Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Nunes highlights Dem smear campaign & Schiff’s lies and buffoonery
Comments
-
Yeah, it's been "debunked" Care to show me where the reporter, who now works for the NYTimes has retracted this story?insinceredawg said:
Bob pulls up 3 year old articles to push a fake news story that has already been debunked. Give it up Bobby. Maybe take another shot with Pizzagate or Uranium One?SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty? -
That's nice that you tout a 3 year old Politico article as the sole source of truth when it fits your agenda. They were wrong, just like your news source was wrong about Uranium One, Pizzagate, and whatever crackpot conspiracy theories @Sledog is peddling this week.SFGbob said:
Was any of the aid he gave them lethal aid? And the person who looks stupid is the gullible Kunt who claimed there was no basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine interfered in the 2016 ElectionGDS said:
And drones and armored humvees and mortar detecting radar. He should have done more but to implicate it was just blankets and mres makes you look as stupid as Nunes did today.SFGbob said:
So then Politico is lying. Got it. And I don't have you confused with anyone. You're the guy who didn't say shit while Obama gave them MREs and blankets to defend themselves.HHusky said:
You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.SFGbob said:
Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?HHusky said:
I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.SFGbob said:
Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?HHusky said:
I cared. Did you, comrade?SFGbob said:
Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted.
Weird how you fell back on your usual MO and ran and hid like a fucking Kunt. Was Politico lying in that article Scotty or were you just running your ignorant twat of mouth again? -
Bob, who has kissed Putin's ass more? Obama or Trump? Please provide examples to back up your answer.
-
When would you expect an article talking about Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election to have been written Scotty? And you saying it has been "debunked" is just another one of your lies. Politico hasn't retracted their story and neither of the reporters have said they are retracting the story.GDS said:
Sorry my WiFi cut out on the plane...aka running and hiding. It wasn’t my testimony it was the witnesses in congresses testimony. Noted that you had to dig up a long since debunked article from three years ago though to try and make your point.SFGbob said:
Was any of the aid he gave them lethal aid? And the person who looks stupid is the gullible Kunt who claimed there was no basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine interfered in the 2016 ElectionGDS said:
And drones and armored humvees and mortar detecting radar. He should have done more but to implicate it was just blankets and mres makes you look as stupid as Nunes did today.SFGbob said:
So then Politico is lying. Got it. And I don't have you confused with anyone. You're the guy who didn't say shit while Obama gave them MREs and blankets to defend themselves.HHusky said:
You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.SFGbob said:
Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?HHusky said:
I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.SFGbob said:
Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?HHusky said:
I cared. Did you, comrade?SFGbob said:
Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted.
Weird how you fell back on your usual MO and ran and hid like a fucking Kunt. Was Politico lying in that article Scotty or were you just running your ignorant twat of mouth again? -
Considering the fact that this is one of right's favorite talking points right now, I'd expect there to be some recent reporting on it. Apparently there's nothing to report because Bob is still clinging on to 3 year old articles. Sad.SFGbob said:
When would you expect an article talking about Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election to have been written Scotty? And you saying it has been "debunked" is just another one of your lies. Politico hasn't retracted their story and neither of the reporters have said they are retracting the story.GDS said:
Sorry my WiFi cut out on the plane...aka running and hiding. It wasn’t my testimony it was the witnesses in congresses testimony. Noted that you had to dig up a long since debunked article from three years ago though to try and make your point.SFGbob said:
Was any of the aid he gave them lethal aid? And the person who looks stupid is the gullible Kunt who claimed there was no basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine interfered in the 2016 ElectionGDS said:
And drones and armored humvees and mortar detecting radar. He should have done more but to implicate it was just blankets and mres makes you look as stupid as Nunes did today.SFGbob said:
So then Politico is lying. Got it. And I don't have you confused with anyone. You're the guy who didn't say shit while Obama gave them MREs and blankets to defend themselves.HHusky said:
You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.SFGbob said:
Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?HHusky said:
I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.SFGbob said:
Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?HHusky said:
I cared. Did you, comrade?SFGbob said:
Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted.
