Hondo Bros, list for me the reasons you believe are responsible...
Comments
-
That means a lot to me coming from you. Mike.MikeDamone said:
Not only are you the dumbest person in this place you’re also the least funny. You’re the opposite of funny.2001400ex said:
So you don't have to shit in the parking lot.MikeDamone said:
Why?2001400ex said:
Stop eating spicy Mexican food from the food truck. Mike.MikeDamone said:
It was last week for me. Technically it was in a parking lot.2001400ex said:
When was the last time you saw someone shitting in the streets Race?RaceBannon said:
So put you down in the shitting in the streets doesn't effect quality of life camp2001400ex said:
Bob stated there's diminishing quality of life in the West coast. I asked him, and then you, how your quality of life has diminished.RaceBannon said:
Fuck off straw man2001400ex said:
How is your quality of life diminishing race? You keep saying how much more money you are making. So what's the disconnect?RaceBannon said:
Straw man shows up2001400ex said:My life in the West coast is great. Seattle and the rest of the cities are booming.
Specifically, how is your quality of life personally diminishing Bob?
Shocking that makes you butthurt. -
Maybe you could show me where I did that in this thread my strawman ass fucking Kunt of a friend. I just asked you to list the reasons why there was a diminished quality of life in these cities and you denied that there was and that things were better then ever. And then being the worthless piece of shit you are you started arguing that there is a "reality" to what I was claiming but that you were just shitting on my "narrative."2001400ex said:
Bob I didn't say there was no reality to it. What I'm calling you out for is blaming liberals for "reduced quality of life in West coast cities". And I'm shitting on your narrative and you are too much of a conservative shill to see it.SFGbob said:
Yes, yes Kunt. It's just my shitting in the street "narrative" there is no reality to it.2001400ex said:
That's my point Bob. Quality of life overall, across the population, has greatly improved in West coast cities. You are just stuck in this "shitting in the streets" narrative your news source pushes, you can't see past that. Being around Seattle in the 80s and 90s, the city is in a much better place now.SFGbob said:
Because it's a strawman ass fuck not based on what I said. I never said that my quality of life had been diminished I said the quality of life had been diminished for all west coast cities. Not being a selfish fuck who thinks only of myself I know that there are business owner and residents of these cities who's quality of life has been diminished.2001400ex said:
You've never actually been to that place Bob. Exactly how has your quality of life been diminished? Why are you and Race ignoring the question?SFGbob said:How could this possibly impact the quality of life for anyone?
And yes Hondo, even though I didn't say it, my quality of life has been diminished. My car has been broken into twice. There is human shit and used needles outside of couple of locations where I do business. I don't enjoy seeing junkies shooting up on the streets and in the BART stations and the city where I work is filthier and more disgusting than at any time during my nearly 25 years of living here. So go fuck yourself Hondo, you have no idea what I've seen or where I've been.
I've been around San Diego a lot since the early 2000s, the downtown area is vastly nicer now than it was then. I've only been to San Fran a few times, so I can't really speak on that City. But I've ridden the train into downtown and it's been great. (Whatever one from the airport, can't remember what they called it)
If you spend enough time in downtown Kansas City, St Louis, Atlanta, etc, you'll see all the exact same shit you do in San Fran.
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/a3xdae/more-people-pooping-in-san-francisco-than-ever-all-time-high-vgtrn
Yes, if you don't mind human shit in the streets and you're not bothered by witnessing junkies shooting up in public and dealing with their dirty syringes also left in the street and you're cool with you car being broken into on a regular basis, the quality of life is great.
What it my "narrative" Kunt?
As usual, Hondo wants to argue both sides of an issue and against things the other person didn't say.
Where did I blame liberals in this thread you lying piece of shit? -
Your narrative is spread throughout this thread Bob. And I'm shitting all over it. Seriously, spend some time in conservative cities and you'll see the exact same shit as in San Fran. Homelessness is an America issue, not a conservative or liberal issue.SFGbob said:
Maybe you could show me where I did that in this thread my strawman ass fucking Kunt of a friend. I just asked you to list the reasons why there was a diminished quality of life in these cities and you denied that there was and that things were better then ever. And then being the worthless piece of shit you are you started arguing that there is a "reality" to what I was claiming but that you were just shitting on my "narrative."2001400ex said:
Bob I didn't say there was no reality to it. What I'm calling you out for is blaming liberals for "reduced quality of life in West coast cities". And I'm shitting on your narrative and you are too much of a conservative shill to see it.SFGbob said:
Yes, yes Kunt. It's just my shitting in the street "narrative" there is no reality to it.2001400ex said:
That's my point Bob. Quality of life overall, across the population, has greatly improved in West coast cities. You are just stuck in this "shitting in the streets" narrative your news source pushes, you can't see past that. Being around Seattle in the 80s and 90s, the city is in a much better place now.SFGbob said:
Because it's a strawman ass fuck not based on what I said. I never said that my quality of life had been diminished I said the quality of life had been diminished for all west coast cities. Not being a selfish fuck who thinks only of myself I know that there are business owner and residents of these cities who's quality of life has been diminished.2001400ex said:
You've never actually been to that place Bob. Exactly how has your quality of life been diminished? Why are you and Race ignoring the question?SFGbob said:How could this possibly impact the quality of life for anyone?
And yes Hondo, even though I didn't say it, my quality of life has been diminished. My car has been broken into twice. There is human shit and used needles outside of couple of locations where I do business. I don't enjoy seeing junkies shooting up on the streets and in the BART stations and the city where I work is filthier and more disgusting than at any time during my nearly 25 years of living here. So go fuck yourself Hondo, you have no idea what I've seen or where I've been.
I've been around San Diego a lot since the early 2000s, the downtown area is vastly nicer now than it was then. I've only been to San Fran a few times, so I can't really speak on that City. But I've ridden the train into downtown and it's been great. (Whatever one from the airport, can't remember what they called it)
If you spend enough time in downtown Kansas City, St Louis, Atlanta, etc, you'll see all the exact same shit you do in San Fran.
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/a3xdae/more-people-pooping-in-san-francisco-than-ever-all-time-high-vgtrn
Yes, if you don't mind human shit in the streets and you're not bothered by witnessing junkies shooting up in public and dealing with their dirty syringes also left in the street and you're cool with you car being broken into on a regular basis, the quality of life is great.
What it my "narrative" Kunt? M -
So you were just lying and talking out your ass. Got it.2001400ex said:
Your narrative is spread throughout this thread Bob. And I'm shitting all over it. Seriously, spend some time in conservative cities and you'll see the exact same shit as in San Fran. Homelessness is an America issue, not a conservative or liberal issue.SFGbob said:
Maybe you could show me where I did that in this thread my strawman ass fucking Kunt of a friend. I just asked you to list the reasons why there was a diminished quality of life in these cities and you denied that there was and that things were better then ever. And then being the worthless piece of shit you are you started arguing that there is a "reality" to what I was claiming but that you were just shitting on my "narrative."2001400ex said:
Bob I didn't say there was no reality to it. What I'm calling you out for is blaming liberals for "reduced quality of life in West coast cities". And I'm shitting on your narrative and you are too much of a conservative shill to see it.SFGbob said:
Yes, yes Kunt. It's just my shitting in the street "narrative" there is no reality to it.2001400ex said:
That's my point Bob. Quality of life overall, across the population, has greatly improved in West coast cities. You are just stuck in this "shitting in the streets" narrative your news source pushes, you can't see past that. Being around Seattle in the 80s and 90s, the city is in a much better place now.SFGbob said:
Because it's a strawman ass fuck not based on what I said. I never said that my quality of life had been diminished I said the quality of life had been diminished for all west coast cities. Not being a selfish fuck who thinks only of myself I know that there are business owner and residents of these cities who's quality of life has been diminished.2001400ex said:
You've never actually been to that place Bob. Exactly how has your quality of life been diminished? Why are you and Race ignoring the question?SFGbob said:How could this possibly impact the quality of life for anyone?
And yes Hondo, even though I didn't say it, my quality of life has been diminished. My car has been broken into twice. There is human shit and used needles outside of couple of locations where I do business. I don't enjoy seeing junkies shooting up on the streets and in the BART stations and the city where I work is filthier and more disgusting than at any time during my nearly 25 years of living here. So go fuck yourself Hondo, you have no idea what I've seen or where I've been.
I've been around San Diego a lot since the early 2000s, the downtown area is vastly nicer now than it was then. I've only been to San Fran a few times, so I can't really speak on that City. But I've ridden the train into downtown and it's been great. (Whatever one from the airport, can't remember what they called it)
If you spend enough time in downtown Kansas City, St Louis, Atlanta, etc, you'll see all the exact same shit you do in San Fran.
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/a3xdae/more-people-pooping-in-san-francisco-than-ever-all-time-high-vgtrn
Yes, if you don't mind human shit in the streets and you're not bothered by witnessing junkies shooting up in public and dealing with their dirty syringes also left in the street and you're cool with you car being broken into on a regular basis, the quality of life is great.
What it my "narrative" Kunt? M -
Hondo the expert on west coast urban living who rode the "train" to downtown SF once and who used to visit San Diego 20 years ago, declares there is no diminished quality of life in West Coast cities today because Race never saw this guy shitting in the streets.
-
Bob here's a question for you. Do you think it's possible that the quality of life overall for our citizens is increasing even tho homelessness isn't getting better?SFGbob said:
So you were just lying and talking out your ass. Got it.2001400ex said:
Your narrative is spread throughout this thread Bob. And I'm shitting all over it. Seriously, spend some time in conservative cities and you'll see the exact same shit as in San Fran. Homelessness is an America issue, not a conservative or liberal issue.SFGbob said:
Maybe you could show me where I did that in this thread my strawman ass fucking Kunt of a friend. I just asked you to list the reasons why there was a diminished quality of life in these cities and you denied that there was and that things were better then ever. And then being the worthless piece of shit you are you started arguing that there is a "reality" to what I was claiming but that you were just shitting on my "narrative."2001400ex said:
Bob I didn't say there was no reality to it. What I'm calling you out for is blaming liberals for "reduced quality of life in West coast cities". And I'm shitting on your narrative and you are too much of a conservative shill to see it.SFGbob said:
Yes, yes Kunt. It's just my shitting in the street "narrative" there is no reality to it.2001400ex said:
That's my point Bob. Quality of life overall, across the population, has greatly improved in West coast cities. You are just stuck in this "shitting in the streets" narrative your news source pushes, you can't see past that. Being around Seattle in the 80s and 90s, the city is in a much better place now.SFGbob said:
Because it's a strawman ass fuck not based on what I said. I never said that my quality of life had been diminished I said the quality of life had been diminished for all west coast cities. Not being a selfish fuck who thinks only of myself I know that there are business owner and residents of these cities who's quality of life has been diminished.2001400ex said:
You've never actually been to that place Bob. Exactly how has your quality of life been diminished? Why are you and Race ignoring the question?SFGbob said:How could this possibly impact the quality of life for anyone?
