Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Putting classified information on a classified server is now a crime

SFGbob
SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
in Tug Tavern
But emailing classified information on a non-secured serve is not a crime.

Got it.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,887 Founders Club
    Its the of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the cover up
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    Securing classified information on a classified serve is now a “cover up.”

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Gwad
    Gwad Member Posts: 2,855
    @SFGbob would you eat hillary's box if it ment getting her convicted of a crime?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,887 Founders Club
    SFGbob said:

    Securing classified information on a classified serve is now a “cover up.”

    Yes. Our enemies aren't able to see it. A cover up
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    Gwad said:

    @SFGbob would you eat hillary's box if it ment getting her convicted of a crime?

    I guess the facts made your snatch hurt. Weird how you and your ass munching pal haven't addressed any of this. You Kunts are dancing around talking about "cover ups" when there appears to be some major holes in you accusations.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,887 Founders Club
    Gwad said:

    @SFGbob would you eat hillary's box if it ment getting her convicted of a crime?

    Thanks for the contribution. I now see why Trump must be impeached
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • insinceredawg
    insinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    SFGbob said:

    But emailing classified information on a non-secured serve is not a crime.

    Got it.

    My post from earlier certainly aged well. Dance bob dance!

    I love how this board full of uneducated right wing nutjobs thinks they know more about national security than the actual professionals. Can't wait to see the dance of the bitchass partisan Kunt.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited September 2019
    RaceBannon said:

    SFGbob said:

    Securing classified information on a classified serve is now a “cover up.”

    Yes. Our enemies aren't able to see it. A cover up
    Yes, and there's no history of Trump's conversations with other world leaders ever being leaked.

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/aug/04/full-transcript-of-trumps-phone-call-with-australian-prime-minister-malcolm-turnbull

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,887 Founders Club
    insinceredawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    But emailing classified information on a non-secured serve is not a crime.

    Got it.

    My post from earlier certainly aged well. Dance bob dance!

    I love how this board full of uneducated right wing nutjobs thinks they know more about national security than the actual professionals. Can't wait to see the dance of the bitchass partisan Kunt.
    We need to do what our leaders say and not think for ourselves. Unless the leader is duly elected. Then we need the CIA to get rid of him

    Yes, you really nailed it you cock sucking establishment tool. Good job
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    insinceredawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    But emailing classified information on a non-secured serve is not a crime.

    Got it.

    My post from earlier certainly aged well. Dance bob dance!

    I love how this board full of uneducated right wing nutjobs thinks they know more about national security than the actual professionals. Can't wait to see the dance of the bitchass partisan Kunt.
    So explain to us dumbfuck, what's the crime of putting classified materials on a classified server? You claimed I didn't want to talk about that an now you're running and hiding like a Kunt from the topic.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • insinceredawg
    insinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    SFGbob said:

    insinceredawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    But emailing classified information on a non-secured serve is not a crime.

    Got it.

    My post from earlier certainly aged well. Dance bob dance!

    I love how this board full of uneducated right wing nutjobs thinks they know more about national security than the actual professionals. Can't wait to see the dance of the bitchass partisan Kunt.
    So explain to us dumbfuck, what's the crime of putting classified materials on a classified server? You claimed I didn't want to talk about that an now you're running and hiding like a Kunt from the topic.
    The whistleblower says in the complaint that they had learned from several sources that senior White House officials had intervened to "lock down" all records of the call, particularly an official word-for-word transcript.

    "This set of actions underscored to me that White House officials understood the gravity of what had transpired in the call," the whistleblower wrote in the complaint.

    The whistleblower says details of the call were stored in a "stand-alone computer system reserved for codeword-level intelligence information, such as covert action".

    The whistleblower adds that officials said it was "'not the first time' under this administration that a presidential transcript was placed into this codeword-level system solely for the purpose of protecting politically sensitive - rather than national security sensitive - information".
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    I recall the entire Joint Chiefs of Staff and the head of Department of Defense telling Obama not to pull out of Iraq. Anyone think that IC the hypocritical piece of shit had any problem with Obama's actions?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,887 Founders Club
    insinceredawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    insinceredawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    But emailing classified information on a non-secured serve is not a crime.

    Got it.

    My post from earlier certainly aged well. Dance bob dance!