Weird how you fell back on your usual MO and ran and hid like a fucking Kunt. Was Politico lying in that article Scotty or were you just running your ignorant twat of mouth again? -
Imagine thinking that America gives a shit about this latest THUD of a scandal
Where to next? Dumfuckistan? -
You may be right and we may have officially passed into the idiocracy zone. But bribery is a ground for impeachment explicitly stated in the Constitution and obviously presented by this case. If that THUDS for you, you should be permanently prohibited from ever lecturing any of us about American exceptionalism or ideals ever again.RaceBannon said:Imagine thinking that America gives a shit about this latest THUD of a scandal
Where to next? Dumfuckistan?
-
The reporter who wrote the article about Coats threatening to resign hasn’t retracted the story either so by your own “kunt logic” you’re conceding that stoutly hasn’t been debunked...SFGbob said:
When would you expect an article talking about Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election to have been written Scotty? And you saying it has been "debunked" is just another one of your lies. Politico hasn't retracted their story and neither of the reporters have said they are retracting the story.GDS said:
Sorry my WiFi cut out on the plane...aka running and hiding. It wasn’t my testimony it was the witnesses in congresses testimony. Noted that you had to dig up a long since debunked article from three years ago though to try and make your point.SFGbob said:
Was any of the aid he gave them lethal aid? And the person who looks stupid is the gullible Kunt who claimed there was no basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine interfered in the 2016 ElectionGDS said:
And drones and armored humvees and mortar detecting radar. He should have done more but to implicate it was just blankets and mres makes you look as stupid as Nunes did today.SFGbob said:
So then Politico is lying. Got it. And I don't have you confused with anyone. You're the guy who didn't say shit while Obama gave them MREs and blankets to defend themselves.HHusky said:
You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.SFGbob said:
Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?HHusky said:
I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.SFGbob said:
Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?HHusky said:
I cared. Did you, comrade?SFGbob said:
Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted.
Weird how you fell back on your usual MO and ran and hid like a fucking Kunt. Was Politico lying in that article Scotty or were you just running your ignorant twat of mouth again? -
I am enjoying watching you goose step to your dem leaders by adopting their terminology. "extortion" ha ha ha.......try thinking for yourself man.HHusky said:I'm enjoying the GOP strategy of pretending because Daddy got caught before his extortion scheme could have its intended effect--caught by members of both parties--there's "nothing to see here".
-
And yet Trump gave it to them and your cocksuck gawd did not.HHusky said:
Lethal aid is much more useful in extorting and bribing a nation under an existential threat. Good point, comrade!SFGbob said:
Was any of the aid he gave them lethal aid? And the person who looks stupid is the gullible Kunt who claimed there was no basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine interfered in the 2016 ElectionGDS said:
And drones and armored humvees and mortar detecting radar. He should have done more but to implicate it was just blankets and mres makes you look as stupid as Nunes did today.SFGbob said:
So then Politico is lying. Got it. And I don't have you confused with anyone. You're the guy who didn't say shit while Obama gave them MREs and blankets to defend themselves.HHusky said:
You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.SFGbob said:
Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?HHusky said:
I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.SFGbob said:
Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?HHusky said:
I cared. Did you, comrade?SFGbob said:
Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted.
Weird how you fell back on your usual MO and ran and hid like a fucking Kunt. Was Politico lying in that article Scotty or were you just running your ignorant twat of mouth again? -
Why does Politico still keep this "debunked" story up on their website?insinceredawg said:
Considering the fact that this is one of right's favorite talking points right now, I'd expect there to be some recent reporting on it. Apparently there's nothing to report because Bob is still clinging on to 3 year old articles. Sad.SFGbob said:
When would you expect an article talking about Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election to have been written Scotty? And you saying it has been "debunked" is just another one of your lies. Politico hasn't retracted their story and neither of the reporters have said they are retracting the story.GDS said:
Sorry my WiFi cut out on the plane...aka running and hiding. It wasn’t my testimony it was the witnesses in congresses testimony. Noted that you had to dig up a long since debunked article from three years ago though to try and make your point.SFGbob said:
Was any of the aid he gave them lethal aid? And the person who looks stupid is the gullible Kunt who claimed there was no basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine interfered in the 2016 ElectionGDS said:
And drones and armored humvees and mortar detecting radar. He should have done more but to implicate it was just blankets and mres makes you look as stupid as Nunes did today.SFGbob said:
So then Politico is lying. Got it. And I don't have you confused with anyone. You're the guy who didn't say shit while Obama gave them MREs and blankets to defend themselves.HHusky said:
You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.SFGbob said:
Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?HHusky said:
I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.SFGbob said:
Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?HHusky said:
I cared. Did you, comrade?SFGbob said:
Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted.
