-16 after two years to illustrate how shitty he's doing.
Leach took over after fucking WULLF! dude. They had no good recruits when he got there, and recruiting to WSU is exponentially more difficult that recruiting to UW. Getting to a bowl game in his second season after inheriting that dumpster fire is impressive. He won't be a sub .500 coach there for long.
If WSU is good enough to get to the conference title game, they will have a chance to win that game, home or away. Would I put money down on WSU reaching the title game? No, but I wouldn't bet against them either. -
I would love CoogLJs input on the New Mexico Bowel being the huge leach supporter he is.
-
Cool. Leach kicked half the Wullf recruits off the team when he took over, and over half of his starters were true sophs and freshman. Wulff won like 2 pac 12 games...Leach made a bowl game in his second year.sarktastic said:
Wulff won 4 games his last year. Leach won 3 the following year.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Uhhh...He_Needs_More_Time said:Remember Orange you have to win title game to be conference champion.
With this new format I don't know if WSU wins conference in 1997 or 2002. Remember they played ucla early in 1997. Ucla started 0-2 then won 20 games in a row.
In 2003 played USC early and USC lost one conference game the following 3 and a half years.
I think in a title game they lose the rematches.
I would take any bet that Leach never wins a conference title at wsu. End of the day he's 9-16 at wsu, Ty/Gilby were 7-16 after two years to illustrate how shitty he's doing.
Leach took over after fucking WULLF! dude. They had no good recruits when he got there, and recruiting to WSU is exponentially more difficult that recruiting to UW. Getting to a bowl game in his second season after inheriting that dumpster fire is impressive. He won't be a sub .500 coach there for long.
If WSU is good enough to get to the conference title game, they will have a chance to win that game, home or away. Would I put money down on WSU reaching the title game? No, but I wouldn't bet against them either.
Leach is better than you doogs give him credit for
-
Leach is better than you doogs give him credit for
I personally like the guy, but he's still the Pirate of Poop Island -
In all seriousness I expect WSU to have a good year this year.
I think UW wins rather easily 7 games on the schedule. WSU is one of the three swing games(Stanford and at Zona others) with two likely losses(ucla and Oregon). I expect to go 3-2 in those five games. -
He's big into brah bonding experiences:
-
Same. I think he's a funny guy and I loved hearing about him spraying water on players as they ran in the sand and had guys rolling in their own puke. I just don't think he is a very good coach. I also find it interesting that he preaches toughness yet runs the pussiest offense in all of college football. I hate watching WSU play. Watching them dink and dunk 70 times a game sucks.unfrozencaveman said:Leach is better than you doogs give him credit for
I personally like the guy, but he's still the Pirate of Poop Island
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
