Doug Chapman's piece was much better because instead of talking about subjective things like whether a team is buying in or not, he looks at Petersen's system and RESULTS:
"...I think Peterson is the guy to take the program to the next level...Petersen will be expected to pick up where Sark left off and do something that Sarkisian couldn’t - beat Oregon. Petersen is 2-0 versus the Ducks in his career and 8-2 against current Pac-12 schools and while at Boise State he had a knack for taking C+ recruits and getting A results."
"Worry not though Husky fans (talking about skill position losses), Petersen’s process worked at Boise State and you should have confidence it will at Washington. The man is a creative play caller and an excellent manager of young men, and UW fans will be happy for years to come."
Gotta love that his only two Pac-12 losses came in Husky Stadium and it will become an even tougher place to play now that he's the HC.
I fucking loved the part where 7 win steve suggests he just wants to get the fucking practice over as fast as possible... he says nobody wants to hang around for 3 hours losing interest.... yeah, like hey why train them to stay focused for 3 hours when games are 3+ hours long. fucking shit writes itself.
I am almost ready to buy season tickets for USC this year because this shit is going to be so fun to watch.
While this fluff piece is being written, we get fat curmudgeons like F3 writing an assessment of UW's spring for collegefootballnews.com and insinuating Peetamus is having a hard time getting players to buy into his style. How the fuck does fetters even know this?
Obviously the jury is still out because Petersen hasn't coached one game at the Pac-12 level, but if you just go by his record at Boise State compared to Sarkisian's relative mediocrity, you'd have to assume he'll be an upgrade.
[Teq: Thanks Fetters for stepping away from Doogman and Kim Jong Vino's obsession w/ Sark and pointing out that Sark was mediocre ... ]
So far through two weeks of spring everyone is saying the right things outwardly, but I still sense that not everyone has bought into what Petersen is selling. It's up to the senior leaders and captains to take hold, and however they have to sell it - a fresh start, more of the 'we all we got, we all we need' mantra, etc... - it doesn't really matter.
[Teq: Obligatory shot from F3 to redeem himself in the Doogman agenda ... changing culture is helped by player leadership obviously, but it's up to Petersen to sell the players that he knows what he's doing ... hard to imagine too many of the players not seeing that he doesn't given his results ... all comments so far have pointed to the players being on board]
Everybody else ... Washington upgraded with references of "Seven Win Steve," the program plateauing, and citing that Petersen coaches up his players.
While this fluff piece is being written, we get fat curmudgeons like F3 writing an assessment of UW's spring for collegefootballnews.com and insinuating Peetamus is having a hard time getting players to buy into his style. How the fuck does fetters even know this?
Obviously the jury is still out because Petersen hasn't coached one game at the Pac-12 level, but if you just go by his record at Boise State compared to Sarkisian's relative mediocrity, you'd have to assume he'll be an upgrade.
[Teq: Thanks Fetters for stepping away from Doogman and Kim Jong Vino's obsession w/ Sark and pointing out that Sark was mediocre ... ]
So far through two weeks of spring everyone is saying the right things outwardly, but I still sense that not everyone has bought into what Petersen is selling. It's up to the senior leaders and captains to take hold, and however they have to sell it - a fresh start, more of the 'we all we got, we all we need' mantra, etc... - it doesn't really matter.
[Teq: Obligatory shot from F3 to redeem himself in the Doogman agenda ... changing culture is helped by player leadership obviously, but it's up to Petersen to sell the players that he knows what he's doing ... hard to imagine too many of the players not seeing that he doesn't given his results ... all comments so far have pointed to the players being on board]
Everybody else ... Washington upgraded with references of "Seven Win Steve," the program plateauing, and citing that Petersen coaches up his players.
Gotta love how F3 is always consistent on being a passive aggressive cocksucker.
The players quotes seem like they've bought in and those who aren't bought in are the lazy fucking pussies who need to LEAVE! anyways.
While this fluff piece is being written, we get fat curmudgeons like F3 writing an assessment of UW's spring for collegefootballnews.com and insinuating Peetamus is having a hard time getting players to buy into his style. How the fuck does fetters even know this?
Obviously the jury is still out because Petersen hasn't coached one game at the Pac-12 level, but if you just go by his record at Boise State compared to Sarkisian's relative mediocrity, you'd have to assume he'll be an upgrade.
