Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

I miss Sark

whlinder
whlinder Member Posts: 5,270
Having an average team under Seven was better because we hated that fucker for being such a fat lazy drunk out late doing blow off of strippers asses and plowing through shots of patron.

Fuck him for stealing the university’s money and for his bullshit sideline antics but at least we hated him for being average on the field.

Now we have average due to..... lack of emotion and stubbornness? How do you get worked up to hate that?

The opposite of love isn’t hate, it’s indifference and Pete is creating an average team in an indifferent way.
«1

Comments

  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,206
    Im not convinced any of Petersen's teams could beat Sarks 2013 9-4 UW squad. That was a good team in a Pac 12 that is way better than it is now.

    2016 probably would due to Sarks recruits

  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823

    Im not convinced any of Petersen's teams could beat Sarks 2013 9-4 UW squad. That was a good team in a Pac 12 that is way better than it is now.

    2016 probably would due to Sarks recruits

    I love this one
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737

    Let's not get carried away fellas. We may have to @FirePete in the next couple of years if we continue to under perform. But Bark for Sark nostalgia is a dark place we shouldn't be going.

    I am hearing there is a stockpile of talent ahead waiting to sit on the bench.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,206

    Let's not get carried away fellas. We may have to @FirePete in the next couple of years if we continue to under perform. But Bark for Sark nostalgia is a dark place we shouldn't be going.

    Tell me Im wrong RE my previous post in this thread?

    I would not bet $1 on Petes teams winning that game
  • phineas
    phineas Member Posts: 4,732
    I miss football being entertaining
  • EwaDawg
    EwaDawg Member Posts: 4,335
    edited October 2019

    Let's not get carried away fellas. We may have to @FirePete in the next couple of years if we continue to under perform. But Bark for Sark nostalgia is a dark place we shouldn't be going.

    Tell me Im wrong RE my previous post in this thread?

    I would not bet $1 on Petes teams winning that game

    Something, something, something about UW's D not giving up more than 35 (or so) points for xxx games. The longest such streak in the country (?) .


    Sark failed to do it back to back weeks and three out five games.


    No comprende PGOS.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,206
    edited October 2019
    EwaDawg said:


    Let's not get carried away fellas. We may have to @FirePete in the next couple of years if we continue to under perform. But Bark for Sark nostalgia is a dark place we shouldn't be going.

    Tell me Im wrong RE my previous post in this thread?

    I would not bet $1 on Petes teams winning that game

    Something, something, something about UW's D not giving up more than 35 (or so) points for xxx games. The longest such streak in the country (?) .


    Sark failed to do it back to back weeks and three out five games.


    No comprende PGOS.
    Pac 12 was way better that year that it is now. Not even close.

    The team lost a fucking heartbreaker at Stanford and wasnt mentally tough enough to recover against good teams.

    That was a fucking brutal 3 game stretch. Petersen could go 0-3 on that stretch. That Oregon team was good and we never beat Tree and Devil on the road

    Oh yeah, Sark also curb stomped Chris Fucking Petersen that year.

    We done here?
  • Thump
    Thump Member Posts: 793
    edited October 2019
    I don't miss 7-win-Steve as HC...

    ...but I'd take him as OC & QB coach.
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,271 Founders Club
    edited October 2019

    EwaDawg said:


    Let's not get carried away fellas. We may have to @FirePete in the next couple of years if we continue to under perform. But Bark for Sark nostalgia is a dark place we shouldn't be going.

    Tell me Im wrong RE my previous post in this thread?

    I would not bet $1 on Petes teams winning that game

    Something, something, something about UW's D not giving up more than 35 (or so) points for xxx games. The longest such streak in the country (?) .


    Sark failed to do it back to back weeks and three out five games.


    No comprende PGOS.
    Pac 12 was way better that year that it is now. Not even close.

    The team lost a fucking heartbreaker at Stanford and wasnt mentally tough enough to recover against good teams.

    That was a fucking brutal 3 game stretch. Petersen could go 0-3 on that stretch. That Oregon team was good and we never beat Tree and Devil on the road

    Oh yeah, Sark also curb stomped Chris Fucking Petersen that year.

    We done here?
    The achievements of the 2016, 17, and 18 squads VASTLY exceed anything 2013 did. It's conceivable 17 or 18 might have gotten upset on the road to the 13 team.

    But we don't deal in hypotheticals so this is silly.

  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,206
    Thump said:

    I don't miss 7-win-Steve as HC...

    ...but I'd take him as OC & QB coach.

    This
  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,369
    What's Nuss up to these days?
  • whlinder
    whlinder Member Posts: 5,270
    You guys are missing the point. Of course Pete’s a better coach than Sark. He’s won more.

    Sark pissed us off for all the bullshit he pulled in being average. Which made us outraged because we saw “if you develop players and don’t call so many fucking bubble screens we’d win more”

    Pete’s gonna be average while not pulling that bullshit but instead following some internal process which refuses to utilize talented players and neuters their emotion. And calls dumb plays.

    We don’t have the ability to reach the same level of outrage against Pete that we had with Sark. That’s what I miss. Being outraged at us instead indifferently resigned to losing.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,206

    EwaDawg said:


    Let's not get carried away fellas. We may have to @FirePete in the next couple of years if we continue to under perform. But Bark for Sark nostalgia is a dark place we shouldn't be going.

    Tell me Im wrong RE my previous post in this thread?

    I would not bet $1 on Petes teams winning that game

    Something, something, something about UW's D not giving up more than 35 (or so) points for xxx games. The longest such streak in the country (?) .


    Sark failed to do it back to back weeks and three out five games.


    No comprende PGOS.
    Pac 12 was way better that year that it is now. Not even close.