Weird how you fell back on your usual MO and ran and hid like a fucking Kunt. Was Politico lying in that article Scotty or were you just running your ignorant twat of mouth again? -
Coats threatening to resign? What the fuck are you talking about cocksucker.GDS said:
The reporter who wrote the article about Coats threatening to resign hasn’t retracted the story either so by your own “kunt logic” you’re conceding that stoutly hasn’t been debunked...SFGbob said:
When would you expect an article talking about Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election to have been written Scotty? And you saying it has been "debunked" is just another one of your lies. Politico hasn't retracted their story and neither of the reporters have said they are retracting the story.GDS said:
Sorry my WiFi cut out on the plane...aka running and hiding. It wasn’t my testimony it was the witnesses in congresses testimony. Noted that you had to dig up a long since debunked article from three years ago though to try and make your point.SFGbob said:
Was any of the aid he gave them lethal aid? And the person who looks stupid is the gullible Kunt who claimed there was no basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine interfered in the 2016 ElectionGDS said:
And drones and armored humvees and mortar detecting radar. He should have done more but to implicate it was just blankets and mres makes you look as stupid as Nunes did today.SFGbob said:
So then Politico is lying. Got it. And I don't have you confused with anyone. You're the guy who didn't say shit while Obama gave them MREs and blankets to defend themselves.HHusky said:
You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.SFGbob said:
Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?HHusky said:
I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.SFGbob said:
Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?HHusky said:
I cared. Did you, comrade?SFGbob said:
Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted.
Weird how you fell back on your usual MO and ran and hid like a fucking Kunt. Was Politico lying in that article Scotty or were you just running your ignorant twat of mouth again? -
Naaaah, "debunked" appears to be the favorite talking point.insinceredawg said:
Considering the fact that this is one of right's favorite talking points right now, I'd expect there to be some recent reporting on it. Apparently there's nothing to report because Bob is still clinging on to 3 year old articles. Sad.SFGbob said:
When would you expect an article talking about Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election to have been written Scotty? And you saying it has been "debunked" is just another one of your lies. Politico hasn't retracted their story and neither of the reporters have said they are retracting the story.GDS said:
Sorry my WiFi cut out on the plane...aka running and hiding. It wasn’t my testimony it was the witnesses in congresses testimony. Noted that you had to dig up a long since debunked article from three years ago though to try and make your point.SFGbob said:
Was any of the aid he gave them lethal aid? And the person who looks stupid is the gullible Kunt who claimed there was no basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine interfered in the 2016 ElectionGDS said:
And drones and armored humvees and mortar detecting radar. He should have done more but to implicate it was just blankets and mres makes you look as stupid as Nunes did today.SFGbob said:
So then Politico is lying. Got it. And I don't have you confused with anyone. You're the guy who didn't say shit while Obama gave them MREs and blankets to defend themselves.HHusky said:
You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.SFGbob said:
Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?HHusky said:
I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.SFGbob said:
Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?HHusky said:
I cared. Did you, comrade?SFGbob said:
Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted.
Weird how you fell back on your usual MO and ran and hid like a fucking Kunt. Was Politico lying in that article Scotty or were you just running your ignorant twat of mouth again? -
ObviouslyHHusky said:
You may be right and we may have officially passed into the idiocracy zone. But bribery is a ground for impeachment explicitly stated in the Constitution and obviously presented by this case. If that THUDS for you, you should be permanently prohibited from ever lecturing any of us about American exceptionalism or ideals ever again.RaceBannon said:Imagine thinking that America gives a shit about this latest THUD of a scandal
Where to next? Dumfuckistan?
Just like the obvious collusion with Russia and the obvious obstruction of justice that you still can't explain
And your leader Schiff makes hondo appear honest. His pathological lying is on another level. Kind of like yours
It thuds for everyone who isn't deranged and has half a brain. So, not you -
I’ve pointed out the fawning over Obama was ridiculous since before he was elected President. And you know that too. Trying to impress the cool kids on the Tug, comrade?SFGbob said:
And yet Trump gave it to them and your cocksuck gawd did not.HHusky said:
Lethal aid is much more useful in extorting and bribing a nation under an existential threat. Good point, comrade!SFGbob said:
Was any of the aid he gave them lethal aid? And the person who looks stupid is the gullible Kunt who claimed there was no basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine interfered in the 2016 ElectionGDS said:
And drones and armored humvees and mortar detecting radar. He should have done more but to implicate it was just blankets and mres makes you look as stupid as Nunes did today.SFGbob said:
So then Politico is lying. Got it. And I don't have you confused with anyone. You're the guy who didn't say shit while Obama gave them MREs and blankets to defend themselves.HHusky said:
You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.SFGbob said:
Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?HHusky said:
I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.SFGbob said:
Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?HHusky said:
I cared. Did you, comrade?SFGbob said:
Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted.
Weird how you fell back on your usual MO and ran and hid like a fucking Kunt. Was Politico lying in that article Scotty or were you just running your ignorant twat of mouth again? -
BullshitHHusky said:
I’ve pointed out the fawning over Obama was ridiculous since before he was elected President. And you know that too. Trying to impress the cool kids on the Tug, comrade?SFGbob said:
And yet Trump gave it to them and your cocksuck gawd did not.HHusky said:
Lethal aid is much more useful in extorting and bribing a nation under an existential threat. Good point, comrade!SFGbob said:
Was any of the aid he gave them lethal aid? And the person who looks stupid is the gullible Kunt who claimed there was no basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine interfered in the 2016 ElectionGDS said:
And drones and armored humvees and mortar detecting radar. He should have done more but to implicate it was just blankets and mres makes you look as stupid as Nunes did today.SFGbob said:
So then Politico is lying. Got it. And I don't have you confused with anyone. You're the guy who didn't say shit while Obama gave them MREs and blankets to defend themselves.HHusky said:
You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.SFGbob said:
Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?HHusky said:
I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.SFGbob said:
Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?HHusky said:
I cared. Did you, comrade?SFGbob said:
Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted.
Weird how you fell back on your usual MO and ran and hid like a fucking Kunt. Was Politico lying in that article Scotty or were you just running your ignorant twat of mouth again? -
Imagine thinking that this is anything moar than a political dog n pony show. Also, who thought it was a good idea to allow Julian Castro and Eric Swalwell speak?
If this is their star witness, you may as well take this shit show back to CSPAN where it can die alone on a burlap sack. -
You were on the Shed too, Race. Are you lying or senile?
-
Whynotboth.gifHHusky said:You were on the Shed too, Race. Are you lying or senile?
-
If you consider those folks makers I'm proud to be a taker!HHusky said:
Makers are talking now.Sledog said:
We need a 2 year investigation and spying on Democrats to find out! More there than in the dossier.HHusky said:
I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.SFGbob said:
Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?HHusky said:
I cared. Did you, comrade?SFGbob said:
Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
Takers should stay mum.
So when you retire and access funds you set aside for retirement you will be a taker. Let me know when that is so I can insult you. -
NeitherHHusky said:You were on the Shed too, Race. Are you lying or senile?
You however are well known as a liar -
Not sure why you’re insulted, Mall Cop. Some people can’t be productive members of society. You were probably born that way.
-
We call them lawyersHHusky said:
You were on the Shed too, Race.RaceBannon said:
BullshitHHusky said:
I’ve pointed out the fawning over Obama was ridiculous since before he was elected President. And you know that too. Trying to impress the cool kids on the Tug, comrade?SFGbob said:
And yet Trump gave it to them and your cocksuck gawd did not.HHusky said:
Lethal aid is much more useful in extorting and bribing a nation under an existential threat. Good point, comrade!SFGbob said:
Was any of the aid he gave them lethal aid? And the person who looks stupid is the gullible Kunt who claimed there was no basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine interfered in the 2016 ElectionGDS said:
And drones and armored humvees and mortar detecting radar. He should have done more but to implicate it was just blankets and mres makes you look as stupid as Nunes did today.SFGbob said:
So then Politico is lying. Got it. And I don't have you confused with anyone. You're the guy who didn't say shit while Obama gave them MREs and blankets to defend themselves.HHusky said:
You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.SFGbob said:
Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?HHusky said:
I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.SFGbob said:
Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?HHusky said:
I cared. Did you, comrade?SFGbob said:
Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted.
Weird how you fell back on your usual MO and ran and hid like a fucking Kunt. Was Politico lying in that article Scotty or were you just running your ignorant twat of mouth again?
Not sure why you’re insulted. Some people can’t be productive members of society. You were probably born that way.Sledog said:
If you consider those folks makers I'm proud to be a taker!HHusky said:
Makers are talking now.Sledog said:
We need a 2 year investigation and spying on Democrats to find out! More there than in the dossier.HHusky said:
I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.SFGbob said:
Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?HHusky said:
I cared. Did you, comrade?SFGbob said:
Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
Takers should stay mum.
So when you retire and access funds you set aside for retirement you will be a taker. Let me know when that is so I can insult you. -
I find it funny that most of Quacks were so ashamed of their work on other boards, that you had to sign up here with unrelated handles.HHusky said:You were on the Shed too, Race. Are you lying or senile?
Sad. -
Now would be a good time to vote on Lindsey Graham’s powerful senate resolution rebuking impeachment that has 51 votes, you would think.RaceBannon said:
ObviouslyHHusky said:
You may be right and we may have officially passed into the idiocracy zone. But bribery is a ground for impeachment explicitly stated in the Constitution and obviously presented by this case. If that THUDS for you, you should be permanently prohibited from ever lecturing any of us about American exceptionalism or ideals ever again.RaceBannon said:Imagine thinking that America gives a shit about this latest THUD of a scandal
Where to next? Dumfuckistan?
Just like the obvious collusion with Russia and the obvious obstruction of justice that you still can't explain
And your leader Schiff makes hondo appear honest. His pathological lying is on another level. Kind of like yours
It thuds for everyone who isn't deranged and has half a brain. So, not you -
Have to disagreesalemcoog said:
I find it funny that most of Quacks were so ashamed of their work on other boards, that you had to sign up here with unrelated handles.HHusky said:You were on the Shed too, Race. Are you lying or senile?
Sad.
H and the gang have the same handle
Blu and Bend are new handles but old posters -
Who was Blu?RaceBannon said:
Have to disagreesalemcoog said:
I find it funny that most of Quacks were so ashamed of their work on other boards, that you had to sign up here with unrelated handles.HHusky said:You were on the Shed too, Race. Are you lying or senile?
Sad.
H and the gang have the same handle
Blu and Bend are new handles but old posters -
Are you including yourself in that "fawning?" Fiscally responsible and complete silence when he sent MRE's and blankets. That kicks it up another level from "fawning."HHusky said:
I’ve pointed out the fawning over Obama was ridiculous since before he was elected President. And you know that too. Trying to impress the cool kids on the Tug, comrade?SFGbob said:
And yet Trump gave it to them and your cocksuck gawd did not.HHusky said:
Lethal aid is much more useful in extorting and bribing a nation under an existential threat. Good point, comrade!SFGbob said:
Was any of the aid he gave them lethal aid? And the person who looks stupid is the gullible Kunt who claimed there was no basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine interfered in the 2016 ElectionGDS said:
And drones and armored humvees and mortar detecting radar. He should have done more but to implicate it was just blankets and mres makes you look as stupid as Nunes did today.SFGbob said:
So then Politico is lying. Got it. And I don't have you confused with anyone. You're the guy who didn't say shit while Obama gave them MREs and blankets to defend themselves.HHusky said:
You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.SFGbob said:
Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?HHusky said:
I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.SFGbob said:
Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?HHusky said:
I cared. Did you, comrade?SFGbob said:
Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted.
Weird how you fell back on your usual MO and ran and hid like a fucking Kunt. Was Politico lying in that article Scotty or were you just running your ignorant twat of mouth again? -
Not sureRaceBannon said:
Have to disagreesalemcoog said:
I find it funny that most of Quacks were so ashamed of their work on other boards, that you had to sign up here with unrelated handles.HHusky said:You were on the Shed too, Race. Are you lying or senile?
Sad.
H and the gang have the same handle
Blu and Bend are new handles but old posters -
So why does Bob call HHusky, Scott and GDS O keefed?RaceBannon said:
Have to disagreesalemcoog said:
I find it funny that most of Quacks were so ashamed of their work on other boards, that you had to sign up here with unrelated handles.HHusky said:You were on the Shed too, Race. Are you lying or senile?
Sad.
H and the gang have the same handle
Blu and Bend are new handles but old posters
