You know you have the wrong coach when

whlinder

After 6 years his best win is over Steve Sarkisian

whlinder

His two conference championships are over schools that don’t belong in the conference

ThomasFremont

whlinder said:

His two conference championships are over schools that don’t belong in the conference

AMEN.

whlinder

He makes Jonathan Smith look like a competent offensive mind

whatshouldicareabout

whlinder said:

After 6 years his best win is over Steve Sarkisian

The 11-2, AP Top 10, Alamo Bowl Champs feel slighted by this post

YellowSnow

whlinder said:

His two conference championships are over schools that don’t belong in the conference

Why did those schools win the South?

Colorado has a more recent natty than GA, ND, Penn State, etc.

Utah beat Saban. They’ve been a better program since Urbs than much of the PAC basement dwellers

whlinder

YellowSnow said:

whlinder said:

His two conference championships are over schools that don’t belong in the conference

Why did those schools win the South?

Colorado has a more recent natty than GA, ND, Penn State, etc.

Utah beat Saban. They’ve been a better program since Urbs than much of the PAC basement dwellers

STOP TRYING TO INJECT LOGIC THAT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH MY NARRATIVE

YellowSnow

whlinder said:

YellowSnow said:

whlinder said:

His two conference championships are over schools that don’t belong in the conference

Why did those schools win the South?

Colorado has a more recent natty than GA, ND, Penn State, etc.

Utah beat Saban. They’ve been a better program since Urbs than much of the PAC basement dwellers

STOP TRYING TO INJECT LOGIC THAT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH MY NARRATIVE

You and I are honor bound to be allies to the end. But I reserve the right to question the narrative @whlinder when appropriate.

DerekJohnson

whlinder said:

His two conference championships are over schools that don’t belong in the conference

It's like BYU claiming a NT, but then you point out "yeah but you beat a 6-6 team in your bowl game!"

BeerThirty

DerekJohnson said:

whlinder said:

His two conference championships are over schools that don’t belong in the conference

It's like BYU claiming a NT, but then you point out "yeah but you beat a 6-6 team in your bowl game!"

That was a good 6-6 Michigan team

89ute

whlinder said:

His two conference championships are over schools that don’t belong in the conference

Your 2016 championship is BECAUSE of us. Our win over USC and loss to CU put CU in the championship. No way you guys beat SC in 2016 if you were to face them in the championship game and you know it.

You earned 2018. It wasn't the fluke bounce off Mariner's leg-Murphy-pick 6, it was your offence controlling the ball for 10 minutes in the 4th.

gmo

After 6 years instead of dominating by exploiting mismatches over and over he instead would rather use trick plays and "outsmart" opponents like he is still in the WAC playing in a bowl game with no advantages physically anywhere.

phineas

gmo said:

After 6 years instead of dominating by exploiting mismatches over and over he instead would rather use trick plays and "outsmart" opponents like he is still in the WAC playing in a bowl game with no advantages physically anywhere.

Yea but, he also recruits to not have any physical advantages.

It's like we think, just because a kid signed to washington, he must be good.

I feel like we are not looking at the same team.

ThomasFremont

89ute said:

whlinder said:

His two conference championships are over schools that don’t belong in the conference

Your 2016 championship is BECAUSE of us. Our win over USC and loss to CU put CU in the championship. No way you guys beat SC in 2016 if you were to face them in the championship game and you know it.

You earned 2018. It wasn't the fluke bounce off Mariner's leg-Murphy-pick 6, it was your offence controlling the ball for 10 minutes in the 4th.

Thanks for the info.

Now LEAVE our conference.

gmo

phineas said:

gmo said:

After 6 years instead of dominating by exploiting mismatches over and over he instead would rather use trick plays and "outsmart" opponents like he is still in the WAC playing in a bowl game with no advantages physically anywhere.

Yea but, he also recruits to not have any physical advantages.

It's like we think, just because a kid signed to washington, he must be good.

I feel like we are not looking at the same team.

there are enough guys playing on Sundays right now that were physical mismatches. Your point is valid on recruiting... my point is just feed your beasts, over and over until the opponent stops it (or doesn't). That is what big boy programs do. This is not what has happened enough over this era.

89ute

ThomasFremont said:

89ute said:

whlinder said:

His two conference championships are over schools that don’t belong in the conference

Your 2016 championship is BECAUSE of us. Our win over USC and loss to CU put CU in the championship. No way you guys beat SC in 2016 if you were to face them in the championship game and you know it.

You earned 2018. It wasn't the fluke bounce off Mariner's leg-Murphy-pick 6, it was your offence controlling the ball for 10 minutes in the 4th.

Thanks for the info.

Now LEAVE our conference.

The Pac-12 powers that be covet our ski nattys.

whlinder

YellowSnow said:

whlinder said:

YellowSnow said:

whlinder said:

His two conference championships are over schools that don’t belong in the conference

Why did those schools win the South?

Colorado has a more recent natty than GA, ND, Penn State, etc.

Utah beat Saban. They’ve been a better program since Urbs than much of the PAC basement dwellers

STOP TRYING TO INJECT LOGIC THAT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH MY NARRATIVE

You and I are honor bound to be allies to the end. But I reserve the right to question the narrative @whlinder when appropriate.

True. The better response to my bitching is that you can only beat who you are asked to play. That said, while the Colorado 1990 Natty is technically more recent than anything PSU, ND or Georgia have won, (1994 PSU didn’t exactly suck) and the Utah peak seasons were very impressive, we all know PSU, ND and Georgia are far superior programs.

YellowSnow

whlinder said:

YellowSnow said:

whlinder said:

YellowSnow said:

whlinder said:

His two conference championships are over schools that don’t belong in the conference

Why did those schools win the South?

Colorado has a more recent natty than GA, ND, Penn State, etc.

Utah beat Saban. They’ve been a better program since Urbs than much of the PAC basement dwellers

STOP TRYING TO INJECT LOGIC THAT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH MY NARRATIVE

You and I are honor bound to be allies to the end. But I reserve the right to question the narrative @whlinder when appropriate.

True. The better response to my bitching is that you can only beat who you are asked to play. That said, while the Colorado 1990 Natty is technically more recent than anything PSU, ND or Georgia have won, (1994 PSU didn’t exactly suck) and the Utah peak seasons were very impressive, we all know PSU, ND and Georgia are far superior programs.

Agree.