Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Perfect answer from Jimmy

sonics1993
sonics1993 Member Posts: 1,460
edited December 2019 in Hardcore Husky Board
Asked Jimmy Lake what his message has been to UW's offensive commits, when system/staffing questions linger past signing day. His response: He talked about built for life, our culture, his aggressive philosophy and stayed away from what type of plays we will be running.

Comments

  • whuggy
    whuggy Member Posts: 2,088

    Asked Jimmy Lake what his message has been to UW's offensive commits, when system/staffing questions linger past signing day. His response: He talked about built for life, our culture, his aggressive philosophy and stayed away from what type of plays we will be running. Bush is gone.

    If you could only shitcan one, Bush or Gregory? And why.
  • whuggy
    whuggy Member Posts: 2,088

    whuggy said:

    Asked Jimmy Lake what his message has been to UW's offensive commits, when system/staffing questions linger past signing day. His response: He talked about built for life, our culture, his aggressive philosophy and stayed away from what type of plays we will be running. Bush is gone.

    If you could only shitcan one, Bush or Gregory? And why.
    Bush because the OC will now run the offense now that Jimmy is in charge and in no way is Bush ready or capable of that right now. We can get by with Bob as the linebacker coach but we can't with Bush as the OC.
    Heard any possible OC names out there? Chip Long?
  • sonics1993
    sonics1993 Member Posts: 1,460
    whuggy said:

    whuggy said:

    Asked Jimmy Lake what his message has been to UW's offensive commits, when system/staffing questions linger past signing day. His response: He talked about built for life, our culture, his aggressive philosophy and stayed away from what type of plays we will be running. Bush is gone.

    If you could only shitcan one, Bush or Gregory? And why.
    Bush because the OC will now run the offense now that Jimmy is in charge and in no way is Bush ready or capable of that right now. We can get by with Bob as the linebacker coach but we can't with Bush as the OC.
    Heard any possible OC names out there? Chip Long?
    I have heard a couple of names but no talks have begun yet. After the bowl game is when you will see the firings happen and that's when things will start to pick up.
  • whuggy
    whuggy Member Posts: 2,088
    DoogDawg said:



    The fact that Lake won't just tell Garbers that Bush is coming back means he's obviously not coming back.
    I

    whuggy said:

    Asked Jimmy Lake what his message has been to UW's offensive commits, when system/staffing questions linger past signing day. His response: He talked about built for life, our culture, his aggressive philosophy and stayed away from what type of plays we will be running. Bush is gone.

    If you could only shitcan one, Bush or Gregory? And why.
    Bush because the OC will now run the offense now that Jimmy is in charge and in no way is Bush ready or capable of that right now. We can get by with Bob as the linebacker coach but we can't with Bush as the OC.
    Possible Bush gets one year as QB coach with a new OC?
  • NoWarningJustDawg
    NoWarningJustDawg Member Posts: 1,000
    DoogDawg said:



    The fact that Lake won't just tell Garbers that Bush is coming back means he's obviously not coming back.

    "b/c I love Seattle, I love the school and I love football."

    Lack of USC offer making more sense. 1/3 won't cut it.
    #FaithFamilyFootball
  • whuggy
    whuggy Member Posts: 2,088
    DoogDawg said:

    whuggy said:

    DoogDawg said:



    The fact that Lake won't just tell Garbers that Bush is coming back means he's obviously not coming back.
    I

    whuggy said:

    Asked Jimmy Lake what his message has been to UW's offensive commits, when system/staffing questions linger past signing day. His response: He talked about built for life, our culture, his aggressive philosophy and stayed away from what type of plays we will be running. Bush is gone.

    If you could only shitcan one, Bush or Gregory? And why.
    Bush because the OC will now run the offense now that Jimmy is in charge and in no way is Bush ready or capable of that right now. We can get by with Bob as the linebacker coach but we can't with Bush as the OC.
    Possible Bush gets one year as QB coach with a new OC?
    I don't want Bush anywhere near our QBs. Browning and Eason both regressed under his tutelage. Bush was a fantastic WR coach when he inherited Ross and Pettis. That's about all he's proven. And I don't see how you can demote a coach and think that will work. Either Bush calls plays or he sells the couch. I'd prefer the latter.
    Not endorsing it just wondering if it's a scenario. Don't think Huard is tied to him but you never know.
  • MontlakeBridgeTroll
    MontlakeBridgeTroll Member Posts: 925
    edited December 2019
    whuggy said:

    whuggy said:

    Asked Jimmy Lake what his message has been to UW's offensive commits, when system/staffing questions linger past signing day. His response: He talked about built for life, our culture, his aggressive philosophy and stayed away from what type of plays we will be running. Bush is gone.