    The team lost a fucking heartbreaker at Stanford and wasnt mentally tough enough to recover against good teams.

    That was a fucking brutal 3 game stretch. Petersen could go 0-3 on that stretch. That Oregon team was good and we never beat Tree and Devil on the road

    Oh yeah, Sark also curb stomped Chris Fucking Petersen that year.

    We done here?
    The achievements of the 2016, 17, and 18 squads VASTLY exceed anything 2013 did. It's conceivable 17 or 18 might have gotten upset on the road to the 13 team.

    But we don't deal in hypotheticals so this is silly.

    No one is arguing the overall achievement aspect of things. The argument im making is that Petes teams arent that much better than Sarks last one.

    Dont be doogs guys jesus fuckng christ. Sarks offense are miles better than Petersens
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,206
    whlinder said:

    You guys are missing the point. Of course Pete’s a better coach than Sark. He’s won more.

    Sark pissed us off for all the bullshit he pulled in being average. Which made us outraged because we saw “if you develop players and don’t call so many fucking bubble screens we’d win more”

    Pete’s gonna be average while not pulling that bullshit but instead following some internal process which refuses to utilize talented players and neuters their emotion. And calls dumb plays.

    We don’t have the ability to reach the same level of outrage against Pete that we had with Sark. That’s what I miss. Being outraged at us instead indifferently resigned to losing.

    Bunch of fucking doogs on this bored lately to be honest. Damone and I tried to curb the enthusiasm but @RaceBannon and others dooged it up

    We beat fucking ewu guys
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,206

    The 2009-2011 Boise State teams would all beat the 2013 UW team rather easily.

    A lot better than 2014-2019 UW too
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,886 Founders Club

    whlinder said:

    You guys are missing the point. Of course Pete’s a better coach than Sark. He’s won more.

    Sark pissed us off for all the bullshit he pulled in being average. Which made us outraged because we saw “if you develop players and don’t call so many fucking bubble screens we’d win more”

    Pete’s gonna be average while not pulling that bullshit but instead following some internal process which refuses to utilize talented players and neuters their emotion. And calls dumb plays.

    We don’t have the ability to reach the same level of outrage against Pete that we had with Sark. That’s what I miss. Being outraged at us instead indifferently resigned to losing.

    Bunch of fucking doogs on this bored lately to be honest. Damone and I tried to curb the enthusiasm but @RaceBannon and others dooged it up

    We beat fucking ewu guys
    Fuck off
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,559


    Caption Contest?
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,206

    whlinder said:

    You guys are missing the point. Of course Pete’s a better coach than Sark. He’s won more.

    Sark pissed us off for all the bullshit he pulled in being average. Which made us outraged because we saw “if you develop players and don’t call so many fucking bubble screens we’d win more”

    Pete’s gonna be average while not pulling that bullshit but instead following some internal process which refuses to utilize talented players and neuters their emotion. And calls dumb plays.

    We don’t have the ability to reach the same level of outrage against Pete that we had with Sark. That’s what I miss. Being outraged at us instead indifferently resigned to losing.

    My outrage right now with Pete is way worse than anything I felt toward Sark. I'd given up hope of national relevance by the the time Sark was here.

    Pete made me care again. I went to the Rose Bowl last year for the first time in my life. FUCK YOU PETE!!! And I went to a CFP game before that.
    Lol. And how was that Rose Bowl for you big guy? Isnt it fun being down 28-7 only to start the hopeless doomed rally with not enough time left? Just tease your balls a little bit before packing her shit up and leaving your pad?

    Fuck caring about the games until the team actually wins something thats not the tallest midget Pac 12 championship
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,271 Founders Club

    whlinder said:

    You guys are missing the point. Of course Pete’s a better coach than Sark. He’s won more.

    Sark pissed us off for all the bullshit he pulled in being average. Which made us outraged because we saw “if you develop players and don’t call so many fucking bubble screens we’d win more”

    Pete’s gonna be average while not pulling that bullshit but instead following some internal process which refuses to utilize talented players and neuters their emotion. And calls dumb plays.

    We don’t have the ability to reach the same level of outrage against Pete that we had with Sark. That’s what I miss. Being outraged at us instead indifferently resigned to losing.

    My outrage right now with Pete is way worse than anything I felt toward Sark. I'd given up hope of national relevance by the the time Sark was here.

    Pete made me care again. I went to the Rose Bowl last year for the first time in my life. FUCK YOU PETE!!! And I went to a CFP game before that.
    Lol. And how was that Rose Bowl for you big guy? Isnt it fun being down 28-7 only to start the hopeless doomed rally with not enough time left? Just tease your balls a little bit before packing her shit up and leaving your pad?

    Fuck caring about the games until the team actually wins something thats not the tallest midget Pac 12 championship

  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288

    whlinder said:

    You guys are missing the point. Of course Pete’s a better coach than Sark. He’s won more.

    Sark pissed us off for all the bullshit he pulled in being average. Which made us outraged because we saw “if you develop players and don’t call so many fucking bubble screens we’d win more”

    Pete’s gonna be average while not pulling that bullshit but instead following some internal process which refuses to utilize talented players and neuters their emotion. And calls dumb plays.

    We don’t have the ability to reach the same level of outrage against Pete that we had with Sark. That’s what I miss. Being outraged at us instead indifferently resigned to losing.

    My outrage right now with Pete is way worse than anything I felt toward Sark. I'd given up hope of national relevance by the the time Sark was here.

    Pete made me care again. I went to the Rose Bowl last year for the first time in my life. FUCK YOU PETE!!! And I went to a CFP game before that.
    UW getting to the playoffs was previously unheard of. Can't expect the dude to win right away. He needs more time to get more of his own guys in there.