Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Fun Stat
MikeSeaver
Member Posts: 5,800
Since 1983. 9 win seasons.
UW: 10
UO: 16
UW: 10
UO: 16
Tagged:
Comments
-
The true measure of successful for any college football team is the number of 9-win seasons since 1983.
-
So you don’t judge programs by wins?whatshouldicareabout said:The true measure of successful for any college football team is the number of 9-win seasons since 1983.
Interesting take.
-
Here we go. Thought you had lost the touch, Mike.
But the replies are now pouring in. -
Thanks for coming by, Race.RaceBannon said:Here we go. Thought you had lost the touch, Mike.
But the replies are now pouring in.
I should clarify, those are 9+ win seasons. I used 9 as that’s about the breaking point of “good season” and I used 1983 because thats the year I saw The Police in the Tacoma Dome. My first concert. 35 years ago. Can’t believe it.
-
If you want to talk about historical greatness, instead of cherry-picking a year that fits your narrative, why don't you just look at all-time numbers?MikeSeaver said:
So you don’t judge programs by wins?whatshouldicareabout said:The true measure of successful for any college football team is the number of 9-win seasons since 1983.
Interesting take. -
You don’t think going back 35 year is a fair assessment of a program? If I go back much further we may have to start including Princeton.BleachedAnusDawg said:
If you want to talk about historical greatness, instead of cherry-picking a year that fits your narrative, why don't you just look at all-time numbers?MikeSeaver said:
So you don’t judge programs by wins?whatshouldicareabout said:The true measure of successful for any college football team is the number of 9-win seasons since 1983.
Interesting take.
I’ll round it up to 40 if you’d like.
In the last 40 years Oregon has had more 9+ win seasons than the Huskysies.
-
Yale Football > Alabama FootballBleachedAnusDawg said:
If you want to talk about historical greatness, instead of cherry-picking a year that fits your narrative, why don't you just look at all-time numbers?MikeSeaver said:
So you don’t judge programs by wins?whatshouldicareabout said:The true measure of successful for any college football team is the number of 9-win seasons since 1983.
Interesting take. -
But we don’t even hear about Yale anymore. That was a really long time ago when they were good.GDS said:
Yale Football > Alabama FootballBleachedAnusDawg said:
If you want to talk about historical greatness, instead of cherry-picking a year that fits your narrative, why don't you just look at all-time numbers?MikeSeaver said:
So you don’t judge programs by wins?whatshouldicareabout said:The true measure of successful for any college football team is the number of 9-win seasons since 1983.
Interesting take.
I bet a lot of those fans have died.
-
I hear Race lost a yuge bet on that 1872 natty between Yale and Columbia.MikeSeaver said:
But we don’t even hear about Yale anymore. That was a really long time ago when they were good.GDS said:
Yale Football > Alabama FootballBleachedAnusDawg said:
If you want to talk about historical greatness, instead of cherry-picking a year that fits your narrative, why don't you just look at all-time numbers?MikeSeaver said:
So you don’t judge programs by wins?whatshouldicareabout said:The true measure of successful for any college football team is the number of 9-win seasons since 1983.
Interesting take.
I bet a lot of those fans have died. -
-
Another fun stat: Oregon is a shitty party school designed to be Wazzu/Beavlet with money but has only come close to achieving their goal once when they lost to Cam Newton's NFL tryout debut.
I don't see what this has to do with a Tier 2 school with a couple of natties under their belt. -
I was as surprised as you are when I did the tabulations.haie said:Another fun stat: Oregon is a shitty party school designed to be Wazzu/Beavlet with money but has only come close to achieving their goal once when they lost to Cam Newton's NFL tryout debut.
I don't see what this has to do with a Tier 2 school with a couple of natties under their belt.
I’m not going to go back and see who’s won the most games over that 35-40 years but it’s gonna be really close.
When was Don James there?
“Tier 2”
What the fuck is that?
-
Since seasons went to 12 games in 2006, 9 wins is obviously a lower bar for teams who have had more recent success. UW is +5 and Oregon is +3 then.MikeSeaver said:Since 1983. 9 win seasons.
UW: 10
UO: 16
Also UW had 4 seasons of 9+ wins immediately preceding 1983. -
Right, I mentioned you can go back 40 years. Oregon still has more 9+ win seasons.Mad_Son said:
Since seasons went to 12 games in 2006, 9 wins is obviously a lower bar for teams who have had more recent success. UW is +5 and Oregon is +3 then.MikeSeaver said:Since 1983. 9 win seasons.
UW: 10
UO: 16
Also UW had 4 seasons of 9+ wins immediately preceding 1983.
A lot of times (unfairly IMO) Oregon fans cut the dates to start right after James quit. I’m including those years here.
-
How many in last 3 years?
