Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
So why was the whistle blower law changed in August?
Comments
-
Meanwhile the whistleblower is still not a whistle blower, did not have first hand info and John Brennen is still trying to unseat a duly elected president using our 17 intelligence agencies and team hondo is all in
You want to talk about shitty fucking Americans, look in the mirror -
The whistleblower isn’t a witness to Daddy’s crimes. He didn’t claim to be. But he knows who the witnesses are. And his information has merely proven to be accurate in all respects, meaning his sources were correct.RaceBannon said:Meanwhile the whistleblower is still not a whistle blower, did not have first hand info and John Brennen is still trying to unseat a duly elected president using our 17 intelligence agencies and team hondo is all in
You want to talk about shitty fucking Americans, look in the mirror
Daddy wants to shoot the sources and arrest Schiff. Nothing to see here, obviously. -
Are you guys going to admit your news source lied to you yet?
-
-
I'm talking about how your news source said the law changed. And it went on to say it changed for the purpose of allowing the form to be filled out based on second hand information. Both of which are lies.HoustonHusky said: -
And by “correct” O’Keefed means full of shit. Still looking for that quid pro quo.HHusky said:
The whistleblower isn’t a witness to Daddy’s crimes. He didn’t claim to be. But he knows who the witnesses are. And his information has merely proven to be accurate in all respects, meaning his sources were correct.RaceBannon said:Meanwhile the whistleblower is still not a whistle blower, did not have first hand info and John Brennen is still trying to unseat a duly elected president using our 17 intelligence agencies and team hondo is all in
You want to talk about shitty fucking Americans, look in the mirror
Daddy wants to shoot the sources and arrest Schiff. Nothing to see here, obviously. -
Well if Jim Jordan and Devin Nunes say so, I’m convinced.
You fucktards got played. -
Law involves Congress. This was a policy/form change that happened right as the complaint was being made. And they will not comment on who/when the change was made (the "new" file was uploaded to the system in Sept 2019 but I know the HondoFS of the world think that is just a coincidence).2001400ex said:
I'm talking about how your news source said the law changed. And it went on to say it changed for the purpose of allowing the form to be filled out based on second hand information. Both of which are lies.HoustonHusky said:
The IG only accepted complaints based on 1st hand knowledge of events (until changing the form/rules to allow this). By definition the IG would not have even accepted the paper complaint. Furthermore by definition it was not an Urgent Matter. The snitches' lawyers knew that so they kept saying Urgent even though it didn't meet the definition. For both reasons it should not have been forwarded to Congress.
But Shitt and Botox had already seen it and likely helped draft it. Because they are crooked like that.
The records are in plain site which is why you ignore them. And the transcript shows its a lie as well.
Keep lying HondoFS.
-
Having the intake form made consistent with the statute sounds pretty sinister.HoustonHusky said:
Law involves Congress. This was a policy/form change that happened right as the complaint was being made. And they will not comment on who/when the change was made (the "new" file was uploaded to the system in Sept 2019 but I know the HondoFS of the world think that is just a coincidence).2001400ex said:
I'm talking about how your news source said the law changed. And it went on to say it changed for the purpose of allowing the form to be filled out based on second hand information. Both of which are lies.HoustonHusky said:
The IG only accepted complaints based on 1st hand knowledge of events (until changing the form/rules to allow this). By definition the IG would not have even accepted the paper complaint. Furthermore by definition it was not an Urgent Matter. The snitches' lawyers knew that so they kept saying Urgent even though it didn't meet the definition. For both reasons it should not have been forwarded to Congress.
But Shitt and Botox had already seen it and likely helped draft it. Because they are crooked like that.
The records are in plain site which is why you ignore them. And the transcript shows its a lie as well.
Keep lying HondoFS. -
Yes, let’s discuss forms and not the content of the actual issue. Classic deflection.
Oh and you’re wrong.
SAD.