And yes Hondo, even though I didn't say it, my quality of life has been diminished. My car has been broken into twice. There is human shit and used needles outside of couple of locations where I do business. I don't enjoy seeing junkies shooting up on the streets and in the BART stations and the city where I work is filthier and more disgusting than at any time during my nearly 25 years of living here. So go fuck yourself Hondo, you have no idea what I've seen or where I've been.
I've been around San Diego a lot since the early 2000s, the downtown area is vastly nicer now than it was then. I've only been to San Fran a few times, so I can't really speak on that City. But I've ridden the train into downtown and it's been great. (Whatever one from the airport, can't remember what they called it)
If you spend enough time in downtown Kansas City, St Louis, Atlanta, etc, you'll see all the exact same shit you do in San Fran.
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/a3xdae/more-people-pooping-in-san-francisco-than-ever-all-time-high-vgtrn
Yes, if you don't mind human shit in the streets and you're not bothered by witnessing junkies shooting up in public and dealing with their dirty syringes also left in the street and you're cool with you car being broken into on a regular basis, the quality of life is great.
What it my "narrative" Kunt? M -
I guess quality of life is pretty ideal in the rest of the nation's cities. Toledo's calling you, blob.SFGbob said:for the diminishing quality of life issues facing most all of our west coast cities?
And yes Hondo, your claim that it's all a myth designed to make liberal cities look bad and the problems aren't that great will be accepted as an answer. There is no wrong answer.
First of all is it even really a problem?
If yes, what's the reason(s) for it. -
Thanks to Trump, yes2001400ex said:
Bob here's a question for you. Do you think it's possible that the quality of life overall for our citizens is increasing even tho homelessness isn't getting better?SFGbob said:
So you were just lying and talking out your ass. Got it.2001400ex said:
Your narrative is spread throughout this thread Bob. And I'm shitting all over it. Seriously, spend some time in conservative cities and you'll see the exact same shit as in San Fran. Homelessness is an America issue, not a conservative or liberal issue.SFGbob said:
Maybe you could show me where I did that in this thread my strawman ass fucking Kunt of a friend. I just asked you to list the reasons why there was a diminished quality of life in these cities and you denied that there was and that things were better then ever. And then being the worthless piece of shit you are you started arguing that there is a "reality" to what I was claiming but that you were just shitting on my "narrative."2001400ex said:
Bob I didn't say there was no reality to it. What I'm calling you out for is blaming liberals for "reduced quality of life in West coast cities". And I'm shitting on your narrative and you are too much of a conservative shill to see it.SFGbob said:
Yes, yes Kunt. It's just my shitting in the street "narrative" there is no reality to it.2001400ex said:
That's my point Bob. Quality of life overall, across the population, has greatly improved in West coast cities. You are just stuck in this "shitting in the streets" narrative your news source pushes, you can't see past that. Being around Seattle in the 80s and 90s, the city is in a much better place now.SFGbob said:
Because it's a strawman ass fuck not based on what I said. I never said that my quality of life had been diminished I said the quality of life had been diminished for all west coast cities. Not being a selfish fuck who thinks only of myself I know that there are business owner and residents of these cities who's quality of life has been diminished.2001400ex said:
You've never actually been to that place Bob. Exactly how has your quality of life been diminished? Why are you and Race ignoring the question?SFGbob said:How could this possibly impact the quality of life for anyone?
And yes Hondo, even though I didn't say it, my quality of life has been diminished. My car has been broken into twice. There is human shit and used needles outside of couple of locations where I do business. I don't enjoy seeing junkies shooting up on the streets and in the BART stations and the city where I work is filthier and more disgusting than at any time during my nearly 25 years of living here. So go fuck yourself Hondo, you have no idea what I've seen or where I've been.
I've been around San Diego a lot since the early 2000s, the downtown area is vastly nicer now than it was then. I've only been to San Fran a few times, so I can't really speak on that City. But I've ridden the train into downtown and it's been great. (Whatever one from the airport, can't remember what they called it)
If you spend enough time in downtown Kansas City, St Louis, Atlanta, etc, you'll see all the exact same shit you do in San Fran.
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/a3xdae/more-people-pooping-in-san-francisco-than-ever-all-time-high-vgtrn
Yes, if you don't mind human shit in the streets and you're not bothered by witnessing junkies shooting up in public and dealing with their dirty syringes also left in the street and you're cool with you car being broken into on a regular basis, the quality of life is great.