-
You sound like a Beaver fan in 2008.HuskyJW said:How many in last 3 years?
You can start a last 3 years thread if you’d like I mean besides every other thread on every other board.
Edit: the “last 3 years” are included in the original post. Otherwise it would have been Oregon 15 UW 7.
Oh man.
-
Since Mariota Oregon has been a UCLA-like team in the North. That's why us doogs give you so much shit.MikeSeaver said:
You sound like a Beaver fan in 2008.HuskyJW said:How many in last 3 years?
You can start a last 3 years thread if you’d like I mean besides every other thread on every other board.
Edit: the “last 3 years” are included in the original post. Otherwise it would have been Oregon 15 UW 7.
Oh man.
I do think it'll be Oregon Utah in the championship but both programs are so mediocre right now that I can't pick a winner. There's a chance Hebert breaks the record for most picks in a P12C against that defense. -
I just want to use accurate measures. Assuming that the 8/9 win measure is meaningful that would mean P10/12 era UW and Oregon have had comparable success.MikeSeaver said:
Right, I mentioned you can go back 40 years. Oregon still has more 9+ win seasons.Mad_Son said:
Since seasons went to 12 games in 2006, 9 wins is obviously a lower bar for teams who have had more recent success. UW is +5 and Oregon is +3 then.MikeSeaver said:Since 1983. 9 win seasons.
UW: 10
UO: 16
Also UW had 4 seasons of 9+ wins immediately preceding 1983.
A lot of times (unfairly IMO) Oregon fans cut the dates to start right after James quit. I’m including those years here.
Thankfully our history is much richer and deeper. -
Richer and deeper are subjective. You think anyone in Iowa knows what your history is? Do you think if they actually looked it up their hair would blow back?Mad_Son said:
I just want to use accurate measures. Assuming that the 8/9 win measure is meaningful that would mean P10/12 era UW and Oregon have had comparable success.MikeSeaver said:
Right, I mentioned you can go back 40 years. Oregon still has more 9+ win seasons.Mad_Son said:
Since seasons went to 12 games in 2006, 9 wins is obviously a lower bar for teams who have had more recent success. UW is +5 and Oregon is +3 then.MikeSeaver said:Since 1983. 9 win seasons.
UW: 10
UO: 16
Also UW had 4 seasons of 9+ wins immediately preceding 1983.
A lot of times (unfairly IMO) Oregon fans cut the dates to start right after James quit. I’m including those years here.
Thankfully our history is much richer and deeper.
I’m using hard data here. I like to remind a lot of the younger doogs that your grandpas Washington is a boomer myth like almost everything else thats been shoved down their throats.
Pattie Labelle, The circus, bazooka Joe. Lots of average with a few highlights.
-
So then winning a national championship isn't that hard which would make Oregon a pretentious shit party school.MikeSeaver said:
Richer and deeper are subjective. You think anyone in Iowa knows what your history is? Do you think if they actually looked it up their hair would blow back?Mad_Son said:
I just want to use accurate measures. Assuming that the 8/9 win measure is meaningful that would mean P10/12 era UW and Oregon have had comparable success.MikeSeaver said:
Right, I mentioned you can go back 40 years. Oregon still has more 9+ win seasons.Mad_Son said:
Since seasons went to 12 games in 2006, 9 wins is obviously a lower bar for teams who have had more recent success. UW is +5 and Oregon is +3 then.MikeSeaver said:Since 1983. 9 win seasons.
UW: 10
UO: 16
Also UW had 4 seasons of 9+ wins immediately preceding 1983.
A lot of times (unfairly IMO) Oregon fans cut the dates to start right after James quit. I’m including those years here.
Thankfully our history is much richer and deeper.
I’m using hard data here. I like to remind a lot of the younger doogs that your grandpas Washington is a boomer myth like almost everything else thats been shoved down their throats.
Pattie Labelle, The circus, bazooka Joe. Lots of average with a few highlights.
Because whether you want to admit it or not 1960, 1984, and 1991 happened. -
It can’t be that hard. I mean, you made up 2 out of 2 1/2 of them.haie said:
So then winning a national championship isn't that hard which would make Oregon a pretentious shit party school.MikeSeaver said:
Richer and deeper are subjective. You think anyone in Iowa knows what your history is? Do you think if they actually looked it up their hair would blow back?Mad_Son said:
I just want to use accurate measures. Assuming that the 8/9 win measure is meaningful that would mean P10/12 era UW and Oregon have had comparable success.MikeSeaver said:
Right, I mentioned you can go back 40 years. Oregon still has more 9+ win seasons.Mad_Son said:
Since seasons went to 12 games in 2006, 9 wins is obviously a lower bar for teams who have had more recent success. UW is +5 and Oregon is +3 then.MikeSeaver said:Since 1983. 9 win seasons.
