Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Reminder to far right fringe revisionists

1246711

Comments

  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    The reason impeachment was initiated as an inquiry was strictly because the White House blocked an urgent whistleblower report. It was not started because Trump was working a quid pro quo of dirt for aid. That ensures it will happen though

    By definition a “whistleblower” has first-hand knowledge of an event of which this guy did not, and Shitt has had it since August.

    But OK...nominate Dementia Biden or Fauxahontas and see how that works out for you.
    He did have first-hand knowledge. He was working with colleagues who told him what happened and that was corroborated with the phone reconstruction along with all relevant details!
    There's a well established legal test for this:

    Unless YOU have proof in HAND...it’s speculation for YOU. ‘Those who know’....meaning YOU are not a ‘THOSE’. I didn’t create the English language but ‘speculation’ is pretty cut and dry. Unless you are an eye witness, YOU are speculating. Word of mouth is not proof.
    I don't feel like they had proof that Clinton had sexual relations with Monica when he was put under oath. So I dig your words in all caps, but you entire point is meaningless.
    Really. No video
    No video. There was secretly recorded audio from Lewinsky.
  • BearsWiin
    BearsWiin Member Posts: 5,076
    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    The reason impeachment was initiated as an inquiry was strictly because the White House blocked an urgent whistleblower report. It was not started because Trump was working a quid pro quo of dirt for aid. That ensures it will happen though

    If russia-gate wasn't enough, you fucking idiots just handed him 2020.

    TYFYS
    If the idiotic president had learned from Russia he wouldn't be getting impeached. Why do you support a treasonous bastard?
    So you position is he should hang?


    @NSA_Dawg ?
    Do I seem like law enforcement?
    You used the word treason.

    Treason is punishable by death.

    I'm using your words.

    Are you saying the big game you talk is bullshit?

    Or that your mouth runs off without your brain?

    If treason is what you mean, then own it. Pussy.
    You know, you are going to be making Hondo jealous with your industrial grade meltdowns.
    Meltdown?

    a) Ironic af

    b) what part of that post oozed emotion that might lead one to reasonably assume meltdown?


    popcorn.gif
    Allow me to interject. Calling somebody a pussy is cringey enough, but making it a full standalone sentence makes you sound hysterical.

    FWIW treason is frequently narrowly defined as giving aid and comfort to the enemy in wartime, so it doesn't apply in this specific case. However, subverting American national interests for personal political gain is indefensible and impeachable, the mark of a grifting traitor. Not a fan of the death penalty, but a few of these guys should be looking at jail time when this is all said and done.
  • ApostleofGrief
    ApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    Bottom line is that Trump was working a deal. He held the as aid and obviously wanted investigation into his political opponents. That is a high crime.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,504 Standard Supporter

    pawz said:

    The reason impeachment was initiated as an inquiry was strictly because the White House blocked an urgent whistleblower report. It was not started because Trump was working a quid pro quo of dirt for aid. That ensures it will happen though

    If russia-gate wasn't enough, you fucking idiots just handed him 2020.

    TYFYS
    If the idiotic president had learned from Russia he wouldn't be getting impeached. Why do you support a treasonous bastard?
    The TDS is skrong in this one.

    You really should only use words that apply.

    “Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”


  • ApostleofGrief
    ApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    The reason impeachment was initiated as an inquiry was strictly because the White House blocked an urgent whistleblower report. It was not started because Trump was working a quid pro quo of dirt for aid. That ensures it will happen though

    By definition a “whistleblower” has first-hand knowledge of an event of which this guy did not, and Shitt has had it since August.