What it my "narrative" Kunt? M
That wasn't the question but still -
Fuck off.2001400ex said:
Bob here's a question for you. Do you think it's possible that the quality of life overall for our citizens is increasing even tho homelessness isn't getting better?SFGbob said:
So you were just lying and talking out your ass. Got it.2001400ex said:
Your narrative is spread throughout this thread Bob. And I'm shitting all over it. Seriously, spend some time in conservative cities and you'll see the exact same shit as in San Fran. Homelessness is an America issue, not a conservative or liberal issue.SFGbob said:
Maybe you could show me where I did that in this thread my strawman ass fucking Kunt of a friend. I just asked you to list the reasons why there was a diminished quality of life in these cities and you denied that there was and that things were better then ever. And then being the worthless piece of shit you are you started arguing that there is a "reality" to what I was claiming but that you were just shitting on my "narrative."2001400ex said:
Bob I didn't say there was no reality to it. What I'm calling you out for is blaming liberals for "reduced quality of life in West coast cities". And I'm shitting on your narrative and you are too much of a conservative shill to see it.SFGbob said:
Yes, yes Kunt. It's just my shitting in the street "narrative" there is no reality to it.2001400ex said:
That's my point Bob. Quality of life overall, across the population, has greatly improved in West coast cities. You are just stuck in this "shitting in the streets" narrative your news source pushes, you can't see past that. Being around Seattle in the 80s and 90s, the city is in a much better place now.SFGbob said:
Because it's a strawman ass fuck not based on what I said. I never said that my quality of life had been diminished I said the quality of life had been diminished for all west coast cities. Not being a selfish fuck who thinks only of myself I know that there are business owner and residents of these cities who's quality of life has been diminished.2001400ex said:
You've never actually been to that place Bob. Exactly how has your quality of life been diminished? Why are you and Race ignoring the question?SFGbob said:How could this possibly impact the quality of life for anyone?
And yes Hondo, even though I didn't say it, my quality of life has been diminished. My car has been broken into twice. There is human shit and used needles outside of couple of locations where I do business. I don't enjoy seeing junkies shooting up on the streets and in the BART stations and the city where I work is filthier and more disgusting than at any time during my nearly 25 years of living here. So go fuck yourself Hondo, you have no idea what I've seen or where I've been.
I've been around San Diego a lot since the early 2000s, the downtown area is vastly nicer now than it was then. I've only been to San Fran a few times, so I can't really speak on that City. But I've ridden the train into downtown and it's been great. (Whatever one from the airport, can't remember what they called it)
If you spend enough time in downtown Kansas City, St Louis, Atlanta, etc, you'll see all the exact same shit you do in San Fran.
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/a3xdae/more-people-pooping-in-san-francisco-than-ever-all-time-high-vgtrn
Yes, if you don't mind human shit in the streets and you're not bothered by witnessing junkies shooting up in public and dealing with their dirty syringes also left in the street and you're cool with you car being broken into on a regular basis, the quality of life is great.
What it my "narrative" Kunt? M -
So you don't want to answer the question. You can move Bob. Kansas reduced taxes to create your Mecca. Go there.SFGbob said:
Fuck off.2001400ex said:
Bob here's a question for you. Do you think it's possible that the quality of life overall for our citizens is increasing even tho homelessness isn't getting better?SFGbob said:
So you were just lying and talking out your ass. Got it.2001400ex said:
Your narrative is spread throughout this thread Bob. And I'm shitting all over it. Seriously, spend some time in conservative cities and you'll see the exact same shit as in San Fran. Homelessness is an America issue, not a conservative or liberal issue.SFGbob said:
Maybe you could show me where I did that in this thread my strawman ass fucking Kunt of a friend. I just asked you to list the reasons why there was a diminished quality of life in these cities and you denied that there was and that things were better then ever. And then being the worthless piece of shit you are you started arguing that there is a "reality" to what I was claiming but that you were just shitting on my "narrative."2001400ex said:
Bob I didn't say there was no reality to it. What I'm calling you out for is blaming liberals for "reduced quality of life in West coast cities". And I'm shitting on your narrative and you are too much of a conservative shill to see it.SFGbob said:
Yes, yes Kunt. It's just my shitting in the street "narrative" there is no reality to it.2001400ex said:
That's my point Bob. Quality of life overall, across the population, has greatly improved in West coast cities. You are just stuck in this "shitting in the streets" narrative your news source pushes, you can't see past that. Being around Seattle in the 80s and 90s, the city is in a much better place now.SFGbob said:
Because it's a strawman ass fuck not based on what I said. I never said that my quality of life had been diminished I said the quality of life had been diminished for all west coast cities. Not being a selfish fuck who thinks only of myself I know that there are business owner and residents of these cities who's quality of life has been diminished.2001400ex said:
You've never actually been to that place Bob. Exactly how has your quality of life been diminished? Why are you and Race ignoring the question?SFGbob said:How could this possibly impact the quality of life for anyone?
And yes Hondo, even though I didn't say it, my quality of life has been diminished. My car has been broken into twice. There is human shit and used needles outside of couple of locations where I do business. I don't enjoy seeing junkies shooting up on the streets and in the BART stations and the city where I work is filthier and more disgusting than at any time during my nearly 25 years of living here. So go fuck yourself Hondo, you have no idea what I've seen or where I've been.
