Impeachment
Comments
-
The White House released the transcript. Don’t quit your day job, Mr. Mason.pawz said:
4th party word of mouth is accepted as evidence? In which situation/conditions? Legally speaking.HHusky said:
Feel free to cite the evidentiary failure. It would be so unlike you just to be running your mouth.pawz said:
Coming from a family of attorneys, I know they cover evidentiary standards in law school. So you must have been sick the entire first year?HHusky said:
I agree Daddy himself released the transcript showing he used the aid to extract a personal “favor”. No mystery or intrigue. Open and shut. But not sexy. Just garden variety corruption.Pitchfork51 said:Dems fucked up when they gave up on Russia and pivoted to Ukraine
Russia was at least juicy. They are an enemy and no matter how preposterous as least it piqued some interest.
He's a Russian asset! That sells papers.
But Ukraine? Withholding aid? Some random ambassador? Hunter Biden?
No one cares about this shit.
"He's still a Russian asset! But we kinda gave up on it! But Ukraine!!!"
Do tell, *ahem counselor.
-
Exactly. Yet you continue to blather on like a fool.HHusky said:
The White House released the transcript. Don’t quit your day job, Mr. Mason.pawz said:
4th party word of mouth is accepted as evidence? In which situation/conditions? Legally speaking.HHusky said:
Feel free to cite the evidentiary failure. It would be so unlike you just to be running your mouth.pawz said:
Coming from a family of attorneys, I know they cover evidentiary standards in law school. So you must have been sick the entire first year?HHusky said:
I agree Daddy himself released the transcript showing he used the aid to extract a personal “favor”. No mystery or intrigue. Open and shut. But not sexy. Just garden variety corruption.Pitchfork51 said:Dems fucked up when they gave up on Russia and pivoted to Ukraine
Russia was at least juicy. They are an enemy and no matter how preposterous as least it piqued some interest.
He's a Russian asset! That sells papers.
But Ukraine? Withholding aid? Some random ambassador? Hunter Biden?
No one cares about this shit.
"He's still a Russian asset! But we kinda gave up on it! But Ukraine!!!"
Do tell, *ahem counselor.
It seems like we are done here. -
I guess we know why you didn’t enter the family business.pawz said:
Exactly. Yet you continue to blather on like a fool.HHusky said:
The White House released the transcript. Don’t quit your day job, Mr. Mason.pawz said:
4th party word of mouth is accepted as evidence? In which situation/conditions? Legally speaking.HHusky said:
Feel free to cite the evidentiary failure. It would be so unlike you just to be running your mouth.pawz said:
Coming from a family of attorneys, I know they cover evidentiary standards in law school. So you must have been sick the entire first year?HHusky said:
I agree Daddy himself released the transcript showing he used the aid to extract a personal “favor”. No mystery or intrigue. Open and shut. But not sexy. Just garden variety corruption.Pitchfork51 said:Dems fucked up when they gave up on Russia and pivoted to Ukraine
Russia was at least juicy. They are an enemy and no matter how preposterous as least it piqued some interest.
He's a Russian asset! That sells papers.
But Ukraine? Withholding aid? Some random ambassador? Hunter Biden?
No one cares about this shit.
"He's still a Russian asset! But we kinda gave up on it! But Ukraine!!!"
Do tell, *ahem counselor.
It seems like we are done here.
-
Swing and a miss. Again.HHusky said:
I guess we know why you didn’t enter the family business.pawz said:
Exactly. Yet you continue to blather on like a fool.HHusky said:
The White House released the transcript. Don’t quit your day job, Mr. Mason.pawz said:
4th party word of mouth is accepted as evidence? In which situation/conditions? Legally speaking.HHusky said:
Feel free to cite the evidentiary failure. It would be so unlike you just to be running your mouth.pawz said:
Coming from a family of attorneys, I know they cover evidentiary standards in law school. So you must have been sick the entire first year?HHusky said:
I agree Daddy himself released the transcript showing he used the aid to extract a personal “favor”. No mystery or intrigue. Open and shut. But not sexy. Just garden variety corruption.Pitchfork51 said:Dems fucked up when they gave up on Russia and pivoted to Ukraine
Russia was at least juicy. They are an enemy and no matter how preposterous as least it piqued some interest.
He's a Russian asset! That sells papers.
But Ukraine? Withholding aid? Some random ambassador? Hunter Biden?
No one cares about this shit.
"He's still a Russian asset! But we kinda gave up on it! But Ukraine!!!"
Do tell, *ahem counselor.
It seems like we are done here.
At least you are diligent. Diligently naive, *ahem* counselor. -
HH thinks asking for investigations via the attorney general is illegal.
-
Any investigation that makes a liberal's snatch sore is illegal. It's right there in the Federal Code.Sledog said:HH thinks asking for investigations via the attorney general is illegal.