[Teq: Thanks Fetters for stepping away from Doogman and Kim Jong Vino's obsession w/ Sark and pointing out that Sark was mediocre ... ]
So far through two weeks of spring everyone is saying the right things outwardly, but I still sense that not everyone has bought into what Petersen is selling. It's up to the senior leaders and captains to take hold, and however they have to sell it - a fresh start, more of the 'we all we got, we all we need' mantra, etc... - it doesn't really matter.
[Teq: Obligatory shot from F3 to redeem himself in the Doogman agenda ... changing culture is helped by player leadership obviously, but it's up to Petersen to sell the players that he knows what he's doing ... hard to imagine too many of the players not seeing that he doesn't given his results ... all comments so far have pointed to the players being on board]
Everybody else ... Washington upgraded with references of "Seven Win Steve," the program plateauing, and citing that Petersen coaches up his players.
Gotta love how F3 is always consistent on being a passive aggressive cocksucker.
The players quotes seem like they've bought in and those who aren't bought in are the lazy fucking pussies who need to LEAVE! anyways.
it's just what F3 "is hearing" through those obestic ear canals
Just wait until he brings a tiger to practice. Then loses the game.
#sizzle
...by 5 fucking touchdowns.
41 to fucking 3 in year four and that 3 was only due to LSU fumbling the opening kickoff. Sark in year fucking four with a returning QB couldn't muster up jack shit on offense.
Still remember their DL celebrating over our OL like we were some Big Sky school. Fuck even North Texas and some other dog shit schools battled them a lot tougher than UW did.
The posters who weren't necessarily HHB's came over to the dark side after that game since Kim start nuking everyone in sight.
While this fluff piece is being written, we get fat curmudgeons like F3 writing an assessment of UW's spring for collegefootballnews.com and insinuating Peetamus is having a hard time getting players to buy into his style. How the fuck does fetters even know this?
Obviously the jury is still out because Petersen hasn't coached one game at the Pac-12 level, but if you just go by his record at Boise State compared to Sarkisian's relative mediocrity, you'd have to assume he'll be an upgrade.
[Teq: Thanks Fetters for stepping away from Doogman and Kim Jong Vino's obsession w/ Sark and pointing out that Sark was mediocre ... ]
So far through two weeks of spring everyone is saying the right things outwardly, but I still sense that not everyone has bought into what Petersen is selling. It's up to the senior leaders and captains to take hold, and however they have to sell it - a fresh start, more of the 'we all we got, we all we need' mantra, etc... - it doesn't really matter.
[Teq: Obligatory shot from F3 to redeem himself in the Doogman agenda ... changing culture is helped by player leadership obviously, but it's up to Petersen to sell the players that he knows what he's doing ... hard to imagine too many of the players not seeing that he doesn't given his results ... all comments so far have pointed to the players being on board]
Everybody else ... Washington upgraded with references of "Seven Win Steve," the program plateauing, and citing that Petersen coaches up his players.
Gotta love how F3 is always consistent on being a passive aggressive cocksucker.
The players quotes seem like they've bought in and those who aren't bought in are the lazy fucking pussies who need to LEAVE! anyways.
This and this again. What is the obsession with the players buying in? Buy in or hit the fucking gate. This guy is 92-12, not some jackass that bangs sloots and hits the bottle while going .500 in his career.
Just wait until he brings a tiger to practice. Then loses the game.
#sizzle
...by 5 fucking touchdowns.
41 to fucking 3 in year four and that 3 was only due to LSU fumbling the opening kickoff. Sark in year fucking four with a returning QB couldn't muster up jack shit on offense.
Still remember their DL celebrating over our OL like we were some Big Sky school. Fuck even North Texas and some other dog shit schools battled them a lot tougher than UW did.
The posters who weren't necessarily HHB's came over to the dark side after that game since Kim start nuking everyone in sight.
There really didn't seem to be that many from doogman. That game sealed it for me though. 2012 was the most boring season for me since 2008. I didn't even really care that we beat Stanford because it was such a shitty game and I knew we were going to get plungered by Oregon the next week.
While this fluff piece is being written, we get fat curmudgeons like F3 writing an assessment of UW's spring for collegefootballnews.com and insinuating Peetamus is having a hard time getting players to buy into his style. How the fuck does fetters even know this?
Obviously the jury is still out because Petersen hasn't coached one game at the Pac-12 level, but if you just go by his record at Boise State compared to Sarkisian's relative mediocrity, you'd have to assume he'll be an upgrade.
[Teq: Thanks Fetters for stepping away from Doogman and Kim Jong Vino's obsession w/ Sark and pointing out that Sark was mediocre ... ]
So far through two weeks of spring everyone is saying the right things outwardly, but I still sense that not everyone has bought into what Petersen is selling. It's up to the senior leaders and captains to take hold, and however they have to sell it - a fresh start, more of the 'we all we got, we all we need' mantra, etc... - it doesn't really matter.
[Teq: Obligatory shot from F3 to redeem himself in the Doogman agenda ... changing culture is helped by player leadership obviously, but it's up to Petersen to sell the players that he knows what he's doing ... hard to imagine too many of the players not seeing that he doesn't given his results ... all comments so far have pointed to the players being on board]
Everybody else ... Washington upgraded with references of "Seven Win Steve," the program plateauing, and citing that Petersen coaches up his players.
Gotta love how F3 is always consistent on being a passive aggressive cocksucker.
The players quotes seem like they've bought in and those who aren't bought in are the lazy fucking pussies who need to LEAVE! anyways.
it's just what F3 "is hearing" through those obestic ear canals
I doubt Sark will apply anything he should have learned from his UW experience.
Hes thinking that he got UW to be a top 20/25 team and that he'll recruit top 5 talent now and thats enough for USC to be back to being a top 5 program.
Comments
What a cool day for the Trojans, man.
"...I think Peterson is the guy to take the program to the next level...Petersen will be expected to pick up where Sark left off and do something that Sarkisian couldn’t - beat Oregon. Petersen is 2-0 versus the Ducks in his career and 8-2 against current Pac-12 schools and while at Boise State he had a knack for taking C+ recruits and getting A results."
"Worry not though Husky fans (talking about skill position losses), Petersen’s process worked at Boise State and you should have confidence it will at Washington. The man is a creative play caller and an excellent manager of young men, and UW fans will be happy for years to come."
Gotta love that his only two Pac-12 losses came in Husky Stadium and it will become an even tougher place to play now that he's the HC.
I am almost ready to buy season tickets for USC this year because this shit is going to be so fun to watch.
From F3:
Obviously the jury is still out because Petersen hasn't coached one game at the Pac-12 level, but if you just go by his record at Boise State compared to Sarkisian's relative mediocrity, you'd have to assume he'll be an upgrade.
[Teq: Thanks Fetters for stepping away from Doogman and Kim Jong Vino's obsession w/ Sark and pointing out that Sark was mediocre ... ]
So far through two weeks of spring everyone is saying the right things outwardly, but I still sense that not everyone has bought into what Petersen is selling. It's up to the senior leaders and captains to take hold, and however they have to sell it - a fresh start, more of the 'we all we got, we all we need' mantra, etc... - it doesn't really matter.
[Teq: Obligatory shot from F3 to redeem himself in the Doogman agenda ... changing culture is helped by player leadership obviously, but it's up to Petersen to sell the players that he knows what he's doing ... hard to imagine too many of the players not seeing that he doesn't given his results ... all comments so far have pointed to the players being on board]
Everybody else ... Washington upgraded with references of "Seven Win Steve," the program plateauing, and citing that Petersen coaches up his players.
The players quotes seem like they've bought in and those who aren't bought in are the lazy fucking pussies who need to LEAVE! anyways.
Still remember their DL celebrating over our OL like we were some Big Sky school. Fuck even North Texas and some other dog shit schools battled them a lot tougher than UW did.
The posters who weren't necessarily HHB's came over to the dark side after that game since Kim start nuking everyone in sight.
This and this again. What is the obsession with the players buying in? Buy in or hit the fucking gate. This guy is 92-12, not some jackass that bangs sloots and hits the bottle while going .500 in his career.
Hes thinking that he got UW to be a top 20/25 team and that he'll recruit top 5 talent now and thats enough for USC to be back to being a top 5 program.