We're #23!!!!
Comments
-
It's a USC / Bama /Oklahoma fuck fest. Give me a break.dflea said:
2001 UM at #7 and UW 91 at #23?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Faulty logic, half the teams on that list have "NONE" next to the "Titles" section. In addition to that, teams that didn't actually play and win a championship game, on the field, or play in an actual championship game, belong on the bottom of the list, after the teams that have.creepycoug said:
None of Chip's team should make the list my dude. He coached some good teams but w/o a title you don't get to play.oregonblitzkrieg said:GTFO with this trash, Trojan bootlicker. 2010 Auburn at #41 and none of Chip's teams made the list. lol. What a dumb list.
Those are the rules. I didn't write them.
Complete piece of shit pole, totally laughable, fuck off and die to whomever was dumb enough to have their stupid name associated with it.
That said, it's comical watching obk struggle and try to be one of the big kids.
1988 Notre Dame? Sure they won the title but all fucking time? They needed a complete shit call that the whole world knows about to keep from losing at home. Fuck those guys. -
What's comical is a school that's never played in the big game once, thinking they can run with the big dogs. Thinking their program is more elite than a school that's played in 9% of the BCS/Playoff era championship games.dflea said:oregonblitzkrieg said:
Faulty logic, half the teams on that list have "NONE" next to the "Titles" section. In addition to that, teams that didn't actually play and win a championship game, on the field, or play in an actual championship game, belong on the bottom of the list, after the teams that have.creepycoug said:
None of Chip's team should make the list my dude. He coached some good teams but w/o a title you don't get to play.oregonblitzkrieg said:GTFO with this trash, Trojan bootlicker. 2010 Auburn at #41 and none of Chip's teams made the list. lol. What a dumb list.
Those are the rules. I didn't write them.
That said, it's comical watching obk struggle and try to be one of the big kids. -
oregonblitzkrieg said:
Win a championship game, play in a championship game, then bitch about it. UW has done neither.Mad_Son said:That is bullshit. 1991 UW is top 10 all-time. 1991 Miami isn't top 25.
-
Welcome back @oregonblitzkrieg to big time college football!!oregonblitzkrieg said:
What's comical is a school that's never played in the big game once, thinking they can run with the big dogs. Thinking their program is more elite than a school that's played in 9% of the BCS/Playoff era championship games.dflea said:oregonblitzkrieg said:
Faulty logic, half the teams on that list have "NONE" next to the "Titles" section. In addition to that, teams that didn't actually play and win a championship game, on the field, or play in an actual championship game, belong on the bottom of the list, after the teams that have.creepycoug said:
None of Chip's team should make the list my dude. He coached some good teams but w/o a title you don't get to play.oregonblitzkrieg said:GTFO with this trash, Trojan bootlicker. 2010 Auburn at #41 and none of Chip's teams made the list. lol. What a dumb list.
Those are the rules. I didn't write them.
That said, it's comical watching obk struggle and try to be one of the big kids. -
See what I mean?oregonblitzkrieg said:
What's comical is a school that's never played in the big game once, thinking they can run with the big dogs. Thinking their program is more elite than a school that's played in 9% of the BCS/Playoff era championship games.dflea said:oregonblitzkrieg said:
Faulty logic, half the teams on that list have "NONE" next to the "Titles" section. In addition to that, teams that didn't actually play and win a championship game, on the field, or play in an actual championship game, belong on the bottom of the list, after the teams that have.creepycoug said:
None of Chip's team should make the list my dude. He coached some good teams but w/o a title you don't get to play.oregonblitzkrieg said:GTFO with this trash, Trojan bootlicker. 2010 Auburn at #41 and none of Chip's teams made the list. lol. What a dumb list.
Those are the rules. I didn't write them.
That said, it's comical watching obk struggle and try to be one of the big kids.
lol
Everyone can see our? crystal football with their own eyes. They can also see your envy. So fuck off. -
Teams with voted 'natties' want them to still mean something today, but they lost value in the BCS era, and lost even more in the playoff era. A 12 game season (or less if you go back further in time) with no conference championship, no playoff semi-final, no championship game, is a joke compared to today's metrics. A voted half natty is worth a few Sven bucks, and that's about all.
-
Please keep screaming this. So far your five year campaign has convinced you, only 50 million or so more CFB fans to go!oregonblitzkrieg said:Teams with voted 'natties' want them to still mean something today, but they lost value in the BCS era, and lost even more in the playoff era. A 12 game season (or less if you go back further in time) with no conference championship, no playoff semi-final, no championship game, is a joke compared to today's metrics. A voted half natty is worth a few Sven bucks, and that's about all.
