Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Shut these losers up

2

Comments

  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,453
    edited October 2019
    RaceBannon said:

    creepycoug said:

    RaceBannon said:

    UO runs (with who?) 35-45 times they win rather easily

    That's the question.
    I don't think that matters

    UW has new starters across the defense but the secondary is still the strength such as it is. And I don't trust Hubert.

    Anyone we have played has had success running but abandoned it. UO has a SEC line.

    Now,if UW can get a lead things could be different

    Either way I think this game is very interesting. The season either continues or ends on Saturday
    Pretty much.

    You don't trust Hubert ? As in, he shows up and plays well? Or he shits the bed?

    Are you skeptical about Oregon's vaunted O line? Your sarcasm is known to be at such a level of sophistication that it can sometimes fly even over the head of a sophisticated and experienced consumer of said sarcasm such as myself.

    I think Hanson and, for sure Sewell, are real-deal guys. Throckmorton seems good but he's always more celebrated for his rare versatility on the line, which is nice to have a guy who can do that, but it doesn't mean he's dominant at any one of them.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,324 Founders Club
    creepycoug said:

    RaceBannon said:

    creepycoug said:

    RaceBannon said:

    UO runs (with who?) 35-45 times they win rather easily

    That's the question.
    I don't think that matters

    UW has new starters across the defense but the secondary is still the strength such as it is. And I don't trust Hubert.

    Anyone we have played has had success running but abandoned it. UO has a SEC line.

    Now,if UW can get a lead things could be different

    Either way I think this game is very interesting. The season either continues or ends on Saturday
    Pretty much.

    You don't trust Hubert ? As in, he shows up and plays well? Or he shits the bed?

    Are you skeptical about Oregon's vaunted O line? Your sarcasm is known to be at such a level of sophistication that it can sometimes fly even over the head of a sophisticated and experienced consumer of said sarcasm such as myself.

    I think Hanson and, for sure Sewell, are real-deal guys. Throckmorton seems good but he's always more celebrated for his rare versatility on the line, which is nice to have a guy who can do that, but it doesn't mean he's dominant at any one of them.



    SEC line is sarkasm

    But their O line is Pac 12 tuff so far and they like to run. It is our? weakness in stopping it
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,453
    RaceBannon said:

    creepycoug said:

    RaceBannon said:

    creepycoug said:

    RaceBannon said:

    UO runs (with who?) 35-45 times they win rather easily

    That's the question.
    I don't think that matters

    UW has new starters across the defense but the secondary is still the strength such as it is. And I don't trust Hubert.

    Anyone we have played has had success running but abandoned it. UO has a SEC line.

    Now,if UW can get a lead things could be different

    Either way I think this game is very interesting. The season either continues or ends on Saturday
    Pretty much.

    You don't trust Hubert ? As in, he shows up and plays well? Or he shits the bed?

    Are you skeptical about Oregon's vaunted O line? Your sarcasm is known to be at such a level of sophistication that it can sometimes fly even over the head of a sophisticated and experienced consumer of said sarcasm such as myself.

    I think Hanson and, for sure Sewell, are real-deal guys. Throckmorton seems good but he's always more celebrated for his rare versatility on the line, which is nice to have a guy who can do that, but it doesn't mean he's dominant at any one of them.



    SEC line is sarkasm

    But their O line is Pac 12 tuff so far and they like to run. It is our? weakness in stopping it
    Yeah, he is mistake-prone. Not to Browning level, but he's two of that very same play you showed, and both were game deciding fuck ups. "Can't have it" - level mistakes from timing and game circumstance standpoint. The Stanford one absolutely cost them the game. They go in on that one it's over. Auburn a little less clear, but still critical.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • backthepack
    backthepack Member Posts: 19,942
    creepycoug said:

    backthepack said:

    Run the fucking football right down their dick and at Kayvon all day.


    We are fucked tho anyways

    Aren't you supposed to be re-taking Algebra II? Get to class loser.
    Ok!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Houhusky
    Houhusky Member Posts: 5,537
    5 DL/6DB

    (Weak) Tryon - Levi - Tuli - Bronson - Potato (Strong)

    Mike area - Asa/Ngata/Mckinney

    Striker - Bryant OR Asa

    Nickel - Molden

    DB - Mcduffie, Taylor, Gordon/Dom

    If the LBers are on the field being run at UW is giving up 7+ yards a carry.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    30-27.

    13 of the last 15.

    Bitch.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,453
    RaceBannon said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    30-27.

    13 of the last 15.

    Bitch.

    2 out of 3 boy
    Raysiss!!!!!!

    @Ballz
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,324 Founders Club
    creepycoug said:

    RaceBannon said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    30-27.

    13 of the last 15.

    Bitch.

    2 out of 3 boy
    Raysiss!!!!!!

    @Ballz
    Come on, Is anyone whiter than our @oregonblitzkrieg ?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter