Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

I found this really hard to believe

2»

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,363 Founders Club
    MikeSeaver said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Facts are facts

    That’s correct. As were the ones I posted. Facts that are facts.



    That looks factual to me
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Might be hard to believe because UW is better at everything except banquets in December in NYC




    As noted. Washington is slightly better overall than Oregon. I’ve said that since the first post. You’re the USC of Seattle. I’ve always said that.

    What is your source for these stats? Many look flawed.

    Also theres a lot of nothing on that chart. “We made this many Cincinnati Jets.”

    Wins, bowls/records, conference titles, top 10/5 finishes. That’s all there is.

    I will say legitimate congrats on pulling away on conference titles a bit. It was down to 14-11 all time. It’s not now. We have our work cut out for us.





    Get your priorities straight. Oregon doesn't compete to try to be better than Washington. Oregon competes for playoff spots and national titles. That's the goal.
    You can do both at the same time.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,363 Founders Club
    MikeSeaver said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Might be hard to believe because UW is better at everything except banquets in December in NYC




    As noted. Washington is slightly better overall than Oregon. I’ve said that since the first post. You’re the USC of Seattle. I’ve always said that.

    What is your source for these stats? Many look flawed.

    Also theres a lot of nothing on that chart. “We made this many Cincinnati Jets.”

    Wins, bowls/records, conference titles, top 10/5 finishes. That’s all there is.

    I will say legitimate congrats on pulling away on conference titles a bit. It was down to 14-11 all time. It’s not now. We have our work cut out for us.





    Get your priorities straight. Oregon doesn't compete to try to be better than Washington. Oregon competes for playoff spots and national titles. That's the goal.
    You can do both at the same time.
    That's what Bill Moos said

    He was almost right

    Too bad the window slammed shut
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,249
    MikeSeaver said:

    You guys know I love crushing numbers and figuring things out and sharing my findings.

    All time top 10 finishes:

    UW 11, OU 9

    All time top 5 finishes:

    UW 7, OU 5

    I couldn’t believe it. I thought UW would have had a LOT more in both cases than Oregon.

    Before you ask. Yes, this includes Don James and Rick Brooks.

    Crushing numbers?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ramenduck
    ramenduck Member Posts: 734
    MikeSeaver said:

    You guys know I love crushing numbers and figuring things out and sharing my findings.

    All time top 10 finishes:

    UW 11, OU 9

    All time top 5 finishes:

    UW 7, OU 5

    I couldn’t believe it. I thought UW would have had a LOT more in both cases than Oregon.

    Before you ask. Yes, this includes Don James and Rick Brooks.

    Why are we including archaic data from pre-1994? No one cares about the leather helmet era.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter