Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Dwayne Washington speaks glowingly about our boy Johnny Nansen
DugtheDoog
Member Posts: 3,180
RB Dwayne Washington, on the differences between former UW RB coach Johnny Nansen and new RB Coach Keith Bhonapha - “Coach KB, I’d say he probably knows what he’s doing more than coach Nansen. Coach Nansen wasn’t really a…I’d say he wasn’t a good running backs coach because he coached special teams."
Ha nice save, kid.
Ha nice save, kid.
Comments
-
And special teams were such a success story...lol
-
Finished it for him before he tried to go PC.DugtheDoog said:RB Dwayne Washington, on the differences between former UW RB coach Johnny Nansen and new RB Coach Keith Bhonapha - “Coach KB, I’d say he probably knows what he’s doing more than coach Nansen. Coach Nansen wasn’t really a coach but rather Sark's drinking buddy."
-
Holt. Nansen. Cozzetto. Demetrice Martin. Ivan Lewis.
A lot of hat and not much cattle. -
The players have spoken of the difference between Dude Brah's staff in 2013 and Peetamus staff in 2014.
-
Fixed for abundance.BabsGilbyTawdTy said:Holt. Nansen. Cozzetto. Demetrice Martin. Ivan Lewis.
Not much hat and not much cattle. -
DWDWHA
-
Running Backs were solid during Sark's tenure. Polk to Sankey ain't bad.
-
The previous RB coach who's name escapes me probably gets the credit. Maybe even Cozzetto gets some as he was the "run game coordinator".Doogles said:Running Backs were solid during Sark's tenure. Polk to Sankey ain't bad.
-
Joel Thomas left to Arkansas
Went from working under a fucktard to..... working under a fucktard.chuck said:
The previous RB coach who's name escapes me probably gets the credit. Maybe even Cozzetto gets some as he was the "run game coordinator".Doogles said:Running Backs were solid during Sark's tenure. Polk to Sankey ain't bad.
-
I also liked that DiAndre Campbell said he came back to play for a coach who was disciplined and serious about details
-
John Ross said there's now discipline in the program on kjr this morning
Many players have spoken about the difference between sark and petersen -
I will say, the players are painting a picture of shooting patron and saying "fuck it" in regards to our former "leader"...
I mean jesus Christ did the coaches have beer on tap at practice? Its one thing to throw them under the bus, but they are continuing to back up over the top of them. -
Anyone else notice that our special teams play was solid at the Hunger Gaymes ...?
.... Without a special teams coach.... ?
Basicly Nansen was Less than ZERO. -
Kids being held accountable, attention paid to details, assistant coaches who know their shit AND can recruit...it's like we have a real adult in charge again.
-
New coaching staff, new attitude.He_Needs_More_Time said:The players have spoken of the difference between Dude Brah's staff in 2013 and Peetamus staff in 2014.
-
The newbies will be inexperienced but they'll bring something we haven't had in a long time which is speed.DugtheDoog said:
New coaching staff, new attitude.He_Needs_More_Time said:The players have spoken of the difference between Dude Brah's staff in 2013 and Peetamus staff in 2014.
-
This sounds like a bullet point in a revised "5 Reasons"He_Needs_More_Time said:The players have spoken of the difference between Dude Brah's staff in 2013 and Peetamus staff in 2014.
-
Let's not get too far ahead of it with premature hype. Coach Pete and his staff have held some meetings and one practice, whereas Sark was on the job in place to impress or influence the kids for five years. Perhaps the three sevens and an eight were the best Sark's sloppiness could do with good talent.
Still, if so many of the players can see such positive differences in the program after just one practice with the new staff, what could the perception of Husky Football under Sark have been in the past. Especially with local recruits, their HS coaches and parents who typically know a lot more than we can about what's happening at Montlake?
Everything we're hearing so far points to the lack of discipline and attention to detail (on offense) which we could clearly see gamedays on the field. Procedural penalties, dropped passes, receivers not getting open, one-Mississippi sacks, etc all make sense now if not before. -
Cyler, String, Callier and Timu certainly can see the difference between the two staffs
-
This is why I've never worried too much about the "buy in" from players ...
Most of the players know that we should have been better than what we were ... those guys will have no problem buying in at this point.
The ones that do? They aren't interested in winning and getting better. WDWTA
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
