Over 300 former national security professionals call out Trump for "unconscionable abuse of power"
Comments
-
Ah so Trump doing his duty as required is criminal. But Joe doing crime is good to go because policy. How does it work in court for you when the victim of the crime says it didn't happen? How does it work when the suspect who is charged with the crime confesses?Legal much?HHusky said:
MallCop: Criminal actions = Furthering US policySledog said:
I wasn't aware of his criminal actions prior. How does threatening witnesses and government officials work in your world?HHusky said:
We knew he pressed for the firing of the prosecutor. He didn't hide that fact; he advertised it. It wasn't a secret that such an outcome was sought by the US and others. Your interest in it seems to have come up only when Daddy's extortion racket became public.Sledog said:So a former VP running for president can withhold aid to a foreign government while VP to influence the criminal investigation of his son by that same government and brag about it but the President, who is required by law to report such abuses, can't ask for an investigation to an admitted abuse of power? Trump has first hand knowledge since rocket scientist Joe confessed to it on video for the whole world to see. But we should investigate Trump for a made up accusation that the victim of said claim denies ever happened based and the transcript proves it didn't happen. All based on hearsay of a biased person that over heard something being said in a complaint drawn up by a law firm most likely paid for by democrats.
Talk about pressing!
If you have evidence that Biden instead acted in order to help his son, bring it forward Mall Cop.
That's the "blame America" crowd for ya.
Legal opinion?
I've watched attempted murderers walk because they recanted in that circumstance. Gang members like to get even on the street.
-
Gee...this doesn't sound staged. At all. Really. Promise.
-
RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA! 2.0 is blowing up in the Dems face.
The real question is, when will they turn on each other?
It's sure to happen. -
Its not the crime its the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up
-
Anything obama was in favor of, you can be sure it fucks america over and helps out 3rd world shitholes at our expense.
-
Calm down turbo. Why so mad?insinceredawg said:The only thing you've exposed on here is yourself as a bitchass partisan Kunt and a closeted gay pedophile.
-
What happened then? In your own words.2001400ex said:
That's not what happened. But I understand why your simple mind sees it that way.Sledog said:So a former VP running for president can withhold aid to a foreign government while VP to influence the criminal investigation of his son by that same government and brag about it but the President, who is required by law to report such abuses, can't ask for an investigation to an admitted abuse of power? Trump has first hand knowledge since rocket scientist Joe confessed to it on video for the whole world to see. But we should investigate Trump for a made up accusation that the victim of said claim denies ever happened based and the transcript proves it didn't happen. All based on hearsay of a biased person that over heard something being said in a complaint drawn up by a law firm most likely paid for by democrats.
Talk about pressing! -
Cue the Kunt act.PurpleThrobber said:
What happened then? In your own words.2001400ex said:
That's not what happened. But I understand why your simple mind sees it that way.Sledog said:So a former VP running for president can withhold aid to a foreign government while VP to influence the criminal investigation of his son by that same government and brag about it but the President, who is required by law to report such abuses, can't ask for an investigation to an admitted abuse of power? Trump has first hand knowledge since rocket scientist Joe confessed to it on video for the whole world to see. But we should investigate Trump for a made up accusation that the victim of said claim denies ever happened based and the transcript proves it didn't happen. All based on hearsay of a biased person that over heard something being said in a complaint drawn up by a law firm most likely paid for by democrats.
Talk about pressing! -
Well you see throbber. Many of the other world leaders were calling for the guy to get fired. And Biden is a talker and bragging about shit that wasn't really on him. Not to mention, that person wasn't even investigating his son. So pretty much every fact I highlighted in bold is wrong other than the fact Biden said those words.PurpleThrobber said:
What happened then? In your own words.2001400ex said:
That's not what happened. But I understand why your simple mind sees it that way.Sledog said:So a former VP running for president can withhold aid to a foreign government while VP to influence the criminal investigation of his son by that same government and brag about it but the President, who is required by law to report such abuses, can't ask for an investigation to an admitted abuse of power? Trump has first hand knowledge since rocket scientist Joe confessed to it on video for the whole world to see. But we should investigate Trump for a made up accusation that the victim of said claim denies ever happened based and the transcript proves it didn't happen. All based on hearsay of a biased person that over heard something being said in a complaint drawn up by a law firm most likely paid for by democrats.
Talk about pressing! -
But he was investigating the NG company, and I don't recall any other world leaders saying they were going to hold up a billion dollar loan unless they fired the guy.2001400ex said:
Well you see throbber. Many of the other world leaders were calling for the guy to get fired. And Biden is a talker and bragging about shit that wasn't really on him. Not to mention, that person wasn't even investigating his son. So pretty much every fact I highlighted in bold is wrong other than the fact Biden said those words.PurpleThrobber said:
What happened then? In your own words.2001400ex said:
That's not what happened. But I understand why your simple mind sees it that way.Sledog said:So a former VP running for president can withhold aid to a foreign government while VP to influence the criminal investigation of his son by that same government and brag about it but the President, who is required by law to report such abuses, can't ask for an investigation to an admitted abuse of power? Trump has first hand knowledge since rocket scientist Joe confessed to it on video for the whole world to see. But we should investigate Trump for a made up accusation that the victim of said claim denies ever happened based and the transcript proves it didn't happen. All based on hearsay of a biased person that over heard something being said in a complaint drawn up by a law firm most likely paid for by democrats.
Talk about pressing!
Got in more bullshit Kunt? -
I’ve seen multiple explanations that say Trump was investigating Biden and Biden’s son, making what appears to be an introductory get to know one another call and, then, asking for information to that end to ferret out corruption in both the US and Ukraine.
All I’d like to see is one plausible scenario (based on what was released in the transcript - though H won’t call it a transcript) that counters the scenario outlined above.
Is that too difficult of a task? -
Did you read the whistleblower complaint? Obviously it's second hand information but there's a lot more to it than just a phone call. The issue isn't as much what Trump did, but the cover up. After reading more on the Clinton deal this morning, the fact pattern is similar to that scenario. Although Trump isn't under oath yet. I've told you guys all along that the Democrat plan has been to get him under oath for anything. This might be their chance.PurpleThrobber said:I’ve seen multiple explanations that say Trump was investigating Biden and Biden’s son, making what appears to be an introductory get to know one another call and, then, asking for information to that end to ferret out corruption in both the US and Ukraine.
All I’d like to see is one plausible scenario (based on what was released in the transcript - though H won’t call it a transcript) that counters the scenario outlined above.
Is that too difficult of a task? -
Great point throbber. Maybe it was all very innocent? Can I ask a favor? Maybe trump is also having casual conversations about corruption in China with Xi and asking about Ivanka’s copyrights there too? After all, trump is notoriously against corruption. What do you think?PurpleThrobber said:I’ve seen multiple explanations that say Trump was investigating Biden and Biden’s son, making what appears to be an introductory get to know one another call and, then, asking for information to that end to ferret out corruption in both the US and Ukraine.
All I’d like to see is one plausible scenario (based on what was released in the transcript - though H won’t call it a transcript) that counters the scenario outlined above.
Is that too difficult of a task? -
2001400ex said:
Did you read the whistleblower complaint? Obviously it's second hand information but there's a lot more to it than just a phone call. The issue isn't as much what Trump did, but the cover up. After reading more on the Clinton deal this morning, the fact pattern is similar to that scenario. Although Trump isn't under oath yet. I've told you guys all along that the Democrat plan has been to get him under oath for anything. This might be their chance.PurpleThrobber said:I’ve seen multiple explanations that say Trump was investigating Biden and Biden’s son, making what appears to be an introductory get to know one another call and, then, asking for information to that end to ferret out corruption in both the US and Ukraine.
All I’d like to see is one plausible scenario (based on what was released in the transcript - though H won’t call it a transcript) that counters the scenario outlined above.
Is that too difficult of a task?
Did you read the whistleblower complaint?
Hondo falls back on the old standby Kunt act when he can't back up his mouth. There's no fucking way in hell that Hondo read either the Memo or the Complaint but he'll pretend he did while he regurgitates the few talking points he can remember.
This month's version of "Read the Mueller Report."
-
Bob doesn't read the next two sentences. Where I explain what I meant by that. You really are struggling today bro. Worried bout you.SFGbob said:2001400ex said:
Did you read the whistleblower complaint? Obviously it's second hand information but there's a lot more to it than just a phone call. The issue isn't as much what Trump did, but the cover up. After reading more on the Clinton deal this morning, the fact pattern is similar to that scenario. Although Trump isn't under oath yet. I've told you guys all along that the Democrat plan has been to get him under oath for anything. This might be their chance.PurpleThrobber said:I’ve seen multiple explanations that say Trump was investigating Biden and Biden’s son, making what appears to be an introductory get to know one another call and, then, asking for information to that end to ferret out corruption in both the US and Ukraine.
