Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

I found this really hard to believe

2»

Comments

  • MikeSeaverMikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,283
    chuck said:

    Oregon had a hell of a run. I'm a little surprised by the numbers (which make you a faggot, btw), but not that surprised.

    Surprised is surprised no matter the level.

    Anyway. The idea that Washington is some sort of mythical college football superpower is nothing more than a glorification of the 80s by the baby boomers who infest this place and their sycophantic minions.

    There was a time (around 20 years ago) where the shit talking was legit. When the message board culture exploded on all of us with its hot molten like energy while standing in the shower.

    Now it’s just an arrested developmental mental disorder to believe UW in any sort of superior program.

    Both programs had a legit power 15ish year run each.

    The rest for both is pretty unremarkable.

  • chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,189 Swaye's Wigwam
    Pump my gas, duck!

    Or, as I always wanted to say on doogman, "pump Chip's ass, duck" rotfflmfatfo!!!1!
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,804 Founders Club
    Might be hard to believe because UW is better at everything except banquets in December in NYC




  • MikeSeaverMikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,283

    Might be hard to believe because UW is better at everything except banquets in December in NYC




    As noted. Washington is slightly better overall than Oregon. I’ve said that since the first post. You’re the USC of Seattle. I’ve always said that.

    What is your source for these stats? Many look flawed.

    Also theres a lot of nothing on that chart. “We made this many Cincinnati Jets.”

    Wins, bowls/records, conference titles, top 10/5 finishes. That’s all there is.

    I will say legitimate congrats on pulling away on conference titles a bit. It was down to 14-11 all time. It’s not now. We have our work cut out for us.





  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,804 Founders Club
    I just deal in facts, Mike. I let the chips fall where they may

    This is from Winsipedia on the internet so I'm sure its accurate
  • MikeSeaverMikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,283

    I just deal in facts, Mike. I let the chips fall where they may

    This is from Winsipedia on the internet so I'm sure its accurate

    Wheres the most uniforms chart?
  • GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470

    Might be hard to believe because UW is better at everything except banquets in December in NYC




    As noted. Washington is slightly better overall than Oregon. I’ve said that since the first post. You’re the USC of Seattle. I’ve always said that.

    What is your source for these stats? Many look flawed.

    Also theres a lot of nothing on that chart. “We made this many Cincinnati Jets.”

    Wins, bowls/records, conference titles, top 10/5 finishes. That’s all there is.

    I will say legitimate congrats on pulling away on conference titles a bit. It was down to 14-11 all time. It’s not now. We have our work cut out for us.





    Race likes to include stats that include that undefeated season in 1916 as it reminds him of going to games with his friends that year.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,804 Founders Club
    Facts are facts
  • MikeSeaverMikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,283
    edited September 2019

    Facts are facts

    That’s correct. As were the ones I posted. Facts that are facts.



  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288

    Might be hard to believe because UW is better at everything except banquets in December in NYC




    As noted. Washington is slightly better overall than Oregon. I’ve said that since the first post. You’re the USC of Seattle. I’ve always said that.

    What is your source for these stats? Many look flawed.

    Also theres a lot of nothing on that chart. “We made this many Cincinnati Jets.”

    Wins, bowls/records, conference titles, top 10/5 finishes. That’s all there is.

    I will say legitimate congrats on pulling away on conference titles a bit. It was down to 14-11 all time. It’s not now. We have our work cut out for us.





    Get your priorities straight. Oregon doesn't compete to try to be better than Washington. Oregon competes for playoff spots and national titles. That's the goal.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,804 Founders Club

    Facts are facts

    That’s correct. As were the ones I posted. Facts that are facts.



    That looks factual to me
  • MikeSeaverMikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,283

    Might be hard to believe because UW is better at everything except banquets in December in NYC




    As noted. Washington is slightly better overall than Oregon. I’ve said that since the first post. You’re the USC of Seattle. I’ve always said that.

    What is your source for these stats? Many look flawed.

    Also theres a lot of nothing on that chart. “We made this many Cincinnati Jets.”

    Wins, bowls/records, conference titles, top 10/5 finishes. That’s all there is.

    I will say legitimate congrats on pulling away on conference titles a bit. It was down to 14-11 all time. It’s not now. We have our work cut out for us.





    Get your priorities straight. Oregon doesn't compete to try to be better than Washington. Oregon competes for playoff spots and national titles. That's the goal.
    You can do both at the same time.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,804 Founders Club

    Might be hard to believe because UW is better at everything except banquets in December in NYC




    As noted. Washington is slightly better overall than Oregon. I’ve said that since the first post. You’re the USC of Seattle. I’ve always said that.

    What is your source for these stats? Many look flawed.

    Also theres a lot of nothing on that chart. “We made this many Cincinnati Jets.”

    Wins, bowls/records, conference titles, top 10/5 finishes. That’s all there is.

    I will say legitimate congrats on pulling away on conference titles a bit. It was down to 14-11 all time. It’s not now. We have our work cut out for us.





    Get your priorities straight. Oregon doesn't compete to try to be better than Washington. Oregon competes for playoff spots and national titles. That's the goal.
    You can do both at the same time.
    That's what Bill Moos said

    He was almost right

    Too bad the window slammed shut
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,499

    You guys know I love crushing numbers and figuring things out and sharing my findings.

    All time top 10 finishes:

    UW 11, OU 9

    All time top 5 finishes:

    UW 7, OU 5

    I couldn’t believe it. I thought UW would have had a LOT more in both cases than Oregon.

    Before you ask. Yes, this includes Don James and Rick Brooks.

    Crushing numbers?
  • ramenduckramenduck Member Posts: 734

    You guys know I love crushing numbers and figuring things out and sharing my findings.

    All time top 10 finishes:

    UW 11, OU 9

    All time top 5 finishes:

    UW 7, OU 5

    I couldn’t believe it. I thought UW would have had a LOT more in both cases than Oregon.

    Before you ask. Yes, this includes Don James and Rick Brooks.

    Why are we including archaic data from pre-1994? No one cares about the leather helmet era.

Sign In or Register to comment.