Wins/Losses vs Talent
@ USC 2015
Stanford 2016
@ Oregon 2016
UCLA 2017
Oregon 2017
@ UCLA 2018
Stanford 2018
USC 2019
Losses against worse talent:
@ Boise 2015
Cal 2015
Utah 2015
@ Oregon 2018
@ Cal 2018
Cal 2019
@ Stanford 2019
We do not play anyone else with more talent this year besides possibly in a bowl game.
Went into this with idea that he has lost more bad games than won good games but the plain stats show it to be relatively even. With this in mind it definetly points more directly to the fact that recruiting is obviously the biggest factor in winning games.
Comments
-
I would like to see us come off a bye and beat Shittingham and the Mountain West Cadets, but I doubt we have any pride left.
Just start Sirmon and Nacua and Chin and get the rest of this shitshow over with.
/// Lyfe. -
-
I know TSIO but it would be fun to get into the Holiday bowl and play Michigan as we have them to start next season and again in '21. Would set up for some good games potentially
-
I think we have the most talented offense in the conference. USC is close, but we have a huge upgrade at QB. The offense should be #1 in the PAC 12 rather easily.
-
We might have the most talented offense in the conference, but we have the worst offensive coaching. The Cal and Stanford games come to mind as baffling, and the lack of halftime adjustments against Oregon resulted in us pissing the game awayRoadDawg55 said:I think we have the most talented offense in the conference. USC is close, but we have a huge upgrade at QB. The offense should be #1 in the PAC 12 rather easily.
-
-
Good thing we have a head coach who prioritizes recruiting so highly!Canadawg said:Since 2015 (as far back as 247 composite team rankings go) Petes wins against talent better than what the Huskies had at the time were:
@ USC 2015
Stanford 2016
@ Oregon 2016
UCLA 2017
Oregon 2017
@ UCLA 2018
Stanford 2018
USC 2019
Losses against worse talent:
@ Boise 2015
Cal 2015
Utah 2015
@ Oregon 2018
@ Cal 2018
Cal 2019
@ Stanford 2019
We do not play anyone else with more talent this year besides possibly in a bowl game.
Went into this with idea that he has lost more bad games than won good games but the plain stats show it to be relatively even. With this in mind it definetly points more directly to the fact that recruiting is obviously the biggest factor in winning games. -
We've got our own Ron ZookUW_Doog_Bot said:
Good thing we have a head coach who prioritizes recruiting so highly!Canadawg said:Since 2015 (as far back as 247 composite team rankings go) Petes wins against talent better than what the Huskies had at the time were:
@ USC 2015
Stanford 2016
@ Oregon 2016
UCLA 2017
Oregon 2017
@ UCLA 2018
Stanford 2018
USC 2019
Losses against worse talent:
@ Boise 2015
Cal 2015
Utah 2015
@ Oregon 2018
@ Cal 2018
Cal 2019
@ Stanford 2019
We do not play anyone else with more talent this year besides possibly in a bowl game.
Went into this with idea that he has lost more bad games than won good games but the plain stats show it to be relatively even. With this in mind it definetly points more directly to the fact that recruiting is obviously the biggest factor in winning games. -
Problem is that half of the talent is waiting on the Sr scrub class to graduateRoadDawg55 said:I think we have the most talented offense in the conference. USC is close, but we have a huge upgrade at QB. The offense should be #1 in the PAC 12 rather easily.
-
Eason, good OL, two very good TE’s. The WR coaching situation and been a disaster. You’re a fucking idiot if you can’t see this offense has a lot of talent.
Three senior OL that will probably get drafted. Adams and Harris will for sure. Even if Harris somehow doesn’t, he’s good. Hilbers has been solid.
Fuller, Puka, and the two TE’s give us plenty of quality options to throw the ball to.
We have three good RB’s.
Offensive coaching has been a F. A lot of coaches would be absolutely lighting up scoreboards with this offense. -
Why would it be fun to play the same opponent in consecutive games?Canadawg said:I know TSIO but it would be fun to get into the Holiday bowl and play Michigan as we have them to start next season and again in '21. Would set up for some good games potentially
-
You needed this offense and Eason to complement your defense in 2016, minus some of the dumb playcalling like the wildcat and the ridiculous JV attempt to have a guy hide in the endzone and try to blend in. Still would have lost to Alabama most likely, but it would have been a closer game.
