DM to Cuog
Comments
-
It’s pretty easy. Browning couldnt expose Oregon’s secondary. Minshew and whatever the hell Leach puts out there has.RaceBannon said:I just think it is interesting that WSU does so well against the teams UW melts in the face of then shrivels up in the AC
This is the first year where I am confident Oregon can tackle in the flats and can play with 5 DBs and actually rotate players in and out. -
Other than hanging 70 on Oregon sure Browning couldn't exploit them
-
Agree about Clemson. The SEC gets a spot regardless. Big 10 is stronger than the PAC 12 currently. But why the hell should a one loss Big 12 conference champ in that weak conference get in over a 1 loss PAC 12 champ?greenblood said:
That will play itself out. Both Alabama and LSU aren’t getting in over a 1 loss P5 conference champ. A one loss conference champ in any conference tops the Pac 12 champ except for Clemson in the ACC. After Clemson, the next best team is basically Arizona. A one loss Clemson will not have the resume as a one loss Oregon or one loss Utahoregonblitzkrieg said:
Alabama has a weak schedule too, they play nobodies except for LSU and Auburn. They shouldn't be ranked at number 1. That spot belongs to LSU.greenblood said:
Believe it or not, Clemson has arguably played the worst football out of the top 5 teams right now. They almost lost at UNC earlier this year. I could easily see a team like South Carolina snipe them at the end of the season, especially with South Carolina at home.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Says who? If Oklahomo drops one to their weak conference competition, they are out and it frees up a space. None of this matters though right now. The only thing that matters this week is beating the coug.ntxduck said:
Statistically yes, it’s more likely than not Oregon drops one of their remaining games. It also won’t matter since the north is already locked up and a 12-1 Pac12 team isn’t making the playoff -
Oregon had the worst defense in all of CFB. Browning was 2-2 against Oregon and beat the worst defense in CFB and Braxton Burmeister.RaceBannon said:Other than hanging 70 on Oregon sure Browning couldn't exploit them
-
Because by season end Oklahoma would at least have 2 top 25 victories, about the same as Oregon and Utah. Clemson wouldn’t have any.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Agree about Clemson. The SEC gets a spot regardless. Big 10 is stronger than the PAC 12 currently. But why the hell should a one loss Big 12 conference champ in that weak conference get in over a 1 loss PAC 12 champ?greenblood said:
That will play itself out. Both Alabama and LSU aren’t getting in over a 1 loss P5 conference champ. A one loss conference champ in any conference tops the Pac 12 champ except for Clemson in the ACC. After Clemson, the next best team is basically Arizona. A one loss Clemson will not have the resume as a one loss Oregon or one loss Utahoregonblitzkrieg said:
Alabama has a weak schedule too, they play nobodies except for LSU and Auburn. They shouldn't be ranked at number 1. That spot belongs to LSU.greenblood said:
Believe it or not, Clemson has arguably played the worst football out of the top 5 teams right now. They almost lost at UNC earlier this year. I could easily see a team like South Carolina snipe them at the end of the season, especially with South Carolina at home.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Says who? If Oklahomo drops one to their weak conference competition, they are out and it frees up a space. None of this matters though right now. The only thing that matters this week is beating the coug.ntxduck said:
Statistically yes, it’s more likely than not Oregon drops one of their remaining games. It also won’t matter since the north is already locked up and a 12-1 Pac12 team isn’t making the playoff -
So he did exploit themlawsandl said:
Oregon had the worst defense in all of CFB. Browning was 2-2 against Oregon and beat the worst defense in CFB and Braxton Burmeister.RaceBannon said:Other than hanging 70 on Oregon sure Browning couldn't exploit them
Thanks -
Oregon often plays down to the level of their opponent, which this week is the cuog. And if there is one team that is good at beating the cuogs it’s cuogs. So take WSU in this one as UO bumbles its way to a loss. Or maybe Oregon will plunger the cuogs to the tune of 49-13. Whatever
-
Or WSU will get destroyed.dongman said:Oregon often plays down to the level of their opponent, which this week is the cuog. And if there is one team that is good at beating the cuogs it’s cuogs. So take WSU in this one as UO bumbles its way to a loss. Or maybe Oregon will plunger the cuogs to the tune of 49-13. Whatever
-
See the last sentence? Learn to readhaie said:
Or WSU will get destroyed.dongman said:Oregon often plays down to the level of their opponent, which this week is the cuog. And if there is one team that is good at beating the cuogs it’s cuogs. So take WSU in this one as UO bumbles its way to a loss. Or maybe Oregon will plunger the cuogs to the tune of 49-13. Whatever
-
I think Oregon could absolutely make it at 12-1.ntxduck said:
Statistically yes, it’s more likely than not Oregon drops one of their remaining games. It also won’t matter since the north is already locked up and a 12-1 Pac12 team isn’t making the playoff
I don't think they're likely to go 12-1 but if they do, they'll be in the playoff.
