Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Nunes highlights Dem smear campaign & Schiff’s lies and buffoonery
Comments
-
Yeah, it's been "debunked" Care to show me where the reporter, who now works for the NYTimes has retracted this story?insinceredawg said:
Bob pulls up 3 year old articles to push a fake news story that has already been debunked. Give it up Bobby. Maybe take another shot with Pizzagate or Uranium One?SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty? -
That's nice that you tout a 3 year old Politico article as the sole source of truth when it fits your agenda. They were wrong, just like your news source was wrong about Uranium One, Pizzagate, and whatever crackpot conspiracy theories @Sledog is peddling this week.SFGbob said:
Was any of the aid he gave them lethal aid? And the person who looks stupid is the gullible Kunt who claimed there was no basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine interfered in the 2016 ElectionGDS said:
And drones and armored humvees and mortar detecting radar. He should have done more but to implicate it was just blankets and mres makes you look as stupid as Nunes did today.SFGbob said:
So then Politico is lying. Got it. And I don't have you confused with anyone. You're the guy who didn't say shit while Obama gave them MREs and blankets to defend themselves.HHusky said:
You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.SFGbob said:
Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?HHusky said:
I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.SFGbob said:
Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?HHusky said:
I cared. Did you, comrade?SFGbob said:
Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted.
Weird how you fell back on your usual MO and ran and hid like a fucking Kunt. Was Politico lying in that article Scotty or were you just running your ignorant twat of mouth again? -
Bob, who has kissed Putin's ass more? Obama or Trump? Please provide examples to back up your answer.
-
When would you expect an article talking about Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election to have been written Scotty? And you saying it has been "debunked" is just another one of your lies. Politico hasn't retracted their story and neither of the reporters have said they are retracting the story.GDS said:
Sorry my WiFi cut out on the plane...aka running and hiding. It wasn’t my testimony it was the witnesses in congresses testimony. Noted that you had to dig up a long since debunked article from three years ago though to try and make your point.SFGbob said:
Was any of the aid he gave them lethal aid? And the person who looks stupid is the gullible Kunt who claimed there was no basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine interfered in the 2016 ElectionGDS said:
And drones and armored humvees and mortar detecting radar. He should have done more but to implicate it was just blankets and mres makes you look as stupid as Nunes did today.SFGbob said:
So then Politico is lying. Got it. And I don't have you confused with anyone. You're the guy who didn't say shit while Obama gave them MREs and blankets to defend themselves.HHusky said:
You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.SFGbob said:
Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?HHusky said:
I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.SFGbob said:
Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?HHusky said:
I cared. Did you, comrade?SFGbob said:
Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted.
Weird how you fell back on your usual MO and ran and hid like a fucking Kunt. Was Politico lying in that article Scotty or were you just running your ignorant twat of mouth again? -
Considering the fact that this is one of right's favorite talking points right now, I'd expect there to be some recent reporting on it. Apparently there's nothing to report because Bob is still clinging on to 3 year old articles. Sad.SFGbob said:
When would you expect an article talking about Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election to have been written Scotty? And you saying it has been "debunked" is just another one of your lies. Politico hasn't retracted their story and neither of the reporters have said they are retracting the story.GDS said:
Sorry my WiFi cut out on the plane...aka running and hiding. It wasn’t my testimony it was the witnesses in congresses testimony. Noted that you had to dig up a long since debunked article from three years ago though to try and make your point.SFGbob said:
Was any of the aid he gave them lethal aid? And the person who looks stupid is the gullible Kunt who claimed there was no basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine interfered in the 2016 ElectionGDS said:
And drones and armored humvees and mortar detecting radar. He should have done more but to implicate it was just blankets and mres makes you look as stupid as Nunes did today.SFGbob said:
So then Politico is lying. Got it. And I don't have you confused with anyone. You're the guy who didn't say shit while Obama gave them MREs and blankets to defend themselves.HHusky said:
You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.SFGbob said:
Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?HHusky said:
I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.SFGbob said:
Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?HHusky said:
I cared. Did you, comrade?SFGbob said:
Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted.
Weird how you fell back on your usual MO and ran and hid like a fucking Kunt. Was Politico lying in that article Scotty or were you just running your ignorant twat of mouth again? -
Imagine thinking that America gives a shit about this latest THUD of a scandal
Where to next? Dumfuckistan? -
You may be right and we may have officially passed into the idiocracy zone. But bribery is a ground for impeachment explicitly stated in the Constitution and obviously presented by this case. If that THUDS for you, you should be permanently prohibited from ever lecturing any of us about American exceptionalism or ideals ever again.RaceBannon said:Imagine thinking that America gives a shit about this latest THUD of a scandal
Where to next? Dumfuckistan?
-
The reporter who wrote the article about Coats threatening to resign hasn’t retracted the story either so by your own “kunt logic” you’re conceding that stoutly hasn’t been debunked...SFGbob said:
When would you expect an article talking about Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election to have been written Scotty? And you saying it has been "debunked" is just another one of your lies. Politico hasn't retracted their story and neither of the reporters have said they are retracting the story.GDS said:
Sorry my WiFi cut out on the plane...aka running and hiding. It wasn’t my testimony it was the witnesses in congresses testimony. Noted that you had to dig up a long since debunked article from three years ago though to try and make your point.SFGbob said:
Was any of the aid he gave them lethal aid? And the person who looks stupid is the gullible Kunt who claimed there was no basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine interfered in the 2016 ElectionGDS said:
And drones and armored humvees and mortar detecting radar. He should have done more but to implicate it was just blankets and mres makes you look as stupid as Nunes did today.SFGbob said:
So then Politico is lying. Got it. And I don't have you confused with anyone. You're the guy who didn't say shit while Obama gave them MREs and blankets to defend themselves.HHusky said:
You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.SFGbob said:
Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?HHusky said:
I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.SFGbob said:
Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?HHusky said:
I cared. Did you, comrade?SFGbob said:
Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted.
Weird how you fell back on your usual MO and ran and hid like a fucking Kunt. Was Politico lying in that article Scotty or were you just running your ignorant twat of mouth again? -
I am enjoying watching you goose step to your dem leaders by adopting their terminology. "extortion" ha ha ha.......try thinking for yourself man.HHusky said:I'm enjoying the GOP strategy of pretending because Daddy got caught before his extortion scheme could have its intended effect--caught by members of both parties--there's "nothing to see here".
-
And yet Trump gave it to them and your cocksuck gawd did not.HHusky said:
Lethal aid is much more useful in extorting and bribing a nation under an existential threat. Good point, comrade!SFGbob said:
Was any of the aid he gave them lethal aid? And the person who looks stupid is the gullible Kunt who claimed there was no basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine interfered in the 2016 ElectionGDS said:
And drones and armored humvees and mortar detecting radar. He should have done more but to implicate it was just blankets and mres makes you look as stupid as Nunes did today.SFGbob said:
So then Politico is lying. Got it. And I don't have you confused with anyone. You're the guy who didn't say shit while Obama gave them MREs and blankets to defend themselves.HHusky said:
You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.SFGbob said:
Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?HHusky said:
I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.SFGbob said:
Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?HHusky said:
I cared. Did you, comrade?SFGbob said:
Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted.
Weird how you fell back on your usual MO and ran and hid like a fucking Kunt. Was Politico lying in that article Scotty or were you just running your ignorant twat of mouth again?
