Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
I found this really hard to believe
Comments
-
Surprised is surprised no matter the level.chuck said:Oregon had a hell of a run. I'm a little surprised by the numbers (which make you a faggot, btw), but not that surprised.
Anyway. The idea that Washington is some sort of mythical college football superpower is nothing more than a glorification of the 80s by the baby boomers who infest this place and their sycophantic minions.
There was a time (around 20 years ago) where the shit talking was legit. When the message board culture exploded on all of us with its hot molten like energy while standing in the shower.
Now it’s just an arrested developmental mental disorder to believe UW in any sort of superior program.
Both programs had a legit power 15ish year run each.
The rest for both is pretty unremarkable.
-
Pump my gas, duck!
Or, as I always wanted to say on doogman, "pump Chip's ass, duck" rotfflmfatfo!!!1! -
Might be hard to believe because UW is better at everything except banquets in December in NYC
-
As noted. Washington is slightly better overall than Oregon. I’ve said that since the first post. You’re the USC of Seattle. I’ve always said that.RaceBannon said:Might be hard to believe because UW is better at everything except banquets in December in NYC
What is your source for these stats? Many look flawed.
Also theres a lot of nothing on that chart. “We made this many Cincinnati Jets.”
Wins, bowls/records, conference titles, top 10/5 finishes. That’s all there is.
I will say legitimate congrats on pulling away on conference titles a bit. It was down to 14-11 all time. It’s not now. We have our work cut out for us.
-
I just deal in facts, Mike. I let the chips fall where they may
This is from Winsipedia on the internet so I'm sure its accurate -
Wheres the most uniforms chart?RaceBannon said:I just deal in facts, Mike. I let the chips fall where they may
This is from Winsipedia on the internet so I'm sure its accurate
-
Race likes to include stats that include that undefeated season in 1916 as it reminds him of going to games with his friends that year.MikeSeaver said:
As noted. Washington is slightly better overall than Oregon. I’ve said that since the first post. You’re the USC of Seattle. I’ve always said that.RaceBannon said:Might be hard to believe because UW is better at everything except banquets in December in NYC
What is your source for these stats? Many look flawed.
Also theres a lot of nothing on that chart. “We made this many Cincinnati Jets.”
Wins, bowls/records, conference titles, top 10/5 finishes. That’s all there is.
I will say legitimate congrats on pulling away on conference titles a bit. It was down to 14-11 all time. It’s not now. We have our work cut out for us. -
Facts are facts
-
-
Get your priorities straight. Oregon doesn't compete to try to be better than Washington. Oregon competes for playoff spots and national titles. That's the goal.MikeSeaver said:
As noted. Washington is slightly better overall than Oregon. I’ve said that since the first post. You’re the USC of Seattle. I’ve always said that.RaceBannon said:Might be hard to believe because UW is better at everything except banquets in December in NYC
What is your source for these stats? Many look flawed.
Also theres a lot of nothing on that chart. “We made this many Cincinnati Jets.”
Wins, bowls/records, conference titles, top 10/5 finishes. That’s all there is.
I will say legitimate congrats on pulling away on conference titles a bit. It was down to 14-11 all time. It’s not now. We have our work cut out for us.
