Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Quid pro crimes

1234568

Comments

  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470
    Sledog said:

    So looking at Sondlands statement was he lying then or is he lying now?

    Sondland - the Trumptard that "donated" a mill to Trump's inauguration? He probably realized going to jail to protect the Don wasn't worth it and instead of going down with the ship he might as well admit the gig is up.
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    Sledog said:

    So looking at Sondlands statement was he lying then or is he lying now?

    So a trump appointed ambassador to the EU who donated $1 million to trump in 2016 has elected to supplement his testimony. Why would he do that?
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,601 Standard Supporter

    Sledog said:

    So looking at Sondlands statement was he lying then or is he lying now?

    So a trump appointed ambassador to the EU who donated $1 million to trump in 2016 has elected to supplement his testimony. Why would he do that?
    He denied any quid pro quo previously and now mentions an anti corruption statement which it's what they're claiming is the qpq. You don't find this odd? Why would he suddenly change his mind or come up with something different?

    We won't know because no one else can ask questions.
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    So looking at Sondlands statement was he lying then or is he lying now?

    So a trump appointed ambassador to the EU who donated $1 million to trump in 2016 has elected to supplement his testimony. Why would he do that?
    He denied any quid pro quo previously and now mentions an anti corruption statement which it's what they're claiming is the qpq. You don't find this odd? Why would he suddenly change his mind or come up with something different?

    We won't know because no one else can ask questions.
    Any one of the 48 GOP members of the three committees on the impeachment inquiry can ask them your question any time they want on the upcoming nationally televised public hearings. They won’t however because most of them aren’t as mentally retarded as you.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,601 Standard Supporter

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    So looking at Sondlands statement was he lying then or is he lying now?

    So a trump appointed ambassador to the EU who donated $1 million to trump in 2016 has elected to supplement his testimony. Why would he do that?
    He denied any quid pro quo previously and now mentions an anti corruption statement which it's what they're claiming is the qpq. You don't find this odd? Why would he suddenly change his mind or come up with something different?

    We won't know because no one else can ask questions.
    Any one of the 48 GOP members of the three committees on the impeachment inquiry can ask them your question any time they want on the upcoming nationally televised public hearings. They won’t however because most of them aren’t as mentally retarded as you.
    No they can't.
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    So looking at Sondlands statement was he lying then or is he lying now?

    So a trump appointed ambassador to the EU who donated $1 million to trump in 2016 has elected to supplement his testimony. Why would he do that?
    He denied any quid pro quo previously and now mentions an anti corruption statement which it's what they're claiming is the qpq. You don't find this odd? Why would he suddenly change his mind or come up with something different?

    We won't know because no one else can ask questions.
    Any one of the 48 GOP members of the three committees on the impeachment inquiry can ask them your question any time they want on the upcoming nationally televised public hearings. They won’t however because most of them aren’t as mentally retarded as you.
    No they can't.
    Jfc.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,601 Standard Supporter

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    So looking at Sondlands statement was he lying then or is he lying now?

    So a trump appointed ambassador to the EU who donated $1 million to trump in 2016 has elected to supplement his testimony. Why would he do that?
    He denied any quid pro quo previously and now mentions an anti corruption statement which it's what they're claiming is the qpq. You don't find this odd? Why would he suddenly change his mind or come up with something different?

    We won't know because no one else can ask questions.
    Any one of the 48 GOP members of the three committees on the impeachment inquiry can ask them your question any time they want on the upcoming nationally televised public hearings. They won’t however because most of them aren’t as mentally retarded as you.
    No they can't.
    Jfc.
    Dems rules they can stop those testifying from answering any question they don't like. HTFH
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    So looking at Sondlands statement was he lying then or is he lying now?

    So a trump appointed ambassador to the EU who donated $1 million to trump in 2016 has elected to supplement his testimony. Why would he do that?
    He denied any quid pro quo previously and now mentions an anti corruption statement which it's what they're claiming is the qpq. You don't find this odd? Why would he suddenly change his mind or come up with something different?

    We won't know because no one else can ask questions.
    Any one of the 48 GOP members of the three committees on the impeachment inquiry can ask them your question any time they want on the upcoming nationally televised public hearings. They won’t however because most of them aren’t as mentally retarded as you.
    No they can't.
    Jfc.
    Dems rules they can stop those testifying from answering any question they don't like. HTFH
    Nunes or any of the other 47 GOP members can ask a publicly testifying witness any question they want during their allotted time, on national television no less.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,051 Standard Supporter
    GDS said:

    Sledog said:

    So looking at Sondlands statement was he lying then or is he lying now?

    Sondland - the Trumptard that "donated" a mill to Trump's inauguration? He probably realized going to jail to protect the Don wasn't worth it and instead of going down with the ship he might as well admit the gig is up.
    Oh, look who crawled out from under his rock!

    Fuck Off and don't come back @GDS until you produce Tulsi's actual words praising or showing her soft spot for Assad, you POS Parrot.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,601 Standard Supporter
    edited November 2019

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    So looking at Sondlands statement was he lying then or is he lying now?

    So a trump appointed ambassador to the EU who donated $1 million to trump in 2016 has elected to supplement his testimony. Why would he do that?
    He denied any quid pro quo previously and now mentions an anti corruption statement which it's what they're claiming is the qpq. You don't find this odd? Why would he suddenly change his mind or come up with something different?

    We won't know because no one else can ask questions.
    Any one of the 48 GOP members of the three committees on the impeachment inquiry can ask them your question any time they want on the upcoming nationally televised public hearings. They won’t however because most of them aren’t as mentally retarded as you.
    No they can't.
    Jfc.
    Dems rules they can stop those testifying from answering any question they don't like. HTFH
    Nunes or any of the other 47 GOP members can ask a publicly testifying witness any question they want during their allotted time, on national television no less.
    Read the dems rules for comprehension. He can ask but the dems then stop them from answering if they don't like the question or the answer. Kangaroo court. Stalin style.