-
How do you think ooc rivalries happen?digits said:
Why would it be fun to play the same opponent in consecutive games?Canadawg said:I know TSIO but it would be fun to get into the Holiday bowl and play Michigan as we have them to start next season and again in '21. Would set up for some good games potentially
-
Not really. One or two WR’s maybe. That’s it. Other than Baccallia, everyone on offense that plays is a genuinely good player.FirePete said:
Problem is that half of the talent is waiting on the Sr scrub class to graduateRoadDawg55 said:I think we have the most talented offense in the conference. USC is close, but we have a huge upgrade at QB. The offense should be #1 in the PAC 12 rather easily.
-
Lol....no, what has Chico done? He could not get open against LB that had 50 pounds on him. That was the match up we wanted and he could not get it done.RoadDawg55 said:
Not really. One or two WR’s maybe. That’s it. Other than Baccallia, everyone on offense that plays is a genuinely good player.FirePete said:
Problem is that half of the talent is waiting on the Sr scrub class to graduateRoadDawg55 said:I think we have the most talented offense in the conference. USC is close, but we have a huge upgrade at QB. The offense should be #1 in the PAC 12 rather easily.
-
I was going to mention him, but he hardly plays.FirePete said:
Lol....no, what has Chico done? He could not get open against LB that had 50 pounds on him. That was the match up we wanted and he could not get it done.RoadDawg55 said:
Not really. One or two WR’s maybe. That’s it. Other than Baccallia, everyone on offense that plays is a genuinely good player.FirePete said:
Problem is that half of the talent is waiting on the Sr scrub class to graduateRoadDawg55 said:I think we have the most talented offense in the conference. USC is close, but we have a huge upgrade at QB. The offense should be #1 in the PAC 12 rather easily.
-
L O L at counting wins against UCLA as punching upward.Canadawg said:Since 2015 (as far back as 247 composite team rankings go) Petes wins against talent better than what the Huskies had at the time were:
@ USC 2015
Stanford 2016
@ Oregon 2016
UCLA 2017
Oregon 2017
@ UCLA 2018
Stanford 2018
USC 2019
Losses against worse talent:
@ Boise 2015
Cal 2015
Utah 2015
@ Oregon 2018
@ Cal 2018
Cal 2019
@ Stanford 2019
We do not play anyone else with more talent this year besides possibly in a bowl game.
Went into this with idea that he has lost more bad games than won good games but the plain stats show it to be relatively even. With this in mind it definetly points more directly to the fact that recruiting is obviously the biggest factor in winning games.
2017 Oregon and 2018 Stanford as well.
So in real life. Pete has 2015 USC and.... that’s about it. -
He sees the field more than he shouldRoadDawg55 said:
I was going to mention him, but he hardly plays.FirePete said:
Lol....no, what has Chico done? He could not get open against LB that had 50 pounds on him. That was the match up we wanted and he could not get it done.RoadDawg55 said:
Not really. One or two WR’s maybe. That’s it. Other than Baccallia, everyone on offense that plays is a genuinely good player.FirePete said:
Problem is that half of the talent is waiting on the Sr scrub class to graduateRoadDawg55 said:I think we have the most talented offense in the conference. USC is close, but we have a huge upgrade at QB. The offense should be #1 in the PAC 12 rather easily.
-
History, tradition, bowl games, home-and-home series...Canadawg said:
How do you think ooc rivalries happen?digits said:
Why would it be fun to play the same opponent in consecutive games?Canadawg said:I know TSIO but it would be fun to get into the Holiday bowl and play Michigan as we have them to start next season and again in '21. Would set up for some good games potentially
-
Wow. That's exactly my point well donedigits said:
History, tradition, bowl games, home-and-home series...Canadawg said:
How do you think ooc rivalries happen?digits said:
Why would it be fun to play the same opponent in consecutive games?Canadawg said:I know TSIO but it would be fun to get into the Holiday bowl and play Michigan as we have them to start next season and again in '21. Would set up for some good games potentially
-
I'm just writing down what the 247 rankings were. No opinion here just numbers.salemcoog said:
L O L at counting wins against UCLA as punching upward.Canadawg said:Since 2015 (as far back as 247 composite team rankings go) Petes wins against talent better than what the Huskies had at the time were:
@ USC 2015
Stanford 2016
@ Oregon 2016
UCLA 2017
Oregon 2017
@ UCLA 2018
Stanford 2018
USC 2019
Losses against worse talent:
@ Boise 2015
Cal 2015
Utah 2015
@ Oregon 2018
@ Cal 2018
Cal 2019
@ Stanford 2019
We do not play anyone else with more talent this year besides possibly in a bowl game.
Went into this with idea that he has lost more bad games than won good games but the plain stats show it to be relatively even. With this in mind it definetly points more directly to the fact that recruiting is obviously the biggest factor in winning games.
2017 Oregon and 2018 Stanford as well.
So in real life. Pete has 2015 USC and.... that’s about it.
