Hondo Bros, list for me the reasons you believe are responsible...
Comments
-
That's why no one here takes you seriously Bob. You seriously are a dullard.SFGbob said:
Yeah because when you're talking about the homeless population in San Francisco it's "fucktarded" to talk about the population of San Francisco.2001400ex said:
Pull up the link Bob. Using the city limits of San Fran is fucktarded.SFGbob said:
State clearly what my "lie" is you worthless piece of shit. The city of San Francisco's population in 1950 was 775K it then declined for 30 years and then didn't reach that number again until 2000. It's a little over 100K from that 1950 number today.2001400ex said:
Bob lies by omission.SFGbob said:
So people are shitting and pissing and doing drugs in the streets more today in SF due to rapid increase in population? Interesting because the population here in SF is only slightly larger than it was in the 1950s and in terms of rapid increase in the cities population growth the growth rates today pale in comparison to what they were in the 1930s 40s and 50s and that's when the city spent next to nothing on services and yet you didn't have people shitting in the streets back then.HHusky said:
The quality of life in most places diminishes when they experience rapid population increases with no comparable increase in infrastructure, housing or services. Thus my comment about the wall. It's hard to imagine this comes as news to you, but perhaps you don't get out much.SFGbob said:
So you have no explanation or reason why the quality of life in West Coast cities has diminished. Got it.HHusky said:
We have open borders with the rest of the country. Maybe we need a wall.SFGbob said:
Has the quality of life in west coast cites decreased in the last 10 years O'Keefed? Are the cities cleaner or are they dirtier? Can you list for us the reasons why you believe that might be the case? Are these question too fucking tough for a liberal Kunt to answer?HHusky said:
I guess quality of life is pretty ideal in the rest of the nation's cities. Toledo's calling you, blob.SFGbob said:for the diminishing quality of life issues facing most all of our west coast cities?
And yes Hondo, your claim that it's all a myth designed to make liberal cities look bad and the problems aren't that great will be accepted as an answer. There is no wrong answer.
First of all is it even really a problem?
If yes, what's the reason(s) for it.
Does the increase in human shit and piss in the streets increase or decrease the quality of life in urban areas?
So, yes this does come as news to me.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisco–Oakland–Berkeley,_CA_Metropolitan_Statistical_Area#Demographics
Go fuck yourself Hondo.
So my "lie" is that you're a fucking moron. -
Yeah Hondo, who here takes you seriously? Name their names. The discussion was about the homeless in San Francisco and for some reason you're so fucking stupid you think that has something to do with the population in San Jose.2001400ex said:
That's why no one here takes you seriously Bob. You seriously are a dullard.SFGbob said:
Yeah because when you're talking about the homeless population in San Francisco it's "fucktarded" to talk about the population of San Francisco.2001400ex said:
Pull up the link Bob. Using the city limits of San Fran is fucktarded.SFGbob said:
State clearly what my "lie" is you worthless piece of shit. The city of San Francisco's population in 1950 was 775K it then declined for 30 years and then didn't reach that number again until 2000. It's a little over 100K from that 1950 number today.2001400ex said:
Bob lies by omission.SFGbob said:
So people are shitting and pissing and doing drugs in the streets more today in SF due to rapid increase in population? Interesting because the population here in SF is only slightly larger than it was in the 1950s and in terms of rapid increase in the cities population growth the growth rates today pale in comparison to what they were in the 1930s 40s and 50s and that's when the city spent next to nothing on services and yet you didn't have people shitting in the streets back then.HHusky said:
The quality of life in most places diminishes when they experience rapid population increases with no comparable increase in infrastructure, housing or services. Thus my comment about the wall. It's hard to imagine this comes as news to you, but perhaps you don't get out much.SFGbob said:
So you have no explanation or reason why the quality of life in West Coast cities has diminished. Got it.HHusky said:
We have open borders with the rest of the country. Maybe we need a wall.SFGbob said:
Has the quality of life in west coast cites decreased in the last 10 years O'Keefed? Are the cities cleaner or are they dirtier? Can you list for us the reasons why you believe that might be the case? Are these question too fucking tough for a liberal Kunt to answer?HHusky said:
I guess quality of life is pretty ideal in the rest of the nation's cities. Toledo's calling you, blob.SFGbob said:for the diminishing quality of life issues facing most all of our west coast cities?
And yes Hondo, your claim that it's all a myth designed to make liberal cities look bad and the problems aren't that great will be accepted as an answer. There is no wrong answer.
First of all is it even really a problem?
If yes, what's the reason(s) for it.
Does the increase in human shit and piss in the streets increase or decrease the quality of life in urban areas?
So, yes this does come as news to me.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisco–Oakland–Berkeley,_CA_Metropolitan_Statistical_Area#Demographics
Go fuck yourself Hondo.
So my "lie" is that you're a fucking moron. -
Bob seems to think that only people that live in the city limits frequent downtown.SFGbob said:So Hondo, are you under some impression that because the population in Fremont has increased that has something to do with the homeless population in San Francisco? Explain the Kunt logic on that one Hondo.
