Leftards lie and love to be lied to

Os course, being a leftard dem law professor from Harvard is all that you need to convince other leftards of the legitimacy of their strong feelings. While it seems like a lot of attorneys lie, it generally is localized to leftards. Turley is a dem, but has some residual honesty. Give him time.
WATCH: LAW PROF. DESTROYS DEMOCRAT CLAIM THAT TRUMP’S UKRAINE CALL WAS ‘BRIBERY.’
Related: George Washington University Law School Prof. Jonathan Turley “flips the Dem argument on impeachment on its head: ‘If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing exactly what you’re criticizing the president of doing.’”
https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/
HARVARD LAW PROF TELLS A BIG FAT ONE: House Judiciary Committee Democrats led their hearing this morning with Harvard’s Noah Feldman. Later in the day under intense questioning by Rep. Matthew Gaetz (R-Flor.), Feldman claimed he “was an impeachment skeptic before July 25.”
That’s a flat-out misrepresentation by Feldman of his views because he was among the early advocates of impeachment, beginning March 7, 2017, barely six weeks after President Donald Trump’s inauguration. See three more examples in 2017 and 2018 of Feldman clearly pushing impeachment of Trump: here, here and here.

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Os course, being a leftard dem law professor from Harvard is all that you need to convince other leftards of the legitimacy of their strong feelings. While it seems like a lot of attorneys lie, it generally is localized to leftards. Turley is a dem, but has some residual honesty. Give him time.
WATCH: LAW PROF. DESTROYS DEMOCRAT CLAIM THAT TRUMP’S UKRAINE CALL WAS ‘BRIBERY.’
Related: George Washington University Law School Prof. Jonathan Turley “flips the Dem argument on impeachment on its head: ‘If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing exactly what you’re criticizing the president of doing.’”
https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/
HARVARD LAW PROF TELLS A BIG FAT ONE: House Judiciary Committee Democrats led their hearing this morning with Harvard’s Noah Feldman. Later in the day under intense questioning by Rep. Matthew Gaetz (R-Flor.), Feldman claimed he “was an impeachment skeptic before July 25.”
That’s a flat-out misrepresentation by Feldman of his views because he was among the early advocates of impeachment, beginning March 7, 2017, barely six weeks after President Donald Trump’s inauguration. See three more examples in 2017 and 2018 of Feldman clearly pushing impeachment of Trump: here, here and here.

This post epitomizes the tug.

PostGameOrangeSlices

Os course, being a leftard dem law professor from Harvard is all that you need to convince other leftards of the legitimacy of their strong feelings. While it seems like a lot of attorneys lie, it generally is localized to leftards. Turley is a dem, but has some residual honesty. Give him time.
WATCH: LAW PROF. DESTROYS DEMOCRAT CLAIM THAT TRUMP’S UKRAINE CALL WAS ‘BRIBERY.’
Related: George Washington University Law School Prof. Jonathan Turley “flips the Dem argument on impeachment on its head: ‘If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing exactly what you’re criticizing the president of doing.’”
https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/
HARVARD LAW PROF TELLS A BIG FAT ONE: House Judiciary Committee Democrats led their hearing this morning with Harvard’s Noah Feldman. Later in the day under intense questioning by Rep. Matthew Gaetz (R-Flor.), Feldman claimed he “was an impeachment skeptic before July 25.”
That’s a flat-out misrepresentation by Feldman of his views because he was among the early advocates of impeachment, beginning March 7, 2017, barely six weeks after President Donald Trump’s inauguration. See three more examples in 2017 and 2018 of Feldman clearly pushing impeachment of Trump: here, here and here.
This post epitomizes the tug.

You epitomize the left.

Conservatives seek the truth, leftards lie and love to be lied to. Whether it's the Tug or the NY Times - doesn't matter.

