Nunes highlights Dem smear campaign & Schiff’s lies and buffoonery

insinceredawg said:

SFGbob said:

GDS said:

SFGbob said:

GDS said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

GDS said:

SFGbob said:

insinceredawg said:

This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter

Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt act

Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theories

Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.

Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.


A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446

Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?

Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!

Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.

Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?

I cared. Did you, comrade?

Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?

I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.

And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.

Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?

You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.

The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted.

So then Politico is lying. Got it. And I don't have you confused with anyone. You're the guy who didn't say shit while Obama gave them MREs and blankets to defend themselves.

And drones and armored humvees and mortar detecting radar. He should have done more but to implicate it was just blankets and mres makes you look as stupid as Nunes did today.

Was any of the aid he gave them lethal aid? And the person who looks stupid is the gullible Kunt who claimed there was no basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine interfered in the 2016 Election

Weird how you fell back on your usual MO and ran and hid like a fucking Kunt. Was Politico lying in that article Scotty or were you just running your ignorant twat of mouth again?

Sorry my WiFi cut out on the plane...aka running and hiding. It wasn’t my testimony it was the witnesses in congresses testimony. Noted that you had to dig up a long since debunked article from three years ago though to try and make your point.

When would you expect an article talking about Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election to have been written Scotty? And you saying it has been "debunked" is just another one of your lies. Politico hasn't retracted their story and neither of the reporters have said they are retracting the story.

Considering the fact that this is one of right's favorite talking points right now, I'd expect there to be some recent reporting on it. Apparently there's nothing to report because Bob is still clinging on to 3 year old articles. Sad.

insinceredawg said:

SFGbob said:

GDS said:

SFGbob said:

GDS said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

GDS said:

SFGbob said:

insinceredawg said:

This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter

Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt act

Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theories

Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.

Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.


A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446

Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?

Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!

Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.

Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?

I cared. Did you, comrade?

Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?

I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.

And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.

Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?

You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.

The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted.

So then Politico is lying. Got it. And I don't have you confused with anyone. You're the guy who didn't say shit while Obama gave them MREs and blankets to defend themselves.

And drones and armored humvees and mortar detecting radar. He should have done more but to implicate it was just blankets and mres makes you look as stupid as Nunes did today.

Was any of the aid he gave them lethal aid? And the person who looks stupid is the gullible Kunt who claimed there was no basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine interfered in the 2016 Election

Weird how you fell back on your usual MO and ran and hid like a fucking Kunt. Was Politico lying in that article Scotty or were you just running your ignorant twat of mouth again?

Sorry my WiFi cut out on the plane...aka running and hiding. It wasn’t my testimony it was the witnesses in congresses testimony. Noted that you had to dig up a long since debunked article from three years ago though to try and make your point.

When would you expect an article talking about Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election to have been written Scotty? And you saying it has been "debunked" is just another one of your lies. Politico hasn't retracted their story and neither of the reporters have said they are retracting the story.

Considering the fact that this is one of right's favorite talking points right now, I'd expect there to be some recent reporting on it. Apparently there's nothing to report because Bob is still clinging on to 3 year old articles. Sad.

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

GDS said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

GDS said:

SFGbob said:

insinceredawg said:

This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter

Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt act

Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theories

Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.

Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.


A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446

Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?

Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!

Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.

Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?

I cared. Did you, comrade?

Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?

I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.

And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.

Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?

You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.

The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted.

So then Politico is lying. Got it. And I don't have you confused with anyone. You're the guy who didn't say shit while Obama gave them MREs and blankets to defend themselves.

And drones and armored humvees and mortar detecting radar. He should have done more but to implicate it was just blankets and mres makes you look as stupid as Nunes did today.

Was any of the aid he gave them lethal aid? And the person who looks stupid is the gullible Kunt who claimed there was no basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine interfered in the 2016 Election

Weird how you fell back on your usual MO and ran and hid like a fucking Kunt. Was Politico lying in that article Scotty or were you just running your ignorant twat of mouth again?

Lethal aid is much more useful in extorting and bribing a nation under an existential threat. Good point, comrade!

And yet Trump gave it to them and your cocksuck gawd did not.

HHusky said:

You were on the Shed too, Race. Are you lying or senile?