Fun Stat

MikeSeaver

Since 1983. 9 win seasons.

UW: 10




































UO: 16

whatshouldicareabout

The true measure of successful for any college football team is the number of 9-win seasons since 1983.

MikeSeaver

whatshouldicareabout said:

The true measure of successful for any college football team is the number of 9-win seasons since 1983.

So you don’t judge programs by wins?

Interesting take.

RaceBannon

Here we go. Thought you had lost the touch, Mike.

But the replies are now pouring in.

MikeSeaver

RaceBannon said:

Here we go. Thought you had lost the touch, Mike.

But the replies are now pouring in.

Thanks for coming by, Race.

I should clarify, those are 9+ win seasons. I used 9 as that’s about the breaking point of “good season” and I used 1983 because thats the year I saw The Police in the Tacoma Dome. My first concert. 35 years ago. Can’t believe it.

BleachedAnusDawg

MikeSeaver said:

whatshouldicareabout said:

The true measure of successful for any college football team is the number of 9-win seasons since 1983.

So you don’t judge programs by wins?

Interesting take.

If you want to talk about historical greatness, instead of cherry-picking a year that fits your narrative, why don't you just look at all-time numbers?

MikeSeaver

BleachedAnusDawg said:

MikeSeaver said:

whatshouldicareabout said:

The true measure of successful for any college football team is the number of 9-win seasons since 1983.

So you don’t judge programs by wins?

Interesting take.

If you want to talk about historical greatness, instead of cherry-picking a year that fits your narrative, why don't you just look at all-time numbers?

You don’t think going back 35 year is a fair assessment of a program? If I go back much further we may have to start including Princeton.

I’ll round it up to 40 if you’d like.

In the last 40 years Oregon has had more 9+ win seasons than the Huskysies.

GDS

BleachedAnusDawg said:

MikeSeaver said:

whatshouldicareabout said:

The true measure of successful for any college football team is the number of 9-win seasons since 1983.

So you don’t judge programs by wins?

Interesting take.

If you want to talk about historical greatness, instead of cherry-picking a year that fits your narrative, why don't you just look at all-time numbers?

Yale Football > Alabama Football

MikeSeaver

GDS said:

BleachedAnusDawg said:

MikeSeaver said:

whatshouldicareabout said:

The true measure of successful for any college football team is the number of 9-win seasons since 1983.

So you don’t judge programs by wins?

Interesting take.

If you want to talk about historical greatness, instead of cherry-picking a year that fits your narrative, why don't you just look at all-time numbers?

Yale Football > Alabama Football

But we don’t even hear about Yale anymore. That was a really long time ago when they were good.

I bet a lot of those fans have died.

GDS

MikeSeaver said:

GDS said:

BleachedAnusDawg said:

MikeSeaver said:

whatshouldicareabout said:

The true measure of successful for any college football team is the number of 9-win seasons since 1983.

So you don’t judge programs by wins?

Interesting take.

If you want to talk about historical greatness, instead of cherry-picking a year that fits your narrative, why don't you just look at all-time numbers?

Yale Football > Alabama Football

But we don’t even hear about Yale anymore. That was a really long time ago when they were good.

I bet a lot of those fans have died.

I hear Race lost a yuge bet on that 1872 natty between Yale and Columbia.

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

MikeSeaver said:

Since 1983. 9 win seasons.

UW: 10




































UO: 16