I've been around San Diego a lot since the early 2000s, the downtown area is vastly nicer now than it was then. I've only been to San Fran a few times, so I can't really speak on that City. But I've ridden the train into downtown and it's been great. (Whatever one from the airport, can't remember what they called it)
If you spend enough time in downtown Kansas City, St Louis, Atlanta, etc, you'll see all the exact same shit you do in San Fran.
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/a3xdae/more-people-pooping-in-san-francisco-than-ever-all-time-high-vgtrn
Yes, if you don't mind human shit in the streets and you're not bothered by witnessing junkies shooting up in public and dealing with their dirty syringes also left in the street and you're cool with you car being broken into on a regular basis, the quality of life is great.
What it my "narrative" Kunt? M -
Has the quality of life in west coast cites decreased in the last 10 years O'Keefed? Are the cities cleaner or are they dirtier? Can you list for us the reasons why you believe that might be the case? Are these question too fucking tough for a liberal Kunt to answer?HHusky said:
I guess quality of life is pretty ideal in the rest of the nation's cities. Toledo's calling you, blob.SFGbob said:for the diminishing quality of life issues facing most all of our west coast cities?
And yes Hondo, your claim that it's all a myth designed to make liberal cities look bad and the problems aren't that great will be accepted as an answer. There is no wrong answer.
First of all is it even really a problem?
If yes, what's the reason(s) for it.
Does the increase in human shit and piss in the streets increase or decrease the quality of life in urban areas? -
We have open borders with the rest of the country. Maybe we need a wall.SFGbob said:
Has the quality of life in west coast cites decreased in the last 10 years O'Keefed? Are the cities cleaner or are they dirtier? Can you list for us the reasons why you believe that might be the case? Are these question too fucking tough for a liberal Kunt to answer?HHusky said:
I guess quality of life is pretty ideal in the rest of the nation's cities. Toledo's calling you, blob.SFGbob said:for the diminishing quality of life issues facing most all of our west coast cities?
And yes Hondo, your claim that it's all a myth designed to make liberal cities look bad and the problems aren't that great will be accepted as an answer. There is no wrong answer.
First of all is it even really a problem?
If yes, what's the reason(s) for it.
Does the increase in human shit and piss in the streets increase or decrease the quality of life in urban areas? -
Again you can't read. I said I've been going there for 20 years and still go to San Diego. Idiot.SFGbob said:Hondo the expert on west coast urban living who rode the "train" to downtown SF once and who used to visit San Diego 20 years ago, declares there is no diminished quality of life in West Coast cities today because Race never saw this guy shitting in the streets.
-
So you have no explanation or reason why the quality of life in West Coast cities has diminished. Got it.HHusky said:
We have open borders with the rest of the country. Maybe we need a wall.SFGbob said:
Has the quality of life in west coast cites decreased in the last 10 years O'Keefed? Are the cities cleaner or are they dirtier? Can you list for us the reasons why you believe that might be the case? Are these question too fucking tough for a liberal Kunt to answer?HHusky said:
I guess quality of life is pretty ideal in the rest of the nation's cities. Toledo's calling you, blob.SFGbob said:for the diminishing quality of life issues facing most all of our west coast cities?
And yes Hondo, your claim that it's all a myth designed to make liberal cities look bad and the problems aren't that great will be accepted as an answer. There is no wrong answer.
First of all is it even really a problem?
If yes, what's the reason(s) for it.
Does the increase in human shit and piss in the streets increase or decrease the quality of life in urban areas? -
The quality of life in most places diminishes when they experience rapid population increases with no comparable increase in infrastructure, housing or services. Thus my comment about the wall. It's hard to imagine this comes as news to you, but perhaps you don't get out much.SFGbob said:
So you have no explanation or reason why the quality of life in West Coast cities has diminished. Got it.HHusky said:
We have open borders with the rest of the country. Maybe we need a wall.SFGbob said:
Has the quality of life in west coast cites decreased in the last 10 years O'Keefed? Are the cities cleaner or are they dirtier? Can you list for us the reasons why you believe that might be the case? Are these question too fucking tough for a liberal Kunt to answer?HHusky said:
I guess quality of life is pretty ideal in the rest of the nation's cities. Toledo's calling you, blob.SFGbob said:for the diminishing quality of life issues facing most all of our west coast cities?
And yes Hondo, your claim that it's all a myth designed to make liberal cities look bad and the problems aren't that great will be accepted as an answer. There is no wrong answer.
First of all is it even really a problem?
If yes, what's the reason(s) for it.
Does the increase in human shit and piss in the streets increase or decrease the quality of life in urban areas? -
So who would be responsible for funding infrastructure and housing and who has made new housing stock prohibitively expensive through regulation? And now - Rent Control!!!!HHusky said:
The quality of life in most places diminishes when they experience rapid population increases with no comparable increase in infrastructure, housing or services. Thus my comment about the wall. It's hard to imagine this comes as news to you, but perhaps you don't get out much.SFGbob said:
So you have no explanation or reason why the quality of life in West Coast cities has diminished. Got it.HHusky said:
We have open borders with the rest of the country. Maybe we need a wall.SFGbob said:
Has the quality of life in west coast cites decreased in the last 10 years O'Keefed? Are the cities cleaner or are they dirtier? Can you list for us the reasons why you believe that might be the case? Are these question too fucking tough for a liberal Kunt to answer?HHusky said:
I guess quality of life is pretty ideal in the rest of the nation's cities. Toledo's calling you, blob.SFGbob said:for the diminishing quality of life issues facing most all of our west coast cities?