-
Even doogs understand (but will never admit) that voted natties are not equal to those won on a field over the course of what is now a 15 game season for whoever wins the championship. You need to take a long, hard look in the mirror if you don't get it. I don't really care if that pisses off a bunch of troogs and doogs beating their chests over voted 'wins' from a bygone era when championship games never existed. 12-0 UW from 1991 = 12-0 Oregon from 2010. Had you played and lost to Miami, there would be no natty for you. But you never had to play the game. That's why the voted half natty is a joke.dnc said:
Please keep screaming this. So far your five year campaign has convinced you, only 50 million or so more CFB fans to go!oregonblitzkrieg said:Teams with voted 'natties' want them to still mean something today, but they lost value in the BCS era, and lost even more in the playoff era. A 12 game season (or less if you go back further in time) with no conference championship, no playoff semi-final, no championship game, is a joke compared to today's metrics. A voted half natty is worth a few Sven bucks, and that's about all.
-
Fine. I will meet @creepycoug at 7 - 11 and whip his ass and settle this thing once and for all.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Even doogs understand (but will never admit) that voted natties are not equal to those won on a field over the course of what is now a 15 game season for whoever wins the championship. You need to take a long, hard look in the mirror if you don't get it. I don't really care if that pisses off a bunch of troogs and doogs beating their chests over voted 'wins' from a bygone era when championship games never existed. 12-0 UW from 1991 = 12-0 Oregon from 2010. Had you played and lost to Miami, there would be no natty for you. But you never had to play the game. That's why the voted half natty is a joke.dnc said:
Please keep screaming this. So far your five year campaign has convinced you, only 50 million or so more CFB fans to go!oregonblitzkrieg said:Teams with voted 'natties' want them to still mean something today, but they lost value in the BCS era, and lost even more in the playoff era. A 12 game season (or less if you go back further in time) with no conference championship, no playoff semi-final, no championship game, is a joke compared to today's metrics. A voted half natty is worth a few Sven bucks, and that's about all.
-
oregonblitzkrieg said:
Teams with voted 'natties' want them to still mean something today, but they lost value in the BCS era, and lost even more in the playoff era. A 12 game season (or less if you go back further in time) with no conference championship, no playoff semi-final, no championship game, is a joke compared to today's metrics. A voted half natty is worth a few Sven bucks, and that's about all.
-
Tree top continues to underestimate my ability to pummel his balls from my reach and vantage point.YellowSnow said:
Fine. I will meet @creepycoug at 7 - 11 and whip his ass and settle this thing once and for all.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Even doogs understand (but will never admit) that voted natties are not equal to those won on a field over the course of what is now a 15 game season for whoever wins the championship. You need to take a long, hard look in the mirror if you don't get it. I don't really care if that pisses off a bunch of troogs and doogs beating their chests over voted 'wins' from a bygone era when championship games never existed. 12-0 UW from 1991 = 12-0 Oregon from 2010. Had you played and lost to Miami, there would be no natty for you. But you never had to play the game. That's why the voted half natty is a joke.dnc said:
Please keep screaming this. So far your five year campaign has convinced you, only 50 million or so more CFB fans to go!oregonblitzkrieg said:Teams with voted 'natties' want them to still mean something today, but they lost value in the BCS era, and lost even more in the playoff era. A 12 game season (or less if you go back further in time) with no conference championship, no playoff semi-final, no championship game, is a joke compared to today's metrics. A voted half natty is worth a few Sven bucks, and that's about all.
-
creepycoug said:
Tree top continues to underestimate my ability to pummel his balls from my reach and vantage point.YellowSnow said:
Fine. I will meet @creepycoug at 7 - 11 and whip his ass and settle this thing once and for all.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Even doogs understand (but will never admit) that voted natties are not equal to those won on a field over the course of what is now a 15 game season for whoever wins the championship. You need to take a long, hard look in the mirror if you don't get it. I don't really care if that pisses off a bunch of troogs and doogs beating their chests over voted 'wins' from a bygone era when championship games never existed. 12-0 UW from 1991 = 12-0 Oregon from 2010. Had you played and lost to Miami, there would be no natty for you. But you never had to play the game. That's why the voted half natty is a joke.dnc said:
Please keep screaming this. So far your five year campaign has convinced you, only 50 million or so more CFB fans to go!oregonblitzkrieg said:Teams with voted 'natties' want them to still mean something today, but they lost value in the BCS era, and lost even more in the playoff era. A 12 game season (or less if you go back further in time) with no conference championship, no playoff semi-final, no championship game, is a joke compared to today's metrics. A voted half natty is worth a few Sven bucks, and that's about all.
-
Fuuuuuuuuuck.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Even doogs understand (but will never admit) that voted natties are not equal to those won on a field over the course of what is now a 15 game season for whoever wins the championship. You need to take a long, hard look in the mirror if you don't get it. I don't really care if that pisses off a bunch of troogs and doogs beating their chests over voted 'wins' from a bygone era when championship games never existed. 12-0 UW from 1991 = 12-0 Oregon from 2010. Had you played and lost to Miami, there would be no natty for you. But you never had to play the game. That's why the voted half natty is a joke.dnc said:
Please keep screaming this. So far your five year campaign has convinced you, only 50 million or so more CFB fans to go!oregonblitzkrieg said:Teams with voted 'natties' want them to still mean something today, but they lost value in the BCS era, and lost even more in the playoff era. A 12 game season (or less if you go back further in time) with no conference championship, no playoff semi-final, no championship game, is a joke compared to today's metrics. A voted half natty is worth a few Sven bucks, and that's about all.