    But OK...nominate Dementia Biden or Fauxahontas and see how that works out for you.
    He did have first-hand knowledge. He was working with colleagues who told him what happened and that was corroborated with the phone reconstruction along with all relevant details!
    There's a well established legal test for this:

    Unless YOU have proof in HAND...it’s speculation for YOU. ‘Those who know’....meaning YOU are not a ‘THOSE’. I didn’t create the English language but ‘speculation’ is pretty cut and dry. Unless you are an eye witness, YOU are speculating. Word of mouth is not proof.
    I don't feel like they had proof that Clinton had sexual relations with Monica when he was put under oath. So I dig your words in all caps, but you entire point is meaningless.
    Really. No video
    No video. There was secretly recorded audio from Lewinsky.
    No dick in mouth. He could have wanked off on the shirt later. Hearsay!!!
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,570 Standard Supporter

    The reason impeachment was initiated as an inquiry was strictly because the White House blocked an urgent whistleblower report. It was not started because Trump was working a quid pro quo of dirt for aid. That ensures it will happen though

    By definition a “whistleblower” has first-hand knowledge of an event of which this guy did not, and Shitt has had it since August.

    But OK...nominate Dementia Biden or Fauxahontas and see how that works out for you.
    He did have first-hand knowledge. He was working with colleagues who told him what happened and that was corroborated with the phone reconstruction along with all relevant details!
    There's a well established legal test for this:

    Unless YOU have proof in HAND...it’s speculation for YOU. ‘Those who know’....meaning YOU are not a ‘THOSE’. I didn’t create the English language but ‘speculation’ is pretty cut and dry. Unless you are an eye witness, YOU are speculating. Word of mouth is not proof.
    Hairsplitting.

    But he does have proof. The phone reconstruction
    Hahahahahaha
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club
    BearsWiin said:

    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    The reason impeachment was initiated as an inquiry was strictly because the White House blocked an urgent whistleblower report. It was not started because Trump was working a quid pro quo of dirt for aid. That ensures it will happen though

    If russia-gate wasn't enough, you fucking idiots just handed him 2020.

    TYFYS
    If the idiotic president had learned from Russia he wouldn't be getting impeached. Why do you support a treasonous bastard?
    So you position is he should hang?


    @NSA_Dawg ?
    Do I seem like law enforcement?
    You used the word treason.

    Treason is punishable by death.

    I'm using your words.

    Are you saying the big game you talk is bullshit?

    Or that your mouth runs off without your brain?

    If treason is what you mean, then own it. Pussy.
    You know, you are going to be making Hondo jealous with your industrial grade meltdowns.
    Meltdown?

    a) Ironic af

    b) what part of that post oozed emotion that might lead one to reasonably assume meltdown?


    popcorn.gif
    Allow me to interject. Calling somebody a pussy is cringey enough, but making it a full standalone sentence makes you sound hysterical.

    FWIW treason is frequently narrowly defined as giving aid and comfort to the enemy in wartime, so it doesn't apply in this specific case. However, subverting American national interests for personal political gain is indefensible and impeachable, the mark of a grifting traitor. Not a fan of the death penalty, but a few of these guys should be looking at jail time when this is all said and done.
    a) disagree. I typed that ice cold.

    b) I actually agree completely with the second paragraph. However it needs to extend across both sides of the aisle.

    What Biden bragged about doing - on video - falls precisely inside the definition of the accusations lobbed at Trump

    queue 1:20 in the following video, although the entire video is the whole story

    (it would be nice if another news source than RT would publish the clip, but that's another discussion)


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCF9My1vBP4




  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club

    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    The reason impeachment was initiated as an inquiry was strictly because the White House blocked an urgent whistleblower report. It was not started because Trump was working a quid pro quo of dirt for aid. That ensures it will happen though

    If russia-gate wasn't enough, you fucking idiots just handed him 2020.

    TYFYS
    If the idiotic president had learned from Russia he wouldn't be getting impeached. Why do you support a treasonous bastard?
    So you position is he should hang?


    @NSA_Dawg ?
    Do I seem like law enforcement?
    You used the word treason.

    Treason is punishable by death.

    I'm using your words.

    Are you saying the big game you talk is bullshit?

    Or that your mouth runs off without your brain?

