DJ Duck is a two-timing whore
Comments
-
Not seeing the issue there but EL OH EL at Pulling poasts from completely different threads.MikeSeaver said:haie said:Arrogance from a road win 3 seasons ago. High off of beating Ute at home. Complete ignorance of being down two defensive starters and every QB but one.
Lousy coaching, undisciplined defense.
UW appears to be improving. They appear like they're just shedding depth.
No gameday. No black helmet fucking losing.
Not much pointing to a SC road win again.
Sounds like you can’t make up your mind...haie said:
It's Shitshow Sunday Mike. It's why you're here too. Try not to act like a loser and downplay a major conference victory on primetime TV. It sounds jealous.MikeSeaver said:
Spring loaded as always.haie said:
Your conference game was against Stanford the beavlet slayers.MikeSeaver said:
That was a GOOD sc teamhaie said:
Yeah a quarterback that threw multiple picks to BYU would have me shaking versus the guy that fun and gunned the supposed South favorites.DJDuck said:Not nervous at all. It’s just the truth. You were lucky they had to use Fink and didn’t have JT Daniels OR Slovis healthy.
JT was a 5 win quarterback.
Fuck off.
Upset Mike is best Mike. -
You said it before the game. Now that you beat him he’d be starting at Oregon?haie said:
Inferior quarterback?DJDuck said:
So you can’t answer the question honestly.DJDuck said:Can you actually say with a straight face that you don’t hope that Slovis is still out when we play SC?
You obfuscate with tangential bullshit like Daniels only won 5 games last year and Slovis lost to BYU. You are avoiding the real question because you don’t like the inconvenient truth.
Are JT Daniels or Slovis better than Fink? Do you care whether Slovis returns when we play USC.Is Fink better than Daniels and Slovis?
I have no idea whether you would have won or lost with a different QB but the fact is you faced an inferior QB which made defeating SC that much easier. To deny that is moronic.
Today it's "3rd string quarterback."
Ok.
BOING!!!! -
I said there wasn't much pointing toward a USC win this time.MikeSeaver said:
You said it before the game. Now that you beat him he’d be starting at Oregon?haie said:
Inferior quarterback?DJDuck said:
So you can’t answer the question honestly.DJDuck said:Can you actually say with a straight face that you don’t hope that Slovis is still out when we play SC?
You obfuscate with tangential bullshit like Daniels only won 5 games last year and Slovis lost to BYU. You are avoiding the real question because you don’t like the inconvenient truth.
Are JT Daniels or Slovis better than Fink? Do you care whether Slovis returns when we play USC.Is Fink better than Daniels and Slovis?
I have no idea whether you would have won or lost with a different QB but the fact is you faced an inferior QB which made defeating SC that much easier. To deny that is moronic.
Today it's "3rd string quarterback."
Ok.
BOING!!!!
I was right.
They still have a lot of talent which they showed. They could prison rape you guys down in LA and no one would blink.
Why are you so upset? -
UW is a good team. USC is a neurotic team that has talent. It will be a fun rest of the season.haie said:
Inferior quarterback? LOL. Pretty sure Pete and Christo accept that kid's commitment.DJDuck said:
So you can’t answer the question honestly.DJDuck said:Can you actually say with a straight face that you don’t hope that Slovis is still out when we play SC?
You obfuscate with tangential bullshit like Daniels only won 5 games last year and Slovis lost to BYU. You are avoiding the real question because you don’t like the inconvenient truth.
Are JT Daniels or Slovis better than Fink? Do you care whether Slovis returns when we play USC.Is Fink better than Daniels and Slovis?
I have no idea whether you would have won or lost with a different QB but the fact is you faced an inferior QB which made defeating SC that much easier. To deny that is moronic.
Yesterday it's "SC is plug and play. Too talented at receiver. Everyone wanted all 3 of their quarterbacks."
Today it's "3rd string quarterback."
Fucking losers.
So basically your whole argument is that don't you give a shit about wins and losses. Spoken like a fan of a 4th in the North progrum.
Philosophically Oregon matches up way better against UW than USC. We shall see though. -
Kedon Slovis' Historic Start Powers USC Football Over No. 23 Stanford, 45-20haie said:
Yeah a quarterback that threw multiple picks to BYU would have me shaking versus the guy that fun and gunned the supposed South favorites.DJDuck said:Not nervous at all. It’s just the truth. You were lucky they had to use Fink and didn’t have JT Daniels OR Slovis healthy.