Os course, being a leftard dem law professor from Harvard is all that you need to convince other leftards of the legitimacy of their strong feelings. While it seems like a lot of attorneys lie, it generally is localized to leftards. Turley is a dem, but has some residual honesty. Give him time.
WATCH: LAW PROF. DESTROYS DEMOCRAT CLAIM THAT TRUMP’S UKRAINE CALL WAS ‘BRIBERY.’
Related: George Washington University Law School Prof. Jonathan Turley “flips the Dem argument on impeachment on its head: ‘If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing exactly what you’re criticizing the president of doing.’”
https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/
HARVARD LAW PROF TELLS A BIG FAT ONE: House Judiciary Committee Democrats led their hearing this morning with Harvard’s Noah Feldman. Later in the day under intense questioning by Rep. Matthew Gaetz (R-Flor.), Feldman claimed he “was an impeachment skeptic before July 25.”
That’s a flat-out misrepresentation by Feldman of his views because he was among the early advocates of impeachment, beginning March 7, 2017, barely six weeks after President Donald Trump’s inauguration. See three more examples in 2017 and 2018 of Feldman clearly pushing impeachment of Trump: here, here and here.
This post epitomizes the tug.
You epitomize the left.

Interesting. How, specifically?

Os course, being a leftard dem law professor from Harvard is all that you need to convince other leftards of the legitimacy of their strong feelings. While it seems like a lot of attorneys lie, it generally is localized to leftards. Turley is a dem, but has some residual honesty. Give him time.
WATCH: LAW PROF. DESTROYS DEMOCRAT CLAIM THAT TRUMP’S UKRAINE CALL WAS ‘BRIBERY.’
Related: George Washington University Law School Prof. Jonathan Turley “flips the Dem argument on impeachment on its head: ‘If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing exactly what you’re criticizing the president of doing.’”
https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/
HARVARD LAW PROF TELLS A BIG FAT ONE: House Judiciary Committee Democrats led their hearing this morning with Harvard’s Noah Feldman. Later in the day under intense questioning by Rep. Matthew Gaetz (R-Flor.), Feldman claimed he “was an impeachment skeptic before July 25.”
That’s a flat-out misrepresentation by Feldman of his views because he was among the early advocates of impeachment, beginning March 7, 2017, barely six weeks after President Donald Trump’s inauguration. See three more examples in 2017 and 2018 of Feldman clearly pushing impeachment of Trump: here, here and here.
This post epitomizes the tug.
You epitomize the left.
Interesting. How, specifically?

Fat and stupid

Os course, being a leftard dem law professor from Harvard is all that you need to convince other leftards of the legitimacy of their strong feelings. While it seems like a lot of attorneys lie, it generally is localized to leftards. Turley is a dem, but has some residual honesty. Give him time.
WATCH: LAW PROF. DESTROYS DEMOCRAT CLAIM THAT TRUMP’S UKRAINE CALL WAS ‘BRIBERY.’
Related: George Washington University Law School Prof. Jonathan Turley “flips the Dem argument on impeachment on its head: ‘If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing exactly what you’re criticizing the president of doing.’”
https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/
HARVARD LAW PROF TELLS A BIG FAT ONE: House Judiciary Committee Democrats led their hearing this morning with Harvard’s Noah Feldman. Later in the day under intense questioning by Rep. Matthew Gaetz (R-Flor.), Feldman claimed he “was an impeachment skeptic before July 25.”
That’s a flat-out misrepresentation by Feldman of his views because he was among the early advocates of impeachment, beginning March 7, 2017, barely six weeks after President Donald Trump’s inauguration. See three more examples in 2017 and 2018 of Feldman clearly pushing impeachment of Trump: here, here and here.
This post epitomizes the tug.
You epitomize the left.
Interesting. How, specifically?
Fat and stupid

I’m not trump.

And fat and stupid PIPS also wears diapers and isn't president. Thank God.

PostGameOrangeSlices

Os course, being a leftard dem law professor from Harvard is all that you need to convince other leftards of the legitimacy of their strong feelings. While it seems like a lot of attorneys lie, it generally is localized to leftards. Turley is a dem, but has some residual honesty. Give him time.
WATCH: LAW PROF. DESTROYS DEMOCRAT CLAIM THAT TRUMP’S UKRAINE CALL WAS ‘BRIBERY.’
Related: George Washington University Law School Prof. Jonathan Turley “flips the Dem argument on impeachment on its head: ‘If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing exactly what you’re criticizing the president of doing.’”
https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/
HARVARD LAW PROF TELLS A BIG FAT ONE: House Judiciary Committee Democrats led their hearing this morning with Harvard’s Noah Feldman. Later in the day under intense questioning by Rep. Matthew Gaetz (R-Flor.), Feldman claimed he “was an impeachment skeptic before July 25.”
That’s a flat-out misrepresentation by Feldman of his views because he was among the early advocates of impeachment, beginning March 7, 2017, barely six weeks after President Donald Trump’s inauguration. See three more examples in 2017 and 2018 of Feldman clearly pushing impeachment of Trump: here, here and here.
This post epitomizes the tug.
You epitomize the left.
Interesting. How, specifically?

