Since seasons went to 12 games in 2006, 9 wins is obviously a lower bar for teams who have had more recent success. UW is +5 and Oregon is +3 then.
Also UW had 4 seasons of 9+ wins immediately preceding 1983.
Right, I mentioned you can go back 40 years. Oregon still has more 9+ win seasons.
A lot of times (unfairly IMO) Oregon fans cut the dates to start right after James quit. I’m including those years here.
I just want to use accurate measures. Assuming that the 8/9 win measure is meaningful that would mean P10/12 era UW and Oregon have had comparable success.
Thankfully our history is much richer and deeper.
Richer and deeper are subjective. You think anyone in Iowa knows what your history is? Do you think if they actually looked it up their hair would blow back?
I’m using hard data here. I like to remind a lot of the younger doogs that your grandpas Washington is a boomer myth like almost everything else thats been shoved down their throats.
Pattie Labelle, The circus, bazooka Joe. Lots of average with a few highlights.
So then winning a national championship isn't that hard which would make Oregon a pretentious shit party school.
Because whether you want to admit it or not 1960, 1984, and 1991 happened.
It can’t be that hard. I mean, you made up 2 out of 2 1/2 of them.
Since seasons went to 12 games in 2006, 9 wins is obviously a lower bar for teams who have had more recent success. UW is +5 and Oregon is +3 then.
Also UW had 4 seasons of 9+ wins immediately preceding 1983.
Right, I mentioned you can go back 40 years. Oregon still has more 9+ win seasons.
A lot of times (unfairly IMO) Oregon fans cut the dates to start right after James quit. I’m including those years here.
I just want to use accurate measures. Assuming that the 8/9 win measure is meaningful that would mean P10/12 era UW and Oregon have had comparable success.
Thankfully our history is much richer and deeper.
Richer and deeper are subjective. You think anyone in Iowa knows what your history is? Do you think if they actually looked it up their hair would blow back?
I’m using hard data here. I like to remind a lot of the younger doogs that your grandpas Washington is a boomer myth like almost everything else thats been shoved down their throats.
Pattie Labelle, The circus, bazooka Joe. Lots of average with a few highlights.
So then winning a national championship isn't that hard which would make Oregon a pretentious shit party school.
Because whether you want to admit it or not 1960, 1984, and 1991 happened.
Since seasons went to 12 games in 2006, 9 wins is obviously a lower bar for teams who have had more recent success. UW is +5 and Oregon is +3 then.
Also UW had 4 seasons of 9+ wins immediately preceding 1983.
Right, I mentioned you can go back 40 years. Oregon still has more 9+ win seasons.
A lot of times (unfairly IMO) Oregon fans cut the dates to start right after James quit. I’m including those years here.
I just want to use accurate measures. Assuming that the 8/9 win measure is meaningful that would mean P10/12 era UW and Oregon have had comparable success.
Thankfully our history is much richer and deeper.
Richer and deeper are subjective. You think anyone in Iowa knows what your history is? Do you think if they actually looked it up their hair would blow back?
I’m using hard data here. I like to remind a lot of the younger doogs that your grandpas Washington is a boomer myth like almost everything else thats been shoved down their throats.
Pattie Labelle, The circus, bazooka Joe. Lots of average with a few highlights.
So then winning a national championship isn't that hard which would make Oregon a pretentious shit party school.
Because whether you want to admit it or not 1960, 1984, and 1991 happened.
What happened?
You watching this SC game? The pageantry, the tradition. Reggie's here. Urban's here picking out which players he's cutting next season.
Not like the white trash clown show you'd find in Eugene.
Since seasons went to 12 games in 2006, 9 wins is obviously a lower bar for teams who have had more recent success. UW is +5 and Oregon is +3 then.
Also UW had 4 seasons of 9+ wins immediately preceding 1983.
Right, I mentioned you can go back 40 years. Oregon still has more 9+ win seasons.
A lot of times (unfairly IMO) Oregon fans cut the dates to start right after James quit. I’m including those years here.
I just want to use accurate measures. Assuming that the 8/9 win measure is meaningful that would mean P10/12 era UW and Oregon have had comparable success.