And yes Hondo, your claim that it's all a myth designed to make liberal cities look bad and the problems aren't that great will be accepted as an answer. There is no wrong answer.
First of all is it even really a problem?
If yes, what's the reason(s) for it.
Does the increase in human shit and piss in the streets increase or decrease the quality of life in urban areas? -
And when he gets out, all he sees is people shitting on the streets and shooting up. Sounds like he needs to go to more high class areas.HHusky said:
The quality of life in most places diminishes when they experience rapid population increases with no comparable increase in infrastructure, housing or services. Thus my comment about the wall. It's hard to imagine this comes as news to you, but perhaps you don't get out much.SFGbob said:
So you have no explanation or reason why the quality of life in West Coast cities has diminished. Got it.HHusky said:
We have open borders with the rest of the country. Maybe we need a wall.SFGbob said:
Has the quality of life in west coast cites decreased in the last 10 years O'Keefed? Are the cities cleaner or are they dirtier? Can you list for us the reasons why you believe that might be the case? Are these question too fucking tough for a liberal Kunt to answer?HHusky said:
I guess quality of life is pretty ideal in the rest of the nation's cities. Toledo's calling you, blob.SFGbob said:for the diminishing quality of life issues facing most all of our west coast cities?
And yes Hondo, your claim that it's all a myth designed to make liberal cities look bad and the problems aren't that great will be accepted as an answer. There is no wrong answer.
First of all is it even really a problem?
If yes, what's the reason(s) for it.
Does the increase in human shit and piss in the streets increase or decrease the quality of life in urban areas? -
Good God, Race! This is just retarded. Regulation has very little to do with what happens to housing prices when hundreds of thousands more people move to a city. I thought you were the gals who worshipped markets.
-
Homelessness isn’t caused by lack or housing or housing prices. You know who isn’t homeless? Immigrants, legal or illegal. HTH -
So people are shitting and pissing and doing drugs in the streets more today in SF due to rapid increase in population? Interesting because the population here in SF is only slightly larger than it was in the 1950s and in terms of rapid increase in the cities population growth the growth rates today pale in comparison to what they were in the 1930s 40s and 50s and that's when the city spent next to nothing on services and yet you didn't have people shitting in the streets back then.HHusky said:
The quality of life in most places diminishes when they experience rapid population increases with no comparable increase in infrastructure, housing or services. Thus my comment about the wall. It's hard to imagine this comes as news to you, but perhaps you don't get out much.SFGbob said:
So you have no explanation or reason why the quality of life in West Coast cities has diminished. Got it.HHusky said:
We have open borders with the rest of the country. Maybe we need a wall.SFGbob said:
Has the quality of life in west coast cites decreased in the last 10 years O'Keefed? Are the cities cleaner or are they dirtier? Can you list for us the reasons why you believe that might be the case? Are these question too fucking tough for a liberal Kunt to answer?HHusky said:
I guess quality of life is pretty ideal in the rest of the nation's cities. Toledo's calling you, blob.SFGbob said:for the diminishing quality of life issues facing most all of our west coast cities?
And yes Hondo, your claim that it's all a myth designed to make liberal cities look bad and the problems aren't that great will be accepted as an answer. There is no wrong answer.
First of all is it even really a problem?
If yes, what's the reason(s) for it.
Does the increase in human shit and piss in the streets increase or decrease the quality of life in urban areas?
So, yes this does come as news to me. -
Why the President, haven't you been paying attention Race?RaceBannon said:
So who would be responsible for funding infrastructure and housing and who has made new housing stock prohibitively expensive through regulation? And now - Rent Control!!!!HHusky said:
The quality of life in most places diminishes when they experience rapid population increases with no comparable increase in infrastructure, housing or services. Thus my comment about the wall. It's hard to imagine this comes as news to you, but perhaps you don't get out much.SFGbob said:
So you have no explanation or reason why the quality of life in West Coast cities has diminished. Got it.HHusky said:
We have open borders with the rest of the country. Maybe we need a wall.SFGbob said:
Has the quality of life in west coast cites decreased in the last 10 years O'Keefed? Are the cities cleaner or are they dirtier? Can you list for us the reasons why you believe that might be the case? Are these question too fucking tough for a liberal Kunt to answer?HHusky said:
I guess quality of life is pretty ideal in the rest of the nation's cities. Toledo's calling you, blob.SFGbob said:for the diminishing quality of life issues facing most all of our west coast cities?
And yes Hondo, your claim that it's all a myth designed to make liberal cities look bad and the problems aren't that great will be accepted as an answer. There is no wrong answer.
First of all is it even really a problem?
If yes, what's the reason(s) for it.