Not very intelligent. Sensitive.

Resorts to repeating things with no factual backing like "enjoy the impeachment"

Os course, being a leftard dem law professor from Harvard is all that you need to convince other leftards of the legitimacy of their strong feelings. While it seems like a lot of attorneys lie, it generally is localized to leftards. Turley is a dem, but has some residual honesty. Give him time.
WATCH: LAW PROF. DESTROYS DEMOCRAT CLAIM THAT TRUMP’S UKRAINE CALL WAS ‘BRIBERY.’
Related: George Washington University Law School Prof. Jonathan Turley “flips the Dem argument on impeachment on its head: ‘If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing exactly what you’re criticizing the president of doing.’”
https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/
HARVARD LAW PROF TELLS A BIG FAT ONE: House Judiciary Committee Democrats led their hearing this morning with Harvard’s Noah Feldman. Later in the day under intense questioning by Rep. Matthew Gaetz (R-Flor.), Feldman claimed he “was an impeachment skeptic before July 25.”
That’s a flat-out misrepresentation by Feldman of his views because he was among the early advocates of impeachment, beginning March 7, 2017, barely six weeks after President Donald Trump’s inauguration. See three more examples in 2017 and 2018 of Feldman clearly pushing impeachment of Trump: here, here and here.
This post epitomizes the tug.
You epitomize the left.
Interesting. How, specifically?
Fat and stupid
I’m not trump.

We know

Trump is successful and the leader of the free world

You rip off immigrants at the check cash joint

Os course, being a leftard dem law professor from Harvard is all that you need to convince other leftards of the legitimacy of their strong feelings. While it seems like a lot of attorneys lie, it generally is localized to leftards. Turley is a dem, but has some residual honesty. Give him time.
WATCH: LAW PROF. DESTROYS DEMOCRAT CLAIM THAT TRUMP’S UKRAINE CALL WAS ‘BRIBERY.’
Related: George Washington University Law School Prof. Jonathan Turley “flips the Dem argument on impeachment on its head: ‘If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing exactly what you’re criticizing the president of doing.’”
https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/
HARVARD LAW PROF TELLS A BIG FAT ONE: House Judiciary Committee Democrats led their hearing this morning with Harvard’s Noah Feldman. Later in the day under intense questioning by Rep. Matthew Gaetz (R-Flor.), Feldman claimed he “was an impeachment skeptic before July 25.”
That’s a flat-out misrepresentation by Feldman of his views because he was among the early advocates of impeachment, beginning March 7, 2017, barely six weeks after President Donald Trump’s inauguration. See three more examples in 2017 and 2018 of Feldman clearly pushing impeachment of Trump: here, here and here.
This post epitomizes the tug.
You epitomize the left.
Interesting. How, specifically?
Not very intelligent. Sensitive.

Resorts to repeating things with no factual backing like "enjoy the impeachment"

Trump’s getting impeached is a factual statement. You’re not enjoying it? I was expecting an intelligent reply. Let’s start here:

Are tariffs taxes on US consumers?

Greater addition to US GDP growth and prosperity: technology, entertainment & finance, or manufacturing?

Can trumpism impede the flow of money, labor, goods and services to their highest and best use?

Can a dem impede or even care about chicom IP theft?

Dems sure want to impede fracking and private insurance.

