Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
I'm sure it was an accident
Comments
-
They tripped, fell and landed in the shredder.
-
They are just saying "fuck off". Even those socialist assholes know a bullshit investigation when they see it.
-
Sign sledog up for supporting destroying evidence in an investigation as long as there is an R next to their name.Sledog said:They are just saying "fuck off". Even those socialist assholes know a bullshit investigation when they see it.
-
Which investigation is this? The Biden one? Or the obstruction of justice one? Is there another new one? How are Trump's tax returns relevant?2001400ex said:
Sign sledog up for supporting destroying evidence in an investigation as long as there is an R next to their name.Sledog said:They are just saying "fuck off". Even those socialist assholes know a bullshit investigation when they see it.
-
How were Hillary's emails relevant to Benghazi? How was Weiner's emails relevant to Hillary a week before the election?Swaye said:
Which investigation is this? The Biden one? Or the obstruction of justice one? Is there another new one? How are Trump's tax returns relevant?2001400ex said:
Sign sledog up for supporting destroying evidence in an investigation as long as there is an R next to their name.Sledog said:They are just saying "fuck off". Even those socialist assholes know a bullshit investigation when they see it.
That being said, Trump's tax returns are relevant to the emoluments clause. Have you heard of it? Not to mention, if there is nothing to hide, why not just release them like every other president. -
I do not understand why you have your panties in a bunch. I asked a serious question. I read the article and did not see where it mentioned which investigation this is a part of. It says some circuit court upheld the need to give them the Manhattan DA for something? Unless I missed it. Either way, thanks for the snarky answer. Also, I never mentioned Hillary, you did. Or Weiner. Could care less about either one of them. Not relevant to this discussion.2001400ex said:
How were Hillary's emails relevant to Benghazi? How was Weiner's emails relevant to Hillary a week before the election?Swaye said:
Which investigation is this? The Biden one? Or the obstruction of justice one? Is there another new one? How are Trump's tax returns relevant?2001400ex said:
Sign sledog up for supporting destroying evidence in an investigation as long as there is an R next to their name.Sledog said:They are just saying "fuck off". Even those socialist assholes know a bullshit investigation when they see it.
That being said, Trump's tax returns are relevant to the emoluments clause. Have you heard of it? Not to mention, if there is nothing to hide, why not just release them like every other president.
I am trying to understand what specific investigation is requesting Trumps tax returns and why they would be relevant to said case. If you don;t know, then just say that, vice all the snarky Hillary Wiener bullshit. TIA
For the record, I think Trump should release his tax returns. -
Lol you wanted a serious answer but responded with but but but Biden!!! Come on man, Biden is as relevant as Hillary to this question.Swaye said:
I do not understand why you have your panties in a bunch. I asked a serious question. I read the article and did not see where it mentioned which investigation this is a part of. It says some circuit court upheld the need to give them the Manhattan DA for something? Unless I missed it. Either way, thanks for the snarky answer. Also, I never mentioned Hillary, you did. Or Weiner. Could care less about either one of them. Not relevant to this discussion.2001400ex said:
How were Hillary's emails relevant to Benghazi? How was Weiner's emails relevant to Hillary a week before the election?Swaye said:
Which investigation is this? The Biden one? Or the obstruction of justice one? Is there another new one? How are Trump's tax returns relevant?2001400ex said:
Sign sledog up for supporting destroying evidence in an investigation as long as there is an R next to their name.Sledog said:They are just saying "fuck off". Even those socialist assholes know a bullshit investigation when they see it.
That being said, Trump's tax returns are relevant to the emoluments clause. Have you heard of it? Not to mention, if there is nothing to hide, why not just release them like every other president.
I am trying to understand what specific investigation is requesting Trumps tax returns and why they would be relevant to said case. If you don;t know, then just say that, vice all the snarky Hillary Wiener bullshit. TIA
For the record, I think Trump should release his tax returns.
I don't think his tax returns are relevant to the Ukraine deal. They are relevant to discussion on emoluments and his position in office. I'm not sure I connected Ukraine to his tax returns either.
