Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Can one of you data hackers do one of these for the Pac12?

2»

Comments

  • rodmansrage
    rodmansrage Member Posts: 6,466
    had no idea kansas had a functional team back when polio was all the rage.
  • whlinder
    whlinder Member Posts: 5,424 Standard Supporter
    So despite Kansas State playing mostly competent football for the last 25 years they’re still in last.

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,285 Founders Club

    had no idea kansas had a functional team back when polio was all the rage.

    Gayle Sayers and John Riggins
  • HuskyJW
    HuskyJW Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,569 Founders Club
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,746 Founders Club
    uzi said:

    I predict it will be Washington and USC early, then UCLA overtakes Washington in the 70s, then Washington takes back 2nd this decade.

    After that is Stanford, then all of the also-rans.

    Nope. UCLA is like 5th or some shit. I don't think UCLA was a school until the teens or something. I just checked and it's USC like 100 ahead of us, then Cal around 50 behind us, with Oregon right on their heels, then Tree a few back from those gas pumping faggots. Then UCLA I think. I may have missed one of the Zona schools. Don't care. It's USC and then us and then shit. But we are still a dwarf.
  • Bread
    Bread Member Posts: 4,110
    Swaye said:

    uzi said:

    I predict it will be Washington and USC early, then UCLA overtakes Washington in the 70s, then Washington takes back 2nd this decade.

    After that is Stanford, then all of the also-rans.

    Nope. UCLA is like 5th or some shit. I don't think UCLA was a school until the teens or something. I just checked and it's USC like 100 ahead of us, then Cal around 50 behind us, with Oregon right on their heels, then Tree a few back from those gas pumping faggots. Then UCLA I think. I may have missed one of the Zona schools. Don't care. It's USC and then us and then shit. But we are still a dwarf.
    Yea, I remember ASU has a surprising amount of wins for never winning anything big. Most consistent slightly above average team.

    Colorado has had a similar path as UW. Very good until they joined they joined the pac. And Utah played trash for most of history.

    I bet the top half would be mostly the same order throughout history but the bottom half has much more ups and downs.

    USC
    UW
    COLORADO
    Utah/cal
    Asu
    Everyone else

    With Oregon and Stanford finally separating from the trash in the last 20 years.

  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,695
    Bread said:

    Swaye said:

    uzi said:

    I predict it will be Washington and USC early, then UCLA overtakes Washington in the 70s, then Washington takes back 2nd this decade.

    After that is Stanford, then all of the also-rans.

    Nope. UCLA is like 5th or some shit. I don't think UCLA was a school until the teens or something. I just checked and it's USC like 100 ahead of us, then Cal around 50 behind us, with Oregon right on their heels, then Tree a few back from those gas pumping faggots. Then UCLA I think. I may have missed one of the Zona schools. Don't care. It's USC and then us and then shit. But we are still a dwarf.
    Yea, I remember ASU has a surprising amount of wins for never winning anything big. Most consistent slightly above average team.

    Colorado has had a similar path as UW. Very good until they joined they joined the pac. And Utah played trash for most of history.

    I bet the top half would be mostly the same order throughout history but the bottom half has much more ups and downs.

    USC
    UW
    COLORADO
    Utah/cal
    Asu
    Everyone else

    With Oregon and Stanford finally separating from the trash in the last 20 years.

    Bread said:

    Swaye said:

    uzi said:

    I predict it will be Washington and USC early, then UCLA overtakes Washington in the 70s, then Washington takes back 2nd this decade.

    After that is Stanford, then all of the also-rans.

    Nope. UCLA is like 5th or some shit. I don't think UCLA was a school until the teens or something. I just checked and it's USC like 100 ahead of us, then Cal around 50 behind us, with Oregon right on their heels, then Tree a few back from those gas pumping faggots. Then UCLA I think. I may have missed one of the Zona schools. Don't care. It's USC and then us and then shit. But we are still a dwarf.
    Yea, I remember ASU has a surprising amount of wins for never winning anything big. Most consistent slightly above average team.

    Colorado has had a similar path as UW. Very good until they joined they joined the pac. And Utah played trash for most of history.

    I bet the top half would be mostly the same order throughout history but the bottom half has much more ups and downs.

    USC
    UW
    COLORADO
    Utah/cal
    Asu
    Everyone else

    With Oregon and Stanford finally separating from the trash in the last 20 years.

    Asu is probably the most consistent team in history. It's shockingly mediocre.

    In every possible metric football wise we come squarely in like 5th
  • Baphomet
    Baphomet Member Posts: 1,511
    edited October 2019
    Swaye said:

    uzi said:

    I predict it will be Washington and USC early, then UCLA overtakes Washington in the 70s, then Washington takes back 2nd this decade.

    After that is Stanford, then all of the also-rans.

    Nope. UCLA is like 5th or some shit. I don't think UCLA was a school until the teens or something. I just checked and it's USC like 100 ahead of us, then Cal around 50 behind us, with Oregon right on their heels, then Tree a few back from those gas pumping faggots. Then UCLA I think. I may have missed one of the Zona schools. Don't care. It's USC and then us and then shit. But we are still a dwarf.
    Pretty Sure UCLA was #2 in the Pac for Pac championships until UW earned it back last year. Don't see how they could be 5th in all time wins.

    Edit

    Well shit I'm wrong.
    http://www.winsipedia.com/ranking/all-time-wins

    Kinda interesting the were #2 for Pac Championships... They must have had some really good years mixed with some even worse than ours.