Leftards lie and love to be lied to
Comments
-
Can a dem impede or even care about chicom IP theft?
-
Dems sure want to impede fracking and private insurance.
-
No, technology, noCirrhosisDawg said:
Trump’s getting impeached is a factual statement. You’re not enjoying it? I was expecting an intelligent reply. Let’s start here:PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Not very intelligent. Sensitive.CirrhosisDawg said:
Interesting. How, specifically?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
You epitomize the left.CirrhosisDawg said:
This post epitomizes the tug.WestlinnDuck said:Os course, being a leftard dem law professor from Harvard is all that you need to convince other leftards of the legitimacy of their strong feelings. While it seems like a lot of attorneys lie, it generally is localized to leftards. Turley is a dem, but has some residual honesty. Give him time.
WATCH: LAW PROF. DESTROYS DEMOCRAT CLAIM THAT TRUMP’S UKRAINE CALL WAS ‘BRIBERY.’
Related: George Washington University Law School Prof. Jonathan Turley “flips the Dem argument on impeachment on its head: ‘If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing exactly what you’re criticizing the president of doing.’”
https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/
HARVARD LAW PROF TELLS A BIG FAT ONE: House Judiciary Committee Democrats led their hearing this morning with Harvard’s Noah Feldman. Later in the day under intense questioning by Rep. Matthew Gaetz (R-Flor.), Feldman claimed he “was an impeachment skeptic before July 25.”
That’s a flat-out misrepresentation by Feldman of his views because he was among the early advocates of impeachment, beginning March 7, 2017, barely six weeks after President Donald Trump’s inauguration. See three more examples in 2017 and 2018 of Feldman clearly pushing impeachment of Trump: here, here and here.
Resorts to repeating things with no factual backing like "enjoy the impeachment"
Are tariffs taxes on US consumers?
Greater addition to US GDP growth and prosperity: technology, entertainment & finance, or manufacturing?
Can trumpism impede the flow of money, labor, goods and services to their highest and best use?
There, I played your dumb little game
These hearings =/= impeachment
Kill yourself -
Don’t run away all frustrated and mad.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
No, technology, noCirrhosisDawg said:
Trump’s getting impeached is a factual statement. You’re not enjoying it? I was expecting an intelligent reply. Let’s start here:PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Not very intelligent. Sensitive.CirrhosisDawg said:
Interesting. How, specifically?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
You epitomize the left.CirrhosisDawg said:
This post epitomizes the tug.WestlinnDuck said:Os course, being a leftard dem law professor from Harvard is all that you need to convince other leftards of the legitimacy of their strong feelings. While it seems like a lot of attorneys lie, it generally is localized to leftards. Turley is a dem, but has some residual honesty. Give him time.
WATCH: LAW PROF. DESTROYS DEMOCRAT CLAIM THAT TRUMP’S UKRAINE CALL WAS ‘BRIBERY.’
Related: George Washington University Law School Prof. Jonathan Turley “flips the Dem argument on impeachment on its head: ‘If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing exactly what you’re criticizing the president of doing.’”
https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/
HARVARD LAW PROF TELLS A BIG FAT ONE: House Judiciary Committee Democrats led their hearing this morning with Harvard’s Noah Feldman. Later in the day under intense questioning by Rep. Matthew Gaetz (R-Flor.), Feldman claimed he “was an impeachment skeptic before July 25.”
That’s a flat-out misrepresentation by Feldman of his views because he was among the early advocates of impeachment, beginning March 7, 2017, barely six weeks after President Donald Trump’s inauguration. See three more examples in 2017 and 2018 of Feldman clearly pushing impeachment of Trump: here, here and here.
Resorts to repeating things with no factual backing like "enjoy the impeachment"
Are tariffs taxes on US consumers?
Greater addition to US GDP growth and prosperity: technology, entertainment & finance, or manufacturing?
Can trumpism impede the flow of money, labor, goods and services to their highest and best use?
There, I played your dumb little game
These hearings =/= impeachment
Kill yourself
So you think tariffs are not taxes on US consumers. Who pays them then? -
Country's being tariffed pay tariffs.CirrhosisDawg said:
Don’t run away all frustrated and mad.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
No, technology, noCirrhosisDawg said:
Trump’s getting impeached is a factual statement. You’re not enjoying it? I was expecting an intelligent reply. Let’s start here:PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Not very intelligent. Sensitive.CirrhosisDawg said:
Interesting. How, specifically?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
You epitomize the left.CirrhosisDawg said:
This post epitomizes the tug.WestlinnDuck said:Os course, being a leftard dem law professor from Harvard is all that you need to convince other leftards of the legitimacy of their strong feelings. While it seems like a lot of attorneys lie, it generally is localized to leftards. Turley is a dem, but has some residual honesty. Give him time.