That being said, I'm not sure if this story is true or why it matters his bank destroyed the records that Im sure his accountant has. -
Wait, what? I specifically asked if this was involved with the Biden investigation. I did not say but, but, Biden. Are you fucking kidding me? There is an entire Congressional investigation proceeding about a whistleblower saying Trump is trying to hurt a political opponent - BIDEN! But, but Biden my ass. I can see why everyone says you are impossible to deal with.2001400ex said:
Lol you wanted a serious answer but responded with but but but Biden!!! Come on man, Biden is as relevant as Hillary to this question.Swaye said:
I do not understand why you have your panties in a bunch. I asked a serious question. I read the article and did not see where it mentioned which investigation this is a part of. It says some circuit court upheld the need to give them the Manhattan DA for something? Unless I missed it. Either way, thanks for the snarky answer. Also, I never mentioned Hillary, you did. Or Weiner. Could care less about either one of them. Not relevant to this discussion.2001400ex said:
How were Hillary's emails relevant to Benghazi? How was Weiner's emails relevant to Hillary a week before the election?Swaye said:
Which investigation is this? The Biden one? Or the obstruction of justice one? Is there another new one? How are Trump's tax returns relevant?2001400ex said:
Sign sledog up for supporting destroying evidence in an investigation as long as there is an R next to their name.Sledog said:They are just saying "fuck off". Even those socialist assholes know a bullshit investigation when they see it.
That being said, Trump's tax returns are relevant to the emoluments clause. Have you heard of it? Not to mention, if there is nothing to hide, why not just release them like every other president.
I am trying to understand what specific investigation is requesting Trumps tax returns and why they would be relevant to said case. If you don;t know, then just say that, vice all the snarky Hillary Wiener bullshit. TIA
For the record, I think Trump should release his tax returns.
I don't think his tax returns are relevant to the Ukraine deal. They are relevant to discussion on emoluments and his position in office. I'm not sure I connected Ukraine to his tax returns either.
That being said, I'm not sure if this story is true or why it matters his bank destroyed the records that Im sure his accountant has.
Biden is completely relevant since one of the investigations into Trump IS ABOUT BIDEN. JFC. -
You asked what investigation. I answered. The one emoluments.Swaye said:
Wait, what? I specifically asked if this was involved with the Biden investigation. I did not say but, but, Biden. Are you fucking kidding me? There is an entire Congressional investigation proceeding about a whistleblower saying Trump is trying to hurt a political opponent - BIDEN! But, but Biden my ass. I can see why everyone says you are impossible to deal with.2001400ex said:
Lol you wanted a serious answer but responded with but but but Biden!!! Come on man, Biden is as relevant as Hillary to this question.Swaye said:
I do not understand why you have your panties in a bunch. I asked a serious question. I read the article and did not see where it mentioned which investigation this is a part of. It says some circuit court upheld the need to give them the Manhattan DA for something? Unless I missed it. Either way, thanks for the snarky answer. Also, I never mentioned Hillary, you did. Or Weiner. Could care less about either one of them. Not relevant to this discussion.2001400ex said:
How were Hillary's emails relevant to Benghazi? How was Weiner's emails relevant to Hillary a week before the election?Swaye said:
Which investigation is this? The Biden one? Or the obstruction of justice one? Is there another new one? How are Trump's tax returns relevant?2001400ex said:
Sign sledog up for supporting destroying evidence in an investigation as long as there is an R next to their name.Sledog said:They are just saying "fuck off". Even those socialist assholes know a bullshit investigation when they see it.
That being said, Trump's tax returns are relevant to the emoluments clause. Have you heard of it? Not to mention, if there is nothing to hide, why not just release them like every other president.
I am trying to understand what specific investigation is requesting Trumps tax returns and why they would be relevant to said case. If you don;t know, then just say that, vice all the snarky Hillary Wiener bullshit. TIA
For the record, I think Trump should release his tax returns.
I don't think his tax returns are relevant to the Ukraine deal. They are relevant to discussion on emoluments and his position in office. I'm not sure I connected Ukraine to his tax returns either.
That being said, I'm not sure if this story is true or why it matters his bank destroyed the records that Im sure his accountant has.
Biden is completely relevant since one of the investigations into Trump IS ABOUT BIDEN. JFC. -
If only a government agency had a copy
-
Sure Hillary deleting 33k emails and smashing her phone when they're under subpoena was ok. She didn't really mean to do it.2001400ex said:
Sign sledog up for supporting destroying evidence in an investigation as long as there is an R next to their name.Sledog said:They are just saying "fuck off". Even those socialist assholes know a bullshit investigation when they see it.
Trump didn't destroy anything. HTH
Fuck you're stupid.
Democrats conducting investigations in search of a crime for 3 years. Bupkis. That's not how our system works. -
Maybe Hilary was just saying “fuck off” because she knew the investigation was bullshit?Sledog said:
Sure Hillary deleting 33k emails and smashing her phone when they're under subpoena was ok. She didn't really mean to do it.2001400ex said:
Sign sledog up for supporting destroying evidence in an investigation as long as there is an R next to their name.Sledog said:They are just saying "fuck off". Even those socialist assholes know a bullshit investigation when they see it.
Trump didn't destroy anything. HTH
Fuck you're stupid.
Democrats conducting investigations in search of a crime for 3 years. Bupkis. That's not how our system works. -
That's how the Republicans operated from 12-16 after Benghazi. Did it miss that?Sledog said:
Sure Hillary deleting 33k emails and smashing her phone when they're under subpoena was ok. She didn't really mean to do it.2001400ex said:
Sign sledog up for supporting destroying evidence in an investigation as long as there is an R next to their name.Sledog said:They are just saying "fuck off". Even those socialist assholes know a bullshit investigation when they see it.
Trump didn't destroy anything. HTH
Fuck you're stupid.
Democrats conducting investigations in search of a crime for 3 years. Bupkis. That's not how our system works. -
Why weren't planes or troops sent in? Why was the ambassador withdrawn like the Brits did? Why was it blamed on a video?
-
All the stuff magically vanished. Seems dems under subpoena do criminal things.2001400ex said:
That's how the Republicans operated from 12-16 after Benghazi. Did it miss that?Sledog said:
Sure Hillary deleting 33k emails and smashing her phone when they're under subpoena was ok. She didn't really mean to do it.2001400ex said:
Sign sledog up for supporting destroying evidence in an investigation as long as there is an R next to their name.Sledog said:They are just saying "fuck off". Even those socialist assholes know a bullshit investigation when they see it.
Trump didn't destroy anything. HTH
Fuck you're stupid.
Democrats conducting investigations in search of a crime for 3 years. Bupkis. That's not how our system works. -
Yeah
Shouldn’t matter at this point. Even by the IRS guidelines on record retention if the returns were prepared properly. Most assuredly they were under audit so unless they were found to be fraudulent, this is just another nothing burger. Loans were back in 2011 through 2014. Banks have slightly longer record retention but not much. They ditch that shit.2001400ex said:
https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/how-long-should-i-keep-records
-
1. They were and got them out.WestlinnDuck said:Why weren't planes or troops sent in? Why was the ambassador withdrawn like the Brits did? Why was it blamed on a video?
2. Don't know.
3. CIA reports. Once survivors and CCTV was analysed the assessment was changed. Like 10 days later.
Anything else WL? There were like 8 or 9 separate major investigations on it. -
You mean the investigation that uncovered the fact that the Secretary of State was using a private email server in violation of the law? Is that the bullshit investigation you're referring to?TheKobeStopper said:
Maybe Hilary was just saying “fuck off” because she knew the investigation was bullshit?Sledog said:
Sure Hillary deleting 33k emails and smashing her phone when they're under subpoena was ok. She didn't really mean to do it.2001400ex said:
Sign sledog up for supporting destroying evidence in an investigation as long as there is an R next to their name.Sledog said:They are just saying "fuck off". Even those socialist assholes know a bullshit investigation when they see it.
Trump didn't destroy anything. HTH
Fuck you're stupid.
Democrats conducting investigations in search of a crime for 3 years. Bupkis. That's not how our system works. -
Talk about dock sucking.....HustlinOwl said:
1. They were and got them out.WestlinnDuck said:Why weren't planes or troops sent in? Why was the ambassador withdrawn like the Brits did? Why was it blamed on a video?
2. Don't know.
3. CIA reports. Once survivors and CCTV was analysed the assessment was changed. Like 10 days later.
Anything else WL? There were like 8 or 9 separate major investigations on it. -
Do you ever feel like your news source lied to you?Sledog said:
Talk about dock sucking.....HustlinOwl said:
1. They were and got them out.WestlinnDuck said:Why weren't planes or troops sent in? Why was the ambassador withdrawn like the Brits did? Why was it blamed on a video?
2. Don't know.
3. CIA reports. Once survivors and CCTV was analysed the assessment was changed. Like 10 days later.
Anything else WL? There were like 8 or 9 separate major investigations on it. -
You don't seem to mind when you're lies to you.2001400ex said:
Do you ever feel like your news source lied to you?Sledog said:
Talk about dock sucking.....HustlinOwl said:
1. They were and got them out.WestlinnDuck said:Why weren't planes or troops sent in? Why was the ambassador withdrawn like the Brits did? Why was it blamed on a video?
2. Don't know.
3. CIA reports. Once survivors and CCTV was analysed the assessment was changed. Like 10 days later.
Anything else WL? There were like 8 or 9 separate major investigations on it.
So what's your fucking point, faggot? -
What story have I swallowed akin to the bullshit sledog is slinging?pawz said:
You don't seem to mind when you're lies to you.2001400ex said:
Do you ever feel like your news source lied to you?Sledog said:
Talk about dock sucking.....HustlinOwl said:
1. They were and got them out.WestlinnDuck said:Why weren't planes or troops sent in? Why was the ambassador withdrawn like the Brits did? Why was it blamed on a video?
2. Don't know.
3. CIA reports. Once survivors and CCTV was analysed the assessment was changed. Like 10 days later.
Anything else WL? There were like 8 or 9 separate major investigations on it.
So what's your fucking point, faggot? -
Fuck off.2001400ex said:
What story have I swallowed akin to the bullshit sledog is slinging?pawz said:
You don't seem to mind when you're lies to you.2001400ex said:
Do you ever feel like your news source lied to you?Sledog said:
Talk about dock sucking.....HustlinOwl said:
1. They were and got them out.WestlinnDuck said:Why weren't planes or troops sent in? Why was the ambassador withdrawn like the Brits did? Why was it blamed on a video?
2. Don't know.
3. CIA reports. Once survivors and CCTV was analysed the assessment was changed. Like 10 days later.
Anything else WL? There were like 8 or 9 separate major investigations on it.
So what's your fucking point, faggot? -
Thought so.pawz said:
Fuck off.2001400ex said:
What story have I swallowed akin to the bullshit sledog is slinging?pawz said:
You don't seem to mind when you're lies to you.2001400ex said:
Do you ever feel like your news source lied to you?Sledog said:
Talk about dock sucking.....HustlinOwl said:
1. They were and got them out.WestlinnDuck said:Why weren't planes or troops sent in? Why was the ambassador withdrawn like the Brits did? Why was it blamed on a video?
2. Don't know.
3. CIA reports. Once survivors and CCTV was analysed the assessment was changed. Like 10 days later.
Anything else WL? There were like 8 or 9 separate major investigations on it.
So what's your fucking point, faggot? -
What bullshit did I sling? You're the king bullshitter.2001400ex said:
What story have I swallowed akin to the bullshit sledog is slinging?pawz said:
You don't seem to mind when you're lies to you.2001400ex said:
Do you ever feel like your news source lied to you?Sledog said:
Talk about dock sucking.....HustlinOwl said:
1. They were and got them out.WestlinnDuck said:Why weren't planes or troops sent in? Why was the ambassador withdrawn like the Brits did? Why was it blamed on a video?
2. Don't know.
3. CIA reports. Once survivors and CCTV was analysed the assessment was changed. Like 10 days later.
Anything else WL? There were like 8 or 9 separate major investigations on it.