Does the increase in human shit and piss in the streets increase or decrease the quality of life in urban areas? -
Bob lies by omission.SFGbob said:
So people are shitting and pissing and doing drugs in the streets more today in SF due to rapid increase in population? Interesting because the population here in SF is only slightly larger than it was in the 1950s and in terms of rapid increase in the cities population growth the growth rates today pale in comparison to what they were in the 1930s 40s and 50s and that's when the city spent next to nothing on services and yet you didn't have people shitting in the streets back then.HHusky said:
The quality of life in most places diminishes when they experience rapid population increases with no comparable increase in infrastructure, housing or services. Thus my comment about the wall. It's hard to imagine this comes as news to you, but perhaps you don't get out much.SFGbob said:
So you have no explanation or reason why the quality of life in West Coast cities has diminished. Got it.HHusky said:
We have open borders with the rest of the country. Maybe we need a wall.SFGbob said:
Has the quality of life in west coast cites decreased in the last 10 years O'Keefed? Are the cities cleaner or are they dirtier? Can you list for us the reasons why you believe that might be the case? Are these question too fucking tough for a liberal Kunt to answer?HHusky said:
I guess quality of life is pretty ideal in the rest of the nation's cities. Toledo's calling you, blob.SFGbob said:for the diminishing quality of life issues facing most all of our west coast cities?
And yes Hondo, your claim that it's all a myth designed to make liberal cities look bad and the problems aren't that great will be accepted as an answer. There is no wrong answer.
First of all is it even really a problem?
If yes, what's the reason(s) for it.
Does the increase in human shit and piss in the streets increase or decrease the quality of life in urban areas?
So, yes this does come as news to me.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisco–Oakland–Berkeley,_CA_Metropolitan_Statistical_Area#Demographics -
They shit on the sidewalks in Oakland, too.2001400ex said:
Bob lies by omission.SFGbob said:
So people are shitting and pissing and doing drugs in the streets more today in SF due to rapid increase in population? Interesting because the population here in SF is only slightly larger than it was in the 1950s and in terms of rapid increase in the cities population growth the growth rates today pale in comparison to what they were in the 1930s 40s and 50s and that's when the city spent next to nothing on services and yet you didn't have people shitting in the streets back then.HHusky said:
The quality of life in most places diminishes when they experience rapid population increases with no comparable increase in infrastructure, housing or services. Thus my comment about the wall. It's hard to imagine this comes as news to you, but perhaps you don't get out much.SFGbob said:
So you have no explanation or reason why the quality of life in West Coast cities has diminished. Got it.HHusky said:
We have open borders with the rest of the country. Maybe we need a wall.SFGbob said:
Has the quality of life in west coast cites decreased in the last 10 years O'Keefed? Are the cities cleaner or are they dirtier? Can you list for us the reasons why you believe that might be the case? Are these question too fucking tough for a liberal Kunt to answer?HHusky said:
I guess quality of life is pretty ideal in the rest of the nation's cities. Toledo's calling you, blob.SFGbob said:for the diminishing quality of life issues facing most all of our west coast cities?
And yes Hondo, your claim that it's all a myth designed to make liberal cities look bad and the problems aren't that great will be accepted as an answer. There is no wrong answer.
First of all is it even really a problem?
If yes, what's the reason(s) for it.
Does the increase in human shit and piss in the streets increase or decrease the quality of life in urban areas?
So, yes this does come as news to me.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisco–Oakland–Berkeley,_CA_Metropolitan_Statistical_Area#Demographics
-
Yes, yes. Going there for 20 years and took the "train" into SF once. Obviously you're an expert on urban affairs.2001400ex said:
Again you can't read. I said I've been going there for 20 years and still go to San Diego. Idiot.SFGbob said:Hondo the expert on west coast urban living who rode the "train" to downtown SF once and who used to visit San Diego 20 years ago, declares there is no diminished quality of life in West Coast cities today because Race never saw this guy shitting in the streets.
-
State clearly what my "lie" is you worthless piece of shit. The city of San Francisco's population in 1950 was 775K it then declined for 30 years and then didn't reach that number again until 2000. It's a little over 100K from that 1950 number today.2001400ex said:
Bob lies by omission.SFGbob said:
So people are shitting and pissing and doing drugs in the streets more today in SF due to rapid increase in population? Interesting because the population here in SF is only slightly larger than it was in the 1950s and in terms of rapid increase in the cities population growth the growth rates today pale in comparison to what they were in the 1930s 40s and 50s and that's when the city spent next to nothing on services and yet you didn't have people shitting in the streets back then.HHusky said:
The quality of life in most places diminishes when they experience rapid population increases with no comparable increase in infrastructure, housing or services. Thus my comment about the wall. It's hard to imagine this comes as news to you, but perhaps you don't get out much.SFGbob said:
So you have no explanation or reason why the quality of life in West Coast cities has diminished. Got it.HHusky said:
We have open borders with the rest of the country. Maybe we need a wall.SFGbob said:
Has the quality of life in west coast cites decreased in the last 10 years O'Keefed? Are the cities cleaner or are they dirtier? Can you list for us the reasons why you believe that might be the case? Are these question too fucking tough for a liberal Kunt to answer?HHusky said:
I guess quality of life is pretty ideal in the rest of the nation's cities. Toledo's calling you, blob.SFGbob said:for the diminishing quality of life issues facing most all of our west coast cities?
And yes Hondo, your claim that it's all a myth designed to make liberal cities look bad and the problems aren't that great will be accepted as an answer. There is no wrong answer.
First of all is it even really a problem?
If yes, what's the reason(s) for it.
Does the increase in human shit and piss in the streets increase or decrease the quality of life in urban areas?