    I love how this board full of uneducated right wing nutjobs thinks they know more about national security than the actual professionals. Can't wait to see the dance of the bitchass partisan Kunt.
    So explain to us dumbfuck, what's the crime of putting classified materials on a classified server? You claimed I didn't want to talk about that an now you're running and hiding like a Kunt from the topic.
    The whistleblower says in the complaint that they had learned from several sources that senior White House officials had intervened to "lock down" all records of the call, particularly an official word-for-word transcript.

    "This set of actions underscored to me that White House officials understood the gravity of what had transpired in the call," the whistleblower wrote in the complaint.

    The whistleblower says details of the call were stored in a "stand-alone computer system reserved for codeword-level intelligence information, such as covert action".

    The whistleblower adds that officials said it was "'not the first time' under this administration that a presidential transcript was placed into this codeword-level system solely for the purpose of protecting politically sensitive - rather than national security sensitive - information".
    And?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • insinceredawg
    insinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    I know you're still going to run around with your bitchass partisan Kunt act and be oblivious to why this is a serious matter. It's a good thing we have smart people running the intelligence agencies instead of uneducated right wing dumbfucks like you.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Gwad
    Gwad Member Posts: 2,855
    SFGbob said:

    Gwad said:

    @SFGbob would you eat hillary's box if it ment getting her convicted of a crime?

    I guess the facts made your snatch hurt. Weird how you and your ass munching pal haven't addressed any of this. You Kunts are dancing around talking about "cover ups" when there appears to be some major holes in you accusations.
    Hey man I just wanted to know how much of a patriot you are. She may not let you out alive.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    Maybe they were trying to "lock it down" because there was a history of people leaking Trump's conversations. The memo itself was classified. So what's the problem with securing it in a classified system? And now we've all seen the memo. Schiff has obviously known the content of the conversation for over a month, so where is the cover up?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    RaceBannon said:

    Gwad said:

    @SFGbob would you eat hillary's box if it ment getting her convicted of a crime?

    Thanks for the contribution. I now see why Trump must be impeached
    GayBob pedophilia rants are more to your liking apparently.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,887 Founders Club
    insinceredawg said:

    I know you're still going to run around with your bitchass partisan Kunt act and be oblivious to why this is a serious matter. It's a good thing we have smart people running the intelligence agencies instead of uneducated right wing dumbfucks like you.

    Trust your un elected leaders. Maybe they can tell us why putting sensitive material on a classified server is so bad

    They didn't have a problem with an unsecured server used for classified information

    Live look at @insinceredawg


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,887 Founders Club
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Gwad said:

    @SFGbob would you eat hillary's box if it ment getting her convicted of a crime?

    Thanks for the contribution. I now see why Trump must be impeached
    GayBob pedophilia rants are more to your liking apparently.
    They are?

    Wow Trump really needs to be impeached now!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • insinceredawg
    insinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    SFGbob said:

    Maybe they were trying to "lock it down" because there was a history of people leaking Trump's conversations. The memo itself was classified. So what's the problem with securing it in a classified system? And now we've all seen the memo. Schiff has obviously known the content of the conversation for over a month, so where is the cover up?

    LOL you are such a sad pathetic man. Keep on telling yourself Trump is innocent.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited September 2019
    insinceredawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    Maybe they were trying to "lock it down" because there was a history of people leaking Trump's conversations. The memo itself was classified. So what's the problem with securing it in a classified system? And now we've all seen the memo. Schiff has obviously known the content of the conversation for over a month, so where is the cover up?

    LOL you are such a sad pathetic man. Keep on telling yourself Trump is innocent.
    Translation: I'm too fucking stupid to respond with anything intelligent. So I, the dumbfuck who loves to swallow like a bitch (Trump told Cohen to lie to Congress) will call you a sad and pathetic, because seriously, I've got nothing and my talking points don't cover what you said.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    RaceBannon said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Gwad said:

    @SFGbob would you eat hillary's box if it ment getting her convicted of a crime?

    Thanks for the contribution. I now see why Trump must be impeached
    GayBob pedophilia rants are more to your liking apparently.
    They are?

    Wow Trump really needs to be impeached now!
    Around thanksgiving, to be more precise.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,887 Founders Club
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Gwad said:

    @SFGbob would you eat hillary's box if it ment getting her convicted of a crime?

    Thanks for the contribution. I now see why Trump must be impeached
    GayBob pedophilia rants are more to your liking apparently.
    They are?

    Wow Trump really needs to be impeached now!
    Around thanksgiving, to be more precise.
    In other news Nadler is getting primaried by an AOC candidate
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Just read the headline. Tell me Bob, what AM radio talk show did you get that insight from?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    Just read the headline. Tell me Bob, what AM radio talk show did you get that insight from?