Thankfully our history is much richer and deeper.
Richer and deeper are subjective. You think anyone in Iowa knows what your history is? Do you think if they actually looked it up their hair would blow back?
I’m using hard data here. I like to remind a lot of the younger doogs that your grandpas Washington is a boomer myth like almost everything else thats been shoved down their throats.
Pattie Labelle, The circus, bazooka Joe. Lots of average with a few highlights.
So then winning a national championship isn't that hard which would make Oregon a pretentious shit party school.
Because whether you want to admit it or not 1960, 1984, and 1991 happened.
What happened?
You watching this SC game? The pageantry, the tradition. Reggie's here. Urban's here picking out which players he's cutting next season.
Not like the white trash clown show you'd find in Eugene.
This is REAL college football bitch.
Reggie and Urban are in your 300 square foot PDX studio apartment huh.
Since seasons went to 12 games in 2006, 9 wins is obviously a lower bar for teams who have had more recent success. UW is +5 and Oregon is +3 then.
Also UW had 4 seasons of 9+ wins immediately preceding 1983.
Right, I mentioned you can go back 40 years. Oregon still has more 9+ win seasons.
A lot of times (unfairly IMO) Oregon fans cut the dates to start right after James quit. I’m including those years here.
I just want to use accurate measures. Assuming that the 8/9 win measure is meaningful that would mean P10/12 era UW and Oregon have had comparable success.
Thankfully our history is much richer and deeper.
Richer and deeper are subjective. You think anyone in Iowa knows what your history is? Do you think if they actually looked it up their hair would blow back?
I’m using hard data here. I like to remind a lot of the younger doogs that your grandpas Washington is a boomer myth like almost everything else thats been shoved down their throats.
Pattie Labelle, The circus, bazooka Joe. Lots of average with a few highlights.
So then winning a national championship isn't that hard which would make Oregon a pretentious shit party school.
Because whether you want to admit it or not 1960, 1984, and 1991 happened.
What happened?
You watching this SC game? The pageantry, the tradition. Reggie's here. Urban's here picking out which players he's cutting next season.
Not like the white trash clown show you'd find in Eugene.
This is REAL college football bitch.
Reggie and Urban are in your 300 square foot PDX studio apartment huh.
Better than Shane and Franny in your Springfield trailer Lane.
Since seasons went to 12 games in 2006, 9 wins is obviously a lower bar for teams who have had more recent success. UW is +5 and Oregon is +3 then.
Also UW had 4 seasons of 9+ wins immediately preceding 1983.
Right, I mentioned you can go back 40 years. Oregon still has more 9+ win seasons.
A lot of times (unfairly IMO) Oregon fans cut the dates to start right after James quit. I’m including those years here.
I just want to use accurate measures. Assuming that the 8/9 win measure is meaningful that would mean P10/12 era UW and Oregon have had comparable success.
Thankfully our history is much richer and deeper.
Richer and deeper are subjective. You think anyone in Iowa knows what your history is? Do you think if they actually looked it up their hair would blow back?
I’m using hard data here. I like to remind a lot of the younger doogs that your grandpas Washington is a boomer myth like almost everything else thats been shoved down their throats.
Pattie Labelle, The circus, bazooka Joe. Lots of average with a few highlights.
So then winning a national championship isn't that hard which would make Oregon a pretentious shit party school.
Because whether you want to admit it or not 1960, 1984, and 1991 happened.
What happened?
You watching this SC game? The pageantry, the tradition. Reggie's here. Urban's here picking out which players he's cutting next season.
Not like the white trash clown show you'd find in Eugene.
This is REAL college football bitch.
Reggie and Urban are in your 300 square foot PDX studio apartment huh.
Since seasons went to 12 games in 2006, 9 wins is obviously a lower bar for teams who have had more recent success. UW is +5 and Oregon is +3 then.
Also UW had 4 seasons of 9+ wins immediately preceding 1983.
Right, I mentioned you can go back 40 years. Oregon still has more 9+ win seasons.
A lot of times (unfairly IMO) Oregon fans cut the dates to start right after James quit. I’m including those years here.
I just want to use accurate measures. Assuming that the 8/9 win measure is meaningful that would mean P10/12 era UW and Oregon have had comparable success.
Thankfully our history is much richer and deeper.
Richer and deeper are subjective. You think anyone in Iowa knows what your history is? Do you think if they actually looked it up their hair would blow back?
I’m using hard data here. I like to remind a lot of the younger doogs that your grandpas Washington is a boomer myth like almost everything else thats been shoved down their throats.
Pattie Labelle, The circus, bazooka Joe. Lots of average with a few highlights.
So then winning a national championship isn't that hard which would make Oregon a pretentious shit party school.
Because whether you want to admit it or not 1960, 1984, and 1991 happened.
What happened?
You watching this SC game? The pageantry, the tradition. Reggie's here. Urban's here picking out which players he's cutting next season.
Not like the white trash clown show you'd find in Eugene.
Since seasons went to 12 games in 2006, 9 wins is obviously a lower bar for teams who have had more recent success. UW is +5 and Oregon is +3 then.
Also UW had 4 seasons of 9+ wins immediately preceding 1983.
Right, I mentioned you can go back 40 years. Oregon still has more 9+ win seasons.
A lot of times (unfairly IMO) Oregon fans cut the dates to start right after James quit. I’m including those years here.
I just want to use accurate measures. Assuming that the 8/9 win measure is meaningful that would mean P10/12 era UW and Oregon have had comparable success.
Thankfully our history is much richer and deeper.
Richer and deeper are subjective. You think anyone in Iowa knows what your history is? Do you think if they actually looked it up their hair would blow back?
I’m using hard data here. I like to remind a lot of the younger doogs that your grandpas Washington is a boomer myth like almost everything else thats been shoved down their throats.
Pattie Labelle, The circus, bazooka Joe. Lots of average with a few highlights.
So then winning a national championship isn't that hard which would make Oregon a pretentious shit party school.
Because whether you want to admit it or not 1960, 1984, and 1991 happened.
What happened?
You watching this SC game? The pageantry, the tradition. Reggie's here. Urban's here picking out which players he's cutting next season.
Not like the white trash clown show you'd find in Eugene.
This is REAL college football bitch.
The amount of people there would fill up little Autzen.
Since seasons went to 12 games in 2006, 9 wins is obviously a lower bar for teams who have had more recent success. UW is +5 and Oregon is +3 then.
Also UW had 4 seasons of 9+ wins immediately preceding 1983.
Right, I mentioned you can go back 40 years. Oregon still has more 9+ win seasons.
A lot of times (unfairly IMO) Oregon fans cut the dates to start right after James quit. I’m including those years here.
I just want to use accurate measures. Assuming that the 8/9 win measure is meaningful that would mean P10/12 era UW and Oregon have had comparable success.
Thankfully our history is much richer and deeper.
Richer and deeper are subjective. You think anyone in Iowa knows what your history is? Do you think if they actually looked it up their hair would blow back?
I’m using hard data here. I like to remind a lot of the younger doogs that your grandpas Washington is a boomer myth like almost everything else thats been shoved down their throats.
Pattie Labelle, The circus, bazooka Joe. Lots of average with a few highlights.
So then winning a national championship isn't that hard which would make Oregon a pretentious shit party school.
Because whether you want to admit it or not 1960, 1984, and 1991 happened.
What happened?
You watching this SC game? The pageantry, the tradition. Reggie's here. Urban's here picking out which players he's cutting next season.
Not like the white trash clown show you'd find in Eugene.
This is REAL college football bitch.
The amount of people there would fill up little Autzen.
Autzen only seats 4,500? Real college football bitch! Jfc
Comments
I wouldn’t want to talk about the present either
Ouch.
Note to all husky’s who are joining the thread late: I have included you’re breathtaking three year run into the equation.
It’s still 16-10
Ouch
Not like the white trash clown show you'd find in Eugene.
This is REAL college football bitch.
Two Rose Bowl beatdowns in our glorious if inflated past