Imagine having a mancrush on this loser
Comments
-
Borghi is legit
-
-
Borghi is fine, but running backs don't matter, especially when you don't run.
Coug players are always overrated when the scheme works, and its really not their fault when it doesn't work. Leach making 0 changes in 7 years gives his players no chance to succeed, I would feel bad for them if they didn't make fools of themselves every year talking shit. -
A RB in a pass heavy spread is the easiest job in the world. He never faces a stacked box and gets the ball in space damn near every tim he touches it.Neighbor2972 said:Borghi is fine, but running backs don't matter, especially when you don't run.
Coug players are always overrated when the scheme works, and its really not their fault when it doesn't work. Leach making 0 changes in 7 years gives his players no chance to succeed, I would feel bad for them if they didn't make fools of themselves every year talking shit.
He doesn't suck but he's not going to be shit at the next level.
Over. Rated.
Also he could barely hobble around after 10 rushes today. No chance he could have handled 20. -
It's 10:50pm EST, I'm drunk and I am ready to go to bed but I still have energy enough to pull out this gif to emphasize @dnc's point.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Meh. Borghi would be the best back on our roster rather easily. Why he went to WSU is a mystery
-
Funny... I never once wished that I played for the COOG. NEVER.GrundleStiltzkin said: -
BushPete would have used him to run the wildcat.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Meh. Borghi would be the best back on our roster rather easily. Why he went to WSU is a mystery
-
Borghi is good but I still love this thread.
-
I believe Klatt (from Colorado like Borghi) has mentioned in the past that Borghi had plans to go to Stanford, but the admissions was taking too long and he didn’t want to end up no where the way Myles Bryant and many others did.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Meh. Borghi would be the best back on our roster rather easily. Why he went to WSU is a mystery
-
Same as it ever was. In 1987 Tim Rosenbach said the Huskies were better dancers than they were hitters. Even though Washington won 34-19Neighbor2972 said:Borghi is fine, but running backs don't matter, especially when you don't run.
Coug players are always overrated when the scheme works, and its really not their fault when it doesn't work. Leach making 0 changes in 7 years gives his players no chance to succeed, I would feel bad for them if they didn't make fools of themselves every year talking shit. -
Didn’t Bledsoe say the same thing in 1991?DerekJohnson said:
Same as it ever was. In 1987 Tim Rosenbach said the Huskies were better dancers than they were hitters. Even though Washington won 34-19Neighbor2972 said:Borghi is fine, but running backs don't matter, especially when you don't run.
Coug players are always overrated when the scheme works, and its really not their fault when it doesn't work. Leach making 0 changes in 7 years gives his players no chance to succeed, I would feel bad for them if they didn't make fools of themselves every year talking shit.
It’s clear we aren’t dealing with Rocket Scientists, but fuck me. Do they just sit around and churn up old, used smug comments on their way to defeat?
What a bunch of fucking losers -
He's Sean McGrew in an offense that creates space for the RB.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Meh. Borghi would be the best back on our roster rather easily. Why he went to WSU is a mystery
He would be third or fourth on our depth here.
Rather easily. -
-
Come on now. He’s a try hard little white RB, but he’s much better than our try hard little white RB.dnc said:
He's Sean McGrew in an offense that creates space for the RB.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Meh. Borghi would be the best back on our roster rather easily. Why he went to WSU is a mystery
He would be third or fourth on our depth here.
Rather easily.
I’m surprised Pete didn’t recruit him tbh. -
This is my favorite. "Did you play?" JFC. BRENTS would be proud.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Then the classic "you didn't go to UW". Lol. That one fucking drives them nuts and they think it's a witty comeback to WSU losing. Harv was one who hated that.
Borghi - would piss himself to have my life.
sincerely, a remora -
DerekJohnson said:
Same as it ever was. In 1987 Tim Rosenbach said the Huskies were better dancers than they were hitters. Even though Washington won 34-19Neighbor2972 said:Borghi is fine, but running backs don't matter, especially when you don't run.
Coug players are always overrated when the scheme works, and its really not their fault when it doesn't work. Leach making 0 changes in 7 years gives his players no chance to succeed, I would feel bad for them if they didn't make fools of themselves every year talking shit.
-
McGrew would be well over 81% as effective in that systemDoogWhisperer said:
Come on now. He’s a try hard little white RB, but he’s much better than our try hard little white RB.dnc said:
He's Sean McGrew in an offense that creates space for the RB.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Meh. Borghi would be the best back on our roster rather easily. Why he went to WSU is a mystery
He would be third or fourth on our depth here.
Rather easily.
I’m surprised Pete didn’t recruit him tbh. -
What more do you want POTS
-
Idiot. Put Salvon in that scheme and he destroys Borghi's numbers. Being a scat back in an air raid makes you look a lot better than you are.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Meh. Borghi would be the best back on our roster rather easily. Why he went to WSU is a mystery
-
To say someone would be third or fourth string under Petersen is not bolstering your argument.dnc said:
He's Sean McGrew in an offense that creates space for the RB.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Meh. Borghi would be the best back on our roster rather easily. Why he went to WSU is a mystery
He would be third or fourth on our depth here.
Rather easily. -
Fine. He would be the third or fourth best back at UW.DerekJohnson said:
To say someone would be third or fourth string under Petersen is not bolstering your argument.dnc said:
He's Sean McGrew in an offense that creates space for the RB.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Meh. Borghi would be the best back on our roster rather easily. Why he went to WSU is a mystery
He would be third or fourth on our depth here.
Rather easily. -
Borghi is way better than Salvon. Borghi actualy fights through contactjhfstyle24 said:
Idiot. Put Salvon in that scheme and he destroys Borghi's numbers. Being a scat back in an air raid makes you look a lot better than you are.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Meh. Borghi would be the best back on our roster rather easily. Why he went to WSU is a mystery
Salvon gets tackled by a 5 mph gust of wind -
This is a weird hill to die on.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Borghi is way better than Salvon. Borghi actualy fights through contactjhfstyle24 said:
Idiot. Put Salvon in that scheme and he destroys Borghi's numbers. Being a scat back in an air raid makes you look a lot better than you are.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Meh. Borghi would be the best back on our roster rather easily. Why he went to WSU is a mystery
Salvon gets tackled by a 5 mph gust of wind