You're trying to make the case that one of Oregon's title game teams is somehow better than a 'mythical' beast like '72 USC or '95 Nebraska?!?
That is so fucked up.
I mean, Chip may have swallowed a lot of cum in his life (allegedly) but nobody is swallowing what you're spurting out, man.
-
I'll still go Teddy Roosevelt on your ass, chuco.creepycoug said:
Tree top continues to underestimate my ability to pummel his balls from my reach and vantage point.YellowSnow said:
Fine. I will meet @creepycoug at 7 - 11 and whip his ass and settle this thing once and for all.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Even doogs understand (but will never admit) that voted natties are not equal to those won on a field over the course of what is now a 15 game season for whoever wins the championship. You need to take a long, hard look in the mirror if you don't get it. I don't really care if that pisses off a bunch of troogs and doogs beating their chests over voted 'wins' from a bygone era when championship games never existed. 12-0 UW from 1991 = 12-0 Oregon from 2010. Had you played and lost to Miami, there would be no natty for you. But you never had to play the game. That's why the voted half natty is a joke.dnc said:
Please keep screaming this. So far your five year campaign has convinced you, only 50 million or so more CFB fans to go!oregonblitzkrieg said:Teams with voted 'natties' want them to still mean something today, but they lost value in the BCS era, and lost even more in the playoff era. A 12 game season (or less if you go back further in time) with no conference championship, no playoff semi-final, no championship game, is a joke compared to today's metrics. A voted half natty is worth a few Sven bucks, and that's about all.
-
Yet allowed Arizona to score 9. Poor form canes.creepycoug said:Miami 2001 would have trampled - I'm using the word TRAMPLED - 2005 Texas. 1991 probably would have too.
Say what you will about 1991 Miami, their defense was stingy af and didn't give up points.
The team that led the nation in rushing, was third in total offense and third in scoring never got inside the Miami 20-yard line, ran for only 82 yards and gained 171 yards in total offense.
Not top 25? What are you smoking ese?
poor form -
This is exactly what a punk-ass fan of a never-was team would say.oregonblitzkrieg said:Teams with voted 'natties' want them to still mean something today, but they lost value in the BCS era, and lost even more in the playoff era. A 12 game season (or less if you go back further in time) with no conference championship, no playoff semi-final, no championship game, is a joke compared to today's metrics. A voted half natty is worth a few Sven bucks, and that's about all.
Hey look!
National
Football
Champion
Read my trophy, Duck!!
This is almost as bad a look for you as last season's disappearing act. You should take your loss, slink away from this thread, and stfu. -
I like how Lane was shitting all over Christo and talking about how dead Oregon football was until UW lost last weekend.
Now he's quooking harder than anyone.
Seems scared of Pete and his 15ppg progrum. -
Pup article coming. Explains why. Cal a difficult team to face as i said. 10 spots is criminal, as if an fcs School. Cal will be ranked soon, then UW fans will really be irate. Cal defense top10 in Cuntry. Sad day for objective college football fans.
-
At their house. It was a courtesy to our? hosts.huskyhooligan said:
Yet allowed Arizona to score 9. Poor form canes.creepycoug said:Miami 2001 would have trampled - I'm using the word TRAMPLED - 2005 Texas. 1991 probably would have too.
Say what you will about 1991 Miami, their defense was stingy af and didn't give up points.
The team that led the nation in rushing, was third in total offense and third in scoring never got inside the Miami 20-yard line, ran for only 82 yards and gained 171 yards in total offense.
Not top 25? What are you smoking ese?
poor form -
That was a GOOD Cal team rant coming.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Pup article coming. Explains why. Cal a difficult team to face as i said. 10 spots is criminal, as if an fcs School. Cal will be ranked soon, then UW fans will really be irate. Cal defense top10 in Cuntry. Sad day for objective college football fans.
-
I hope you’re sitting down for thiscreepycoug said:
That was a GOOD Cal team rant coming.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Pup article coming. Explains why. Cal a difficult team to face as i said. 10 spots is criminal, as if an fcs School. Cal will be ranked soon, then UW fans will really be irate. Cal defense top10 in Cuntry. Sad day for objective college football fans.
-
Did Derek get you set up on the 401k Pup?puppylove_sugarsteel said:Pup article coming. Explains why. Cal a difficult team to face as i said. 10 spots is criminal, as if an fcs School. Cal will be ranked soon, then UW fans will really be irate. Cal defense top10 in Cuntry. Sad day for objective college football fans.
