Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Since 2015 (as far back as 247 composite team rankings go) Petes wins against talent better than what the Huskies had at the time were:
@ USC 2015
Stanford 2016
@ Oregon 2016
UCLA 2017
Oregon 2017
@ UCLA 2018
Stanford 2018
USC 2019
Losses against worse talent:
@ Boise 2015
Cal 2015
Utah 2015
@ Oregon 2018
@ Cal 2018
Cal 2019
@ Stanford 2019
We do not play anyone else with more talent this year besides possibly in a bowl game.
Went into this with idea that he has lost more bad games than won good games but the plain stats show it to be relatively even. With this in mind it definetly points more directly to the fact that recruiting is obviously the biggest factor in winning games.
3 ·
Comments
Just start Sirmon and Nacua and Chin and get the rest of this shitshow over with.
/// Lyfe.
Three senior OL that will probably get drafted. Adams and Harris will for sure. Even if Harris somehow doesn’t, he’s good. Hilbers has been solid.
Fuller, Puka, and the two TE’s give us plenty of quality options to throw the ball to.
We have three good RB’s.
Offensive coaching has been a F. A lot of coaches would be absolutely lighting up scoreboards with this offense.
2017 Oregon and 2018 Stanford as well.
So in real life. Pete has 2015 USC and.... that’s about it.