PostGameOrangeSlices

Os course, being a leftard dem law professor from Harvard is all that you need to convince other leftards of the legitimacy of their strong feelings. While it seems like a lot of attorneys lie, it generally is localized to leftards. Turley is a dem, but has some residual honesty. Give him time.
WATCH: LAW PROF. DESTROYS DEMOCRAT CLAIM THAT TRUMP’S UKRAINE CALL WAS ‘BRIBERY.’
Related: George Washington University Law School Prof. Jonathan Turley “flips the Dem argument on impeachment on its head: ‘If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing exactly what you’re criticizing the president of doing.’”
https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/
HARVARD LAW PROF TELLS A BIG FAT ONE: House Judiciary Committee Democrats led their hearing this morning with Harvard’s Noah Feldman. Later in the day under intense questioning by Rep. Matthew Gaetz (R-Flor.), Feldman claimed he “was an impeachment skeptic before July 25.”
That’s a flat-out misrepresentation by Feldman of his views because he was among the early advocates of impeachment, beginning March 7, 2017, barely six weeks after President Donald Trump’s inauguration. See three more examples in 2017 and 2018 of Feldman clearly pushing impeachment of Trump: here, here and here.
This post epitomizes the tug.
You epitomize the left.
Interesting. How, specifically?
Not very intelligent. Sensitive.

Resorts to repeating things with no factual backing like "enjoy the impeachment"
Trump’s getting impeached is a factual statement. You’re not enjoying it? I was expecting an intelligent reply. Let’s start here:

Are tariffs taxes on US consumers?

Greater addition to US GDP growth and prosperity: technology, entertainment & finance, or manufacturing?

Can trumpism impede the flow of money, labor, goods and services to their highest and best use?

No, technology, no

There, I played your dumb little game

These hearings =/= impeachment

Kill yourself

Os course, being a leftard dem law professor from Harvard is all that you need to convince other leftards of the legitimacy of their strong feelings. While it seems like a lot of attorneys lie, it generally is localized to leftards. Turley is a dem, but has some residual honesty. Give him time.
WATCH: LAW PROF. DESTROYS DEMOCRAT CLAIM THAT TRUMP’S UKRAINE CALL WAS ‘BRIBERY.’
Related: George Washington University Law School Prof. Jonathan Turley “flips the Dem argument on impeachment on its head: ‘If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing exactly what you’re criticizing the president of doing.’”
https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/
HARVARD LAW PROF TELLS A BIG FAT ONE: House Judiciary Committee Democrats led their hearing this morning with Harvard’s Noah Feldman. Later in the day under intense questioning by Rep. Matthew Gaetz (R-Flor.), Feldman claimed he “was an impeachment skeptic before July 25.”
That’s a flat-out misrepresentation by Feldman of his views because he was among the early advocates of impeachment, beginning March 7, 2017, barely six weeks after President Donald Trump’s inauguration. See three more examples in 2017 and 2018 of Feldman clearly pushing impeachment of Trump: here, here and here.
This post epitomizes the tug.
You epitomize the left.
Interesting. How, specifically?
Not very intelligent. Sensitive.

Resorts to repeating things with no factual backing like "enjoy the impeachment"
Trump’s getting impeached is a factual statement. You’re not enjoying it? I was expecting an intelligent reply. Let’s start here:

Are tariffs taxes on US consumers?

Greater addition to US GDP growth and prosperity: technology, entertainment & finance, or manufacturing?

Can trumpism impede the flow of money, labor, goods and services to their highest and best use?
No, technology, no

There, I played your dumb little game

These hearings =/= impeachment

Kill yourself

Don’t run away all frustrated and mad.

So you think tariffs are not taxes on US consumers. Who pays them then?

PostGameOrangeSlices

Os course, being a leftard dem law professor from Harvard is all that you need to convince other leftards of the legitimacy of their strong feelings. While it seems like a lot of attorneys lie, it generally is localized to leftards. Turley is a dem, but has some residual honesty. Give him time.
WATCH: LAW PROF. DESTROYS DEMOCRAT CLAIM THAT TRUMP’S UKRAINE CALL WAS ‘BRIBERY.’
Related: George Washington University Law School Prof. Jonathan Turley “flips the Dem argument on impeachment on its head: ‘If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing exactly what you’re criticizing the president of doing.’”
https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/
HARVARD LAW PROF TELLS A BIG FAT ONE: House Judiciary Committee Democrats led their hearing this morning with Harvard’s Noah Feldman. Later in the day under intense questioning by Rep. Matthew Gaetz (R-Flor.), Feldman claimed he “was an impeachment skeptic before July 25.”
That’s a flat-out misrepresentation by Feldman of his views because he was among the early advocates of impeachment, beginning March 7, 2017, barely six weeks after President Donald Trump’s inauguration. See three more examples in 2017 and 2018 of Feldman clearly pushing impeachment of Trump: here, here and here.
This post epitomizes the tug.
You epitomize the left.
Interesting. How, specifically?
Not very intelligent. Sensitive.