UW: 10
UO: 16
Also UW had 4 seasons of 9+ wins immediately preceding 1983.
A lot of times (unfairly IMO) Oregon fans cut the dates to start right after James quit. I’m including those years here.
Thankfully our history is much richer and deeper.
I’m using hard data here. I like to remind a lot of the younger doogs that your grandpas Washington is a boomer myth like almost everything else thats been shoved down their throats.
Pattie Labelle, The circus, bazooka Joe. Lots of average with a few highlights.
Because whether you want to admit it or not 1960, 1984, and 1991 happened.
-
OkMikeSeaver said:
You sound like a Beaver fan in 2008.HuskyJW said:How many in last 3 years?
You can start a last 3 years thread if you’d like I mean besides every other thread on every other board.
Edit: the “last 3 years” are included in the original post. Otherwise it would have been Oregon 15 UW 7.
Oh man.
I wouldn’t want to talk about the present either
Ouch. -
The present is included in the equation, bro.HuskyJW said:
OkMikeSeaver said:
You sound like a Beaver fan in 2008.HuskyJW said:How many in last 3 years?
You can start a last 3 years thread if you’d like I mean besides every other thread on every other board.
Edit: the “last 3 years” are included in the original post. Otherwise it would have been Oregon 15 UW 7.
Oh man.
I wouldn’t want to talk about the present either
Ouch.
Note to all husky’s who are joining the thread late: I have included you’re breathtaking three year run into the equation.
It’s still 16-10
-
I wouldn’t want to talk about the present either
Ouch -
Ok*HuskyJW said:I wouldn’t want to talk about the present either
Ouch -
What happened?haie said:
So then winning a national championship isn't that hard which would make Oregon a pretentious shit party school.MikeSeaver said:
Richer and deeper are subjective. You think anyone in Iowa knows what your history is? Do you think if they actually looked it up their hair would blow back?Mad_Son said:
I just want to use accurate measures. Assuming that the 8/9 win measure is meaningful that would mean P10/12 era UW and Oregon have had comparable success.MikeSeaver said:
Right, I mentioned you can go back 40 years. Oregon still has more 9+ win seasons.Mad_Son said:
Since seasons went to 12 games in 2006, 9 wins is obviously a lower bar for teams who have had more recent success. UW is +5 and Oregon is +3 then.MikeSeaver said:Since 1983. 9 win seasons.
UW: 10
UO: 16
Also UW had 4 seasons of 9+ wins immediately preceding 1983.
A lot of times (unfairly IMO) Oregon fans cut the dates to start right after James quit. I’m including those years here.
Thankfully our history is much richer and deeper.
I’m using hard data here. I like to remind a lot of the younger doogs that your grandpas Washington is a boomer myth like almost everything else thats been shoved down their throats.
Pattie Labelle, The circus, bazooka Joe. Lots of average with a few highlights.
Because whether you want to admit it or not 1960, 1984, and 1991 happened. -
You watching this SC game? The pageantry, the tradition. Reggie's here. Urban's here picking out which players he's cutting next season.oregonblitzkrieg said:
What happened?haie said:
So then winning a national championship isn't that hard which would make Oregon a pretentious shit party school.MikeSeaver said:
Richer and deeper are subjective. You think anyone in Iowa knows what your history is? Do you think if they actually looked it up their hair would blow back?Mad_Son said:
I just want to use accurate measures. Assuming that the 8/9 win measure is meaningful that would mean P10/12 era UW and Oregon have had comparable success.MikeSeaver said:
Right, I mentioned you can go back 40 years. Oregon still has more 9+ win seasons.Mad_Son said:
Since seasons went to 12 games in 2006, 9 wins is obviously a lower bar for teams who have had more recent success. UW is +5 and Oregon is +3 then.MikeSeaver said:Since 1983. 9 win seasons.
UW: 10
UO: 16
Also UW had 4 seasons of 9+ wins immediately preceding 1983.
A lot of times (unfairly IMO) Oregon fans cut the dates to start right after James quit. I’m including those years here.
Thankfully our history is much richer and deeper.
I’m using hard data here. I like to remind a lot of the younger doogs that your grandpas Washington is a boomer myth like almost everything else thats been shoved down their throats.
Pattie Labelle, The circus, bazooka Joe. Lots of average with a few highlights.
Because whether you want to admit it or not 1960, 1984, and 1991 happened.
Not like the white trash clown show you'd find in Eugene.