All I’d like to see is one plausible scenario (based on what was released in the transcript - though H won’t call it a transcript) that counters the scenario outlined above.
Is that too difficult of a task?
Did you read the whistleblower complaint?
Hondo falls back on the old standby Kunt act when he can't back up his mouth. There's no fucking way in hell that Hondo read either the Memo or the Complaint but he'll pretend he did while he regurgitates the few talking points he can remember.
This month's version of "Read the Mueller Report." -
Expand on that. If his daughter is profiting like apparently hunter did, I have no problem punishing her or himCirrhosisDawg said:
Great point throbber. Maybe it was all very innocent? Can I ask a favor? Maybe trump is also having casual conversations about corruption in China with Xi and asking about Ivanka’s copyrights there too? After all, trump is notoriously against corruption. What do you think?PurpleThrobber said:I’ve seen multiple explanations that say Trump was investigating Biden and Biden’s son, making what appears to be an introductory get to know one another call and, then, asking for information to that end to ferret out corruption in both the US and Ukraine.
All I’d like to see is one plausible scenario (based on what was released in the transcript - though H won’t call it a transcript) that counters the scenario outlined above.
Is that too difficult of a task?
I’d rather punish her but that’s a personal fetish not corruption related. Yeah you know me. -
2001400ex said:
Did you read the whistleblower complaint? Obviously it's second hand information but there's a lot more to it than just a phone call. The issue isn't as much what Trump did, but the cover up. After reading more on the Clinton deal this morning, the fact pattern is similar to that scenario. Although Trump isn't under oath yet. I've told you guys all along that the Democrat plan has been to get him under oath for anything. This might be their chance.PurpleThrobber said:I’ve seen multiple explanations that say Trump was investigating Biden and Biden’s son, making what appears to be an introductory get to know one another call and, then, asking for information to that end to ferret out corruption in both the US and Ukraine.
All I’d like to see is one plausible scenario (based on what was released in the transcript - though H won’t call it a transcript) that counters the scenario outlined above.
Is that too difficult of a task?
Yeah I did. It bears little resemblance to the transcript and what the Ukraine president says was said and how he took it.
So explain away. -
Pics? Come on man for the home team.PurpleThrobber said:
Expand on that. If his daughter is profiting like apparently hunter did, I have no problem punishing her or himCirrhosisDawg said:
Great point throbber. Maybe it was all very innocent? Can I ask a favor? Maybe trump is also having casual conversations about corruption in China with Xi and asking about Ivanka’s copyrights there too? After all, trump is notoriously against corruption. What do you think?PurpleThrobber said:I’ve seen multiple explanations that say Trump was investigating Biden and Biden’s son, making what appears to be an introductory get to know one another call and, then, asking for information to that end to ferret out corruption in both the US and Ukraine.
All I’d like to see is one plausible scenario (based on what was released in the transcript - though H won’t call it a transcript) that counters the scenario outlined above.
Is that too difficult of a task?
I’d rather punish her but that’s a personal fetish not corruption related. Yeah you know me. -
Not at my PC and I suck at posting pics on the phone.2001400ex said:
Pics? Come on man for the home team.PurpleThrobber said:
Expand on that. If his daughter is profiting like apparently hunter did, I have no problem punishing her or himCirrhosisDawg said:
Great point throbber. Maybe it was all very innocent? Can I ask a favor? Maybe trump is also having casual conversations about corruption in China with Xi and asking about Ivanka’s copyrights there too? After all, trump is notoriously against corruption. What do you think?PurpleThrobber said:I’ve seen multiple explanations that say Trump was investigating Biden and Biden’s son, making what appears to be an introductory get to know one another call and, then, asking for information to that end to ferret out corruption in both the US and Ukraine.
All I’d like to see is one plausible scenario (based on what was released in the transcript - though H won’t call it a transcript) that counters the scenario outlined above.
Is that too difficult of a task?
I’d rather punish her but that’s a personal fetish not corruption related. Yeah you know me. -
True dat. And I've given up on Photofuckit.PurpleThrobber said:
Not at my PC and I suck at posting pics on the phone.2001400ex said:
Pics? Come on man for the home team.PurpleThrobber said:
Expand on that. If his daughter is profiting like apparently hunter did, I have no problem punishing her or himCirrhosisDawg said:
Great point throbber. Maybe it was all very innocent? Can I ask a favor? Maybe trump is also having casual conversations about corruption in China with Xi and asking about Ivanka’s copyrights there too? After all, trump is notoriously against corruption. What do you think?PurpleThrobber said:I’ve seen multiple explanations that say Trump was investigating Biden and Biden’s son, making what appears to be an introductory get to know one another call and, then, asking for information to that end to ferret out corruption in both the US and Ukraine.