So, yes this does come as news to me.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisco–Oakland–Berkeley,_CA_Metropolitan_Statistical_Area#Demographics
Go fuck yourself Hondo.
-
Good Lord indeed. Your knowledge of supply and demand in housing is pitiful. Adding massive regulation from initial land buy through completion of the stock has no effect on price.HHusky said:Good God, Race! This is just retarded. Regulation has very little to do with what happens to housing prices when hundreds of thousands more people move to a city. I thought you were the gals who worshipped markets.
If hundreds of thousands of people move to a city it would seem that the city leaders would do all they can to add housing stock not discourage it. Guess what they choose
-
Yes, if you just gave the people shitting and pissing in the streets homes, you'd "solve" the homeless problem.MikeDamone said:
Homelessness isn’t caused by lack or housing or housing prices. You know who isn’t homeless? Immigrants, legal or illegal. HTH -
Pull up the link Bob. Using the city limits of San Fran is fucktarded.SFGbob said:
State clearly what my "lie" is you worthless piece of shit. The city of San Francisco's population in 1950 was 775K it then declined for 30 years and then didn't reach that number again until 2000. It's a little over 100K from that 1950 number today.2001400ex said:
Bob lies by omission.SFGbob said:
So people are shitting and pissing and doing drugs in the streets more today in SF due to rapid increase in population? Interesting because the population here in SF is only slightly larger than it was in the 1950s and in terms of rapid increase in the cities population growth the growth rates today pale in comparison to what they were in the 1930s 40s and 50s and that's when the city spent next to nothing on services and yet you didn't have people shitting in the streets back then.HHusky said:
The quality of life in most places diminishes when they experience rapid population increases with no comparable increase in infrastructure, housing or services. Thus my comment about the wall. It's hard to imagine this comes as news to you, but perhaps you don't get out much.SFGbob said:
So you have no explanation or reason why the quality of life in West Coast cities has diminished. Got it.HHusky said:
We have open borders with the rest of the country. Maybe we need a wall.SFGbob said:
Has the quality of life in west coast cites decreased in the last 10 years O'Keefed? Are the cities cleaner or are they dirtier? Can you list for us the reasons why you believe that might be the case? Are these question too fucking tough for a liberal Kunt to answer?HHusky said:
I guess quality of life is pretty ideal in the rest of the nation's cities. Toledo's calling you, blob.SFGbob said:for the diminishing quality of life issues facing most all of our west coast cities?
And yes Hondo, your claim that it's all a myth designed to make liberal cities look bad and the problems aren't that great will be accepted as an answer. There is no wrong answer.
First of all is it even really a problem?
If yes, what's the reason(s) for it.
Does the increase in human shit and piss in the streets increase or decrease the quality of life in urban areas?
So, yes this does come as news to me.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisco–Oakland–Berkeley,_CA_Metropolitan_Statistical_Area#Demographics
Go fuck yourself Hondo. -
Yeah because when you're talking about the homeless population in San Francisco it's "fucktarded" to talk about the population of San Francisco.2001400ex said:
Pull up the link Bob. Using the city limits of San Fran is fucktarded.SFGbob said:
State clearly what my "lie" is you worthless piece of shit. The city of San Francisco's population in 1950 was 775K it then declined for 30 years and then didn't reach that number again until 2000. It's a little over 100K from that 1950 number today.2001400ex said:
Bob lies by omission.SFGbob said:
So people are shitting and pissing and doing drugs in the streets more today in SF due to rapid increase in population? Interesting because the population here in SF is only slightly larger than it was in the 1950s and in terms of rapid increase in the cities population growth the growth rates today pale in comparison to what they were in the 1930s 40s and 50s and that's when the city spent next to nothing on services and yet you didn't have people shitting in the streets back then.HHusky said:
The quality of life in most places diminishes when they experience rapid population increases with no comparable increase in infrastructure, housing or services. Thus my comment about the wall. It's hard to imagine this comes as news to you, but perhaps you don't get out much.SFGbob said:
So you have no explanation or reason why the quality of life in West Coast cities has diminished. Got it.HHusky said:
We have open borders with the rest of the country. Maybe we need a wall.SFGbob said:
Has the quality of life in west coast cites decreased in the last 10 years O'Keefed? Are the cities cleaner or are they dirtier? Can you list for us the reasons why you believe that might be the case? Are these question too fucking tough for a liberal Kunt to answer?HHusky said:
I guess quality of life is pretty ideal in the rest of the nation's cities. Toledo's calling you, blob.SFGbob said:for the diminishing quality of life issues facing most all of our west coast cities?
And yes Hondo, your claim that it's all a myth designed to make liberal cities look bad and the problems aren't that great will be accepted as an answer. There is no wrong answer.
First of all is it even really a problem?
If yes, what's the reason(s) for it.
Does the increase in human shit and piss in the streets increase or decrease the quality of life in urban areas?
So, yes this does come as news to me.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisco–Oakland–Berkeley,_CA_Metropolitan_Statistical_Area#Demographics
Go fuck yourself Hondo.
So my "lie" is that you're a fucking moron. -
So Hondo, are you under some impression that because the population in Fremont has increased that has something to do with the homeless population in San Francisco? Explain the Kunt logic on that one Hondo.