Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Sarkisian winning over his players

13

Comments

  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,778
    I glanced over USC's upcoming class for 2015. 2 QBs, 1 WR. I know...it's awfully warm and shit. But still.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HFNY
    HFNY Member Posts: 5,587
    edited April 2014
    Doug Chapman's piece was much better because instead of talking about subjective things like whether a team is buying in or not, he looks at Petersen's system and RESULTS:

    "...I think Peterson is the guy to take the program to the next level...Petersen will be expected to pick up where Sark left off and do something that Sarkisian couldn’t - beat Oregon. Petersen is 2-0 versus the Ducks in his career and 8-2 against current Pac-12 schools and while at Boise State he had a knack for taking C+ recruits and getting A results."

    "Worry not though Husky fans (talking about skill position losses), Petersen’s process worked at Boise State and you should have confidence it will at Washington. The man is a creative play caller and an excellent manager of young men, and UW fans will be happy for years to come."

    Gotta love that his only two Pac-12 losses came in Husky Stadium and it will become an even tougher place to play now that he's the HC.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,259
    DugtheDoog said:

    While this fluff piece is being written, we get fat curmudgeons like F3 writing an assessment of UW's spring for collegefootballnews.com and insinuating Peetamus is having a hard time getting players to buy into his style. How the fuck does fetters even know this?

    This article delivers: http://cfn.scout.com/2/1388682.html

    From F3:

    Obviously the jury is still out because Petersen hasn't coached one game at the Pac-12 level, but if you just go by his record at Boise State compared to Sarkisian's relative mediocrity, you'd have to assume he'll be an upgrade.

    [Teq: Thanks Fetters for stepping away from Doogman and Kim Jong Vino's obsession w/ Sark and pointing out that Sark was mediocre ... ]

    So far through two weeks of spring everyone is saying the right things outwardly, but I still sense that not everyone has bought into what Petersen is selling. It's up to the senior leaders and captains to take hold, and however they have to sell it - a fresh start, more of the 'we all we got, we all we need' mantra, etc... - it doesn't really matter.

    [Teq: Obligatory shot from F3 to redeem himself in the Doogman agenda ... changing culture is helped by player leadership obviously, but it's up to Petersen to sell the players that he knows what he's doing ... hard to imagine too many of the players not seeing that he doesn't given his results ... all comments so far have pointed to the players being on board]

    Everybody else ... Washington upgraded with references of "Seven Win Steve," the program plateauing, and citing that Petersen coaches up his players.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    Tequilla said:

    DugtheDoog said:

    While this fluff piece is being written, we get fat curmudgeons like F3 writing an assessment of UW's spring for collegefootballnews.com and insinuating Peetamus is having a hard time getting players to buy into his style. How the fuck does fetters even know this?

    This article delivers: http://cfn.scout.com/2/1388682.html

    From F3:

    Obviously the jury is still out because Petersen hasn't coached one game at the Pac-12 level, but if you just go by his record at Boise State compared to Sarkisian's relative mediocrity, you'd have to assume he'll be an upgrade.

    [Teq: Thanks Fetters for stepping away from Doogman and Kim Jong Vino's obsession w/ Sark and pointing out that Sark was mediocre ... ]

    So far through two weeks of spring everyone is saying the right things outwardly, but I still sense that not everyone has bought into what Petersen is selling. It's up to the senior leaders and captains to take hold, and however they have to sell it - a fresh start, more of the 'we all we got, we all we need' mantra, etc... - it doesn't really matter.

    [Teq: Obligatory shot from F3 to redeem himself in the Doogman agenda ... changing culture is helped by player leadership obviously, but it's up to Petersen to sell the players that he knows what he's doing ... hard to imagine too many of the players not seeing that he doesn't given his results ... all comments so far have pointed to the players being on board]

    Everybody else ... Washington upgraded with references of "Seven Win Steve," the program plateauing, and citing that Petersen coaches up his players.

    Gotta love how F3 is always consistent on being a passive aggressive cocksucker.

    The players quotes seem like they've bought in and those who aren't bought in are the lazy fucking pussies who need to LEAVE! anyways.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Meek
    Meek Member Posts: 7,031
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    Tequilla said:

    DugtheDoog said:

    While this fluff piece is being written, we get fat curmudgeons like F3 writing an assessment of UW's spring for collegefootballnews.com and insinuating Peetamus is having a hard time getting players to buy into his style. How the fuck does fetters even know this?

    This article delivers: http://cfn.scout.com/2/1388682.html

    From F3:

    Obviously the jury is still out because Petersen hasn't coached one game at the Pac-12 level, but if you just go by his record at Boise State compared to Sarkisian's relative mediocrity, you'd have to assume he'll be an upgrade.

    [Teq: Thanks Fetters for stepping away from Doogman and Kim Jong Vino's obsession w/ Sark and pointing out that Sark was mediocre ... ]

    So far through two weeks of spring everyone is saying the right things outwardly, but I still sense that not everyone has bought into what Petersen is selling. It's up to the senior leaders and captains to take hold, and however they have to sell it - a fresh start, more of the 'we all we got, we all we need' mantra, etc... - it doesn't really matter.

    [Teq: Obligatory shot from F3 to redeem himself in the Doogman agenda ... changing culture is helped by player leadership obviously, but it's up to Petersen to sell the players that he knows what he's doing ... hard to imagine too many of the players not seeing that he doesn't given his results ... all comments so far have pointed to the players being on board]

    Everybody else ... Washington upgraded with references of "Seven Win Steve," the program plateauing, and citing that Petersen coaches up his players.

    Gotta love how F3 is always consistent on being a passive aggressive cocksucker.

    The players quotes seem like they've bought in and those who aren't bought in are the lazy fucking pussies who need to LEAVE! anyways.
    it's just what F3 "is hearing" through those obestic ear canals
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BayDawg
    BayDawg Member Posts: 1,623
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    Tequilla said:

    DugtheDoog said:

    While this fluff piece is being written, we get fat curmudgeons like F3 writing an assessment of UW's spring for collegefootballnews.com and insinuating Peetamus is having a hard time getting players to buy into his style. How the fuck does fetters even know this?

    This article delivers: http://cfn.scout.com/2/1388682.html

    From F3:

    Obviously the jury is still out because Petersen hasn't coached one game at the Pac-12 level, but if you just go by his record at Boise State compared to Sarkisian's relative mediocrity, you'd have to assume he'll be an upgrade.

    [Teq: Thanks Fetters for stepping away from Doogman and Kim Jong Vino's obsession w/ Sark and pointing out that Sark was mediocre ... ]

    So far through two weeks of spring everyone is saying the right things outwardly, but I still sense that not everyone has bought into what Petersen is selling. It's up to the senior leaders and captains to take hold, and however they have to sell it - a fresh start, more of the 'we all we got, we all we need' mantra, etc... - it doesn't really matter.

    [Teq: Obligatory shot from F3 to redeem himself in the Doogman agenda ... changing culture is helped by player leadership obviously, but it's up to Petersen to sell the players that he knows what he's doing ... hard to imagine too many of the players not seeing that he doesn't given his results ... all comments so far have pointed to the players being on board]

    Everybody else ... Washington upgraded with references of "Seven Win Steve," the program plateauing, and citing that Petersen coaches up his players.

    Gotta love how F3 is always consistent on being a passive aggressive cocksucker.

    The players quotes seem like they've bought in and those who aren't bought in are the lazy fucking pussies who need to LEAVE! anyways.

    This and this again. What is the obsession with the players buying in? Buy in or hit the fucking gate. This guy is 92-12, not some jackass that bangs sloots and hits the bottle while going .500 in his career.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter