Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
So why was the whistle blower law changed in August?
Comments
-
Read it, there was no promise. You lied.GDS said:
You didn't read the complaint? I admit I didn't get a chance to read it until yesterday as we were on yacht du scott for some salmon and crab killing since Thursday but seeing how you were on here endlessly since Thursday I figured you would have read it at least. Then again you never read the Mueller Report either so I guess I shouldn't be surprised...SFGbob said:
Hey what happened to that "promise" you told us was in the Whistle blower complaint Scotty?GDS said:
Glad I was able to correct your mistake about the whistleblower law changing though. -
The law did change
HTH -
-
It wasn’t changed. Glad I could help.SFGbob said:And who changed it?
Is there a single liberal here who doesn't think something stinks about this? And why does the whistle blower complaint read like it was written by a team of lawyers? -
Do you not know the definition of a lie? How could I lie when I hadn't seen the complaint. I claimed reports said the complaint contained a promise and it did.SFGbob said:
Read it, there was no promise. You lied.GDS said:
You didn't read the complaint? I admit I didn't get a chance to read it until yesterday as we were on yacht du scott for some salmon and crab killing since Thursday but seeing how you were on here endlessly since Thursday I figured you would have read it at least. Then again you never read the Mueller Report either so I guess I shouldn't be surprised...SFGbob said:
Hey what happened to that "promise" you told us was in the Whistle blower complaint Scotty?GDS said:
Glad I was able to correct your mistake about the whistleblower law changing though. -
Hey Blob - in case you aren't aware of what a lie is this is a lie. Your welcome.RaceBannon said:The law did change
HTH -
My link versus the word of two pathological liars like scoot and H
Tuff call
The law changed -
But, in a detail first reported by The Federalist, a key form was recently revised to drop a requirement that such complaints include first-hand information in order to be sent to Congress.
In a letter obtained by Fox News, top House Republicans urged Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson to preserve all records related to that revision, allegedly made sometime in August.
Specifically, they questioned whether the timing was related to the Ukraine complaint.
“When this revised form was published, and whether the whistleblower received a copy of this form when making the disclosure on August 12, 2019, are both unknown to the House Intelligence Committee. However, the timing of the removal of the first-hand information requirement raises questions about potential connections to this whistleblower’s complaint,” said the letter signed by House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., House Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Devin Nunes, R-Calif., and House Oversight Committee Ranking Member Jim Jordan, R-Ohio. “This timing, along with numerous apparent leaks of classified information about the contents of this complaint, also raise questions about potential criminality in the handling of these matters.”
They lie. Its what they do. Its who they are -
For a “small government conservative” you sure are in favor of bureaucrats requiring things the statute does not. Your intake form isn’t the law.RaceBannon said:My link versus the word of two pathological liars like scoot and H
Tuff call
The law changed -
Gosh whom to believe? O'Keefed who claimed Hillary never lied to the public about her emails and that Schiff never lied when he claimed Trump asked them to "manufacture" dirt on Biden? Or the plan language of the IG that says First hand information is required.HHusky said:
It wasn’t changed. Glad I could help.SFGbob said:And who changed it?
Is there a single liberal here who doesn't think something stinks about this? And why does the whistle blower complaint read like it was written by a team of lawyers?