    If you could only shitcan one, Bush or Gregory? And why.
    Bush because the OC will now run the offense now that Jimmy is in charge and in no way is Bush ready or capable of that right now. We can get by with Bob as the linebacker coach but we can't with Bush as the OC.
    Heard any possible OC names out there? Chip Long?
    I know nothing but I've been suggesting this guy for a couple of years now, even before we hired Bush

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Horton

    He isn't a hot rising star, but he has a lot of experience in college and the NFL and does good things at SDSU with less talent than we have.

    When he was the QB coach at Wisconsin:
    "The quarterbacks during his tenure (Jim Sorgi, Brooks Bollinger, and John Stocco), rank first, second, and fourth in Badgers history in passing yards."

    He was also an OL coach in the NFL for the Rams, and did a great job developing some RBs at SDSU as the OC.

    Experienced enough to run a good offense without an offensive minded HC.


  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744

    whuggy said:

    whuggy said:

    Asked Jimmy Lake what his message has been to UW's offensive commits, when system/staffing questions linger past signing day. His response: He talked about built for life, our culture, his aggressive philosophy and stayed away from what type of plays we will be running. Bush is gone.

    If you could only shitcan one, Bush or Gregory? And why.
    Bush because the OC will now run the offense now that Jimmy is in charge and in no way is Bush ready or capable of that right now. We can get by with Bob as the linebacker coach but we can't with Bush as the OC.
    Heard any possible OC names out there? Chip Long?
    I know nothing but I've been suggesting this guy for a couple of years now, even before we hired Bush

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Horton

    He isn't a hot rising star, but he has a lot of experience in college and the NFL and does good things at SDSU with less talent than we have.

    When he was the QB coach at Wisconsin:
    "The quarterbacks during his tenure (Jim Sorgi, Brooks Bollinger, and John Stocco), rank first, second, and fourth in Badgers history in passing yards."

    He was also an OL coach in the NFL for the Rams, and did a great job developing some RBs at SDSU as the OC.

    Experienced enough to run a good offense without an offensive minded HC.


    Hard pass on a guy who flamed out as a head coach before fudgepacker was even born and whose most notable stint this millennium is coaching QBs at the one school in the nation that gives zero fucks about the qb position.
  • backthepack
    backthepack Member Posts: 19,937

    whuggy said:

    whuggy said:

    Asked Jimmy Lake what his message has been to UW's offensive commits, when system/staffing questions linger past signing day. His response: He talked about built for life, our culture, his aggressive philosophy and stayed away from what type of plays we will be running. Bush is gone.

    If you could only shitcan one, Bush or Gregory? And why.
    Bush because the OC will now run the offense now that Jimmy is in charge and in no way is Bush ready or capable of that right now. We can get by with Bob as the linebacker coach but we can't with Bush as the OC.
    Heard any possible OC names out there? Chip Long?
    I know nothing but I've been suggesting this guy for a couple of years now, even before we hired Bush

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Horton

    He isn't a hot rising star, but he has a lot of experience in college and the NFL and does good things at SDSU with less talent than we have.

    When he was the QB coach at Wisconsin:
    "The quarterbacks during his tenure (Jim Sorgi, Brooks Bollinger, and John Stocco), rank first, second, and fourth in Badgers history in passing yards."

    He was also an OL coach in the NFL for the Rams, and did a great job developing some RBs at SDSU as the OC.

    Experienced enough to run a good offense without an offensive minded HC.


    Lets go from archaic offense to another! Great fucking idea!
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,962 Founders Club
    We are Wisconsin

    Did Horton hear a Who?
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,739 Founders Club
    Logically better to remove Bush than Gregory if you can only fire one. But goddamnit Gregory just sucks the life out of me. Please for the love of god fire both. And can we swing for the fences and get a legit OC for once? Christ. If we hire anyone who has ever worked for Peterman before i am burning my trailer to the ground.
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,444 Founders Club
    DoogDawg said:

    whuggy said:

    DoogDawg said:



    The fact that Lake won't just tell Garbers that Bush is coming back means he's obviously not coming back.
    I

    whuggy said:

    Asked Jimmy Lake what his message has been to UW's offensive commits, when system/staffing questions linger past signing day. His response: He talked about built for life, our culture, his aggressive philosophy and stayed away from what type of plays we will be running. Bush is gone.

    If you could only shitcan one, Bush or Gregory? And why.
    Bush because the OC will now run the offense now that Jimmy is in charge and in no way is Bush ready or capable of that right now. We can get by with Bob as the linebacker coach but we can't with Bush as the OC.
    Possible Bush gets one year as QB coach with a new OC?
    I don't want Bush anywhere near our QBs. Browning and Eason both regressed under his tutelage. Bush was a fantastic WR coach when he inherited Ross and Pettis. That's about all he's proven. And I don't see how you can demote a coach and think that will work. Either Bush calls plays or he sells the couch. I'd prefer the latter.
    What if the problem was Pete and not Hamden?
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    whuggy said:

    whuggy said:

    Asked Jimmy Lake what his message has been to UW's offensive commits, when system/staffing questions linger past signing day. His response: He talked about built for life, our culture, his aggressive philosophy and stayed away from what type of plays we will be running. Bush is gone.