All I’d like to see is one plausible scenario (based on what was released in the transcript - though H won’t call it a transcript) that counters the scenario outlined above.
Is that too difficult of a task?
I’d rather punish her but that’s a personal fetish not corruption related. Yeah you know me. -
Explain away. Focus.2001400ex said:
True dat. And I've given up on Photofuckit.PurpleThrobber said:
Not at my PC and I suck at posting pics on the phone.2001400ex said:
Pics? Come on man for the home team.PurpleThrobber said:
Expand on that. If his daughter is profiting like apparently hunter did, I have no problem punishing her or himCirrhosisDawg said:
Great point throbber. Maybe it was all very innocent? Can I ask a favor? Maybe trump is also having casual conversations about corruption in China with Xi and asking about Ivanka’s copyrights there too? After all, trump is notoriously against corruption. What do you think?PurpleThrobber said:I’ve seen multiple explanations that say Trump was investigating Biden and Biden’s son, making what appears to be an introductory get to know one another call and, then, asking for information to that end to ferret out corruption in both the US and Ukraine.
All I’d like to see is one plausible scenario (based on what was released in the transcript - though H won’t call it a transcript) that counters the scenario outlined above.
Is that too difficult of a task?
I’d rather punish her but that’s a personal fetish not corruption related. Yeah you know me. -
You mean the next two sentences where you just mouthed vacuous twaddle?2001400ex said:
Bob doesn't read the next two sentences. Where I explain what I meant by that. You really are struggling today bro. Worried bout you.SFGbob said:2001400ex said:
Did you read the whistleblower complaint? Obviously it's second hand information but there's a lot more to it than just a phone call. The issue isn't as much what Trump did, but the cover up. After reading more on the Clinton deal this morning, the fact pattern is similar to that scenario. Although Trump isn't under oath yet. I've told you guys all along that the Democrat plan has been to get him under oath for anything. This might be their chance.PurpleThrobber said:I’ve seen multiple explanations that say Trump was investigating Biden and Biden’s son, making what appears to be an introductory get to know one another call and, then, asking for information to that end to ferret out corruption in both the US and Ukraine.
All I’d like to see is one plausible scenario (based on what was released in the transcript - though H won’t call it a transcript) that counters the scenario outlined above.
Is that too difficult of a task?
Did you read the whistleblower complaint?
Hondo falls back on the old standby Kunt act when he can't back up his mouth. There's no fucking way in hell that Hondo read either the Memo or the Complaint but he'll pretend he did while he regurgitates the few talking points he can remember.
This month's version of "Read the Mueller Report."
Obviously it's second hand information but there's a lot more to it than just a phone call. The issue isn't as much what Trump did, but the cover up.
Yeah, that's real fucking insightful you fucking moron. -
Yes you can post. But clearly can't read.SFGbob said:
You mean the next two sentences where you just mouthed vacuous twaddle?2001400ex said:
Bob doesn't read the next two sentences. Where I explain what I meant by that. You really are struggling today bro. Worried bout you.SFGbob said:2001400ex said:
Did you read the whistleblower complaint? Obviously it's second hand information but there's a lot more to it than just a phone call. The issue isn't as much what Trump did, but the cover up. After reading more on the Clinton deal this morning, the fact pattern is similar to that scenario. Although Trump isn't under oath yet. I've told you guys all along that the Democrat plan has been to get him under oath for anything. This might be their chance.PurpleThrobber said:I’ve seen multiple explanations that say Trump was investigating Biden and Biden’s son, making what appears to be an introductory get to know one another call and, then, asking for information to that end to ferret out corruption in both the US and Ukraine.
All I’d like to see is one plausible scenario (based on what was released in the transcript - though H won’t call it a transcript) that counters the scenario outlined above.
Is that too difficult of a task?
Did you read the whistleblower complaint?
Hondo falls back on the old standby Kunt act when he can't back up his mouth. There's no fucking way in hell that Hondo read either the Memo or the Complaint but he'll pretend he did while he regurgitates the few talking points he can remember.
This month's version of "Read the Mueller Report."
Obviously it's second hand information but there's a lot more to it than just a phone call. The issue isn't as much what Trump did, but the cover up.
