Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

I miss Sark

whlinder
whlinder Member Posts: 5,402
Having an average team under Seven was better because we hated that fucker for being such a fat lazy drunk out late doing blow off of strippers asses and plowing through shots of patron.

Fuck him for stealing the university’s money and for his bullshit sideline antics but at least we hated him for being average on the field.

Now we have average due to..... lack of emotion and stubbornness? How do you get worked up to hate that?

The opposite of love isn’t hate, it’s indifference and Pete is creating an average team in an indifferent way.
«13456

Comments

  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,839
    Im not convinced any of Petersen's teams could beat Sarks 2013 9-4 UW squad. That was a good team in a Pac 12 that is way better than it is now.

    2016 probably would due to Sarks recruits

  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823

    Im not convinced any of Petersen's teams could beat Sarks 2013 9-4 UW squad. That was a good team in a Pac 12 that is way better than it is now.

    2016 probably would due to Sarks recruits

    I love this one
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737

    Let's not get carried away fellas. We may have to @FirePete in the next couple of years if we continue to under perform. But Bark for Sark nostalgia is a dark place we shouldn't be going.

    I am hearing there is a stockpile of talent ahead waiting to sit on the bench.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,839

    Let's not get carried away fellas. We may have to @FirePete in the next couple of years if we continue to under perform. But Bark for Sark nostalgia is a dark place we shouldn't be going.

    Tell me Im wrong RE my previous post in this thread?

    I would not bet $1 on Petes teams winning that game
  • phineas
    phineas Member Posts: 4,732
    I miss football being entertaining
  • EwaDawg
    EwaDawg Member Posts: 4,441
    edited October 2019

    Let's not get carried away fellas. We may have to @FirePete in the next couple of years if we continue to under perform. But Bark for Sark nostalgia is a dark place we shouldn't be going.

    Tell me Im wrong RE my previous post in this thread?

    I would not bet $1 on Petes teams winning that game

    Something, something, something about UW's D not giving up more than 35 (or so) points for xxx games. The longest such streak in the country (?) .


    Sark failed to do it back to back weeks and three out five games.


    No comprende PGOS.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,839
    edited October 2019
    EwaDawg said:


    Let's not get carried away fellas. We may have to @FirePete in the next couple of years if we continue to under perform. But Bark for Sark nostalgia is a dark place we shouldn't be going.

    Tell me Im wrong RE my previous post in this thread?

    I would not bet $1 on Petes teams winning that game

    Something, something, something about UW's D not giving up more than 35 (or so) points for xxx games. The longest such streak in the country (?) .


    Sark failed to do it back to back weeks and three out five games.


    No comprende PGOS.
    Pac 12 was way better that year that it is now. Not even close.

    The team lost a fucking heartbreaker at Stanford and wasnt mentally tough enough to recover against good teams.

    That was a fucking brutal 3 game stretch. Petersen could go 0-3 on that stretch. That Oregon team was good and we never beat Tree and Devil on the road

    Oh yeah, Sark also curb stomped Chris Fucking Petersen that year.

    We done here?