    If you could only shitcan one, Bush or Gregory? And why.
    Bush because the OC will now run the offense now that Jimmy is in charge and in no way is Bush ready or capable of that right now. We can get by with Bob as the linebacker coach but we can't with Bush as the OC.
    Heard any possible OC names out there? Chip Long?
    I have heard a couple of names but no talks have begun yet. After the bowl game is when you will see the firings happen and that's when things will start to pick up.
    Things will get crazy after the bowl game?
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,444 Founders Club
    Swaye said:

    Logically better to remove Bush than Gregory if you can only fire one. But goddamnit Gregory just sucks the life out of me. Please for the love of god fire both. And can we swing for the fences and get a legit OC for once? Christ. If we hire anyone who has ever worked for Peterman before i am burning my trailer to the ground.

    Are you gonna then move into Fudgie's mom's basement?
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,444 Founders Club

    DoogDawg said:

    whuggy said:

    DoogDawg said:



    The fact that Lake won't just tell Garbers that Bush is coming back means he's obviously not coming back.
    I

    whuggy said:

    Asked Jimmy Lake what his message has been to UW's offensive commits, when system/staffing questions linger past signing day. His response: He talked about built for life, our culture, his aggressive philosophy and stayed away from what type of plays we will be running. Bush is gone.

    If you could only shitcan one, Bush or Gregory? And why.
    Bush because the OC will now run the offense now that Jimmy is in charge and in no way is Bush ready or capable of that right now. We can get by with Bob as the linebacker coach but we can't with Bush as the OC.
    Possible Bush gets one year as QB coach with a new OC?
    I don't want Bush anywhere near our QBs. Browning and Eason both regressed under his tutelage. Bush was a fantastic WR coach when he inherited Ross and Pettis. That's about all he's proven. And I don't see how you can demote a coach and think that will work. Either Bush calls plays or he sells the couch. I'd prefer the latter.
    What if the problem was Pete and not Hamden?
    It was both. Pete’s offense sucked but Hamdan sucks at in game play calling. At least Smiff had the aptitude for in game play calling.
    But did we know that about Smith when he was here?
  • MisterEm
    MisterEm Member Posts: 6,685

    DoogDawg said:

    whuggy said:

    DoogDawg said:



    The fact that Lake won't just tell Garbers that Bush is coming back means he's obviously not coming back.
    I

    whuggy said:

    Asked Jimmy Lake what his message has been to UW's offensive commits, when system/staffing questions linger past signing day. His response: He talked about built for life, our culture, his aggressive philosophy and stayed away from what type of plays we will be running. Bush is gone.

    If you could only shitcan one, Bush or Gregory? And why.
    Bush because the OC will now run the offense now that Jimmy is in charge and in no way is Bush ready or capable of that right now. We can get by with Bob as the linebacker coach but we can't with Bush as the OC.
    Possible Bush gets one year as QB coach with a new OC?
    I don't want Bush anywhere near our QBs. Browning and Eason both regressed under his tutelage. Bush was a fantastic WR coach when he inherited Ross and Pettis. That's about all he's proven. And I don't see how you can demote a coach and think that will work. Either Bush calls plays or he sells the couch. I'd prefer the latter.
    What if the problem was Pete and not Hamden?
    Selective memory.

    The offense has indeed been shit during Pete's entire tenure.
  • WilburHooksHands
    WilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,804
    DoogDawg said:



    The fact that Lake won't just tell Garbers that Bush is coming back means he's obviously not coming back.
    That was Bush himself telling that to Garbers which means his couch is already sold.
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165
    DoogDawg said:



    The fact that Lake won't just tell Garbers that Bush is coming back means he's obviously not coming back.
    Sounds like Bush is getting a nice severance to stay on and butter up recruits while selling them on a UW without him. Probably an easy job.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839

    DoogDawg said:

    whuggy said:

    DoogDawg said:



    The fact that Lake won't just tell Garbers that Bush is coming back means he's obviously not coming back.
    I

    whuggy said:

    Asked Jimmy Lake what his message has been to UW's offensive commits, when system/staffing questions linger past signing day. His response: He talked about built for life, our culture, his aggressive philosophy and stayed away from what type of plays we will be running. Bush is gone.

    If you could only shitcan one, Bush or Gregory? And why.
    Bush because the OC will now run the offense now that Jimmy is in charge and in no way is Bush ready or capable of that right now. We can get by with Bob as the linebacker coach but we can't with Bush as the OC.
    Possible Bush gets one year as QB coach with a new OC?
    I don't want Bush anywhere near our QBs. Browning and Eason both regressed under his tutelage. Bush was a fantastic WR coach when he inherited Ross and Pettis. That's about all he's proven. And I don't see how you can demote a coach and think that will work. Either Bush calls plays or he sells the couch. I'd prefer the latter.
    What if the problem was Pete and not Hamden?
    WhyNotBoth.gif