This is REAL college football bitch. -
Reggie and Urban are in your 300 square foot PDX studio apartment huh.haie said:
You watching this SC game? The pageantry, the tradition. Reggie's here. Urban's here picking out which players he's cutting next season.oregonblitzkrieg said:
What happened?haie said:
So then winning a national championship isn't that hard which would make Oregon a pretentious shit party school.MikeSeaver said:
Richer and deeper are subjective. You think anyone in Iowa knows what your history is? Do you think if they actually looked it up their hair would blow back?Mad_Son said:
I just want to use accurate measures. Assuming that the 8/9 win measure is meaningful that would mean P10/12 era UW and Oregon have had comparable success.MikeSeaver said:
Right, I mentioned you can go back 40 years. Oregon still has more 9+ win seasons.Mad_Son said:
Since seasons went to 12 games in 2006, 9 wins is obviously a lower bar for teams who have had more recent success. UW is +5 and Oregon is +3 then.MikeSeaver said:Since 1983. 9 win seasons.
UW: 10
UO: 16
Also UW had 4 seasons of 9+ wins immediately preceding 1983.
A lot of times (unfairly IMO) Oregon fans cut the dates to start right after James quit. I’m including those years here.
Thankfully our history is much richer and deeper.
I’m using hard data here. I like to remind a lot of the younger doogs that your grandpas Washington is a boomer myth like almost everything else thats been shoved down their throats.
Pattie Labelle, The circus, bazooka Joe. Lots of average with a few highlights.
Because whether you want to admit it or not 1960, 1984, and 1991 happened.
Not like the white trash clown show you'd find in Eugene.
This is REAL college football bitch. -
Better than Shane and Franny in your Springfield trailer Lane.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Reggie and Urban are in your 300 square foot PDX studio apartment huh.haie said:
You watching this SC game? The pageantry, the tradition. Reggie's here. Urban's here picking out which players he's cutting next season.oregonblitzkrieg said:
What happened?haie said:
So then winning a national championship isn't that hard which would make Oregon a pretentious shit party school.MikeSeaver said:
Richer and deeper are subjective. You think anyone in Iowa knows what your history is? Do you think if they actually looked it up their hair would blow back?Mad_Son said:
I just want to use accurate measures. Assuming that the 8/9 win measure is meaningful that would mean P10/12 era UW and Oregon have had comparable success.MikeSeaver said:
Right, I mentioned you can go back 40 years. Oregon still has more 9+ win seasons.Mad_Son said:
Since seasons went to 12 games in 2006, 9 wins is obviously a lower bar for teams who have had more recent success. UW is +5 and Oregon is +3 then.MikeSeaver said:Since 1983. 9 win seasons.
UW: 10
UO: 16
Also UW had 4 seasons of 9+ wins immediately preceding 1983.
A lot of times (unfairly IMO) Oregon fans cut the dates to start right after James quit. I’m including those years here.
Thankfully our history is much richer and deeper.
I’m using hard data here. I like to remind a lot of the younger doogs that your grandpas Washington is a boomer myth like almost everything else thats been shoved down their throats.
Pattie Labelle, The circus, bazooka Joe. Lots of average with a few highlights.
Because whether you want to admit it or not 1960, 1984, and 1991 happened.
Not like the white trash clown show you'd find in Eugene.
This is REAL college football bitch. -
Have another drinkoregonblitzkrieg said:
Reggie and Urban are in your 300 square foot PDX studio apartment huh.haie said:
You watching this SC game? The pageantry, the tradition. Reggie's here. Urban's here picking out which players he's cutting next season.oregonblitzkrieg said:
What happened?haie said:
So then winning a national championship isn't that hard which would make Oregon a pretentious shit party school.MikeSeaver said:
Richer and deeper are subjective. You think anyone in Iowa knows what your history is? Do you think if they actually looked it up their hair would blow back?Mad_Son said:
I just want to use accurate measures. Assuming that the 8/9 win measure is meaningful that would mean P10/12 era UW and Oregon have had comparable success.MikeSeaver said:
Right, I mentioned you can go back 40 years. Oregon still has more 9+ win seasons.Mad_Son said:
Since seasons went to 12 games in 2006, 9 wins is obviously a lower bar for teams who have had more recent success. UW is +5 and Oregon is +3 then.MikeSeaver said:Since 1983. 9 win seasons.
UW: 10
UO: 16
Also UW had 4 seasons of 9+ wins immediately preceding 1983.
A lot of times (unfairly IMO) Oregon fans cut the dates to start right after James quit. I’m including those years here.
Thankfully our history is much richer and deeper.
I’m using hard data here. I like to remind a lot of the younger doogs that your grandpas Washington is a boomer myth like almost everything else thats been shoved down their throats.
Pattie Labelle, The circus, bazooka Joe. Lots of average with a few highlights.
Because whether you want to admit it or not 1960, 1984, and 1991 happened.
Not like the white trash clown show you'd find in Eugene.
This is REAL college football bitch.