Resorts to repeating things with no factual backing like "enjoy the impeachment"
Trump’s getting impeached is a factual statement. You’re not enjoying it? I was expecting an intelligent reply. Let’s start here:

Are tariffs taxes on US consumers?

Greater addition to US GDP growth and prosperity: technology, entertainment & finance, or manufacturing?

Can trumpism impede the flow of money, labor, goods and services to their highest and best use?
No, technology, no

There, I played your dumb little game

These hearings =/= impeachment

Kill yourself
Don’t run away all frustrated and mad.

So you think tariffs are not taxes on US consumers. Who pays them then?

Country's being tariffed pay tariffs.

Let me guess, youre anti-tariff? Interesting.

Fucking Chinese communist

Os course, being a leftard dem law professor from Harvard is all that you need to convince other leftards of the legitimacy of their strong feelings. While it seems like a lot of attorneys lie, it generally is localized to leftards. Turley is a dem, but has some residual honesty. Give him time.
WATCH: LAW PROF. DESTROYS DEMOCRAT CLAIM THAT TRUMP’S UKRAINE CALL WAS ‘BRIBERY.’
Related: George Washington University Law School Prof. Jonathan Turley “flips the Dem argument on impeachment on its head: ‘If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing exactly what you’re criticizing the president of doing.’”
https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/
HARVARD LAW PROF TELLS A BIG FAT ONE: House Judiciary Committee Democrats led their hearing this morning with Harvard’s Noah Feldman. Later in the day under intense questioning by Rep. Matthew Gaetz (R-Flor.), Feldman claimed he “was an impeachment skeptic before July 25.”
That’s a flat-out misrepresentation by Feldman of his views because he was among the early advocates of impeachment, beginning March 7, 2017, barely six weeks after President Donald Trump’s inauguration. See three more examples in 2017 and 2018 of Feldman clearly pushing impeachment of Trump: here, here and here.
This post epitomizes the tug.
You epitomize the left.
Interesting. How, specifically?
Not very intelligent. Sensitive.

Resorts to repeating things with no factual backing like "enjoy the impeachment"
Trump’s getting impeached is a factual statement. You’re not enjoying it? I was expecting an intelligent reply. Let’s start here:

Are tariffs taxes on US consumers?

Greater addition to US GDP growth and prosperity: technology, entertainment & finance, or manufacturing?

Can trumpism impede the flow of money, labor, goods and services to their highest and best use?
No, technology, no

There, I played your dumb little game

These hearings =/= impeachment

Kill yourself
Don’t run away all frustrated and mad.

So you think tariffs are not taxes on US consumers. Who pays them then?
Country's being tariffed pay tariffs.

Let me guess, youre anti-tariff? Interesting.

Fucking Chinese communist

PGOS believed Husky Stadium was going to be a pea patch.

PostGameOrangeSlices

PGOS believed Husky Stadium was going to be a pea patch.

Nah, just that the remodel wouldn't go through

Great libtard pivot as always

PGOS believed Husky Stadium was going to be a pea patch.
Nah, just that the remodel wouldn't go through

Great libtard pivot as always

Not a pivot. You were an imbecile 10 years ago. You’re a retard today. There’s no difference between the pea patch and trump’s tariffs. They are both things stupid people believe.

PostGameOrangeSlices

PGOS believed Husky Stadium was going to be a pea patch.
Nah, just that the remodel wouldn't go through

Great libtard pivot as always
Not a pivot. You were an imbecile 10 years ago. You’re a retard today. There’s no difference between the pea patch and trump’s tariffs. They are both things stupid people believe.

Great non argument as always.

You really are a fucking retarded piece of shit.

Deep down you know that.

Quick Links