JT was a 5 win quarterback.
https://usctrojans.com/news/2019/9/7/usc-trojans-football-stanford-cardinal-recap-pac-12-kedon-slovis.aspx
-
Different thread same subject. It’s not my fault you’re an emotional wreck when it comes football. I just report the facts.haie said:
Not seeing the issue there but EL OH EL at Pulling poasts from completely different threads.MikeSeaver said:haie said:Arrogance from a road win 3 seasons ago. High off of beating Ute at home. Complete ignorance of being down two defensive starters and every QB but one.
Lousy coaching, undisciplined defense.
UW appears to be improving. They appear like they're just shedding depth.
No gameday. No black helmet fucking losing.
Not much pointing to a SC road win again.
Sounds like you can’t make up your mind...haie said:
It's Shitshow Sunday Mike. It's why you're here too. Try not to act like a loser and downplay a major conference victory on primetime TV. It sounds jealous.MikeSeaver said:
Spring loaded as always.haie said:
Your conference game was against Stanford the beavlet slayers.MikeSeaver said:
That was a GOOD sc teamhaie said:
Yeah a quarterback that threw multiple picks to BYU would have me shaking versus the guy that fun and gunned the supposed South favorites.DJDuck said:Not nervous at all. It’s just the truth. You were lucky they had to use Fink and didn’t have JT Daniels OR Slovis healthy.
JT was a 5 win quarterback.
Fuck off.
Upset Mike is best Mike.
-
Historical 8 win comparison coming between SC and Oregon?MikeSeaver said:
Different thread same subject. It’s not my fault you’re an emotional wreck when it comes football. I just report the facts.haie said:
Not seeing the issue there but EL OH EL at Pulling poasts from completely different threads.MikeSeaver said:haie said:Arrogance from a road win 3 seasons ago. High off of beating Ute at home. Complete ignorance of being down two defensive starters and every QB but one.
Lousy coaching, undisciplined defense.
UW appears to be improving. They appear like they're just shedding depth.
No gameday. No black helmet fucking losing.
Not much pointing to a SC road win again.
Sounds like you can’t make up your mind...haie said:
It's Shitshow Sunday Mike. It's why you're here too. Try not to act like a loser and downplay a major conference victory on primetime TV. It sounds jealous.MikeSeaver said:
Spring loaded as always.haie said:
Your conference game was against Stanford the beavlet slayers.MikeSeaver said:
That was a GOOD sc teamhaie said:
Yeah a quarterback that threw multiple picks to BYU would have me shaking versus the guy that fun and gunned the supposed South favorites.DJDuck said:Not nervous at all. It’s just the truth. You were lucky they had to use Fink and didn’t have JT Daniels OR Slovis healthy.
JT was a 5 win quarterback.
Fuck off.
Upset Mike is best Mike. -
Reading your analysis of Huhbert I would say that all 3 of SC's quarterbacks are starting at Oregon.MikeSeaver said:
You said it before the game. Now that you beat him he’d be starting at Oregon?haie said:
Inferior quarterback?DJDuck said:
So you can’t answer the question honestly.DJDuck said:Can you actually say with a straight face that you don’t hope that Slovis is still out when we play SC?
You obfuscate with tangential bullshit like Daniels only won 5 games last year and Slovis lost to BYU. You are avoiding the real question because you don’t like the inconvenient truth.
Are JT Daniels or Slovis better than Fink? Do you care whether Slovis returns when we play USC.Is Fink better than Daniels and Slovis?
I have no idea whether you would have won or lost with a different QB but the fact is you faced an inferior QB which made defeating SC that much easier. To deny that is moronic.
Today it's "3rd string quarterback."
Ok.
BOING!!!! -
“That’s a good SC team over there. A lot better than I thought”haie said:
I said there wasn't much pointing toward a USC win this time.MikeSeaver said:
You said it before the game. Now that you beat him he’d be starting at Oregon?haie said:
Inferior quarterback?DJDuck said:
So you can’t answer the question honestly.DJDuck said:Can you actually say with a straight face that you don’t hope that Slovis is still out when we play SC?
You obfuscate with tangential bullshit like Daniels only won 5 games last year and Slovis lost to BYU. You are avoiding the real question because you don’t like the inconvenient truth.
Are JT Daniels or Slovis better than Fink? Do you care whether Slovis returns when we play USC.Is Fink better than Daniels and Slovis?
I have no idea whether you would have won or lost with a different QB but the fact is you faced an inferior QB which made defeating SC that much easier. To deny that is moronic.
Today it's "3rd string quarterback."
Ok.
BOING!!!!
I was right.
They still have a lot of talent which they showed. They could prison rape you guys down in LA and no one would blink. -
Still avoiding the question.😂😂
