Yang the racist

Claiming there are a lot of Asian doctors and that they are good at math is such a slam on Asians. I'm sure that there will be a hoard of antifa asians staking out his house. The only thing that pisses me off is that there are a lot of dem asians, like Yang, that have no business being dems. As it is, I really have no idea of what Yang believes in because any dem presidential candidate has to prostrate themselves to the left. At best, he is hopelessly naive about human nature and his universal income plan. Reminds me of hard core libertarians and open borders.

ThomasFremont said:

WestlinnDuck said:

Claiming there are a lot of Asian doctors and that they are good at math is such a slam on Asians. I'm sure that there will be a hoard of antifa asians staking out his house. The only thing that pisses me off is that there are a lot of dem asians, like Yang, that have no business being dems. As it is, I really have no idea of what Yang believes in because any dem presidential candidate has to prostrate themselves to the left. At best, he is hopelessly naive about human nature and his universal income plan. Reminds me of hard core libertarians and open borders.

His policy proposals are clearly listed at yang2020.com

Mystery solved.

Why would a lot of Asians have “no business being dems”???

You sound like a fucktard who thinks black people cant be conservative.

You just like his Yang.

Looks like the establishment is getting nervous that Yang is the 4th favorite now according to betting markets...

WestlinnDuck said:

Well, Thomas - Yang is getting no traction on his proposals from the dem base. He is pro nuke. That's one dem non-starter. I have no idea why an educated black is a dem. Perhaps you can explain it to me. Phu*ck, you can't even explain why you are a dem.

He’s now in 4th place. Going up against 3 candidates with decades of name recognition. Maybe this is where it ends for him, but he keeps trending up.

I’m pro nuke. Not sure that’s the non-starter you insist it is. But then, I’m not a Dem.

He seems to appeal to independents, libertarians, working class and young voters. Traditional Dems will fall in line to defeat Trump. If he gets the nomination I guarantee he will win thanks to his broad appeal. But the DNC is probably gonna force Biden.

UW_Doog_Bot said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

ThomasFremont said:

WestlinnDuck said:

Well, Thomas - Yang is getting no traction on his proposals from the dem base. He is pro nuke. That's one dem non-starter. I have no idea why an educated black is a dem. Perhaps you can explain it to me. Phu*ck, you can't even explain why you are a dem.

He’s now in 4th place. Going up against 3 candidates with decades of name recognition. Maybe this is where it ends for him, but he keeps trending up.

I’m pro nuke. Not sure that’s the non-starter you insist it is. But then, I’m not a Dem.

He seems to appeal to independents, libertarians, working class and young voters. Traditional Dems will fall in line to defeat Trump. If he gets the nomination I guarantee he will win thanks to his broad appeal. But the DNC is probably gonna force Biden.

Not sure about that.

I like Yang for, dare I say, his comportment significantly more than his policies.

UBI is actually popular in lots of libertarian circles as an alternative to the federal welfare bureaucracy.

Right, but I think we* all know it's in addition to, practically speaking.

ThomasFremont said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

ThomasFremont said:

WestlinnDuck said:

Well, Thomas - Yang is getting no traction on his proposals from the dem base. He is pro nuke. That's one dem non-starter. I have no idea why an educated black is a dem. Perhaps you can explain it to me. Phu*ck, you can't even explain why you are a dem.

He’s now in 4th place. Going up against 3 candidates with decades of name recognition. Maybe this is where it ends for him, but he keeps trending up.

I’m pro nuke. Not sure that’s the non-starter you insist it is. But then, I’m not a Dem.

He seems to appeal to independents, libertarians, working class and young voters. Traditional Dems will fall in line to defeat Trump. If he gets the nomination I guarantee he will win thanks to his broad appeal. But the DNC is probably gonna force Biden.

Not sure about that.

I like Yang for, dare I say, his comportment significantly more than his policies.

UBI is actually popular in lots of libertarian circles as an alternative to the federal welfare bureaucracy.

Yang’s UBI plan is opt in, but doing so requires you to forfeit other programs (welfare). It’s also easier to administer since there no army or bureaucrats needed to test and verify eligibility requirements repeatedly.

Small government libertarians should LOVE UBI compared to our current set up.

It’s also just better. Let people decide for themselves what the money should be spent on to improve their lives.

I agree with that part. But Yang won't write the law. It'll be an add-on.

That's my problem with hard core libertarians and Yang. They can articulate a theoretical position and then adopt it with religious fervor ignoring the actual reality on the ground. Yang "feels" that his UBI proposal will end welfare. It won't and as you say it will be additional. Milton Friedman supported the earned income tax credit assuming it would be enforced by the federal government and act as an encouragement to get off welfare and work. The reality is that Friedman ignored the underground cash economy and the federal governments intentional enabling of massive EITC fraud. EITC is just another welfare program that contributes to the massive welfare magnet that the US has become to the world's ill educated poor.

Oregon just adopted a psuedo sales tax on gross receipts at the "low" rate of 0.56%. You think that is going to be the rate in 5 years? Leftards lie and love to be lied to.

WestlinnDuck said:

That's my problem with hard core libertarians and Yang. They can articulate a theoretical position and then adopt it with religious fervor ignoring the actual reality on the ground. Yang "feels" that his UBI proposal will end welfare. It won't and as you say it will be additional. Milton Friedman supported the earned income tax credit assuming it would be enforced by the federal government and act as an encouragement to get off welfare and work. The reality is that Friedman ignored the underground cash economy and the federal governments intentional enabling of massive EITC fraud. EITC is just another welfare program that contributes to the massive welfare magnet that the US has become to the world's ill educated poor.