    If treason is what you mean, then own it. Pussy.
    You know, you are going to be making Hondo jealous with your industrial grade meltdowns.
    Meltdown?

    a) Ironic af

    b) what part of that post oozed emotion that might lead one to reasonably assume meltdown?


    popcorn.gif
    So anyway Trump is being impeached because he broke whistleblower law.
    You're going to be so disappointed. Again.
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 6,011
    edited September 2019
    HHusky said:

    The reason impeachment was initiated as an inquiry was strictly because the White House blocked an urgent whistleblower report. It was not started because Trump was working a quid pro quo of dirt for aid. That ensures it will happen though

    By definition a “whistleblower” has first-hand knowledge of an event of which this guy did not, and Shitt has had it since August.

    But OK...nominate Dementia Biden or Fauxahontas and see how that works out for you.
    He did have first-hand knowledge. He was working with colleagues who told him what happened and that was corroborated with the phone reconstruction along with all relevant details!
    There's a well established legal test for this:

    Unless YOU have proof in HAND...it’s speculation for YOU. ‘Those who know’....meaning YOU are not a ‘THOSE’. I didn’t create the English language but ‘speculation’ is pretty cut and dry. Unless you are an eye witness, YOU are speculating. Word of mouth is not proof.

    The reason impeachment was initiated as an inquiry was strictly because the White House blocked an urgent whistleblower report. It was not started because Trump was working a quid pro quo of dirt for aid. That ensures it will happen though

    By definition a “whistleblower” has first-hand knowledge of an event of which this guy did not, and Shitt has had it since August.

    But OK...nominate Dementia Biden or Fauxahontas and see how that works out for you.
    By definition a whistleblower has information about wrongdoing. Hearsay is information. It either leads to evidence or it does not. This whistleblower’s information has proven very accurate based on what we saw today.
    The entire HondoFSBros are out in force...

    No, that is not the law as written for intelligence whistle blowers no matter how much you would want it to be.



    Keep lying though...
  • BearsWiin
    BearsWiin Member Posts: 5,076
    pawz said:

    BearsWiin said:

    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    The reason impeachment was initiated as an inquiry was strictly because the White House blocked an urgent whistleblower report. It was not started because Trump was working a quid pro quo of dirt for aid. That ensures it will happen though

    If russia-gate wasn't enough, you fucking idiots just handed him 2020.

    TYFYS
    If the idiotic president had learned from Russia he wouldn't be getting impeached. Why do you support a treasonous bastard?
    So you position is he should hang?


    @NSA_Dawg ?
    Do I seem like law enforcement?
    You used the word treason.

    Treason is punishable by death.

    I'm using your words.

    Are you saying the big game you talk is bullshit?

    Or that your mouth runs off without your brain?

    If treason is what you mean, then own it. Pussy.
    You know, you are going to be making Hondo jealous with your industrial grade meltdowns.
    Meltdown?

    a) Ironic af

    b) what part of that post oozed emotion that might lead one to reasonably assume meltdown?


    popcorn.gif
    Allow me to interject. Calling somebody a pussy is cringey enough, but making it a full standalone sentence makes you sound hysterical.

    FWIW treason is frequently narrowly defined as giving aid and comfort to the enemy in wartime, so it doesn't apply in this specific case. However, subverting American national interests for personal political gain is indefensible and impeachable, the mark of a grifting traitor. Not a fan of the death penalty, but a few of these guys should be looking at jail time when this is all said and done.
    a) disagree. I typed that ice cold.

    b) I actually agree completely with the second paragraph. However it needs to extend across both sides of the aisle.

    What Biden bragged about doing - on video - falls precisely inside the definition of the accusations lobbed at Trump

    queue 1:20 in the following video, although the entire video is the whole story

    (it would be nice if another news source than RT would publish the clip, but that's another discussion)


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCF9My1vBP4




    a) sure you did.

    b) Biden brags about a lot of shit. He's a mouthy twerp, and I won't defend him. But the EU guys who were advocating for the guy's dismissal had a lot more to do with it than Biden did. This smacks of the Uranium One accusations where people thought that Hillary could push something through that in reality had so many more agencies involved (and she wasn't). That's just not how this shit works.

    FWIW I'd have no problem if Biden's campaign is fatally torpedoed by his name being connected in any way to this shitstorm.