Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Nunes highlights Dem smear campaign & Schiff’s lies and buffoonery
DJDuck
Member Posts: 5,970
in Tug Tavern
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vylTr2dRGu8Comments
-
This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
-
Don’t forget his fake mominsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
-
Nunes even got a dig in about moron Schiff being pranked trying to get nonexistent nude photos of Trump.😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxHrn6Byz3g -
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
-
Nunes' talking points came right from this board. Conspiracy theories, blatant lies, and of course he brings up Hillary. This is Tug's champion to stop impeachment?!SFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
-
Rats on here should be embarrassed by what Nunez said but they don't have any decency or moral compass. They just ignore the truth and celebrate the corruption.
-
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
-
I'm enjoying the GOP strategy of pretending because Daddy got caught before his extortion scheme could have its intended effect--caught by members of both parties--there's "nothing to see here".
-
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty? -
Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
-
Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so? -
I cared. Did you, comrade?SFGbob said:
Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so? -
Bob pulls up 3 year old articles to push a fake news story that has already been debunked. Give it up Bobby. Maybe take another shot with Pizzagate or Uranium One?SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty? -
Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there any factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?HHusky said:
I cared. Did you, comrade?SFGbob said:
Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so? -
Nunes is a dumbfuck conspiracy theory toting moron. I can see why this board loves him.
-
Says the clown quoting MSNBC.insinceredawg said:Nunes is a dumbfuck conspiracy theory toting moron. I can see why this board loves him.
#HondoBros #lapdog #triggered -
I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.SFGbob said:
Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?HHusky said:
I cared. Did you, comrade?SFGbob said:
Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election. -
Is there anything factually wrong from that tweet? Learn the difference between facts and opinions.pawz said:
Says the clown quoting MSNBC.insinceredawg said:Nunes is a dumbfuck conspiracy theory toting moron. I can see why this board loves him.
#HondoBros #lapdog #triggered
#pawzFS #Clockworkshill -
Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?HHusky said:
I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.SFGbob said:
Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?HHusky said:
I cared. Did you, comrade?SFGbob said:
Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election. -
Ironic. It's always special when you get called up to do Hondo's heavy lifting.insinceredawg said:
Is there anything factually wrong from that tweet? Learn the difference between facts and opinions.pawz said:
Says the clown quoting MSNBC.insinceredawg said:Nunes is a dumbfuck conspiracy theory toting moron. I can see why this board loves him.
#HondoBros #lapdog #triggered
#pawzFS #Clockworkshill
#HondoBros #lapdog #triggered -
You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.SFGbob said:
Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?HHusky said:
I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.SFGbob said:
Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?HHusky said:
I cared. Did you, comrade?SFGbob said:
Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted. -
Imagine accusing Obama of kissing Putin's ass but not see anything wrong with the way Trump has interacted with Putin. Bitchass partisan Kunt.SFGbob said:
Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?HHusky said:
I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.SFGbob said:
Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?HHusky said:
I cared. Did you, comrade?SFGbob said:
Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
Did you miss this story from last week?
https://time.com/5723222/trump-putin-russian-parade/
-
We need a 2 year investigation and spying on Democrats to find out! More there than in the dossier.HHusky said:
I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.SFGbob said:
Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?HHusky said:
I cared. Did you, comrade?SFGbob said:
Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election. -
Makers are talking now.Sledog said:
We need a 2 year investigation and spying on Democrats to find out! More there than in the dossier.HHusky said:
I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.SFGbob said:
Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?HHusky said:
I cared. Did you, comrade?SFGbob said:
Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
Takers should stay mum.
-
So then Politico is lying. Got it. And I don't have you confused with anyone. You're the guy who didn't say shit while Obama gave them MREs and blankets to defend themselves.HHusky said:
You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.SFGbob said:
Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?HHusky said:
I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.SFGbob said:
Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?HHusky said:
I cared. Did you, comrade?SFGbob said:
Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted. -
Trump gave the Ukraine's lethal weapons to defend themselves. Obama gave them blankets. Suck harder IC.insinceredawg said:
Imagine accusing Obama of kissing Putin's ass but not see anything wrong with the way Trump has interacted with Putin. Bitchass partisan Kunt.SFGbob said:
Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?HHusky said:
I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.SFGbob said:
Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?HHusky said:
I cared. Did you, comrade?SFGbob said:
Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
Did you miss this story from last week?
https://time.com/5723222/trump-putin-russian-parade/ -
And drones and armored humvees and mortar detecting radar. He should have done more but to implicate it was just blankets and mres makes you look as stupid as Nunes did today.SFGbob said:
So then Politico is lying. Got it. And I don't have you confused with anyone. You're the guy who didn't say shit while Obama gave them MREs and blankets to defend themselves.HHusky said:
You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.SFGbob said:
Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?HHusky said:
I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.SFGbob said:
Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?HHusky said:
I cared. Did you, comrade?SFGbob said:
Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted. -
Was any of the aid he gave them lethal aid? And the person who looks stupid is the gullible Kunt who claimed there was no basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine interfered in the 2016 ElectionGDS said:
And drones and armored humvees and mortar detecting radar. He should have done more but to implicate it was just blankets and mres makes you look as stupid as Nunes did today.SFGbob said:
So then Politico is lying. Got it. And I don't have you confused with anyone. You're the guy who didn't say shit while Obama gave them MREs and blankets to defend themselves.HHusky said:
You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.SFGbob said:
Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?HHusky said:
I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.SFGbob said:
Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?HHusky said:
I cared. Did you, comrade?SFGbob said:
Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted.
Weird how you fell back on your usual MO and ran and hid like a fucking Kunt. Was Politico lying in that article Scotty or were you just running your ignorant twat of mouth again? -
Lethal aid is much more useful in extorting and bribing a nation under an existential threat. Good point, comrade!SFGbob said:
Was any of the aid he gave them lethal aid? And the person who looks stupid is the gullible Kunt who claimed there was no basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine interfered in the 2016 ElectionGDS said:
And drones and armored humvees and mortar detecting radar. He should have done more but to implicate it was just blankets and mres makes you look as stupid as Nunes did today.SFGbob said:
So then Politico is lying. Got it. And I don't have you confused with anyone. You're the guy who didn't say shit while Obama gave them MREs and blankets to defend themselves.HHusky said:
You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.SFGbob said:
Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?HHusky said:
I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.SFGbob said:
Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?HHusky said:
I cared. Did you, comrade?SFGbob said:
Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted.
Weird how you fell back on your usual MO and ran and hid like a fucking Kunt. Was Politico lying in that article Scotty or were you just running your ignorant twat of mouth again? -
Sorry my WiFi cut out on the plane...aka running and hiding. It wasn’t my testimony it was the witnesses in congresses testimony. Noted that you had to dig up a long since debunked article from three years ago though to try and make your point.SFGbob said:
Was any of the aid he gave them lethal aid? And the person who looks stupid is the gullible Kunt who claimed there was no basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine interfered in the 2016 ElectionGDS said:
And drones and armored humvees and mortar detecting radar. He should have done more but to implicate it was just blankets and mres makes you look as stupid as Nunes did today.SFGbob said:
So then Politico is lying. Got it. And I don't have you confused with anyone. You're the guy who didn't say shit while Obama gave them MREs and blankets to defend themselves.HHusky said:
You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.SFGbob said:
Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?HHusky said:
I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.SFGbob said:
Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?HHusky said:
I cared. Did you, comrade?SFGbob said:
Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!SFGbob said:
Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.GDS said:
Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theoriesSFGbob said:
Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt actinsinceredawg said:This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter
Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.
A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted.
Weird how you fell back on your usual MO and ran and hid like a fucking Kunt. Was Politico lying in that article Scotty or were you just running your ignorant twat of mouth again?