Oregon just adopted a psuedo sales tax on gross receipts at the "low" rate of 0.56%. You think that is going to be the rate in 5 years? Leftards lie and love to be lied to.

Mexico is going to pay for the wall!!!

ThomasFremont said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

ThomasFremont said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

ThomasFremont said:

WestlinnDuck said:

Well, Thomas - Yang is getting no traction on his proposals from the dem base. He is pro nuke. That's one dem non-starter. I have no idea why an educated black is a dem. Perhaps you can explain it to me. Phu*ck, you can't even explain why you are a dem.

He’s now in 4th place. Going up against 3 candidates with decades of name recognition. Maybe this is where it ends for him, but he keeps trending up.

I’m pro nuke. Not sure that’s the non-starter you insist it is. But then, I’m not a Dem.

He seems to appeal to independents, libertarians, working class and young voters. Traditional Dems will fall in line to defeat Trump. If he gets the nomination I guarantee he will win thanks to his broad appeal. But the DNC is probably gonna force Biden.

Not sure about that.

I like Yang for, dare I say, his comportment significantly more than his policies.

UBI is actually popular in lots of libertarian circles as an alternative to the federal welfare bureaucracy.

Yang’s UBI plan is opt in, but doing so requires you to forfeit other programs (welfare). It’s also easier to administer since there no army or bureaucrats needed to test and verify eligibility requirements repeatedly.

Small government libertarians should LOVE UBI compared to our current set up.

It’s also just better. Let people decide for themselves what the money should be spent on to improve their lives.

I agree with that part. But Yang won't write the law. It'll be an add-on.

I don’t think so. That’s part of how it will be funded. If people are better off on disabilities or whatever they don’t get UBI too.

More power to him. He will face heavy opposition from his own party to pass UBI in that way.

This might be my favorite of his positions - https://www.yang2020.com/policies/automatically-sunsetting-old-laws/

WestlinnDuck said:

Leftards lie and love to be lied to.™

fixed it for you. Don't want anyone stealing your schtick without paying your royalty.

PurpleThrobber said:

ThomasFremont said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

ThomasFremont said:

WestlinnDuck said:

Well, Thomas - Yang is getting no traction on his proposals from the dem base. He is pro nuke. That's one dem non-starter. I have no idea why an educated black is a dem. Perhaps you can explain it to me. Phu*ck, you can't even explain why you are a dem.

He’s now in 4th place. Going up against 3 candidates with decades of name recognition. Maybe this is where it ends for him, but he keeps trending up.

I’m pro nuke. Not sure that’s the non-starter you insist it is. But then, I’m not a Dem.

He seems to appeal to independents, libertarians, working class and young voters. Traditional Dems will fall in line to defeat Trump. If he gets the nomination I guarantee he will win thanks to his broad appeal. But the DNC is probably gonna force Biden.

Not sure about that.

I like Yang for, dare I say, his comportment significantly more than his policies.

UBI is actually popular in lots of libertarian circles as an alternative to the federal welfare bureaucracy.

Yang’s UBI plan is opt in, but doing so requires you to forfeit other programs (welfare). It’s also easier to administer since there no army or bureaucrats needed to test and verify eligibility requirements repeatedly.

Small government libertarians should LOVE UBI compared to our current set up.

It’s also just better. Let people decide for themselves what the money should be spent on to improve their lives.

IF there's a corresponding reduction in bureaucrats, The Throbber is IN.

But if this is just add-on/new department/no RIF of gubmint teet sucking bureaucrats, hard pass.

That said, Jake Browning still sucks.

100% agree. I like UBI as a more efficient model for social safety net programs. I don’t like it as an add on to the current system

PurpleThrobber said:

ThomasFremont said:

PurpleThrobber said:

ThomasFremont said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

ThomasFremont said:

WestlinnDuck said:

Well, Thomas - Yang is getting no traction on his proposals from the dem base. He is pro nuke. That's one dem non-starter. I have no idea why an educated black is a dem. Perhaps you can explain it to me. Phu*ck, you can't even explain why you are a dem.

He’s now in 4th place. Going up against 3 candidates with decades of name recognition. Maybe this is where it ends for him, but he keeps trending up.

I’m pro nuke. Not sure that’s the non-starter you insist it is. But then, I’m not a Dem.

He seems to appeal to independents, libertarians, working class and young voters. Traditional Dems will fall in line to defeat Trump. If he gets the nomination I guarantee he will win thanks to his broad appeal. But the DNC is probably gonna force Biden.

Not sure about that.

I like Yang for, dare I say, his comportment significantly more than his policies.

UBI is actually popular in lots of libertarian circles as an alternative to the federal welfare bureaucracy.

Yang’s UBI plan is opt in, but doing so requires you to forfeit other programs (welfare). It’s also easier to administer since there no army or bureaucrats needed to test and verify eligibility requirements repeatedly.

Small government libertarians should LOVE UBI compared to our current set up.

It’s also just better. Let people decide for themselves what the money should be spent on to improve their lives.

IF there's a corresponding reduction in bureaucrats, The Throbber is IN.

But if this is just add-on/new department/no RIF of gubmint teet sucking bureaucrats, hard pass.

That said, Jake Browning still sucks.

100% agree. I like UBI as a more efficient model for social safety net programs. I don’t like it as an add on to the current system

See, even the Throbber can get out on the end of the bell curve every once in a while reasonably.

You want to swing by the Guns and Religion Compound later for some shooting and bible verses?

I’m currently stoned out of my mind so I’d better stay away from dangerous stuff like Bible verses.