Yeah, that's real fucking insightful you fucking moron. -
I put my favorite gifs in a dropbox folder for easy use from laptop or phonePurpleThrobber said:
Not at my PC and I suck at posting pics on the phone.2001400ex said:
Pics? Come on man for the home team.PurpleThrobber said:
Expand on that. If his daughter is profiting like apparently hunter did, I have no problem punishing her or himCirrhosisDawg said:
Great point throbber. Maybe it was all very innocent? Can I ask a favor? Maybe trump is also having casual conversations about corruption in China with Xi and asking about Ivanka’s copyrights there too? After all, trump is notoriously against corruption. What do you think?PurpleThrobber said:I’ve seen multiple explanations that say Trump was investigating Biden and Biden’s son, making what appears to be an introductory get to know one another call and, then, asking for information to that end to ferret out corruption in both the US and Ukraine.
All I’d like to see is one plausible scenario (based on what was released in the transcript - though H won’t call it a transcript) that counters the scenario outlined above.
Is that too difficult of a task?
I’d rather punish her but that’s a personal fetish not corruption related. Yeah you know me.
Old dog
New tricks -
Huh?PurpleThrobber said:
Explain away. Focus.2001400ex said:
True dat. And I've given up on Photofuckit.PurpleThrobber said:
Not at my PC and I suck at posting pics on the phone.2001400ex said:
Pics? Come on man for the home team.PurpleThrobber said:
Expand on that. If his daughter is profiting like apparently hunter did, I have no problem punishing her or himCirrhosisDawg said:
Great point throbber. Maybe it was all very innocent? Can I ask a favor? Maybe trump is also having casual conversations about corruption in China with Xi and asking about Ivanka’s copyrights there too? After all, trump is notoriously against corruption. What do you think?PurpleThrobber said:I’ve seen multiple explanations that say Trump was investigating Biden and Biden’s son, making what appears to be an introductory get to know one another call and, then, asking for information to that end to ferret out corruption in both the US and Ukraine.
All I’d like to see is one plausible scenario (based on what was released in the transcript - though H won’t call it a transcript) that counters the scenario outlined above.
Is that too difficult of a task?
I’d rather punish her but that’s a personal fetish not corruption related. Yeah you know me. -
@insecuredawg - great source for unbiased views https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/national-security-action/
did they have this letter written before or after the phone call? CBS using those guys as a source (and you doing the same) is why no one trusts the media -
I should have made this easier for those who don't like to read The NSA =
National Security Action (NSA) is a left-wing 501(c)(4) advocacy group largely composed of former Obama administration staffers and leadership. NSA works to advance global policies and oppose the foreign policy of the Trump administration. -
More Obama commie plants.LebamDawg said:I should have made this easier for those who don't like to read The NSA =
National Security Action (NSA) is a left-wing 501(c)(4) advocacy group largely composed of former Obama administration staffers and leadership. NSA works to advance global policies and oppose the foreign policy of the Trump administration.
I wish you pussies would get to your revolution I ain't getting any younger!
But I will be replaced when I go by my kids who are just like me! -
You still haven't answered or explained from a legal perspective how Trump broke the law and is 'treasonous'.2001400ex said:
Huh?PurpleThrobber said:
Explain away. Focus.2001400ex said:
True dat. And I've given up on Photofuckit.PurpleThrobber said:
Not at my PC and I suck at posting pics on the phone.2001400ex said:
Pics? Come on man for the home team.PurpleThrobber said:
Expand on that. If his daughter is profiting like apparently hunter did, I have no problem punishing her or himCirrhosisDawg said:
Great point throbber. Maybe it was all very innocent? Can I ask a favor? Maybe trump is also having casual conversations about corruption in China with Xi and asking about Ivanka’s copyrights there too? After all, trump is notoriously against corruption. What do you think?PurpleThrobber said:I’ve seen multiple explanations that say Trump was investigating Biden and Biden’s son, making what appears to be an introductory get to know one another call and, then, asking for information to that end to ferret out corruption in both the US and Ukraine.
All I’d like to see is one plausible scenario (based on what was released in the transcript - though H won’t call it a transcript) that counters the scenario outlined above.
Is that too difficult of a task?
I’d rather punish her but that’s a personal fetish not corruption related. Yeah you know me.
Nobody has, in fact.
-
treasonous is not what they want - they just want impeachable.
Remember high crimes and misdemeanors and we don't like him. I think that is how it is written
