Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

You know you have the wrong coach when

whlinderwhlinder Member Posts: 4,628 Standard Supporter
After 6 years his best win is over Steve Sarkisian

Comments

  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    whlinder said:

    His two conference championships are over schools that don’t belong in the conference

    AMEN.
  • whlinderwhlinder Member Posts: 4,628 Standard Supporter
    He makes Jonathan Smith look like a competent offensive mind
  • whatshouldicareaboutwhatshouldicareabout Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,719 Swaye's Wigwam
    whlinder said:

    After 6 years his best win is over Steve Sarkisian

    The 11-2, AP Top 10, Alamo Bowl Champs feel slighted by this post
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,106 Founders Club
    whlinder said:

    whlinder said:

    His two conference championships are over schools that don’t belong in the conference

    Why did those schools win the South?

    Colorado has a more recent natty than GA, ND, Penn State, etc.

    Utah beat Saban. They’ve been a better program since Urbs than much of the PAC basement dwellers
    STOP TRYING TO INJECT LOGIC THAT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH MY NARRATIVE


    You and I are honor bound to be allies to the end. But I reserve the right to question the narrative @whlinder when appropriate.
  • DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 62,643 Founders Club
    whlinder said:

    His two conference championships are over schools that don’t belong in the conference

    It's like BYU claiming a NT, but then you point out "yeah but you beat a 6-6 team in your bowl game!"
  • 89ute89ute Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,477 Swaye's Wigwam
    whlinder said:

    His two conference championships are over schools that don’t belong in the conference

    Your 2016 championship is BECAUSE of us. Our win over USC and loss to CU put CU in the championship. No way you guys beat SC in 2016 if you were to face them in the championship game and you know it.

    You earned 2018. It wasn't the fluke bounce off Mariner's leg-Murphy-pick 6, it was your offence controlling the ball for 10 minutes in the 4th.
  • phineasphineas Member Posts: 4,732
    gmo said:

    After 6 years instead of dominating by exploiting mismatches over and over he instead would rather use trick plays and "outsmart" opponents like he is still in the WAC playing in a bowl game with no advantages physically anywhere.

    Yea but, he also recruits to not have any physical advantages.

    It's like we think, just because a kid signed to washington, he must be good.

    I feel like we are not looking at the same team.
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    89ute said:

    whlinder said:

    His two conference championships are over schools that don’t belong in the conference

    Your 2016 championship is BECAUSE of us. Our win over USC and loss to CU put CU in the championship. No way you guys beat SC in 2016 if you were to face them in the championship game and you know it.

    You earned 2018. It wasn't the fluke bounce off Mariner's leg-Murphy-pick 6, it was your offence controlling the ball for 10 minutes in the 4th.
    Thanks for the info.

    Now LEAVE our conference.
  • gmogmo Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 3,735 Swaye's Wigwam
    phineas said:

    gmo said:

    After 6 years instead of dominating by exploiting mismatches over and over he instead would rather use trick plays and "outsmart" opponents like he is still in the WAC playing in a bowl game with no advantages physically anywhere.

    Yea but, he also recruits to not have any physical advantages.

    It's like we think, just because a kid signed to washington, he must be good.

    I feel like we are not looking at the same team.
    there are enough guys playing on Sundays right now that were physical mismatches. Your point is valid on recruiting... my point is just feed your beasts, over and over until the opponent stops it (or doesn't). That is what big boy programs do. This is not what has happened enough over this era.
  • 89ute89ute Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,477 Swaye's Wigwam

    89ute said:

    whlinder said:

    His two conference championships are over schools that don’t belong in the conference

    Your 2016 championship is BECAUSE of us. Our win over USC and loss to CU put CU in the championship. No way you guys beat SC in 2016 if you were to face them in the championship game and you know it.

    You earned 2018. It wasn't the fluke bounce off Mariner's leg-Murphy-pick 6, it was your offence controlling the ball for 10 minutes in the 4th.
    Thanks for the info.

    Now LEAVE our conference.
    The Pac-12 powers that be covet our ski nattys.
  • whlinderwhlinder Member Posts: 4,628 Standard Supporter

    whlinder said:

    whlinder said:

    His two conference championships are over schools that don’t belong in the conference

    Why did those schools win the South?

    Colorado has a more recent natty than GA, ND, Penn State, etc.

    Utah beat Saban. They’ve been a better program since Urbs than much of the PAC basement dwellers
    STOP TRYING TO INJECT LOGIC THAT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH MY NARRATIVE


    You and I are honor bound to be allies to the end. But I reserve the right to question the narrative @whlinder when appropriate.
    True. The better response to my bitching is that you can only beat who you are asked to play. That said, while the Colorado 1990 Natty is technically more recent than anything PSU, ND or Georgia have won, (1994 PSU didn’t exactly suck) and the Utah peak seasons were very impressive, we all know PSU, ND and Georgia are far superior programs.
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,106 Founders Club
    whlinder said:

    whlinder said:

    whlinder said:

    His two conference championships are over schools that don’t belong in the conference

    Why did those schools win the South?

    Colorado has a more recent natty than GA, ND, Penn State, etc.

    Utah beat Saban. They’ve been a better program since Urbs than much of the PAC basement dwellers
    STOP TRYING TO INJECT LOGIC THAT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH MY NARRATIVE


    You and I are honor bound to be allies to the end. But I reserve the right to question the narrative @whlinder when appropriate.
    True. The better response to my bitching is that you can only beat who you are asked to play. That said, while the Colorado 1990 Natty is technically more recent than anything PSU, ND or Georgia have won, (1994 PSU didn’t exactly suck) and the Utah peak seasons were very impressive, we all know PSU, ND and Georgia are far superior programs.
    Agree.
Sign In or Register to comment.