You see Bob, there's been a growing number of people outside the city limits that commute into downtown, probably many from Fremont. So you need the infrastructure to handle many more people than just those that live in the city limits.
Come on Bob, use your brain. -
So the homeless in San Francisco that are shitting in the streets are commuting in from Fremont to do so and then return to Fremont at the end of the day. Oh yeah Hondo, you're a fucking genius.2001400ex said:
Bob seems to think that only people that live in the city limits frequent downtown.SFGbob said:So Hondo, are you under some impression that because the population in Fremont has increased that has something to do with the homeless population in San Francisco? Explain the Kunt logic on that one Hondo.
You see Bob, there's been a growing number of people outside the city limits that commute into downtown, probably many from Fremont. So you need the infrastructure to handle many more people than just those that live in the city limits.
Come on Bob, use your brain. -
Bob actually gets more dumb with each comment. Sad thing is, you aren't even trolling.SFGbob said:
So the homeless in San Francisco that are shitting in the streets are commuting in from Fremont to do so and then return to Fremont at the end of the day. Oh yeah Hondo, you're a fucking genius.2001400ex said:
Bob seems to think that only people that live in the city limits frequent downtown.SFGbob said:So Hondo, are you under some impression that because the population in Fremont has increased that has something to do with the homeless population in San Francisco? Explain the Kunt logic on that one Hondo.
You see Bob, there's been a growing number of people outside the city limits that commute into downtown, probably many from Fremont. So you need the infrastructure to handle many more people than just those that live in the city limits.
Come on Bob, use your brain.
Step back Bob and look at the overall discussion, particularly the part you were responding to that lead to this rabbit hole. -
The gibberish response. So to recap, when talking about the population of San Francisco, according to Hondo the lying Kunt, it's "dishonest" if you don't also list the population of Berkeley.2001400ex said:
Bob actually gets more dumb with each comment. Sad thing is, you aren't even trolling.SFGbob said:
So the homeless in San Francisco that are shitting in the streets are commuting in from Fremont to do so and then return to Fremont at the end of the day. Oh yeah Hondo, you're a fucking genius.2001400ex said:
Bob seems to think that only people that live in the city limits frequent downtown.SFGbob said:So Hondo, are you under some impression that because the population in Fremont has increased that has something to do with the homeless population in San Francisco? Explain the Kunt logic on that one Hondo.
You see Bob, there's been a growing number of people outside the city limits that commute into downtown, probably many from Fremont. So you need the infrastructure to handle many more people than just those that live in the city limits.
Come on Bob, use your brain.
Step back Bob and look at the overall discussion, particularly the part you were responding to that lead to this rabbit hole. -
Do you realize that the majority of the homeless in any given metro area will tend to congregate in the downtown of the region's major city because that's where most of the social services as well as panhandling opportunities are located? But perhaps since you're a Russian bot you lack the cognitive ability to understand that. #GayBobFS.
-
Fuck, you did it. Came up with a more fucktarded response.SFGbob said:
The gibberish response. So to recap, when talking about the population of San Francisco, according to Hondo the lying Kunt, it's "dishonest" if you don't also list the population of Berkeley.2001400ex said:
Bob actually gets more dumb with each comment. Sad thing is, you aren't even trolling.SFGbob said:
So the homeless in San Francisco that are shitting in the streets are commuting in from Fremont to do so and then return to Fremont at the end of the day. Oh yeah Hondo, you're a fucking genius.2001400ex said:
Bob seems to think that only people that live in the city limits frequent downtown.SFGbob said:So Hondo, are you under some impression that because the population in Fremont has increased that has something to do with the homeless population in San Francisco? Explain the Kunt logic on that one Hondo.
You see Bob, there's been a growing number of people outside the city limits that commute into downtown, probably many from Fremont. So you need the infrastructure to handle many more people than just those that live in the city limits.
Come on Bob, use your brain.
Step back Bob and look at the overall discussion, particularly the part you were responding to that lead to this rabbit hole.
Look at the HH post you responded to. Idiot. -
No way dude, they commute in from Fremont, take a shit and then return to Fremont.insinceredawg said:Do you realize that the majority of the homeless in any given metro area will tend to congregate in the downtown of the region's major city because that's where most of the social services as well as panhandling opportunities are located? But perhaps since you're a Russian bot you lack the cognitive ability to understand that. #GayBobFS.
-
Homeless ppl from all over the Bay Area hop on a bus and go to SF to live in the streets. They aren't going to be counted in the census population totals. Is this concept that complex for you?SFGbob said:
No way dude, they commute in from Fremont, take a shit and then return to Fremont.insinceredawg said:Do you realize that the majority of the homeless in any given metro area will tend to congregate in the downtown of the region's major city because that's where most of the social services as well as panhandling opportunities are located? But perhaps since you're a Russian bot you lack the cognitive ability to understand that. #GayBobFS.