So what's your fucking point, faggot? -
How? It requires brain activity.2001400ex said:
Thought so.pawz said:
Fuck off.2001400ex said:
What story have I swallowed akin to the bullshit sledog is slinging?pawz said:
You don't seem to mind when you're lies to you.2001400ex said:
Do you ever feel like your news source lied to you?Sledog said:
Talk about dock sucking.....HustlinOwl said:
1. They were and got them out.WestlinnDuck said:Why weren't planes or troops sent in? Why was the ambassador withdrawn like the Brits did? Why was it blamed on a video?
2. Don't know.
3. CIA reports. Once survivors and CCTV was analysed the assessment was changed. Like 10 days later.
Anything else WL? There were like 8 or 9 separate major investigations on it.
So what's your fucking point, faggot? -
Read back a few posts.Sledog said:
What bullshit did I sling? You're the king bullshitter.2001400ex said:
What story have I swallowed akin to the bullshit sledog is slinging?pawz said:
You don't seem to mind when you're lies to you.2001400ex said:
Do you ever feel like your news source lied to you?Sledog said:
Talk about dock sucking.....HustlinOwl said:
1. They were and got them out.WestlinnDuck said:Why weren't planes or troops sent in? Why was the ambassador withdrawn like the Brits did? Why was it blamed on a video?
2. Don't know.
3. CIA reports. Once survivors and CCTV was analysed the assessment was changed. Like 10 days later.
Anything else WL? There were like 8 or 9 separate major investigations on it.
So what's your fucking point, faggot? -
Smollets, Kavanaugh, Covington kids, Russian collusion, Trump told Cohen to lie to Congress, your mother really loves you2001400ex said:
What story have I swallowed akin to the bullshit sledog is slinging?pawz said:
You don't seem to mind when you're lies to you.2001400ex said:
Do you ever feel like your news source lied to you?Sledog said:
Talk about dock sucking.....HustlinOwl said:
1. They were and got them out.WestlinnDuck said:Why weren't planes or troops sent in? Why was the ambassador withdrawn like the Brits did? Why was it blamed on a video?
2. Don't know.
3. CIA reports. Once survivors and CCTV was analysed the assessment was changed. Like 10 days later.
Anything else WL? There were like 8 or 9 separate major investigations on it.
So what's your fucking point, faggot? -
Lil lyin Bob.SFGbob said:
Smollets, Kavanaugh, Covington kids, Russian collusion, Trump told Cohen to lie to Congress, your mother really loves you2001400ex said:
What story have I swallowed akin to the bullshit sledog is slinging?pawz said:
You don't seem to mind when you're lies to you.2001400ex said:
Do you ever feel like your news source lied to you?Sledog said:
Talk about dock sucking.....HustlinOwl said:
1. They were and got them out.WestlinnDuck said:Why weren't planes or troops sent in? Why was the ambassador withdrawn like the Brits did? Why was it blamed on a video?
2. Don't know.
3. CIA reports. Once survivors and CCTV was analysed the assessment was changed. Like 10 days later.
Anything else WL? There were like 8 or 9 separate major investigations on it.
So what's your fucking point, faggot? -
Poast your tax returns, Oh Beacon of Truth and Purity.2001400ex said:
Lil lyin Bob.SFGbob said:
Smollets, Kavanaugh, Covington kids, Russian collusion, Trump told Cohen to lie to Congress, your mother really loves you2001400ex said:
What story have I swallowed akin to the bullshit sledog is slinging?pawz said:
You don't seem to mind when you're lies to you.2001400ex said:
Do you ever feel like your news source lied to you?Sledog said:
Talk about dock sucking.....HustlinOwl said:
1. They were and got them out.WestlinnDuck said:Why weren't planes or troops sent in? Why was the ambassador withdrawn like the Brits did? Why was it blamed on a video?
2. Don't know.
3. CIA reports. Once survivors and CCTV was analysed the assessment was changed. Like 10 days later.
Anything else WL? There were like 8 or 9 separate major investigations on it.
So what's your fucking point, faggot?
