‘ Sheer CONTEMPT 4 members of Congress’: Vindman’s transcript makes Schiff look even worse
Comments
-
When an accuser is trying to edit text to match his accusation I'd call that criminal.GDS said:
Doesn't change the fact that Vindman testified the memo was edited yet the blog author in Deej's post lied about the testimony in his very next sentence. Weird how you left that our Blob. Fucking lying piece of shit.SFGbob said:
And that the "edit" wasn't due to malicious intent and that the transcript was a "very accurate" record of the conversation. Weird how you left that out Scotty. Fucking lying piece of shit.GDS said:Deej's "damning blog post" is pure bullshit. The first tweeted portion of the transcript clearly shows that Vindman testified the memo summary of the call was edited and the blog author then writes the memo wasn't edited per the testimony clearly lying about what the tweeted portion of the transcript states. Fucking hell Deej...
-
So you agree that was a political witch-hunt and not related to Benghazi. You are progressing from a partisan shill.SFGbob said:
That uncovered Hillary's use of an illegal private email server.2001400ex said:
You also missed 4 years of investigations of Benghazi.Sledog said:KGB tactics in America's Congress. Hondo Bros cheer. The left cheers. The left is now openly communist/socialist. They have support from the low IQ crowd, illegals and criminals.
Never thought I would see this in my lifetime. It's going to have to be cleaned up. -
Tell us how the "edit" materially altered the content, Scotty? The "edit" was minor and insignificant and as Vindman states it wasn't edited due to any malicious intent, refuting another one of your earlier lies, and that the transcript was a "very accurate" record of the conversation, refuting yet another of your lies.GDS said:
Doesn't change the fact that Vindman testified the memo was edited yet the blog author in Deej's post lied about the testimony in his very next sentence. Weird how you left that our Blob. Fucking lying piece of shit.SFGbob said:
And that the "edit" wasn't due to malicious intent and that the transcript was a "very accurate" record of the conversation. Weird how you left that out Scotty. Fucking lying piece of shit.GDS said:Deej's "damning blog post" is pure bullshit. The first tweeted portion of the transcript clearly shows that Vindman testified the memo summary of the call was edited and the blog author then writes the memo wasn't edited per the testimony clearly lying about what the tweeted portion of the transcript states. Fucking hell Deej...
A person with an ounce of shame would have admitted they'd been talking out their ass. -
DJ hates him some ad hominem attacks. He’s only guilty of about 5 of them in this thread.DJDuck said:ramenduck said:
There’s nothing in that transcript that demonstrates Vindman and his attorney showing “sheer contempt” for members of Congress.DJDuck said:‘ Sheer CONTEMPT for members of Congress’: Byron York breaks down Vindman’s transcript making Schiff look even dirtier
https://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2019/11/11/sheer-contempt-for-members-of-congress-byron-york-breaks-down-vindmans-transcript-making-schiff-look-even-dirtier/
Not surprising that DJ eats it up, since he has already volunteered to shoot Col. Vindman for treason.
Happy Veterans’ day, all.
Schiff has shown nothing but contempt for Congress to try and have a fair hearing. You are an ignorant moron.ramenduck said:
There’s nothing in that transcript that demonstrates Vindman and his attorney showing “sheer contempt” for members of Congress.DJDuck said:‘ Sheer CONTEMPT for members of Congress’: Byron York breaks down Vindman’s transcript making Schiff look even dirtier
https://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2019/11/11/sheer-contempt-for-members-of-congress-byron-york-breaks-down-vindmans-transcript-making-schiff-look-even-dirtier/
Not surprising that DJ eats it up, since he has already volunteered to shoot Col. Vindman for treason.
Happy Veterans’ day, all.
I addressed the content of your article, dipshit. I just threw in your complete fucking unhinged lunacy for effect.
-
Explain how her emails were related to Benghazi.Sledog said:
When everything under subpoena is destroyed and deleted I'd say someone was converting their tracks. They've recovered most of that now and it's gonna be special.2001400ex said:
You also missed 4 years of investigations of Benghazi.Sledog said:KGB tactics in America's Congress. Hondo Bros cheer. The left cheers. The left is now openly communist/socialist. They have support from the low IQ crowd, illegals and criminals.
Never thought I would see this in my lifetime. It's going to have to be cleaned up. -
So you agree that you are a pathological lying piece of crap.2001400ex said:
So you agree that was a political witch-hunt and not related to Benghazi. You are progressing from a partisan shill.SFGbob said:
That uncovered Hillary's use of an illegal private email server.2001400ex said:
You also missed 4 years of investigations of Benghazi.Sledog said:KGB tactics in America's Congress. Hondo Bros cheer. The left cheers. The left is now openly communist/socialist. They have support from the low IQ crowd, illegals and criminals.
Never thought I would see this in my lifetime. It's going to have to be cleaned up. -
iSanchez.i don't have to. She Does. Her emails are retired to be retained by law. She destroyed evidence under subpoena.2001400ex said:
Explain how her emails were related to Benghazi.Sledog said:
When everything under subpoena is destroyed and deleted I'd say someone was converting their tracks. They've recovered most of that now and it's gonna be special.2001400ex said:
You also missed 4 years of investigations of Benghazi.Sledog said:KGB tactics in America's Congress. Hondo Bros cheer. The left cheers. The left is now openly communist/socialist. They have support from the low IQ crowd, illegals and criminals.
Never thought I would see this in my lifetime. It's going to have to be cleaned up.
You defend that. I'm right, you're just deflecting as usual. -
Bob waves the white flag. Although I was expecting more pedophile homoerotic fantasies. Looks like you've grown a lot today Bob.SFGbob said:
So you agree that you are a pathological lying piece of crap.2001400ex said:
So you agree that was a political witch-hunt and not related to Benghazi. You are progressing from a partisan shill.SFGbob said:
That uncovered Hillary's use of an illegal private email server.2001400ex said:
You also missed 4 years of investigations of Benghazi.Sledog said:KGB tactics in America's Congress. Hondo Bros cheer. The left cheers. The left is now openly communist/socialist. They have support from the low IQ crowd, illegals and criminals.
Never thought I would see this in my lifetime. It's going to have to be cleaned up. -
Blob - when the blog author writes the transcript "was not edited" based solely upon Vindman's testimony is that a true or false statement? This isn't hard unless you are a lying piece of shit.....SFGbob said:
Tell us how the "edit" materially altered the content, Scotty? The "edit" was minor and insignificant and as Vindman states it wasn't edited due to any malicious intent, refuting another one of your earlier lies, and that the transcript was a "very accurate" record of the conversation, refuting yet another of your lies.GDS said:
Doesn't change the fact that Vindman testified the memo was edited yet the blog author in Deej's post lied about the testimony in his very next sentence. Weird how you left that our Blob. Fucking lying piece of shit.SFGbob said:
And that the "edit" wasn't due to malicious intent and that the transcript was a "very accurate" record of the conversation. Weird how you left that out Scotty. Fucking lying piece of shit.GDS said:Deej's "damning blog post" is pure bullshit. The first tweeted portion of the transcript clearly shows that Vindman testified the memo summary of the call was edited and the blog author then writes the memo wasn't edited per the testimony clearly lying about what the tweeted portion of the transcript states. Fucking hell Deej...
A person with an ounce of shame would have admitted they'd been talking out their ass. -
Pretty funny how you've lied your ass off repeatedly about the transcript and the edits to that transcript but now pretend to get all upset about the blog authors misstatements. Why don't you clean up the bullshit you've stated here on this board first Kunt and then we can discuss the blog author.GDS said:
Blob - when the blog author writes the transcript "was not edited" based solely upon Vindman's testimony is that a true or false statement? This isn't hard unless you are a lying piece of shit.....SFGbob said:
Tell us how the "edit" materially altered the content, Scotty? The "edit" was minor and insignificant and as Vindman states it wasn't edited due to any malicious intent, refuting another one of your earlier lies, and that the transcript was a "very accurate" record of the conversation, refuting yet another of your lies.GDS said:
Doesn't change the fact that Vindman testified the memo was edited yet the blog author in Deej's post lied about the testimony in his very next sentence. Weird how you left that our Blob. Fucking lying piece of shit.SFGbob said:
And that the "edit" wasn't due to malicious intent and that the transcript was a "very accurate" record of the conversation. Weird how you left that out Scotty. Fucking lying piece of shit.GDS said:Deej's "damning blog post" is pure bullshit. The first tweeted portion of the transcript clearly shows that Vindman testified the memo summary of the call was edited and the blog author then writes the memo wasn't edited per the testimony clearly lying about what the tweeted portion of the transcript states. Fucking hell Deej...
A person with an ounce of shame would have admitted they'd been talking out their ass.