    Not being a dumbfuck like you Hondo, I'm able to think for myself.

    Now stop being a fucking Kunt and give me the name of that "prosecutor" who put Clinton under oath.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    Just read the headline. Tell me Bob, what AM radio talk show did you get that insight from?

    Not being a dumbfuck like you Hondo, I'm able to think for myself.

    Now stop being a fucking Kunt and give me the name of that "prosecutor" who put Clinton under oath.
    Be honest Bob. Where did you get the headline from?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    Just read the headline. Tell me Bob, what AM radio talk show did you get that insight from?

    Not being a dumbfuck like you Hondo, I'm able to think for myself.

    Now stop being a fucking Kunt and give me the name of that "prosecutor" who put Clinton under oath.
    Be honest Bob. Where did you get the headline from?
    Go fuck yourself. Back up your fucking mouth for once in your pathetic life and tell us the name of the "prosecutor" who you claim put Clinton under oath before they had possession of the blue dress. You said it you pathetic fucking moron, back it up.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    Just read the headline. Tell me Bob, what AM radio talk show did you get that insight from?

    Not being a dumbfuck like you Hondo, I'm able to think for myself.

    Now stop being a fucking Kunt and give me the name of that "prosecutor" who put Clinton under oath.
    Be honest Bob. Where did you get the headline from?
    Go fuck yourself. Back up your fucking mouth for once in your pathetic life and tell us the name of the "prosecutor" who you claim put Clinton under oath before they had possession of the blue dress. You said it you pathetic fucking moron, back it up.
    Bob playing word semantics. As always. When he realizes he's fucking dumb. And has no clue what the topic is even about.

    Come on Bob, I share my source of information. Why are you always afraid to share your source??? I'm genuinely curious where you got that thought process from.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited September 2019
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    Just read the headline. Tell me Bob, what AM radio talk show did you get that insight from?

    Not being a dumbfuck like you Hondo, I'm able to think for myself.

    Now stop being a fucking Kunt and give me the name of that "prosecutor" who put Clinton under oath.
    Be honest Bob. Where did you get the headline from?
    Go fuck yourself. Back up your fucking mouth for once in your pathetic life and tell us the name of the "prosecutor" who you claim put Clinton under oath before they had possession of the blue dress. You said it you pathetic fucking moron, back it up.
    Bob playing word semantics. As always. When he realizes he's fucking dumb. And has no clue what the topic is even about.

    Come on Bob, I share my source of information. Why are you always afraid to share your source??? I'm genuinely curious where you got that thought process from.
    I quoted what you said you lying sack of shit. There was no "prosecutor" who put Clinton under oath before they had possession of the blue dress. You fucking lied Kunt and instead of having the integrity to admit that you were fucking wrong, you called me a liar and made up some bullshit story about how you weren't talking about the Paula Jones case.

    How big a fucking Kunt do you have to be in order to be unable to admit you made a mistake on an anonymous message board?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    Just read the headline. Tell me Bob, what AM radio talk show did you get that insight from?

    Not being a dumbfuck like you Hondo, I'm able to think for myself.

    Now stop being a fucking Kunt and give me the name of that "prosecutor" who put Clinton under oath.
    Be honest Bob. Where did you get the headline from?
    Go fuck yourself. Back up your fucking mouth for once in your pathetic life and tell us the name of the "prosecutor" who you claim put Clinton under oath before they had possession of the blue dress. You said it you pathetic fucking moron, back it up.
    Bob playing word semantics. As always. When he realizes he's fucking dumb. And has no clue what the topic is even about.

    Come on Bob, I share my source of information. Why are you always afraid to share your source??? I'm genuinely curious where you got that thought process from.
    I quoted what you said you lying sack of shit. There was no "prosecutor" who put Clinton under oath before they had possession of the blue dress. You fucking lied Kunt and instead of having the integrity to admit that you were fucking wrong, you called me a liar and made up some bullshit story about how you weren't talking about the Paula Jones case.

    How big a fucking Kunt do you have to be in order to be unable to admit you made a mistake on an anonymous message board?
    Bob I honestly don't even remember the specifics of that comment and I'm not going to dig it up, you are welcome to however and I can respond it to. That being said. The point of the comment was that Clinton was put under oath prior to having evidence. Which is absolutely correct. And was in response to you guys all saying Trump couldn't be investigated based on second hand information.

    Anyways. What is the source of your headline? Why are you embarrassed to say so Bob?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter