Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
You know you have the wrong coach when
Comments
-
After 6 years instead of dominating by exploiting mismatches over and over he instead would rather use trick plays and "outsmart" opponents like he is still in the WAC playing in a bowl game with no advantages physically anywhere.
-
Yea but, he also recruits to not have any physical advantages.gmo said:After 6 years instead of dominating by exploiting mismatches over and over he instead would rather use trick plays and "outsmart" opponents like he is still in the WAC playing in a bowl game with no advantages physically anywhere.
It's like we think, just because a kid signed to washington, he must be good.
I feel like we are not looking at the same team. -
Thanks for the info.89ute said:
Your 2016 championship is BECAUSE of us. Our win over USC and loss to CU put CU in the championship. No way you guys beat SC in 2016 if you were to face them in the championship game and you know it.whlinder said:His two conference championships are over schools that don’t belong in the conference
You earned 2018. It wasn't the fluke bounce off Mariner's leg-Murphy-pick 6, it was your offence controlling the ball for 10 minutes in the 4th.
Now LEAVE our conference. -
there are enough guys playing on Sundays right now that were physical mismatches. Your point is valid on recruiting... my point is just feed your beasts, over and over until the opponent stops it (or doesn't). That is what big boy programs do. This is not what has happened enough over this era.phineas said:
Yea but, he also recruits to not have any physical advantages.gmo said:After 6 years instead of dominating by exploiting mismatches over and over he instead would rather use trick plays and "outsmart" opponents like he is still in the WAC playing in a bowl game with no advantages physically anywhere.
It's like we think, just because a kid signed to washington, he must be good.
I feel like we are not looking at the same team. -
The Pac-12 powers that be covet our ski nattys.ThomasFremont said:
Thanks for the info.89ute said:
Your 2016 championship is BECAUSE of us. Our win over USC and loss to CU put CU in the championship. No way you guys beat SC in 2016 if you were to face them in the championship game and you know it.whlinder said:His two conference championships are over schools that don’t belong in the conference
You earned 2018. It wasn't the fluke bounce off Mariner's leg-Murphy-pick 6, it was your offence controlling the ball for 10 minutes in the 4th.
Now LEAVE our conference. -
True. The better response to my bitching is that you can only beat who you are asked to play. That said, while the Colorado 1990 Natty is technically more recent than anything PSU, ND or Georgia have won, (1994 PSU didn’t exactly suck) and the Utah peak seasons were very impressive, we all know PSU, ND and Georgia are far superior programs.YellowSnow said:
You and I are honor bound to be allies to the end. But I reserve the right to question the narrative @whlinder when appropriate.whlinder said:
STOP TRYING TO INJECT LOGIC THAT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH MY NARRATIVEYellowSnow said:
Why did those schools win the South?whlinder said:His two conference championships are over schools that don’t belong in the conference
Colorado has a more recent natty than GA, ND, Penn State, etc.
Utah beat Saban. They’ve been a better program since Urbs than much of the PAC basement dwellers -
Agree.whlinder said:
True. The better response to my bitching is that you can only beat who you are asked to play. That said, while the Colorado 1990 Natty is technically more recent than anything PSU, ND or Georgia have won, (1994 PSU didn’t exactly suck) and the Utah peak seasons were very impressive, we all know PSU, ND and Georgia are far superior programs.YellowSnow said:
You and I are honor bound to be allies to the end. But I reserve the right to question the narrative @whlinder when appropriate.whlinder said:
STOP TRYING TO INJECT LOGIC THAT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH MY NARRATIVEYellowSnow said:
Why did those schools win the South?whlinder said:His two conference championships are over schools that don’t belong in the conference
Colorado has a more recent natty than GA, ND, Penn State, etc.
Utah beat Saban. They’ve been a better program since Urbs than much of the PAC basement dwellers