-
Yeah, only the Ukrainian President who seems to be a straight shooter has repeatedly claimed there was no "shakedown" (is that the latest dem focus grouped word you rats want to use?). But you and your dem buddies keep on keeping the lie going HH. Its what you rats do, you lie.HHusky said:
The shakedown is very obvious. The facts are clear; the proffered innocent explanations for holding up Ukraine’s aid are preposterous.RaceBannon said:If this "shake down" is so obvious you wouldn't have to imagine it at all
-
Umm.......with holding aid has been a hammer for every President in your life time. If you think they go running to congress every time they need to use that hammer you are sorely mistaken.HHusky said:
Congress provided military aid. Daddy withheld it—and without a word to Congress. That in itself was illegal. But people from both parties came to wonder why the aid wasn’t being sent and Daddy, rather than defending his actions, caved when caught. All obvious hallmarks of total innocence, of course.WestlinnDuck said:The working leftard position was that Trump should be impeached for Russian collusion paid for by PIPS and with false information supplied by Russian intelligence and with information to be gathered with FISA warrants secured by supplying the court with false statements. The leftards next position is that there was nothing wrong with the corrupt Ukrainian gas company paying off the Biden family with millions of dollars paid to a cokehead who knew nothing about the energy industry. In fact, Biden bragged about the threat to hold up aid if the prosecutor looking into Burisma and Hunter corruption if the Ukrainian government didn’t fire the prosecutor – which they did. Pro- Russian Ukrainians were also involved with releasing documents involving Trump campaign officials.
So, it’s okay for leftards to investigate supposed corruption of Trump in 2016 but it’s not okay to investigate real dem corruption in 2016. Biden counseled against providing military aid. Trump provided military aid. And yet, Trump is still alleged by leftards to be Putin’s bitch.
But lets get back to biden and his threats to the Ukraine, you know that episode where his corrupt son was being investigated and biden told Ukraine they wouldn't get any money if they didn't call off the prosecutor? Biden bragged about it and not a peep from you or your liberal rat buddies. Why is that HH? Why do you think your rat leaders have no interest in pursuing biden and his clear as day corruption?
The facts are that you and your elitist rat leaders have no integrity or honesty. Due to those missing positive attributes, what you all think about Trump means nothing. You said you were going to impeach him before he even took office and now you are going to go through with it. You can quit trying to make up lies and ignoring your sides clear corruption. You got it done, celebrate it HH. Shout it from the highest roof top. You people accomplished your goal that was set before he was even President. You should be proud.
Now on to the senate where you lying libs will be squashed and when Trump wins in 2020 it is all of us on the other side that will relish the lefts meltdown. The emotional rat drama in all its glory. The tears, the protests, the hissy fits, the face down kicking and screaming that is always association with spoiled liberal children when they don't get their way. But for now be proud of yourselves HH. You finally accomplished your goal pre General election goal from all the way back in 2016. And like I said, now you don't have to make shit up or lie all the time defending your made up impeachment of Trump. Go have fun. -
For 45 years the law has required they “run to Congress” if they want to withhold aid. The secrecy surrounding this withholding does not imply an innocent purpose. You are free to prefer a monarchy. I don’t.Bendintheriver said:
Umm.......with holding aid has been a hammer for every President in your life time. If you think they go running to congress every time they need to use that hammer you are sorely mistaken.HHusky said:
Congress provided military aid. Daddy withheld it—and without a word to Congress. That in itself was illegal. But people from both parties came to wonder why the aid wasn’t being sent and Daddy, rather than defending his actions, caved when caught. All obvious hallmarks of total innocence, of course.WestlinnDuck said:The working leftard position was that Trump should be impeached for Russian collusion paid for by PIPS and with false information supplied by Russian intelligence and with information to be gathered with FISA warrants secured by supplying the court with false statements. The leftards next position is that there was nothing wrong with the corrupt Ukrainian gas company paying off the Biden family with millions of dollars paid to a cokehead who knew nothing about the energy industry. In fact, Biden bragged about the threat to hold up aid if the prosecutor looking into Burisma and Hunter corruption if the Ukrainian government didn’t fire the prosecutor – which they did. Pro- Russian Ukrainians were also involved with releasing documents involving Trump campaign officials.
So, it’s okay for leftards to investigate supposed corruption of Trump in 2016 but it’s not okay to investigate real dem corruption in 2016. Biden counseled against providing military aid. Trump provided military aid. And yet, Trump is still alleged by leftards to be Putin’s bitch.
But lets get back to biden and his threats to the Ukraine, you know that episode where his corrupt son was being investigated and biden told Ukraine they wouldn't get any money if they didn't call off the prosecutor? Biden bragged about it and not a peep from you or your liberal rat buddies. Why is that HH? Why do you think your rat leaders have no interest in pursuing biden and his clear as day corruption?
The facts are that you and your elitist rat leaders have no integrity or honesty. Due to those missing positive attributes, what you all think about Trump means nothing. You said you were going to impeach him before he even took office and now you are going to go through with it. You can quit trying to make up lies and ignoring your sides clear corruption. You got it done, celebrate it HH. Shout it from the highest roof top. You people accomplished your goal that was set before he was even President. You should be proud.
Now on to the senate where you lying libs will be squashed and when Trump wins in 2020 it is all of us on the other side that will relish the lefts meltdown. The emotional rat drama in all its glory. The tears, the protests, the hissy fits, the face down kicking and screaming that is always association with spoiled liberal children when they don't get their way. But for now be proud of yourselves HH. You finally accomplished your goal pre General election goal from all the way back in 2016. And like I said, now you don't have to make shit up or lie all the time defending your made up impeachment of Trump. Go have fun. -
You should always take the hostage’s statement that he’s okay at face value, of course.Bendintheriver said:
Yeah, only the Ukrainian President who seems to be a straight shooter has repeatedly claimed there was no "shakedown" (is that the latest dem focus grouped word you rats want to use?). But you and your dem buddies keep on keeping the lie going HH. Its what you rats do, you lie.HHusky said:
The shakedown is very obvious. The facts are clear; the proffered innocent explanations for holding up Ukraine’s aid are preposterous.RaceBannon said:If this "shake down" is so obvious you wouldn't have to imagine it at all