WATCH: LAW PROF. DESTROYS DEMOCRAT CLAIM THAT TRUMP’S UKRAINE CALL WAS ‘BRIBERY.’
Related: George Washington University Law School Prof. Jonathan Turley “flips the Dem argument on impeachment on its head: ‘If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing exactly what you’re criticizing the president of doing.’”
https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/
HARVARD LAW PROF TELLS A BIG FAT ONE: House Judiciary Committee Democrats led their hearing this morning with Harvard’s Noah Feldman. Later in the day under intense questioning by Rep. Matthew Gaetz (R-Flor.), Feldman claimed he “was an impeachment skeptic before July 25.”
That’s a flat-out misrepresentation by Feldman of his views because he was among the early advocates of impeachment, beginning March 7, 2017, barely six weeks after President Donald Trump’s inauguration. See three more examples in 2017 and 2018 of Feldman clearly pushing impeachment of Trump: here, here and here.
Resorts to repeating things with no factual backing like "enjoy the impeachment"
Are tariffs taxes on US consumers?
Greater addition to US GDP growth and prosperity: technology, entertainment & finance, or manufacturing?
Can trumpism impede the flow of money, labor, goods and services to their highest and best use?
There, I played your dumb little game
These hearings =/= impeachment
Kill yourself
So you think tariffs are not taxes on US consumers. Who pays them then?
Let me guess, youre anti-tariff? Interesting.
Fucking Chinese communist -
PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Country's being tariffed pay tariffs.CirrhosisDawg said:
Don’t run away all frustrated and mad.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
No, technology, noCirrhosisDawg said:
Trump’s getting impeached is a factual statement. You’re not enjoying it? I was expecting an intelligent reply. Let’s start here:PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Not very intelligent. Sensitive.CirrhosisDawg said:
Interesting. How, specifically?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
You epitomize the left.CirrhosisDawg said:
This post epitomizes the tug.WestlinnDuck said:Os course, being a leftard dem law professor from Harvard is all that you need to convince other leftards of the legitimacy of their strong feelings. While it seems like a lot of attorneys lie, it generally is localized to leftards. Turley is a dem, but has some residual honesty. Give him time.
WATCH: LAW PROF. DESTROYS DEMOCRAT CLAIM THAT TRUMP’S UKRAINE CALL WAS ‘BRIBERY.’
Related: George Washington University Law School Prof. Jonathan Turley “flips the Dem argument on impeachment on its head: ‘If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing exactly what you’re criticizing the president of doing.’”
https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/
HARVARD LAW PROF TELLS A BIG FAT ONE: House Judiciary Committee Democrats led their hearing this morning with Harvard’s Noah Feldman. Later in the day under intense questioning by Rep. Matthew Gaetz (R-Flor.), Feldman claimed he “was an impeachment skeptic before July 25.”
That’s a flat-out misrepresentation by Feldman of his views because he was among the early advocates of impeachment, beginning March 7, 2017, barely six weeks after President Donald Trump’s inauguration. See three more examples in 2017 and 2018 of Feldman clearly pushing impeachment of Trump: here, here and here.
Resorts to repeating things with no factual backing like "enjoy the impeachment"
Are tariffs taxes on US consumers?
Greater addition to US GDP growth and prosperity: technology, entertainment & finance, or manufacturing?
Can trumpism impede the flow of money, labor, goods and services to their highest and best use?
There, I played your dumb little game
These hearings =/= impeachment
Kill yourself
So you think tariffs are not taxes on US consumers. Who pays them then?
Let me guess, youre anti-tariff? Interesting.
Fucking Chinese communist
-
PGOS believed Husky Stadium was going to be a pea patch.
-
Nah, just that the remodel wouldn't go throughCirrhosisDawg said:PGOS believed Husky Stadium was going to be a pea patch.
Great libtard pivot as always -
Not a pivot. You were an imbecile 10 years ago. You’re a retard today. There’s no difference between the pea patch and trump’s tariffs. They are both things stupid people believe.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Nah, just that the remodel wouldn't go throughCirrhosisDawg said:PGOS believed Husky Stadium was going to be a pea patch.
Great libtard pivot as always -
Great non argument as always.CirrhosisDawg said:
Not a pivot. You were an imbecile 10 years ago. You’re a retard today. There’s no difference between the pea patch and trump’s tariffs. They are both things stupid people believe.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Nah, just that the remodel wouldn't go throughCirrhosisDawg said:PGOS believed Husky Stadium was going to be a pea patch.
Great libtard pivot as always
You really are a fucking retarded piece of shit.
Deep down you know that.
