Watching the vote
Comments
-
You are seriously upset cause they voted today instead of yesterday? The meltdown has started.DoogieMcDoogerson said:They go immediately to the vote. Seriously, they couldn't have "squeezed this in" last night? What a bunch of fucking losers.
-
The grandstanding is real. There’s no turning back now as the House will have enough votes to impeach. They are humping their last 15 minutes of fame hard. For come late January, the Party will be over.DoogieMcDoogerson said:They go immediately to the vote. Seriously, they couldn't have "squeezed this in" last night? What a bunch of fucking losers.
-
If there was even a hint of non-partisan behavior, this whole charade would have a much better chance of success. Instead they all want to be lead dog in the TDS parade.salemcoog said:
The grandstanding is real. There’s no turning back now as the House will have enough votes to impeach. They are humping their last 15 minutes of fame hard. For come late January, the Party will be over.DoogieMcDoogerson said:They go immediately to the vote. Seriously, they couldn't have "squeezed this in" last night? What a bunch of fucking losers.
The left is fuckingly stupid in how they cloak their coupe. Even Hedake Smith knew enough to pick his spot when throwing games.
-
With luck, this impeachment charade will result in the implementation of term limits for both the House and Senate. No more career politicians playing politics with the law.
-
They should drag the Senate trial on for months and expose very ounce of corruption. Get Schitt under oath. Hunter and Joe ... Let the American people see the truth in all its reverential glorysalemcoog said:
The grandstanding is real. There’s no turning back now as the House will have enough votes to impeach. They are humping their last 15 minutes of fame hard. For come late January, the Party will be over.DoogieMcDoogerson said:They go immediately to the vote. Seriously, they couldn't have "squeezed this in" last night? What a bunch of fucking losers.
-
We can only hope. But the question is: who will lead that charge? The parties don't want it because it ruins their cash machine. The media doesn't want it because they red v. blue draws viewers. It's going to take some sort of Ross Perot kind of guy with a ridiculous amount of money and a passion for the cause to carry the banner.USMChawk said:With luck, this impeachment charade will result in the implementation of term limits for both the House and Senate. No more career politicians playing politics with the law.
-
A billionaire who has an axe to grind against a corrupt system. Where could we (?) find such a guy?PurpleThrobber said:
We can only hope. But the question is: who will lead that charge? The parties don't want it because it ruins their cash machine. The media doesn't want it because they red v. blue draws viewers. It's going to take some sort of Ross Perot kind of guy with a ridiculous amount of money and a passion for the cause to carry the banner.USMChawk said:With luck, this impeachment charade will result in the implementation of term limits for both the House and Senate. No more career politicians playing politics with the law.
-
Term limits would be auce. Thought I’d try to bring that word back.USMChawk said:With luck, this impeachment charade will result in the implementation of term limits for both the House and Senate. No more career politicians playing politics with the law.
The sad part is that Trump couldn’t do it for the simple fact that the Dems wouldn’t give him the votes.
I mean if Trump proposed the Green New Deal, they wouldn’t vote for it. -
The Republicans wouldn't give him the votes eithersalemcoog said:
Term limits would be auce. Thought I’d try to bring that word back.USMChawk said:With luck, this impeachment charade will result in the implementation of term limits for both the House and Senate. No more career politicians playing politics with the law.
The sad part is that Trump couldn’t do it for the simple fact that the Dems wouldn’t give him the votes.
I mean if Trump proposed the Green New Deal, they wouldn’t vote for it. -
Trump is, after all, a DemocratDerekJohnson said:
The Republicans wouldn't give him the votes eithersalemcoog said:
Term limits would be auce. Thought I’d try to bring that word back.USMChawk said:With luck, this impeachment charade will result in the implementation of term limits for both the House and Senate. No more career politicians playing politics with the law.
The sad part is that Trump couldn’t do it for the simple fact that the Dems wouldn’t give him the votes.
I mean if Trump proposed the Green New Deal, they wouldn’t vote for it. -
Trump is his own categoryGrundleStiltzkin said:
Trump is, after all, a DemocratDerekJohnson said:
The Republicans wouldn't give him the votes eithersalemcoog said:
Term limits would be auce. Thought I’d try to bring that word back.USMChawk said:With luck, this impeachment charade will result in the implementation of term limits for both the House and Senate. No more career politicians playing politics with the law.
The sad part is that Trump couldn’t do it for the simple fact that the Dems wouldn’t give him the votes.
I mean if Trump proposed the Green New Deal, they wouldn’t vote for it.
